Sunday, February 15, 2009 7:22:00 PM
The answer is simple. It's called not posting to one's position just because one wants NEOM stock to go up. (IMHO it's better to let NEOM management actually produce something verifiable which would cause the stock to appreciate rather than try to bolster the share price by posting on a message board.) It's called providing facts-based analysis of NEOM's financial agreements and the contents of their website as an alternative to rosy speculations and tenuous dots. It's called logical debate regardless of one's position in NeoMedia's stock.
In short ... it's called plain old honesty.
jonesie
p.s. I haven't seen any bona fide "attempts of the new administration to build the company into a successful or profitable organization". I've seen a lot of talk, and, oh okay, maybe an ill-advised trial which got them sued, but I have yet to see anyone making any money other than the richly-salaried and richly-severanced succession of talking heads running the NeoMedia sham(bles). Do you remember how much we're PAYING IM? And for what?
Yorkville / Cornell Tracking Board #board-9964
"I can think of no more valuable commodity than information"
Avant Technologies Engages Wired4Tech to Evaluate the Performance of Next Generation AI Server Technology • AVAI • May 23, 2024 8:00 AM
Branded Legacy, Inc. Unveils Collaboration with Celebrity Tattoo Artist Kat Tat for New Tattoo Aftercare Product • BLEG • May 22, 2024 8:30 AM
"Defo's Morning Briefing" Set to Debut for "GreenliteTV" • GRNL • May 21, 2024 2:28 PM
North Bay Resources Announces 50/50 JV at Fran Gold Project, British Columbia; Initiates NI 43-101 Resources Estimate and Bulk Sample • NBRI • May 21, 2024 9:07 AM
Greenlite Ventures Inks Deal to Acquire No Limit Technology • GRNL • May 17, 2024 3:00 PM
Music Licensing, Inc. (OTC: SONG) Subsidiary Pro Music Rights Secures Final Judgment of $114,081.30 USD, Demonstrating Strength of Licensing Agreements • SONGD • May 17, 2024 11:00 AM