Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
FWIW- The Sunnyvale Arrayit office is no longer. The space is taken over by a company called Covalent Metrology. Google street view photos have yet to be refreshed.
Nielson, who the judge wants to send close by to a low security facility won’t be suffering very much if you ask me. I don’t know about Lampoc, but there is such a facility not too far from Silicon Valley called Ben Lemond Conservation camp, nestled on top a mountain in the Santa Cruz redwoods. I had an acquaintance with money get sentenced there for a nasty drunk driving incident. His lawyer weaseled him into that place, for 3 years. Well groomed baseball diamond, Basket ball courts, they watch over you and have very liberal visitations rules. A beautiful redwoods camp. Here is a link of such a place. I bet all being sentenced get into places like this.
https://www.cdcr.ca.gov/facility-locator/conservation-camps/ben-lomond/
Since the guy is an ex-cop… I wonder if he gets treated differently.
Cosmic Ray induced events are a waste of time to try and make any reliable conclusions from.
There are no more people killed by EV drivers than gas drivers during such Cosmic Ray events.
Here is a very recent one in which a popular county supervisor was killed walking her dog by a gas powered vehicle during the same time window.
https://abc7news.com/amp/wilma-chan-supervisor-dead-alameda-co-car-accident/11195598/
This is not an issue according to the Dept of Transportation safety statics.
The DOT stats take into account incidents such as that, and since EVs are at the to of the list in terms of safety… it is safe to say Geomagnetic unrest due to cosmic rays is a non-issue.
We have been challenging you to prove otherwise for quite sometime and it is clear you are still not there yet.
So you only caught one of the half dozen followups.
Not fair to the community here.
NO… it’s true.
I don’t think you have been following up on the investigative reports for those accidents. The professional investigators deemed for the most part driver neglect and arson.
These follow ups have posted many times in the past. You don’t seem to be interested in re-broadcasting those updates.
It is CLEAR that EVs have improved the automobile safety factor for the public even under your Cosmic Ray events.
The Cosmic Ray magnetic solar events are a moot point as far as overall safety is concerned.
Just the FACTS…
Professional investigators for each incident on your list have deemed each and every one to be of DRIVER NEGLECT and/or PROVEN arson.
Just because you can throw up a lot of text doesn’t change the facts that Cosmic Radiation events is a non-event as far as driver safety is concerned.
The links you put up are never challenged by people here because they know better that the topic is rubbish and won’t waste their time.
People should know those links you use are NOT proving your case. Your using them for more correlation of theory and events. So again the FACT remains, you have nothing to proving your case.
Professional investigators for each incident on your list have deemed each and every one to be of DRIVER NEGLECT and/or PROVEN arson.
Just because you can throw up a lot of text doesn’t change the facts that Cosmic Radiation events is a non-event as far as driver safety is concerned.
The links you put up are never challenged by people here because they know better that the topic is rubbish and won’t waste their time.
People should know those links you use are NOT proving your case. Your using them for more correlation of theory and events. So again the FACT remains, you have nothing to proving your case.
Yup, no link saying so. Why are we not surprised.
Just because you put up a lot of text does not make it true.
You got nothing
EVIDENCE is not fact.
People here want facts.
You have no proof of Cosmic Ray disturbances causing accidents or burning up cars.
The correlation of events is not acceptable to prove anything in the scientific realm.
There is no proof that the developmental 30x steel will have counter Electromagnetic properties.
You have no link saying it does.
You have no proof saying it does.
It is reckless to try and correlate a developmental 30x steel and claim it will have the same properties as a different 304L steel.
You really don’t have a leg to stand on here.
There is ZERO proof EM radiation causes EVs to go out of control.
The posted lab studies from highly controlled environments are far from real world conditions.
The Chinéese white paper is fake, unreviewed, and riddled with errors.
Not in your lifetime will you ever see this connection be made.
Professional investigators for each one on that list have deemed every incidents to be that of either driver neglect and/or PROVEN arson.
Yes, we know why you are not updating that list.
Go to DOT for your official stats.
Making up your own stays out of pure thin air won’t get you anywhere.
Your misguiding the readers.
Recalls are not countable accidents.
The DOT tracks the actual incidents and gives us the totals. You are turning your head on the real life statistics.
Wrong
DOT statistics show EVs are at least 10x safer.
If you want to go by cars on the road, EVs are 49.3x safer.
The conspiracy theorists have not ventured that far yet into the phones yet even though phones are much more sensitive electronics
That is a research paper written by the chinéese.
It carry’s no merit… spelling mistakes, etc. Far from being proof.
Not so fast buddy…
>>> There have been over 50 Teslas that have burned up from mid Oct 2020 to mid Oct 2021 all during solar weather and geomagnetic unrest.
