Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I tend to agree. However, the character assassination, the fiercely degrading language and images exposes him to a vulnerability he may not be aware of. If there is a way to prove what he is claiming, maybe he should get together with those that agree and proceed from there. For real. I wonder how much time has to pass when a company can no longer be considered a "start up". There are a couple of other QD companies that are collecting revenue. Privately held. There is much to prove and nothing to be said.
I tend to agree. However, the character assassination, the fiercely degrading language and images exposes him to a vulnerability he may not be aware of. If there is a way to prove what he is claiming, maybe he should get together with those that agree and proceed from there. For real. I wonder how much time has to pass when a company can no longer be considered a "start up". There are a couple of other QD companies that are collecting revenue. Privately held. There is much to prove and nothing to be said.
After all the BS posts, we are finally reading something with real substance. I don't know if you realize it, but in some really weird way you are both on the same page. shoondrug.
somewhere between you and Shoondale is reality
There you go. You said all that without using any images... Way to go. Now we know how you really feel.
The world is disgusting enough. Would you please stop showing the disgusting picture of innocent sheep going to their slaughter. Is that all you've got? It represents nothing but Man's cruelty to a helpless species.
I guess I am just dense. I don't understand your last post. Are you referring to the posters on this board or the other board? There certainly posters on the other board that are in denial and want everyone to drink the Kool-aid. I really don't see that here. "The fan club posts... look like a scam."???? I agree there are posts that seem to reek of dishonesty.
I assume that the posters on this board want Quantum to succeed, although realizing that the chances are extremely slim based upon all of the failings and devious activities of management. Posts that share a glimmer of hope don't have to be attacked as being dishonest. Just read for what they are. We ALL know that this company is in the critical care ward on a ventilator. I thought the purpose of this board was to support each other. If someone is here because they want Quantum to fail for whatever reason, I believe they can make better use of their time. However, I don't believe any of us want that end, although things right now are sickening and disturbing.
This board at times mirrors everything it hates about the other board. Attacking the poster and not the facts, or posting banal responses with no facts. We should take into account that everyone isn't right all the time or wrong all the time, or a portion of what one posts is correct and the rest is supposition. A little civilized discourse wouldn't hurt.
I forgot to add: especially anything related quantum dots. All posts by him on Youtube are old. I was not able to bring up his past or present websites. I would not even have brought this up had the other board once again not done so.
Dr. Todd Malan seems to be a non-practicing gynocolgist here in Phoenix. He turned to cosmetic surgery and stem cell therapy. There is absolutely nothing that gives credence to his "scientific" background as stated on the other board. It helps to read the patient ratings, reviews and comments. This should indicate why he is a perfect fit for Squires. I was considering him for stem cell therapy but after reading patient reviews I decided to go elsewhere.
PS: Some of the reviewers said TERRIBLE things about him. I was shocked by some of the reviews. Draw your own conclusions. Dr. Todd Malan, Phoenix, Az.
I think we all lose sight of the fact that this company is supposed to have a board of directors that convene quarterly, according to the BYLAWS OF INCORPORATION. Anyone can read them, they are on the website. They are supposed to file or assist in filing all quarterly reports ON TIME with the SEC. Let's not forget that. Where is the supposed board in all this? Are they a bunch of cowering cowards who lick the boots of King Squires? Do they even exist as a group that is supposed to meet and solve corporate issues? Every post talks about SQUIRES. If Squires is THE SHOW, then this is not a corporation at all? What does that make us?
Reply to Kurt and Snark. I believe you missed the point. Drugman didn't make a value judgement, he only posted the lasted "not a real deal" post by Squires. If anyone knows what a "term sheet" agreement is, they will know it is one step above a letter of intent. Usually a term sheet is supplied by an entrepreneur saying he will invest money into a start up company based upon certain criteria. It is not binding upon anyone involved in the agreement. In this instance, once again, we have no details of who is giving what to who, and under what conditions. Since both companies are considered startups, who is giving money to who, if that is the intent of the term sheet. Of course, after ten years doing non-business, Quantum is still considered a start up. This in my opinion is like the non-agreement with Sheffield (sp). Can anyone figure what use Quantum may be to Neurolytixs? This whole thing once again is a tempest in a tea pot, a non-deal.
You guys are right. I apologize, bad example. BAD MATH. If you bought 50,000 shares of Quantum, over time, averaging out to .10 per share, that is $5000.00 and you got a reverse split of 50 to 1 at .02 per share, 1000 shares at $1.00 per share. That means you have to make up the loss of $4,000.00 with only 1000 shares. SOMEBODY! Is that correct? So does it have to go to $5.00 a share to be even in this example? Anybody? This RS amount is not out of the realm of reality. I really mean it, correct me if I am wrong.
Here's the rub as described by critical cat on the other board. If you bought 100 shares for $1.00 a share, and the stock now sells for .50 and the company does an RS of 10 for 1, you now own 10 shares at $5.00 per share. You are down $500.00 and you only have 10 shares. The stock has to go to $50 a share for you to be even. And that is only at 10 for 1. With QTMM, a reverse split, in order to make sense for the company, screwing the investors in the process, an RS would have to be much, much higher. If and when that happens, we are all underwater no matter what, forever. The thing that will save us from an RS is that Mr. Squires is in this boat with us. AT the present share price he would stand to lose a bundle, and a big bundle at that.
Kurt, re: your questions posed on 9/12, @Superwomanesq on Stocktwits is asking for all questions from investors to ask Squires. I know from prior tweets she has been in contact with Squires and has received responses. I believe all of your questions should be answered. If you can reach out to her, you may get answers. She has also stated that, under the right
circumstances, she would spearhead some kind of class action, if necessary. You may have to join Stocktwits. It is free.
