Looks like too many people got the one cent Why just anyone call the broker and ask him about it and see why and what it's?

THINGS START TO MOVE FOR REAL WE ARE NEXT In Re: Libor-Based Financial Instruments Antitrust Litigation
Court Docket Sheet
Southern District of New York
1:2011-md-02262 (nysd)
Interested in this case?
Get Instant Updates
Documents
Last full update: 179 days ago. Update now
# Date Description
402104/20/2024MOTION for Disbursement of Funds AFTER DETERMINATION OF REASONABLE FEES DUE, IF ANY. Document filed by David Klusendorf. Return Date set for 5/6/2024 at 11:59 PM.
8 Attachments ?
402004/19/2024NOTICE of Compliance with 28 U.S.C. 1715(b). Document filed by The Norinchukin Bank. Filed In Associated Cases: 1:11-md-02262-NRB, 1:11-cv-02613-NRB.
401904/18/2024STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF PORTIGON AG AND WESTDEUTSCHE IMMOBILIENBANK AG PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(a)(ii): IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between Plaintiffs and Defendants Portigon AG (f/k/a WestLB AG) ("Portigon") and Westdeutsche ImmobilienBank AG ("Westimmo") that all of Plaintiffs' claims against Portigon and Westlmmo only are hereby dismissed with prejudice from the action Triaxx Prime CDO 2006-1 ltd., et al. v. Bank of America Corporation, et al., No. 1:14-cv-000146-NRB (S.D.N.Y.), pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, without interest to any party and with each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs. For the avoidance of doubt, this stipulation of dismissal applies only to Portigon and Westlmmo, and Plaintiffs are continuing to pursue claims against other Defendants in this action. SO ORDERED. WestDeutsche Immobilienbank AG terminated. (Signed by Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald on 4/18/2024)
401804/17/2024PROTECTIVE ORDER AND STIPULATION.regarding procedures to be followed that shall govern the handling of confidential material. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald on 4/17/2024)
401704/16/2024NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by James Koutoulas on behalf of David Klusendorf.
401604/16/2024NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF ROYAL BANK OF CANADA PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A) (ii): PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiffs, by and through their undersigned attorneys, hereby dismiss all of their claims against Defendant Royal Bank of Canada ("Royal Bank") with prejudice from the action Triaxx Prime CDO 2006-1 Ltd. et al. v. Bank of America Corp. et al., 14-cv-00146-NRB (S.D.N.Y.), without interest to any party and with each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs. For the avoidance of doubt, this voluntary dismissal applies only to Royal Bank, and Plaintiffs are continuing to pursue claims against other Defendants in this action. So ordered. Royal Bank of Canada and The Royal Bank of Canada terminated. (Signed by Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald on 4/16/2024)
401504/16/2024NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF LLOYD'S BANKING GROUP PLC PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii): PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiffs, by and through their undersigned attorneys, hereby dismiss all of their claims against Defendant Lloyd's Banking Group PLC (collectively, "Lloyd's"), with prejudice from the action Triaxx Prime CDO 2006-1 Ltd. et al. v. Bank of America Corp. et al., 14-cv-00146-NRB (S.D.N.Y.), without interest to any party and with each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs. For the avoidance of doubt, this voluntary dismissal applies only to Lloyd's, and Plaintiffs are continuing to pursue claims against other Defendants in this action. So ordered. Lloyds Banking Group Plc terminated. (Signed by Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald on 4/16/2024)
401404/16/2024PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Document filed by FDIC, as receiver, Federal Deposit Insurance, The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver, The Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation.
04/12/2024***NOTICE TO COURT REGARDING PROPOSED ORDER. Document No. (4013 in 1:11-md-02262-NRB, 884 in 1:11-cv-02613-NRB) Proposed Order was reviewed and approved as to form. Filed In Associated Cases: 1:11-md-02262-NRB, 1:11-cv-02613-NRB (Text entry; no document attached.)
401304/11/2024PROPOSED ORDER. Document filed by 303030 Trading LLC, 303030 Trading, LLC, Atlantic Trading USA, LLC, FTC Futures Fund PCC Ltd, FTC Futures Fund SICAV, Gary Francis, Gary Francis, Nathaniel Haynes, Metzler Investment GmbH. Related Document Number: [4009]. Proposed Order to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.
