Has anybody seen the article in the Fortune magazine , December investor edition?

Not seeing any filing on this, where are you seeing it?

Was posting this to inform you guys as to where the 4.5 million sale (not dump) came from to provide any insight to your trading strategy forthcoming. Didn’t have to say a word, but figured any DD insight is better than nothing. I’m sure some folks might have wandered about some of the sales on Friday, well, this may answer their question

Dang. Not up to you how I choose to take profits.

I’m out. I unloaded 4.5 million throughout the day. Bought these many years ago and wrote them off . Just my luck I was up over 1000 percent and took my profits around 130 k. Just FYI for those looking at the sales at around .028. That was my limit five or take. Good luck peeps.

That’s awesome news. Hopefully will strengthen our relationship there along with many others.

Not necessarily. I submitted a question as they were answering the 1st one. May be a time limit to these things.

Are all notes held off till next spring? In my reading, I think there are two small ones that can convert in September, while the others are 2021.

Agreed. I’ve been traveling through Atlanta every week on the same day at the same time. Last trip noticed more and more people driving. Not grid lock like it normally is, but increasing. And with China slowly trying to get back up and running along with everybody else, the demand will increase. Will it jump overnight back to where it was , no way? But give it time and we will be back up and running wide open sucking down the gas.

Also, I believe that the small oil producers that got squashed out due to the events going on right now will end up pushing the price of oil higher several years from now. Not to mention the cuts currently being made by oil producers on expenditures for future production. These two factors will actually cause oil to be in higher demand several years from now.

Saudi did this on purpose if you ask me. Bite the bullet now , to reap the benefits several years from now. They just helped bankrupt some of the small producers as well as keeping some of the big boys from investing in new exploration. Oil will be much higher when the demand is back and supply is not like it used to be

Target?

What currency are you referencing with the $2.60?

Seeing $5.65 in pre market trading

Took a position at 4.72. Let’s roll

Glad somebody else understands the s-1. Also, this s-1 isn’t effective currently. This was the registration filing and now the SEC has to provide approval, comments, etc..

This appears to be a straight forward registration as I don’t expect much if anything at all.

I’m understanding this to be different. That number was used to calculate the registration fee upon this s-1 registration.

Note 2) Estimated in accordance with Rule 457(c) under the Securities Act solely for the purpose of calculating the registration fee based upon the average of the high and low prices of the Registrant’s common stock on the OTC Pink Market on January 24, 2020. The shares offered hereunder may be sold by the selling stockholder from time to time in the open market, through privately negotiated transactions, or a combination of these methods at market prices prevailing at the time of sale or at negotiated prices.

S-1 the goes on to state that pag will sell up to 5 million worth of shares.

“The selling stockholder identified in this Prospectus may offer an indeterminate number of shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share, which will consist of up to $5,000,000 of shares of common stock held by PAG Group, LLC (“PAG”), which is the “selling stockholder” hereunder, pursuant to an Equity Financing Agreement (the “Financing Agreement”) dated January 24, 2020. If issued presently, the 4,046,995 shares of common stock registered for resale by PAG would represent 33 % of our issued and outstanding shares of common stock (excluding shares owned by affiliates of the Company, as of January 24 2020.”

Note what is says above. If issued presently, this would be the case.

But s-1 continues to state that Jason will call upon pag to sell shares at any given time.


“We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of the shares of our common stock by PAG. However, we will receive proceeds from our initial sale of shares to PAG pursuant to the Financing Agreement. We will sell shares to PAG at a price equal to 90% of the lowest closing price of our common stock during the ten (10) consecutive trading day period immediately prior to the date on which we deliver a put notice to PAG (the “Market Price”). There will be a minimum of ten (10) trading days between purchases.”


Essentially, Jason registered the 4 million shares, calculated the registration fee using the .35 number which was based on the high and low average price on January 24th, will call on pag at any time to buy shares in which they get a 10 percent discount, and are could be obligated to buy up to 5 million bucks worth max in total when it is all said and done.

So depending on price and when Jason needs the money, then the shares go to market.

Why are you fixated on the .35 price?

I

Please advise as to why you think Araloc share becoming unrestricted is going to a problem? You keep stating this and reminding everybody about this

So, is visa now in on the share selling scam? Yeah, right!!

Great work folks.

I understand that there is no difference between 1.5 billion and 2 million (post split). I read your post as if you were saying there is no difference if data443 wins the case or not.

I guess everybody else is stupid just like all of us rooting for the team and company to succeed.

Winning or losing most definetky makes a difference. A difference of 1.5 billion shares. Jason can elect to retire the shares or hold onto them to use for future acquisitions, funding purposes, etc.

China man gets them and that’s it, they are spoken for. Jason would still need to find have shares for funding and acquisitions.

So basically, winning the case essentially prevents additional Dilution by 1.5 billion shares.

So no reason at this point to be concerned . When the time comes we discuss it then. Lots can happen between now and then. Earnings could increase to cover them, or new notes to buy us time. The point I’m trying to make is that the company is increasing revenues and forging forward to do this and is the goal. Business 101. Increase sales to increase income to pay off debt and hopefully become cash flow positive. How about giving them time to prove this is what they are doing. None of what they are doing screams scam, selling shares to fill their pockets. They are trying to build a business.

