Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Excellent excellent post lesnshawn ...
... especially for any who think NeoMedia isn't in default on several financing agreements with YA.
It's all in the filings, everything anyone needs to know about the situation NEOM is in and exactly what YA can do any time they want to.
From your link to that SEC filing:
"As of August 23, 2008, we were in default on our August 23, 2006 Convertible Debenture due to non-payment of principal and interest in accordance with the terms of the agreement. Due to cross-default provisions in the other financing arrangements, all nine instruments were considered in default as of August 23, 2008. The event of default caused YA Global to have certain material rights that did not exist prior to default. Specifically, the full face value of the instruments is callable and additional default remedies such as default interest and conversion price provisions went into effect.
On September 24, 2008, the Company entered into a Letter Agreement with YA Global which extended the maturity dates on the August 23, 2006 and the December 26, 2006 agreements to July 29, 2010; however, this agreement was executed subsequent to the event of default occurring. All nine Secured Convertible Debentures contain cross-default provisions related to debt obligations exceeding $100,000. Therefore, the event of default on the August 23, 2006 financing arrangement caused an event of default on the other eight agreements. The extension was considered a one-time extension for the specific period indicated but was not considered a waiver of existing events of default."
Excellent post personalizit.
You obviously get it.
I and others received the same self-aggrandizing email from Chip Hoffman ex-CEO of NeoMedia, and none of it has held one ounce of water.
jonesie
"there are zero % of such action from YA."
Did you not read this in my post? There are many here who will recall that I posted specific examples of where YA did exactly that, and I included the SEC filings.
"I've shown SEC filings for other YA clients where they took those companies' assets/IP/etc when they were in default and in one case that I recall , put those assets into another publicly-traded company they had their hooks in. YA's actions had nothing to do with how much was owed to them ... it was solely based on the default situation and because ... YA could do it if they wanted to. The shareholders were shocked. Nothing changed due to their shock."
duly noted lesnshawn
but 'that isn't true' isn't exactly a challenge.
And saying YA can't hold more than 4.99% of the outstanding at any given time doesn't mean that "default" as written in the SEC filings means that YA would only get 5% of the value of the company if they defaulted and sold it. YA has rights to ALL of the IP if they decide to put NEOM into default , at a time beneficial to YA to do so.
IMO
Later , it's too pretty outside here to stay inside for more than a few minutes at a time lol. See ya off and on.
jonesie
jcg, you could be right.
I'm not trying to convince anyone to share my opinion or change theirs ... just stating mine. As someone else said the other day ... "discuss amongst yourselves". ;)
What ifs:
(1) -- what would force YA to hold an auction? I've shown SEC filings for other YA clients where they took those companies' assets/IP/etc when they were in default and in one case that I recall , put those assets into another publicly-traded company they had their hooks in. YA's actions had nothing to do with how much was owed to them ... it was solely based on the default situation and because ... YA could do it if they wanted to.
The shareholders were shocked.
Nothing changed due to their shock.
(2) -- after selling their endless supply of shares to the public for as long as people seemed willing to buy , and/or not seeing the stock appreciate like in times past , even with some arguably good news out there ... YA decided to give it up and sell NEOM to an entity who had made overtures at a cocktail party.
After having made that decision in their minds , YA defaults NEOM , owns everything , waits a 'proper' and discrete amount of time and closes the sale.
I imagine there are several ways YA could accomplish getting ALL the value out of NEOM if they want to , when they want to. My speculations as to the 'how' could be wrong , but that doesn't mean there aren't ways.
Again , not saying you're wrong , just voicing my opinion based on all the things I've seen YA do , many of which left retail shareholders flat-footed and mouths agape.
Like I said earlier , here's hoping that YA sees a calculable benefit in keeping NEOM around as a publicly traded company trading under the symbol NEOM. (I know, they could change the symbol without changing anything about the shareholder structure, but everybody knows what I mean lol)
jonesie
I understand what you're saying ...
... and we all hope it works out for our benefit.
re: "all I,m trying to say if patents has value then everyone could have bread/butter"
One of the points in my post (just one, there were several others) merely addresses the reality of the situation ... YA owns NEOM via all NEOM assets having been pledged as collateral on various financings .... some of which we may well be in default on. (sorry for the dangling participle). It's all in the SEC filings.
"could have" is a very nice sentiment and hope. But YA doesn't have to allow anyone else to have any bread. They could make us very mad and those same SEC filings could very well keep our anger (read: litigation) from giving YA cause for any concern.