401204/11/2024DECLARATION of Elaine Pang in Support re: (880 in 1:11-cv-02613-NRB) MOTION to Approve Preliminary Approval of Settlement with Credit Suisse AG, Lloyds Bank plc, Bank of Scotland plc, NatWest Markets plc, Portigon AG, Westdeutsche Immobilienbank AG, Royal Bank of Canada, RBC Capital Markets, LLC, Coperatieve Rabobank. Document filed by 303030 Trading LLC, 303030 Trading, LLC, Atlantic Trading USA, LLC, FTC Futures Fund PCC Ltd, FTC Futures Fund SICAV, Gary Francis, Gary Francis, Nathaniel Haynes, Metzler Investment GmbH. Filed In Associated Cases: 1:11-md-02262-NRB, 1:11-cv-02613-NRB.
11 Attachments ?
401104/11/2024DECLARATION of David E. Kovel in Support re: (880 in 1:11-cv-02613-NRB) MOTION to Approve Preliminary Approval of Settlement with Credit Suisse AG, Lloyds Bank plc, Bank of Scotland plc, NatWest Markets plc, Portigon AG, Westdeutsche Immobilienbank AG, Royal Bank of Canada, RBC Capital Markets, LLC, Coperatieve Rabobank. Document filed by 303030 Trading LLC, 303030 Trading, LLC, Atlantic Trading USA, LLC, FTC Futures Fund PCC Ltd, FTC Futures Fund SICAV, Gary Francis, Gary Francis, Nathaniel Haynes, Metzler Investment GmbH. Filed In Associated Cases: 1:11-md-02262-NRB, 1:11-cv-02613-NRB.
1 Attachment ?
401004/11/2024MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: (880 in 1:11-cv-02613-NRB) MOTION to Approve Preliminary Approval of Settlement with Credit Suisse AG, Lloyds Bank plc, Bank of Scotland plc, NatWest Markets plc, Portigon AG, Westdeutsche Immobilienbank AG, Royal Bank of Canada, RBC Capital Markets, LLC, Coperatieve Rabobank. Document filed by 303030 Trading LLC, 303030 Trading, LLC, Atlantic Trading USA, LLC, FTC Futures Fund PCC Ltd, FTC Futures Fund SICAV, Gary Francis, Gary Francis, Nathaniel Haynes, Metzler Investment GmbH. Filed In Associated Cases: 1:11-md-02262-NRB, 1:11-cv-02613-NRB.
400904/11/2024MOTION to Approve Preliminary Approval of Settlement with Credit Suisse AG, Lloyds Bank plc, Bank of Scotland plc, NatWest Markets plc, Portigon AG, Westdeutsche Immobilienbank AG, Royal Bank of Canada, RBC Capital Markets, LLC, Coperatieve Rabobank U.A., The Norinchukin Bank, MUFG Bank, Ltd., and UBS AG. Document filed by 303030 Trading LLC, 303030 Trading, LLC, Atlantic Trading USA, LLC, FTC Futures Fund PCC Ltd, FTC Futures Fund SICAV, Gary Francis, Gary Francis, Nathaniel Haynes, Metzler Investment GmbH.Filed In Associated Cases: 1:11-md-02262-NRB, 1:11-cv-02613-NRB.
400804/11/2024ORDER granting [4006] Letter Motion for Conference re: [4006] LETTER MOTION for Conference Regarding Preliminary Approval of Exchange-Based Plaintiffs' Settlement with Remaining Defendants addressed to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald from David E. Kovel and Christopher Lovell dated April 9, 2024. Plaintiffs are granted leave to file the proposed motion for preliminary approval of the settlement without the necessity of a pre-motion conference. So ordered. (Signed by Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald on 4/11/2024)
04/10/2024>>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice to RE-FILE Document No. [4007] MOTION for Timothy S. Kearns to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-29201011. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): expired Certificate of Good Standing from Supreme Court of Delaware and Supreme Court of DC;. Re-file the motion as a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice - attach the correct signed PDF - select the correct named filer/filers - attach valid Certificates of Good Standing issued within the past 30 days - attach Proposed Order. (Text entry; no document attached.)
04/10/2024>>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice to RE-FILE Document No. [4007] MOTION for Timothy S. Kearns to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-29201011. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): expired Certificate of Good Standing from Supreme Court of Delaware and Supreme Court of DC;. Re-file the motion as a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice - attach the correct signed PDF - select the correct named filer/filers - attach valid Certificates of Good Standing issued within the past 30 days - attach Proposed Order. (Text entry; no document attached.)
400704/10/2024MOTION for Timothy S. Kearns to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-29201011. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Mayor and City Council of Baltimore.