Or renegotiated as they currently have been done. Or paid off eventually.

Please tell me when the first one comes due?

I know that. But this conversion is not from money provided directly to ldsr for shares. This was a legacy note having nothing to do with lending money . Current lenders haven’t converted a single share.

Has anyone converted to date? The answer is no. Everybody single lender has opted to renegotiate rather than convert. And BC doesnt count as that was a legacy toxic note having nothing to do with data 443 prior to. And the consolidated note by BC, that has also been renegotiated.

Why do you all of the sudden think redstart and others are going to magically start converting? When each of these notes are renegotiated, this tells me more than I need to know.

To you it’s a dream, for me it’s playing my cards right. I’m willing to give this company time to grow. If they can grow enough to get out from under their notes, then I’m happy, we all will be happy. And that’s the risk I’m willing to take. Not your risk, my risk.

Your response to me should have been, I wish you the best of luck in your investment, I hope it works out for you.

Instead you are quick to tell me just the opposite.

Anybody here ever study the dale carniege method, “how to win friends and influence people”? Because , h2004, you are doing just the opposite.

Thanks again for your support and worry about my investment, my money. You are real swell guy....

Agreed. The key in my opinion is for revenues to continue increasing and hopefully at some point, we are good on our own or a financier seed the potential and steps in with non dilutive type financing.

So, if q-2 has doubled, would that make you comfortable knowing that the company is progressing in the right direction? Would those numbers give the confidence needed by outside investors to fund this venture with better terms than the existing notes? If revs continue on the up, somebody somewhere will take notice. Imo

Sean. So based on birch response to this, he feels that the revenues will not be there to pay back the loans as well as have enough capital for expenses. What’s your take on this? Obviously q-2 numbers will help shed some light on this, but at what quarterly rev numbers do you see the flip into having enough to pay expenses along with starting to pay off the notes? Also, as we all know there are other financing strategies available to get cash in hand to pay off the notes and buy more time for revenue to kick in. Mezzanine financing, etc...

As long as Jason doesn’t issue his 2.3 billion shares we are fine. Is this an accurate statement TROW?

If not issued, they don’t count towards the outstanding share count. Similar to warrants, etc...

How much does Jason get once warrants are converted? Not technically funding in hand now, but if and when converted, there is future funds in the door. Actus warrant will be $300,000 based on 60,000,000 warrants times $.005. Seems that actus believes price will be over that at some point to agree to that strike price.

In response to the “two TAs refusing” to remove /cancel those shares is not exactly true in my opinion. I’m willing to bet that every single TA in business would not cancel the shares. This is more from a CYA perspective. Not that they refused, but more of “give me something else to cover myself first”. At least that’s my thoughts.

I know I would if I ran a TA. This holds true for just about anything these days. No don’t do squat unless I have something in writing to fall back on. Been burned too many times.

What our friend z doesn’t get us that integration of classidocs or parts of it into araloc and/or arcmail doesn’t necessarily have to be GDPR related. There are certain functions of it that could enhance those products regardless of a GDPR type function.

Not a secret. Just common sense imo. Not directed at you, just makes sense to me as this is business 101. Thx.

It’s like going to the buffet. Ldsr is eventually going to have a full blown buffet to offer. I go up and pick and choose what I desire. May not want a full plate of classidocs, but just a spoon full along with a large portion of araloc and arcmail. Or any combination I desire. More food offerings coming soon.

This is what is being built.

Here’s what a lot of you don’t understand. Classidocs has many functions that have been utilized and incorporated into araloc and arcmail products. So, to say there are not classidocs sales isn’t necessarily true. Portions of the programs are used in other facets. If it can be used to enhance the acquisitions products and is.

Shares floating around or not has nothing to do with the big picture. The point is this and it’s very elementary so please pay close attention.

If Chinese shares exist, the the shares can be sold by said company and are accounted for in the outstanding share count. Jason has zero control over those shares.

If they don’t exist, then Jason has full control. They can be left in the OS count, or they can be removed. And, the shares are owned by Jason which means the $ amount associated with them belongs to Jason.

So, if Chinese shares go away, he can retire them therefore lessening the OS, which correlates to our market cap, or he’s (the company, our company we are invested in), is sitting on almost 4 million bucks based on current share price. Which relates back to market cap as the $ would be reflected upon in the financials.

Below is info I found on 2018 booth pricing. Smallest space is 10x10, which equates to $13,000. I’d much rather attend and do something with our partners as well as separate meetings behind the scenes.



“RSA Conference goers get an opportunity to purchase exhibit space outside of our sponsorship package offerings. Exhibit space is priced at $130.00 per square foot (the “Booth Fee”) for 2018.”

So how do you proposes they raise funds.

That’s boiler plate language you mentioned about the cautionary language. Seen it a thousand times.

Agreed, and this is extremely conservative.

There are some many things that can be factored in that have the potential for revenues (classidocs, blockchain, mobile classidocs, wordpress, resellers, major cross selling, and on and on.).

Because of this, we may also be rewarded with a much large PE ratio.

There are so many potential streams of revenue, the numbers could get crazy. However, I'm not here to project on that, just the basics for now.