Here's hoping the YA guys turn out to be nice fellows. Or that they at least see a quantifiable benefit in remaining public so some future exuberance by common shareholders/traders will give them the opportunity to sell shares at higher prices , reflecting a higher market cap. , than they could realize in any sort of auction or sale.
jonesie
neom2006, thanks for checking on that ...
... and reporting back.
The recent patent-related events are certainly heartening.
Although we don't know what the final ramifications will be, the potential work-arounds by the big boys , and how long a potential continuing barrage of patent challenges could tie us up in court (if at all) ... what the USPTO has done so far sure beats a poke in the eye with a sharp stick. (lol , but it might have felt like one to the EFF!)
You'd think if NeoMedia now had a lock on substantial revenues to be enjoyed in the mobile marketing arena , our share price would have moved higher and there wouldn't be enough selling at this level to hold the PPS in check. NeoMedia did get up 'off the floor' so to speak , but remaining at sub-penny is somewhat surprising.
There are certainly a lot of people in the mobile-marketing arena (plus their friends, their friends' friends, and their brokers) who now know this news. Mobile-advertising-cognizant carriers, brand managers, phone manufacturers, advertising companies and etc. all know it , and I doubt they all have NDA's with us or inside knowledge of deals which haven't been made public yet. Why not a deluge of buying? Why not more "irrational exuberance"? Why not a couple of cents for a share price already?
The rest of the patent story yet to be written?
Market unsure of NeoMedia's future ability , via business plan execution and/or royalties/licenses flowing in from other companies' market execution, to monetize our patent position?
Market wary of YA's ability to take their NEOM ball and go home if they choose to , at a time advantageous to them, even though it could mean wiping out common shareholders' interests?
The trading has been substantial since the day before the news was officially announced. Including the 31MM shares traded on 2/17 (the day before the news came out lol) , as of yesterday NEOM has traded 459,762,193 shares at a simple average closing share price of $0.005206667 for a simple average total of $2,393,828 traded.
Even though a lot of that has obviously been momo traders swooping in and out and churning the stock , I guess that's some pretty good dollars in 14 trading days.
I'm glad my shares are worth more than they were 3 weeks ago lol. And I suppose some more time is in order to see how it all plays out , to see what the facts truly are , and what certain intentions truly are.
I was in and out of another stock between 12/07 and 1/08. We called the in/out on my Yorkville Cornell board as there was Yorkville-related activity which caused some of the movement, although most of the movement was related to folks thinking they company had a lock on what purported to be a very lucrative niche. (Turns out those assumptions were incorrect, no 'lock', no 'very lucrative') It took 5 weeks for the PPS to go from .008 to a high close of .092. (Before coming back down to the current .004) That's an 11-bagger and an 11-bagger from our recent lows would get us at least a little over a penny.
Perhaps another couple of weeks will tell us more. Aren't we owed a 10-K before too long? Should be interesting reading to see some of the updated numbers in various categories, and some of the verbiage on YAGI's 'lock' on NeoMedia.
Good luck to us all!
jonesie
30 trading days of ...
... + 16% per day would put us at $0.429 per share.
I don't expect you to do anything ...
... I was simply explaining to nicehit how that part of NeoMedia works.
If you're going to disagree with my statement of fact, you might want to do more than say "no it's not". But I don't expect you to.
Perhaps someone will explain ... to everyone ... how NeoMedia will get recurring revenue from scanning of airline tickets by equipment Gavitec sells to airlines. I've yet to hear anyone who knows anything about NeoMedia say they will get per scan revenues from such activity. One good explanation of where the recurring revenues are in these Gavitec deals with airlines, based on facts we can see in print or on a NeoMedia balance sheet, would certainly put the subject to bed ... on the plus side.
Have a good day!
jonesie
Unfortunately nicehit ...
... NeoMedia will not get paid "per scan of the barcode boarding pass".
Oh, and they don't "have to use our hardware and software", there are competing companies out there selling similar products, and this area is not covered by patents which forces anyone to use NeoMedia/Gavitec equipment.
Recurring revs will come from elsewhere ... like advertising campaigns ... maybe.
jonesie
That's fine.
I was responding to a post about mobile ticket scanners in airports.
Again, what does this have to do with NeoMedia?
Other than some one-time equipment sales which don't seem to be making Gavitec cash-flow-positive?
Nothing.
jonesie
I don't think we will ...