3 Attachments ?
400604/09/2024LETTER MOTION for Conference Regarding Preliminary Approval of Exchange-Based Plaintiffs' Settlement with Remaining Defendants addressed to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald from David E. Kovel and Christopher Lovell dated April 9, 2024. Document filed by 303030 Trading LLC, 303030 Trading, LLC, Atlantic Trading USA, LLC, FTC Futures Fund PCC Ltd, FTC Futures Fund SICAV, Gary Francis, Gary Francis, Nathaniel Haynes, Metzler Investment GmbH. Filed In Associated Cases: 1:11-md-02262-NRB, 1:11-cv-02613-NRB.
5 Attachments ?
400504/05/2024STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF DEFENDANTS CITIBANK, N.A. AND CITIGROUP INC. PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41 (a)(1)(A)(i): IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between Plaintiffs in the above-captioned actions and Defendants Citibank, N.A. and Citigroup Inc. that all of Plaintiffs' respective claims against Defendants Citibank, N.A. and Citigroup Inc. only are hereby dismissed with prejudice from the actions City of Houston v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-05616; City of Richmond, et al. v. Bank of AmericaCorp., et al., No. 13-cv-00627; City of Riverside, et al. v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-00597; County of Mendocino v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-08644; County of Sacramento v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-05569; County of San Diego v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-00667; County of San Mateo, et al. v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-00625; County of Sonoma, et al. v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-05187; East Bay Municipal Utility District v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-00626; San Diego Association of Governments v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-05221; and The Regents of the University
400404/05/2024MEMO ENDORSED ORDER granting [4002] Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. ENDORSEMENT: Application granted. So ordered. Attorney Elizabeth A Cassady terminated. (Signed by Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald on 4/5/2024)
04/05/2024***NOTICE TO COURT REGARDING STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Document No. [4003] Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal was reviewed and referred to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald for approval for the following reason(s): the plaintiff(s) filed their voluntary dismissal and it did not dismiss all of the parties or the action in its entirety. (Text entry; no document attached.)
400304/04/2024STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice against the defendant(s) Citibank NA, Citigroup Inc, Citibank, N.A. and without costs pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Document filed by California Public Plaintiffs, City Of Houston, City of Richmond, City of Riverside, County of Mendocino, County of Sacramento, County of San Diego, County of San Mateo, County of Sonoma, East Bay Municipal Utility District, San Diego Association of Governments, San Mateo Couty Joint Powers Financing Authority, Successor Agency to the Richmond Community Redevelopment Agency, David Sundstrom, The Regents of the University of California, The Richmond Joint Powers Financing Authority, The Riverside Public Financing Authority. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers).Filed In Associated Cases: 1:11-md-02262-NRB et al.
400204/04/2024MOTION for Elizabeth A. Cassady to Withdraw as Attorney. Document filed by Portigon AG, WestDeutsche Immobilienbank AG.
400104/03/2024ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Counsel from NAOMI REICE BUCHWALD UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE dated 4/3/2024 re: The Court is in receipt of the Direct Action and OTC Plaintiffs' letter of April 2, 2024. ENDORSEMENT: Dear Counsel: The Court is in receipt of the Direct Action and OTC Plaintiffs' letter of April 2, 2024. See ECF No. 4000. Of course, the Court has no interest in interfering with counsels' continuing cooperative efforts as reflected in the existing scheduling order and its prior iteration. However, regardless of counsels' efforts inter se, the Court considers fact discovery closed as of April 4, 2024. Further, as the Court has repeatedly made crystal clear, there cannot and will not be any further adjournments of the class certification, summary judgment, and Daubert motions. Very truly yours, NAOMI REICE BUCHWALD, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE. (Signed by Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald on 4/3/2024)
400004/02/2024LETTER MOTION for Conference to request approval from the Court to take a limited number of depositions following the close of fact discovery on April 4, 2024 addressed to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald from James R. Martin and William Christopher Carmody dated 4/2/2024. Document filed by FDIC, as receiver, Federal Deposit Insurance, The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver, The Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation.
399903/27/2024NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jenny Chenying Gu on behalf of Portigon AG, Portigon AG f/k/a WestLB AG, Portigon/WestLB AG, WestDeutsche Immobilienbank AG, WestLB AG, WestLB AG (n/k/a Portigon AG), Westdeutsche ImmobilienBank AG (n/k/a Westdeutsche Immobilien Servicing AG). Filed In Associated Cases: 1:11-md-02262-NRB et al.
