Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
June 28th? Really? Hilarious ticker. What happened to the law suit AABB pumped?
“Gold at Your Fingertips”
lol you’re joking right? Go ahead and swap that token for gold? Hell, try and buy a bag of manure with those “gold backed” tokens.
loaded the app and used it for about 2 minutes.
the feed was a cluster f***
deleted the app
deleted instagram too while I was at it
well you say that . . .
AABB are proven liars. Verifiable. They stole pictures off the internet and used them to represent their own fake management.
If they are lying about who "works" there, then they are lying about everything else.
On Netflix: The Social Dilemma
I'm pretty sure MZ would not let his anyone in his own family really "use" any of his apps.
WTF? Even if this was a legit operation there is still no “product.” Bitcoin, is not “a product” etc etc. Buy a vowel for Christ’s sake.
Probably. Just like “the cloud.” CEOs with little technical knowledge will glom into the latest buzz to justify their compensation.
What happened? Contract not renewed?
We have peaches. Dwarf tree. Gets about 6-8 blooms converted into fruit. Then the squirrels take a share. Hoping my last 2 can hang on to maturity.
Split? lmao. Reverse Split, maybe.
Bingo
It is unfair to say this company is suffering from “poor management.” No offense but it is like complaining that the 9/11 hi-hackers did not conduct the required engine inspections. It’s like complaining the bank robbers opened up low interest checking accounts.
How can the management be accused of subpar performance when the only goal of management is to sell shares?
I got mine. It was filled with delicious milk chocolate with a picture of a bunny on one side.
He was awesome and seemed willing to help anyone that has a genuine desire to learn.
Based on posts like this . . . and many others.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=157224648
Not a surprise.
Article on the Poop Map
The legendary San Francisco Interactive Poop Map
The city is so filthy they need a map of deification. I smelled mostly human feces oder in SFO. In Seattle it was mostly urine (the ammonia).
I often wondered about that and I always suspected Integral had.
Yes. I took it "cold" and scored 55%. Passing is 70% (if memory serves). I am confident I can pick up 15 points and learn a few things along the way. Some of the questions were just common sense, algebra (can you figure out what your account will look like after a stock dividend). It was interesting.
Honestly, I find it "fun." Arguments against it based on logic and economics are moot. The heart wants what the heart wants. I don't plan to spend anything more on training (so far $250, approx).
For me it's not so much about how to invest. It's more of learning about the inner workings of the securities industry and perhaps landing a job in that industry as I want to keep working but I have had my fill of software. I've just burned out on software development Everything is changing constantly and nothing has really improved that industry.
The software industry suffers from a lack of formal certification. Imagine healthcare without the AMA or licensing and board requirements. As such the software industry suffers from a plethora of "snake oil salesmen." There are more "methodologies" than you can count because anyone can claim to be a Software Engineer. The software industry operates on the same model as the fashion industry. It's a cult of personality.
The methodologies are not testable. Anyone can claim their methods solve critical issues. There is no science in the industry. "Engineers" flock to what is "perceived" to be the "cool" new topic de jour.
The NASDAQ had one of the most refreshing approaches. They had purchased the Philadelphia stock exchange which ran on software my company built. Testing and quality assurance always gets the most attention because no one has really figured out a solution to compare approaches, scientifically. So, we asked about the NASDAQ's approach to QA. I still quote this response today. "We don't have a QA department. You write your code. You test your code. If you make too many mistakes, you don't work here any more."
I love that because there are so many people that are drowning in the deep end of the pool when they jumped in without being able to swim in the first place.
It's the entry level exam for any of the "series" exams. You can take the Series 63, 65, 6,7 etc without taking this exam but my understanding is that those exams will not "count" unless you pass this 'essentials' exam first.
I'm planning on retiring at the end of the year but I want to perhaps get a job (maybe part time) in the industry. Perhaps work for a local financial advisor and I don't care if all I do is client/customer qualification and intake. The training material wasn't that expensive ($250 for the printed material plus a few days of actual classes). I've spent more on a bottle of scotch.
1) I am curious and I like to learn.
2) For future employment, passing the exam might help land a entry-level position with the FA.
You should take that over to WSB and tell them you’ve found the next GameStop. lol
Sorry. I was making light of the fact that the training material author thought it was important to point out the alternate name which I’ve never seen anyone use, ever.
Well, I’ve been in technology all my life and as I near retirement I thought I’d continue to learn and perhaps start a little “second” career. I doubt I’ll go on to any of “the series.” Who knows. It’s not very expensive and I find it interesting.
And for the love of kittens who here has ever uttered the statement “They company intends to up list to one of the ‘double-auction markets?”
I’m studying for the “Securities Industry Essentials” and I found this sentence which seems odd.
“The answer to the question ‘Why are there secondary markets?’ Is that secondary markets provide a place for the buyers and sellers of securities to connect and transact business and the secondary markets support the primary markets.
It just sounds circular to me. Can I not say the same thing (the first clause) about the primary markets?
To me it sounds like a “definition” of the word “market.”
is that why AABB has announced legal action twice now with no follow through?
How long before AABB announces a “letter of intent” concerning a partnership with an AI scam called “aabbGPT?”
No FTDs = No naked shorting. Bless your heart.
Sigh . . .
The biggest lie . . .
So far this year . . .
March 11, 2023
April 28, 2023
June 11, 2023
Just to clarify, I didn't post that because I thought I'd discovered something new. I had three main reasons.
1. It's truthful.
2. It's kind of humorous.
3. And perhaps most importantly in that we are reminded every day about the naïveté of the modern "investor" here in iHub/OTC land.
Naked shorty
MOASS
Waiting game
Ladies and gentlemen may I present “the otc scam trifecta.
lmao
It's easy once you know how . . .
One of the most convincing scams is called "Miracle Man."
It's awesome. Anyway, it came from this web site. I have been periodically checking in on Paul for the last 30 years. I find the articles supportive of the opinion that critical thinking has suffered over the years and it seems many penny stock "investors" exemplify this degradation of a important life skill.
There's even a short article on investing.