... on mobile ticket scanners. We (Gavitec) just sell the scanners, the customer owns it, we don't get paid anything after that.
Hopefully NeoMedia will ink some deals with someone who wants to pay us to manage an advertising campaign. That WAS how we used to think we'd make money. Manage a campaign, get paid something for every click.
And if we're really lucky, sometime before 2020, everyone else running an ad campaign will have to license from us. Not one of those license-swapping free deals either, but something where they HAVE to pay us.
Something's wrong. Either our patents aren't going to cause that to happen, or people aren't really all that fired up about mobile barcode scanning.
For a long time this has reminded me of the 'fad' which surrounded telemedicine back in 2000. With rising health care costs it seemed like a no-brainer that in-home healthcare would get a big boost by having patients linked to their doctors via webcams and telemetered vital signs, etc.
It totally fizzled. Who's got an Aunt Clara who chats with her doc via webcam and her home healthcare nurse hooks her up to the internet-connected black box so her doc can see what's going on real-time?
In any event, "Per (mobile ticket) scanning" will pay us nada.
jmho
jonesie
Gavitec sells some equipment.
Or I guess they sold some equipment in this deal. Aren't those equipment sales one-time deals with no recurring revenue? Has Gavitec gone into the green yet by selling equipment? Does it matter how many gazillion mobile tickets are put out there if Gavitec is competing with bigger equipment manufacturers for the one-time sales of equipment, and each piece of equipment can read gazillions of tickets?
It's still not something NeoMedia gets a per-ticket fee for, is it? Or has something changed?
jonesie
This guy did pretty well
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/profile.asp?user=59787&PrevStart=9687983
His main 'prediction' or advice that I remember was back when NEOM was trying to break through .40 or so very early in 2006. He said the best thing to do there was to be out and to buy if it broke thru to the upside on volume, and be ready to sell if it broke back below.
NEOM failed there, never broke through, and it's been generally down ever since.
And of course NEOM was PR'ing acquisition after acquisition during that time frame, which distracted us all from what was really happening to the stock ... the beginning of the incredible dilution which pared the stock price from .40 to .004 , 1% of its former self.
Anyway, chartist1 did a pretty good job of it IMO
jonesie
That six months ....
.... was up on February 4th if you start at the date of the PR.
I'd have to look back at the actual filing to see the date of the first (of three) tranches. In any event we haven't received the third tranche as far as we know and I'd guess the six months has elapsed. Perhaps we'll hear something soon.
jonesie
Good posts clawmann.
I agree , spinmeisters on both sides LOL. As you said , and as I said in an earlier post ... it would be nice to see NEOM issue such a PR with total accuracy , honesty and detail. We can EXPECT the EFF to spin things ... too bad we can't expect NEOM not to.
jonesie
"Consolidations of duplications" ...
... duplications which became duplications after NeoMedia amended ... and narrowed ... some of the claims.
I understand the duplications part. 95 , 89 , no big deal either way.
The point now is ... as Kwun says ... is it easier or harder for workarounds to be found by the MSFT's and Googles and Mom & Pop and College Student Barcode companies around the world?
Have the amendments , with the additional language inserted into the claims as Kwun points out ... made the patent a target for a new round of challenges on different grounds?
Did the EFF nearly succeed in 'busting' NEOM? NEOM looks pretty broke to me at the moment , and no news of the third tranche funding.
Could NEOM survive another year and a half to two years of another challenge during which time the outcome would be unclear?
I guess we'll see.
jonesie
"Who do they think IS the law on patents? The US Patent Office, that is who. Period."
It is the courts that ultimately decide the validity of a patent not the USPTO. Before the USPTO adopted the ex-parte re-exam process disputes were settled by the courts after a trial. The final arbiter of such disputes is the federal appeal court , not the USPTO. The ex parte re-exam was created by the USPTO to give individuals a less expensive route to challenge a patent's validity than having to use the courts and spend thousands of dollars. The only authority that can overrule the court is the appellate division.
Neomedia's case can certainly still go to court. It could become a case of patent versus patent with Scanbuy and Neomedia. A free cross - licensing agreement could be the end result , with guys like Iain having to decide if they really want to work for a living and produce a product or service .... or want to get paid handsomely by YA and the shareholders of YA's next victim.
The USPTO is not the final word on patents.
Just FYI
jonesie
narrowed
"back and forth churn between 004 and 008, this will be in pennies in few days"
More like one forth and then two backs.
I'd like to see pennies in a few days.
