Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
TTE - I'll see what I can do. Was planning on shooting myself first.
Hostile takeover might be a good thing:)
All the same, I’m voting No. Also voting No on Eckman and JZ.
Thx - thought it was something technical:)
HDG - pardon my ignorance, but what does IIRC stand for?
"piss/poor management team" - being a little generous there Zman:)
Capt - Are you accounting for the items HDG notes (lower Canada revenue and lower wholesaler inventory)?
Anyone heard from Hamoa?
Was just perusing Stocktwits. Not much optimism of an appeal win from some of the lawyers
Zip - I would add that TG levels in Mori were no where near 500. More like 150 - 200. (To eliminate any nitpicking about 499 vs 501).
Gotta agree, JT sets the bar pretty low in all he does. To my understanding, generics don’t advertise/educate. It’s how they keep prices low
Been having the same thoughts RAF. Plaster the airwaves as to how a safe, life saving medicine will not see the light of day in the US owing to theft of property rights
Mateo - so, do we have a shot in hell at winning appeal?
TTE/Bouf - Bingo to both of you. That in itself should eviscerate DU’s abhorrent ruling.
HK - Thx much!
HK - isn’t Du's assessment of prima facie obviousness where all the factual errors come into play? I hear a lot of talk about focusing on the legal procedural errors but it’s the factual errors that drive me nuts.
To me, the factual errors render her her prima facie finding complete BS. I mean, good grief, do facts and truth mean anything?
Bear in mind, I’m obviously no attorney. Thx for any response
Yet all you keep yapping about is Poland
Kiwi - a little advice. You can be an extreme irritant at times. Does the thought of just clamming up ever occur to you?
God help us if a remand back to ditzy Du
Kiwi - it appears you believe Amrn either wins appeal or it’s down the drain, EU/ROW aren’t worth jack.
If that is not your point, then WTF is it?
Raf - Thanks. But does the TG>500 issue go into the bucket of no matter how badly Du f'd it up it was, by golly, a finding of fact by her that, no matter how erroneous, cannot be revisited?
Good grief, this whole mess is f'd up.
TTE - How can something be unquestionably an error yet not be "clearly erroneous"? My head is gonna explode!
Deference on factual issues even when the trial court is 100% wrong?
Unless that “winner” is AMRN
Bouf - you think our odds of winning appeal are low?
TTE - let’s hope the judges are intelligent enough to understand the scientific facts, energetic enough to want to understand, and worthy enough to don their black robes
Did our "management" team ever indicate when the Covid study results would be available?
TTE - you mean short of trying to lie or misrepresent the facts?
Marjac - Let's hope. You would thing this company would be worth 6 - 8B to someone. That would get us 16 - 20. But, hell, what do I know?
Postes - Ooh, I got this! Let me think, ummm Zero?
Circuit - I remember him saying that. I almost swallowed my tongue!
Louie - good point though I don’t know about left outlets. Have they told a single truth the past 4 years? They have so misled people. Yet, the blind sheep follow...
Unfortunately, my avg in my largest account is about 8.50. Bought too much in 17’s. Heck, just get me even and I’m gone. So sick of the nightmare that has been AMRN
Do generics maintain a sales force? Or, is that another expense AMRN would shed?
Posted - but JT has always blathered on about complexity/difficulty of V manufacturing and encapsulation:)
I don’t take anything he says seriously
MP - you ought to try reading/watching actual news. You know, facts and stuff. Truth matters
Postes - not that you asked, but I don’t think a buyer would pay jack. Perhaps a CVR contingent on appeal win
So, what does this mean?
Du focused on the evidence and facts? (I know what you are saying, just couldn’t resist)
TTE - Good stuff. Thanks!!