dwms i guess we will find out , but you own both companys now,if you are long the stock and there is something called intrinsic value, one needs to google that.and i am done on this topic, its been fun

dwms read my post again, i said one for one , but however they do it the money has to come out the same, and they cannot rip part of the company away from you or you would lose intrinsic value for your shares

DWMS let me try to explain something to you , but just once, you have already chosen , if you own alcoa stock , they cannot make you chose, lawsuits would follow the only choice is after the split you can sell which ever company you want, that choosing is for after the split, or new investors after the split it has to be like a forward split imho, one for one . if they split the company today the price of the stock is 9.50 that would be 5.00 for one and 4.50 for the other it has to come out at 9.50 you cannot pull figures out of thin air, if you own 10000 shares before the split you should own 20000 after the split , and then you can choose , do you get it now, because iam done explaining it thanx Bob

DWMS let me try to explain something to you , but just once, you have already chosen , if you own alcoa stock , they cannot make you chose, lawsuits would follow the only choice is after the split you can sell which ever company you want, that choosing is for after the split, or new investors after the split it has to be like a forward split imho, one for one . if they split the company today the price of the stock is 9.50 that would be 5.00 for one and 4.50 for the other it has to come out at 9.50 you cannot pull figures out of thin air, if you own 10000 shares before the split you should own 20000 after the split , and then you can choose , do you get it now, because iam done explaining it thanx Bob

dwms where do you get your info at

if they tried splitting the company as you described in your post, there would be lawsuits up the ying yang, you would lose intrinsic value, not going to happoen like that

if they tried splitting the company as you described in your post, there would be lawsuits up the ying yang, you would lose intrinsic value, not going to happoen like that

ipo what are you talking about, you cant take an exsiting business and call a split an ipo, if the stock is 15.00 thats all you have to work with, where do you get your info

I am voting no if asked , against this ludicrous offer from liberty media, it rips all the intrinsic value out of your sirixm shares, it is really disgusting imo

bottom line is funds got them 60% more than there opening bid and remember he lowballed, you do the math

sorry about that,

before you get discouraged please read the article that joan lappin wrote for forbes , and him investment firm owns shares of sirixm I will post a link . but if that fails type in joan lappin, and then click on forbes article deduced reckoning, and pat close attention to the last two paragraphs, www.forbes.com/sites/joanlappin

before you get discouraged please read the article that joan lappin wrote for forbes , and him investment firm owns shares of sirixm I will post a link . but if that fails type in joan lappin, and then click on forbes article deduced reckoning, and pat close attention to the last two paragraphs, www.forbes.com/sites/joanlappin

before you get discouraged please read the article that joan lappin wrote for forbes , and him investment firm owns shares of sirixm I will post a link . but if that fails type in joan lappin, and then click on forbes article deduced reckoning, and pat close attention to the last two paragraphs, www.forbes.com/sites/joanlappin

before you get discouraged please read the article that joan lappin wrote for forbes , and him investment firm owns shares of sirixm I will post a link . but if that fails type in joan lappin, and then click on forbes article deduced reckoning, and pat close attention to the last two paragraphs, www.forbes.com/sites/joanlappin

before you get discouraged please read the article that joan lappin wrote for forbes , and him investment firm owns shares of sirixm I will post a link . but if that fails type in joan lappin, and then click on forbes article deduced reckoning, and pat close attention to the last two paragraphs, www.forbes.com/sites/joanlappin

paperview, buyout tradeoff, ratios, what ever you want to call it, is totally ludicrous, and its the same as a buyout, you need to read more articles, Malone wants the last 48% of the sirixm stock, call it what ever you want , and in return he wants to print paper out of thin air,and if he had his way when he got done you would not own siriixm stock, now I call that a buyout, but FIRST lets establish what sirixm is worth,and its worth a he$$ of a lot more than $3.68 wheather you are buying me out or trading me out , its the same effect as a buyout,do you get it

Ralph Nader posted an open letter over at Benzinga
http://www.benzinga.com/news/14/01/4222119/update-ralph-nader-issues-letter-to-sirius-xm-holders and you should mail him a thank you note, he can help a lot thanx

Bloomberg news barkleys says sirixm shares upside are capped by liberty offer, scrolled on bloomberg

well liberty people on this board, they are easy to spot

lawyer up and vote NO, do not let Malone steal your shares 8 billion in NOLs , we need the spectrum valued , 25million subs, contract with every major car mfg co. agero connected car that we just purchased for 500 million, all the satellites, forward looking revenue, Premium paid for a paper swap

inorout, you are right, and better yet he is not spending cash , he wants to give us paper, so what is he going to be out, explain that to me,

imo in a paper swap where Malone is not putting out one red cent, he could easily give us 7.00 a share or better, why would he care, its just paper

toby you are spot on keep up the good work , Malone only offered half of what its worth

we got to get at least 5.50 one way or another

in 1999 Sirius hit over $68.00 per share, all time high

are we going to rally into earnings, or rally after earnings, any ideas

tinsel12, I think you meant 30% over 5 years,

Roy must be going to the Bahamas to get on the crap table. lol

well i would not go so far as to say they lied, it can turn out to be a number of variables, he may be going to hook up with a large beverage co, soda companys , beer companys,, who knows.before he was connected to coca cola, so i would not be so fast about judging. i have no dogs in the fight, for the moment

mcClanes, from what i understand only stocks what there clients ask for, so if you get a chain of stores that want the product then they will stock the product,and deliver it,if you get the drift,i have no dogs in the fight,

for whatever it means, i personally talked to the marketing manager of dailys in nashville tenn, and he was happy with the product, he said it was selling a little over four units per day per store, they have 80 stores,he gave me a lead ,so i emailed the info to roy, i have no dogs in the fight,

I did talk to dailys in nasville , the product is in there stores and selling at a good clip.

just recieved the product i ordered, i love it,this thing will come out of this hole soon, WATCH

blackrock involved, moving to new bigger offices,33 billion doller distribution co,all positives, read the fillings, excellent product

sounds like sopmething big coming down the pike

iam thinking roy approved those other shares, so when blackrock buys him out he will get a bigger slice,hmmm

cruiser, this is big, now iam sure good old roy will take care of his shareholders soon with a big pr, what say you???

something big is in the wind, i can feel it

this thing will run with news now,i think by the 15th of feb, for sure