But I don't expect to.
We've got fresh shareholders who are already down nearly 50% ... within hours.
jonesie
Why did NeoMedia say ....
"All ninety-five claims of this Barcode Lookup Patent have been confirmed as being patentable by the PTO."
and
"We are pleased that this patent has withstood the intense scrutiny of the PTO's re-examination process"
and
" .... confirming all ninety-five claims as being patentable", said Tony Barkume of Barkume & Associates, P.C., patent counsel for NeoMedia."
When, as the author states, NeoMedia canceled 6 of the claims?
Why couldn't NeoMedia just be accurate and forthcoming ... for once ... in their PR and mention "The amendments narrowed the claims by adding several additional requirements."?
I don't see the EFF backpedaling at all. Kwun seems to be going after NeoMedia.
How accurate are the comments by Kwun quoted below? Will we be tied up in court for another year and half? How long do these patents run before they expire? If we really have 'rock solid' patents that actually tie up this 'nascent industry' and will force licensing, royalties or per-click compensation ... PUTTING SOME MONEY IN NEOMEDIA'S TREASURY ... why isn't the stock at least a paltry penny a share?
"even the narrowed claims are of suspect validity.
Is it really novel to add the feature of having a remote database of predetermined relationships? (You'd think that UPC barcode systems would have done that years before.) Or the features of reading data client-side and doing a lookup based on that data server-side? (Standard fare in millions of client-server systems.) Or using the resulting information client-side? (Again, common practice in all sorts of client-server systems.)
Given that those features are the basis for the PTO's decision to reissue the amended patent claims, and given that those features were well known long before before the NeoMedia patent application was filed, the amended patent claims are obvious and thus invalid unless the combination yields novel and unexpected results. Where are the novel and unexpected results here?"
Although most of the U.S. or global population certainly aren't at all aware of NeoMedia or 2d barcodes for that matter ... certainly every mobile barcode related company was watching for the PTO's decision. Carriers, brands, brand managers, advertising agencies, phone manufacturers, on and on, everybody on some long list I saw posted here earlier.
That has to represent quite a few people .. and their friends .. and their brokers .. and their friends ... and their brokers. At .004/share and in the absence of even "3 days in play" after the decision , it might seem the majority of those who were actually watching this play out don't sense a monetarily lucrative 'win' here?
jonesie
There is a benefit to YA ...
... but probably little benefit to common shareholders.
A R/S without proportionately reducing the A/S makes all those tens of billions of shares YA (theoretically, okay YJ, okay) has rights to at these low prices per share. And that type of R/S, sans reduction in A/S, has been done many times in pennyland.
There's really no reason for YA NOT to do a R/S other than how loud it made this board squawk when they talked about it before lol, IMO that's the only reason they took it off the table. They can serve it back up any time they want.
JMHO
jonesie
5 STAR POST lesnshawn
Thanks for posting.
jonesie
DOGGR FTP SITE TABLE SHOWING NOVEMBER PRODUCTION
The numbers in the table below include all Tri-Valley oil and gas wells.
Gas up a little, oil up a little, vs October which is in the post replied to.
Same jonesie.
Just as happy with good news as anyone.
Just as realistic as always.
Just waiting to see how YAGI plays it. If the patent is really worth anything , now that it's upheld maybe someone big will make an offer for it and/or the company.
Maybe YAGI will let us play , maybe they'll default us like that ADVR deal and keep it all. Maybe they'll let "us" and new "us's" jack the price up a bit more , sell some , then do whatever they plan on doing.
If you were YAGI and the choice was that simple ... and you were a businessman like Angelo seems to be ... what would YOU do?
Later
jonesie
LOL, not being dark.
It would be an interesting number to know ... IF the $29/sh back then had some merit (probably just a WAG though) then simply multiply it by the OS at the time, maybe an average of the OS 5 & 6 years ago. That = the market cap someone was predicting. (did you say that was someone at NeoMedia? Initials CF or CJ?)
Divide that by whatever number of current shares seems fair (3B? 5B?) and that would give you a current WAG share price equivalent to the WAG from 5-6 years ago.
For the $29/sh you mention to be at all relevant, that's the best way to look at it.
JMHO and perhaps we'll see further price appreciation when the news spreads more widely. So, around 50MM shares traded today at an average price of what? (I haven't been around, working on a complex project today) .003? Call it .004? So, somewhere less than $200,000 has traded so far, not bad for a sub-penny stock I suppose. Probably still some fear when it comes to buying much higher, with YAGI holding all the cards, and nobody really knowing how many ways there are for the Googles and MSFT's to get around us.