Why not shoot Mr. Squires an email. ask@quantummaterialscorp.com or maybe twitter (don't know how that would work too long) or whatever way you would be able to ask these questions. Maybe he will respond. These are all excellent questions that should be answered.
Has anyone tried to contact Mr. Squires either on twitter or the company website ask@quantummaterials.com to get direct answers to these important questions? If there is a better place to ask, please advise.
You would think that what you stated in this post alone would be a tremendous incentive to keep all filings current. So much at stake for Squires. Does anyone have a theory besides being destructively lazy and just not wanting to do the work?
Ted, you're the man!
I can say that I don't understand what all the numbers mean. This is a lot of work and deserves a great big THANK YOU!
Just Pasaca stays in the picture.
I don't believe anyone knows what his salary is. If it was based on being productive, it should be 00.00
Bingo, my exact sentiment. Nobody listens
From your reply, it seems that there is no upside to not listing all of the available shares from all investors. It is a supply and demand question, and what the market for the products will be. Too simple?
In this situation I don't believe less shares means a higher share price or that the shares would have more value if there is not significant revenue. I don't know. Seems logical though.
At that point, who would set the sale price and how would it be done? Do you really know? Not conjecture or probably, but actually really know. From your last post it sounds like you do. I honestly want an explanation from someone.
I believe the dialogue that is taking place on the other board between Peruvida and Critical Cat reveals the advocacy of Peruvida on behalf of Quantum and Steve.
That is fortunate. Merrill won't let me sell my shares because the SEC has the toxic sign on the company.
You got that right.
Now that's funny. seriously.
My question about Pasaca's purchase of shares was really sparked by the volume of purchases and the number of shares traded. First, I believe you have to know the "expert exchange" exists, I love that term, to buy shares in a company that may not exist in a few weeks or months yet there were several days where the volume was over 1,000,000 shares either purchased or sold. I suppose that is the same thing. Who would want to buy? Under normal conditions shares of this company sold a a rate of 300,000 to 600,000 a day at best. Does anyone have a reasonable speculative answer as to what, why, where, when or how this makes sense? More suckers? I think not.
Under the theory of every little bit helps. Is it possible that Pasaca is buying all of the shares as they become available on the expert exchange where shares are being sold at a discount? A few million shares here and there could change the equation. Under the present circumstances, they must know they need more shares to take 51% control. Acquiring them wherever they can makes sense. I realize this is bazaar, but what if this is one of the expected or anticipated results of not filing. Giving Pasaca the ability to acquire shares they would not have had? To a professional this probably sounds pretty stupid, but to layman like myself, it makes some sense.
Thank you for your thoughtful reply.
Why has this become the subject of conversation when the subject should be how can we protect the investments we have and what recourse do we have if this is a deliberate tactic to enrich certain insiders by bringing the company private and everyone else losing their money. let's not lose tract of the fact that Squires must have asked someone who knows, "what are the potential consequences if we don't file?" They have become very apparent. The way this company has been managed, if it was a private compony five years ago, it would not exist today. Living off investors money and then doing this is reprehensible. Again, we will see if there is any honor left.
ONE SCENARIO: think Pasaca does know what they are doing with QMC. They loan $15,000,000.00, I believe with the condition that QMC uplist to the NASDAC by the end of May knowing the improbableness of that condition being met. They integrate QMC into their ecosystem. QMC not only doesn't uplist to the NASDAC, but they go from the OTC to the pink sheets, to Expert. QMC agreed to these conditions before taking the money. Pasaca claims they showed good faith by giving QMC unprecedented opportunities and their CEO still could not even follow the most basic rules of the SEC. FILE ON TIME. Now Pasaca has to decide what to do. They integrated QMC. let the world know that. They have to call the note. QMC can't pay. 51% gives them the right to do whatever they want. QMC gave Pasaca no alternative but to take over the assets, dismantle the company to save their investment. No one knows where the $15,000,000.00 went because there is no accounting to anyone from anyone. HORRIBLE, BUT NOT AN UNLIKELY SCENARIO. Pasaca certainly does not need QMC's Board or its management skills. The share holders are left with nothing. OH WELL!
Drugman, thank you for taking the time to respond. We, the shareholders, still don't know the reason why, when things were finally starting to get going, this happens, killing the momentum, creating doubt and putting the company in jeopardy. Where is the logic? You have to file, good news or bad. Just file. We will see. Thank you.
I don't understand how this works? Doesn't it also work the other way? To have buyers, you must have sellers? My questions is, under these extraordinary circumstances, would it help to maintain the present share price if there were very few sellers? Give the company the opportunity to comply with all SEC rules, and at the same time maintaining the SP integrity. In the OTC marketplace doesn't it depend upon buyers and sellers? My personal challenge with all of this is that compliance is mandatory. Why put the company's very existence in jeopardy and not comply. Spend additional thousands of dollars to catch up. I can't help thinking that a CEO would not want to do that to his company or share holders unless there is something nefarious afoot.
Can the situation arise that if no one sold that the price would not go down? Would it be a stay as you are and wait and see? If so, would that not be the best case scenario for all present share holders. The brokerages would be helping to stop the stock from going into a downward spiral?
It's the bottom of the ninth, SEC 10k QUANTUM 0, Squires is at bat. Here's the pitch, Squires takes a mighty swing, strike one. The pitcher doesn't bother to look at the bases because there is no one on. The pitcher winds up, throws a perfect but what should have been an easily hit ball over the last ten years, strike two. One more strike and the SEC wins 10k to 0. The excitement is the crowd is deafening. And there's the pitch... stay tuned for tomorrow's update and final call. Good night from Austin, Texas.