Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Thanks JJS
I do understand the positive implication of the ruling and I hope Mr Re drives it home.
I was making an observation about the makeup of the majority Kagan Ginsberg Sotomayor along with Thomas scalia.
Mr Angus explained my clumsy comment( thanks Red I need all the help I can get)
I also made a unprofessional snarky comment about Chief Justice Roberts.
My point...exactly! Not sure how to classify the Chief!
Interesting make up of the majority vs dissenting. ie conservative vs liberal.
Rotflmao
Any more indications from your softie buddies ?
Don't know but would luuuuuvvvvvv to find out
Where are your buddies in the white coats?
I may be totally confused. If so I apologize. I was commenting on the response brief to the "second appeal" which google and for and received uncontested 21 day delay/extension.
I was updating Ridgecoves comment in which he/she referencing the uncontested response delay google requested. There are so many moving parts to vrng it is hard keep straight.
Fyi the uncontested cafc extension delays until April 6 or 7th....not May thank goodness
Don't hold back, tell us how you really feel!!!!......I anxiously await the day of recking for goog but in the mean time let's hope one good event occurs which fries shorty
Re postyle.....you may want to back up....I have followed post for years and he is well versed in the patent litigation area and I believe better than patent lit Atty because of his market experience.
Their investor presentation shows 10 m warrants at 1.76 which would be approximately 20 mil in funds
3/27/14. Tommorow??
JJS may be able to clarify this....I think there was a conference call yesterday to reschedule the face to face conference today at 2pm
Add in the possible weather....we may be cursed
Pacer 1084 being reported on freeforum by netprf. ...no details
Nice
I understand your frustrations in regards to the lack of PR... I have "hopium" that they have been in serious settlement negotiations. The Chinese are very conservative and reserved and maybe as a gesture of goodwill they are not gloating.
Is it just me. Does it seem odd that vringo did not announce injunction? And remember they refused to comment on the reason for trial delay in German.
Ipitty....I appreciate and respect your posts....thank you. ...
I am a glass half full type and have gotten frustrated with your negative posts recently...but the more I think about the overall google situation I am beginning to believe you....if HJJ really wanted a settlement he would rule or broadcast his sett. He instructed that the 2 parties meet this week but without a starting point...he has allowed the w/a to simmer since may...
Sorry.....998
Does Google have the right to respond to 978 or is the hearing the response?
Could get interesting if ZTE are in negotiations based on the lack of info about trial rescheduling. ..
Don't hold back JJ tell us how you really feel!! LOL
FYI Cliff's landline....646 532 6777
ZTE DELAY
FYI..I just called Cliff IR...he said that upon advice of counsel he could not answer if this was a reschedule from the court or if agreed to by both parties.....HMMMMM!
Greetings Mr. Seabrook! and Kudos to Postyle. Thanks for your insight.
I think I have read in the past from reliable posters that HJJ has a history of pushing settlements or maybe a high settlement rate.
I am intrigued by HJJ's schedule of briefs and settlement efforts. My basic belief is that the w/a is not valid. If HJJ wants to "encourage" a settlement he will rule on the w/a quickly to give the settlement meeting by G and V to have some teeth.
I do have a question. Does the settlement conference with the Judge Magistrate require a resolution or can it conclude with a stalemate?
TIA
Mr. JJ Seabrook. ..
How do you read HJJ'S instructions regarding a settlement conference? Is a conference to be scheduled to occur by December 1st or scheduled by December 1st and occur whenever?
Greatings Mr Seabrook. Hope you had (having) a great weekend.
If 980 is accurate would that not "fly into the face" of HJJ? If Google had difficulty (justified or not) complying by the 26th would it not justify a request for delay or clarification? To simply not comply would it not display open defiance to the courts order?
Is this behavior acceptable or the norm?
You may me dead on...but is it unreasonable for a fed judge to ask goog to produce evidence of their wa?....he may have, intentional or not, given goog plenty of rope to...
Settlement
Just musing on a beautiful Friday afternoon.
IF AND ONLY IF GOOGLE'S WORKAROUND IS A RED HERRING!!!!
The lowest possible settlement is available during a narrow window which closes Monday at midnight. If it is a sham... it will be revealed to Vringo which makes them stronger.....and it could lead to HJJ wrath.
In my past...dealing with risk management. We tried to look at the situation and position for the lowest expense. Although we were never in a situation having the massive cash reserves that is available to Google.
(may just be what I want to happen)
To the Honorable JJ SEABROOK non esq (but better) Do you have any insight into how google is to present evidence to v by the 25th....that they have a workaround???
ie....breif...?
I sincerely appreciated your time and expense so we can see the pacers
ROTFLM"FRUSTRATED"AO
To the honorable JJ Seabrook. ...What's your take on v not replying with $ calc..kinda makes me scratch my head and say "whuuuuut"
Strike is over....WE ACCEPT YOUR TERMS!!!!
Thanks again for the valuable info.....interesting that this was ruled in approx 2 months....guessing defendants lawyers were not as strategic (devious wise savy wellpaid whatever)
Thanks again...soo you are speculating..from recent posts that when supp is fully briefed that he will produce the balance of the rulings in a flurry...because he nor his staff will need to do weeks worth of exhaustive research...maybe I should have phrased it that it is possible that he spits out a flurry when supp is fully briefed
Ps thanks jj for your valuable past insight