Here's hopin'! If we're going to have some irrational exuberance let's at least get to a penny, and twenty cents would be awesome. Oh, call it .29 and I'll be happy, we've probably got at least 100 times more shares now than we did in 2003, maybe?
Good luck to us all!
jonesie
That is great news!
Beats the heck out of the alternative. Glad I peeked to see the price action. Be interesting to see it over the next few days.
Best of luck to all of us.
jonesie
How many shares did they have 5-6 years ago?
Outstanding?
Committed to?
That $29 target (who said that? Neomedia) was based on dividing a 'potential' market cap by the then-outstanding share count.
Just fyi.
Yeah, welcome back.
Drmyke will be happy to see you.
The following has more to do with NeoMedia ...
... than all the PRs about what other companies are 'doing in the space' IMO
Here's how easily YAGI can yank NeoMedia's IP and sell it, or keep it and sell it later, or auction it, or pawn it, or flush it, whatever they want to do with it. They did the below over $750K - $2MM. Really easy over $10's of $MM$'s.
This is ON TOPIC as it describes the situation NeoMedia is in with YAGI except that YAGI hasn't pulled the plug on NeoMedia .. yet. I imagine there were ADVR shareholders who figured YAGI was in it for success and would carry the shareholders along for the ride.
ADVR
Form 8-K for ADVANCED VIRAL RESEARCH CORP
6-Feb-2009
Triggering Events That Accelerate or Increase a Direct Financial Obligation
On February 3, 2009 we received from YA Global Investments, L.P. (f/k/a Cornell Capital Partners, LP) ("YA Global") (i) a default letter (the "Default Letter"); and (ii) Notices of Disposition of Collateral (collectively, the "Disposition Notice").
Pursuant to the Default Letter, YA Global notified us that we are in default under the financing transactions entered into between us, including, without limitation the (i) Amended and Restated Secured Convertible Debenture dated as of July 24, 2007 issued by us to YA Global in the original principal amount of $750,000, as amended on December 3, 2007; (ii) Amended and Restated Secured Convertible Debenture dated as of July 24, 2007 issued by us to YA Global in the original principal amount of $750,000, as amended on December 3, 2007;
(iii) Secured Convertible Debenture dated as of July 24, 2007 issued by us to YA Global in the original principal amount of $750,000; (iv) Secured Convertible Debenture dated as of July 24, 2007 issued by us to YA Global in the original principal amount of $750,000; (v) Secured Convertible Debenture dated as of June 6, 2008 by us to YA Global in the original principal amount of $312,000;
(vi) Secured Convertible Debenture dated as of June 30, 2008 issued by us to Y A Global in the original principal amount of $313,000; (vii) Secured Convertible Debenture dated as of October 15, 2008 issued by us to YA Global in the original principal amount of $312,000; (the "Debentures"); (viii) Amended and Restated Security Agreement dated as of December 3, 2007; and (ix) Patent Security Agreement dated as of December 3, 2007 (the "Agreements" and collectively with the Debentures, the "Transaction Documents"). Under the Default Letter, YA Global claims that one or more defaults have occurred under the Transaction Documents.
Accordingly, YA Global demanded that we immediately repay all of our obligations (the "Obligations") to YA Global under the Transaction Documents, which amounts to approximately $2.2 million as of February 3, 2009, inclusive of accrued and unpaid interest.
In addition, YA Global stated its intention to proceed with the exercise of its rights and remedies under the Transaction Documents to collect the outstanding indebtedness without further notice to us. Pursuant to the Disposition Notice, YA Global notified us that pursuant to the terms of the Transaction Documents and Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code, YA Global intends to sell certain of the property which serves as collateral for our repayment obligations under the Transaction Documents, including general intangibles, intellectual property and other personal property used in connection with our ongoing clinical trials (the "Collateral").
The Disposition Notice further provides that YA Global intends to sell the Collateral by one or more public and/or private sales and that we shall be notified of the date, time and place of any public disposition of the Collateral and the date after which any private sale is to be made. In this regard, the Disposition Notice provides that the first such private sale may take place on or after February 13, 2009.