Just make sure you put this into perspective. The Dept of Transportation tracks all fires. The DOT stats say that fires in EVs occur 10x less frequently compared to a gas powered vehicle. (The stats fairly balanced out there being more gas vehicles on the road)
Even when looking at this from a different perspective, by instead the number of vehicles on the road as Boston745 suggested we find gas fires happen 49.3x more frequently that gas powered cars.
So EVs win by a long shot either way even if one believes in those fires claimed to be from the suns Cosmic Ray disturbance conspiracy theory’s.
Bottom line is social safety is much higher even if you believe in those conspiracy theories.
But yet there is not one ounce of proof supporting any of those claims.
Go back and read what the professional investigators said for each and everyone of those incidents on that list.
You have no supporting data at all.
This is proof the technical community accepts all claims of Tesla being an ultra Uber safe vehicle to own.
Those conspiracy theories will never make a dent in the great reputation of the vehicle and company.
No it doesn’t
It provides foder to speculation regarding the silly lil theory of it does anything at all.
It is a chinéese white paper written by no-name people. It is unreviewed by the scientific community.
Your latest text says “Helps to identify”… but the post before it you stated that it “proves”.
Nuff said…
That means nothing.
The incidence of occurrence is well below the rate of a natural bonafied accident.
Even if we did consider events like that the DOT says that for ALL accidents considered, EVs are on order of magnitude safer that their gas counterparts.
So it is a moot point.
The website hosting that information is a hokey hodgepodge of cheaply put together white papers.
I wouldn’t trust anything on that site.
You should be updating that list as the vast lions share of those incidents were updated by professional investigators with the actual cause of the accident. Most are driver ineptitude.
You do understand that you are forecasting 2 accidents from an active base of 1,400,000 vehicles don’t you?
All that proves is we are better off in an electric vehicle than a gas powered vehicle.
The link you referenced is another speculative white paper. Like the others, it has not been peer reviewed and contains its share of spelling mistakes.
The information is FAR from proving anything and also based in China. Reader beware…
>>> >>> Thanks for the open debates, helped me find smoking gun evidence that electromagnetic radiation causes EVs to go out of control.
You can find anything you want with an imagination and consistent googling.
Heck, there are some guys out there proving that they can toast bread using their dogs electric collar strapped to a giraffes private parts…. This is just as valid as those Cosmic rays rumored to be causing an EV to combust.
Tesla order could double to 200,000 Model 3s to satisfy deal with Uber, says Hertz CEO
https://apple.news/AEzBnA9ieR96USdUBbbAeAQ
>>> The lack of Tesla out of control accidents during periods like right now is further proof
Since Cosmic Ray disturbances are happening virtually around the clock, this proves the topic couldn’t be a bigger waste of time.
But yet you have no support from ANY professional investigator to back up this claim.
So let’s move along unless you can provide support proof from a source with integrity.
It is junk…. Anybody can see that.
>>> Its the final piece showing real world examples of electric vehicles going out control
I don’t believe anybody here thinks that Cosmic Rays spin anybody off into trees to absolve the drunk driver community.
We got mentally immature people slipping into the back seat to drive with their feet. We don’t accept this behavior to help support your Cosmic disturbances theories.
>>>Next section of the STUDY ???
We are not looking for “studies”.
People here are looking for REAL WORLD proof that does not contradict what the Dept of Transportation is “actually” measuring.
You have no real world links… we know that.
Lab results or grasping at straws papers don’t cut it.
There is no final piece of the puzzle.
Your puzzle is 1000 pieces in total…. and no 2 pieces fit together.
You have not provided any suitable links of real world proof.
Dr Belt is a failure. He knows as well his paper is not a real world applicable.
To add to this:
>>> Tesla Model 3 Regains CR Top Pick Status and IIHS Safety Award
Thanks for posting this
It certainly jives with the published safety statistics put out by the Dept of Transportation.
>>> Far from the safest car unless you mean safest to get into an accident in.
But yet you have no data to back up this claim.
We do not accept laboratory claims or white papers that avoid from being challenged.
Again, please provide some form of REAL WORLD proof.
>>> No evidence to support any link. Lol no I just have a study where electromagnetic radiation was the direct cause
That study is worthless. A study does not analyze ALL factors of a “real” incident. It is on the same order as Lab testing.
So people here are correct that you have NO CREDIBLE link showing/proving EM is a risk to an EV driver. In fact DOT safety statistics actually prove otherwise.
Dr Belts paper is even worse. It is true to the adage it is not worth the paper it is written on. Trying to use papers to prove the safety of a real world vehicle is like staring at a complex food recipe and telling everybody the dish is delicious but nobody has yet to figure out why it is a consistent flop.
Dr Belts paper is one cut under a lab study. There is no reliability for his results as they satisfy only fixed criteria when the real world is in constant flux.
Everybody wants to test drive a Tesla at this time.
The safest car statistics on the planet.
I doubt Avis, National, Enterprise, Sixt, or Budget will allow Hertz to monopolize the Tesla rental biz.