We do not have sufficient cash resources to satisfy the Obligations nor do we have any agreements, agreements in principle or understandings to acquire sufficient cash resources to satisfy the Obligations. We have been in discussions with YA Global in order to reach a resolution regarding the default. In addition, we have been seeking sources of financing in order to redeem the outstanding debt owed to YA Global and to resume operations. Notwithstanding the foregoing, there can be no assurance that we will acquire additional financing, ever resume operations or that we will not be required to assemble for delivery to YA Global , all of the property pledged to YA Global as a first priority security interest under our Transaction Documents, which includes all of our assets. In connection with the exercise of its remedies, YA Global may take possession of all or some of our assets.
"painting it red at the close on a small block. We've seen it time and time again. Why?"
What about folks who dump into any rally these days, however puny? I hope the folks that bought at .0023 are happy, they're now down about 25% already.
"I will say this: There will come a day, hopefully soon, when market makers will not be allowed to get away with the fraud they've committed on investors for years."
What about pennystockscamsters like CF, JJ, GO, AR and the lot? They're the people who draw in the suckers with the fake business plans and fake pr's so they AND the MM's can 'commit fraud'. They work together, it's a club, an ugly little club called the otcbb club.
"bold posture" ???
So , what is the penalty if Iain is just blowing smoke around like all of his predecessors with their "bold posture"s??
The same penalty his predecessors received for blowing smoke up our collective skirts?
Oh boy , I'll bet Iain McCready NeoMedia CEO (but not legal representative of NeoMedia) is really worried about talking through his hat , er , I mean 'speaking from strength' now LOL. Those were some incredibly harsh penalties , I think they may have violated the Geneva Conventions. Previous penalties for blowing smoke included handing them million dollar mansions with lots of change left over , fat severance checks , Iain must be shaking in his boots.
LOL
jonesie
Iain will be talking at the MWC...
... hopefully someone will hear him and contract with NEOM for a service and pay NEOM money for it.
Otherwise, it's just a company-paid junket by Iain.
jonesie
That would be the 'talking' part ...
... of "attending and talking" as I posted.
jonesie
Have it your way.
"why" ????
The answer is simple. It's called not posting to one's position just because one wants NEOM stock to go up. (IMHO it's better to let NEOM management actually produce something verifiable which would cause the stock to appreciate rather than try to bolster the share price by posting on a message board.) It's called providing facts-based analysis of NEOM's financial agreements and the contents of their website as an alternative to rosy speculations and tenuous dots. It's called logical debate regardless of one's position in NeoMedia's stock.
In short ... it's called plain old honesty.
jonesie
p.s. I haven't seen any bona fide "attempts of the new administration to build the company into a successful or profitable organization". I've seen a lot of talk, and, oh okay, maybe an ill-advised trial which got them sued, but I have yet to see anyone making any money other than the richly-salaried and richly-severanced succession of talking heads running the NeoMedia sham(bles). Do you remember how much we're PAYING IM? And for what?
Yes it is.
There is the fact that YAGI is by far the majority shareholder, says who stays and who goes, has their 'turn around expert' GO on the board and 'legally representing' NeoMedia. YAGI also enumerates what NeoMedia must do in order to receive subsequent financing tranches.
I'd say YAGI is pulling all the strings, playing the tune, calling the shots, pick your metaphor.
jonesie
Possibly because they are ...
... just 'attending' and 'talking'.
One would think if they are really serious in this space they'd exhibit at the MWC , because everybody is keeping their eyes squarely fixed on it.
http://www.mobileworldcongress.com/exhibitorlisting
No NeoMedia, no Gavitec?
Saving money I suppose. Perhaps they have no choice in the matter , they have to do whatever YAGI/O'Leary tell them to do.
jonesie
It is indeed more than amazing
You can indeed set your watch by it..
Not even 24 hours since the website revamping was posted and already the website revamping is a sign that
NEOM isn't going down the drain any time soon,
NEOM is going big time,
that it may mean silent partners are already on-board,
that something is under foot for the Mobile World Congress this upcoming week,
that the train may have left the station,
that it shows a much bigger approach,
that we are now going to bypass the agency/brand/carrier/handset/ecosystem line up,
'conspiracy theories' like why would they launch a brand new website (with no PR) just days before Feb.16 (Mobile World Congress),
that it could mean a MWC launch,
that we might get unprecedented press coverage thru at least one of the majors,
that there is possibly new blood on board,
that someone besides YA may have stepped up with funding.
IMHO my very specific comments about particular language/content put on the new website by NeoMedia management pale by comparison to the speculation put forth about the great things this website revamping might foretell.
jonesie