399803/27/2024NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Lisa C. Cohen on behalf of Portigon AG, Portigon AG f/k/a WestLB AG, Portigon/WestLB AG, WestDeutsche Immobilienbank AG, WestLB AG, WestLB AG (n/k/a Portigon AG), Westdeutsche ImmobilienBank AG (n/k/a Westdeutsche Immobilien Servicing AG). Filed In Associated Cases: 1:11-md-02262-NRB et al.
399703/27/2024NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Steven J. Fink on behalf of Portigon AG, Portigon AG f/k/a WestLB AG, Portigon/WestLB AG, WestDeutsche Immobilienbank AG, WestLB AG, WestLB AG (n/k/a Portigon AG), Westdeutsche ImmobilienBank AG (n/k/a Westdeutsche Immobilien Servicing AG). Filed In Associated Cases: 1:11-md-02262-NRB et al.
399603/15/2024NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41 (a)(1)(A)(i): PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiffs, by and through their undersigned attorneys, hereby dismiss all of their claims against Defendants Coperatieve Rabobank U.A. (f/k/a Coperatieve Centrale Raiffseisen-Boerenleenbank, B.A.) ("Rabobank"), HBOS plc ("HBOS"), Lloyds Banking Group plc ("Lloyds"), and PORTIGON AG (f/k/a WestLB AG) ("Portigon"), with prejudice from the actions City of Richmond, et al. v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv- 00627; City of Riverside, et al. v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-00597; County of Mendocino v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-08644; County of Sacramento v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-05569; County of San Diego v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-00667; County of San Mateo, et al. v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-00625; County of Sonoma, et al. v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-05187; East Bay Municipal Utility District v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-00626; San Diego Association of Governments v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-05221; and The Regents of the University of California v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-05186, without interest to any party and with each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs. For the avoidance of doubt, this notice of voluntary dismissal applies only to Rabobank, HBOS, Lloyds, and Portigon, and Plaintiffs are continuing to pursue claims against other Defendants in these actions. So ordered. Cooperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank B.A. (Rabobank), Cooperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank B.A. (Rabobank), Cooperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank B.A. (Rabobank), Cooperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank B.A. (Rabobank), Cooperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank B.A. (Rabobank), Cooperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank B.A. (Rabobank), Cooperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank BA (Rabobank), HBOS PLC, HBOS PLC, HBOS PLC, HBOS PLC, HBOS PLC, HBOS PLC (a United Kingdom Banking and Insurance Company), Lloyds Banking Group plc, Lloyds Banking Group plc, Lloyds Banking Group plc, Lloyds Banking Group plc, Lloyds Banking Group plc, Lloyds Banking Group plc (a United Kingdom Public Limited Company), Portigon AG, Portigon AG, Portigon AG (a German Joint Stock Company), Cooperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank B.A. (a Netherlands Financial Services Provider) and Cooperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank B.A. (Rabobank) terminated. (Signed by Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald on 3/15/2024)
399503/15/2024NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF THE NORINCHUKIN BANK PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i): PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiffs, by and through their undersigned attorneys, hereby dismiss all of their respective claims against Defendant The Norinchukin Bank with prejudice from the actions City of Richmond, et al. v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-00627; City of Riverside, et al. v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-00597; County of Mendocino v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-08644; County of Sacramento v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-05569; County of San Diego v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-00667; County of San Mateo, et al. v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-00625; County of Sonoma, et al. v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-05187; East Bay Municipal Utility District v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-00626; San Diego Association of Governments v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-05221; and The Regents of the University of California v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-05186, without interest to any party and with each party to bear its own attorneys fees and costs. For the avoidance of doubt, this notice of voluntary dismissal applies only to The Norinchukin Bank, and Plaintiffs are continuing to pursue claims against other Defendants in these actions. So ordered. The Norinchukin Bank, The Norinchukin Bank, The Norinchukin Bank, The Norinchukin Bank (a Japanese Bank), Norinchukin Bank and Norinchukin Bank terminated. (Signed by Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald on 3/15/2024)
399403/15/2024NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i): PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiff, by and through its undersigned attorneys, hereby dismisses all of its claims against Defendants Coperatieve Rabobank U.A. (f/k/a Coperatieve Centrale Raiffseisen-Boerenleenbank, B.A.) ("Rabobank"), HBOS plc ("HBOS"), Lloyds Banking Group plc ("Lloyds"), and PORTIGON AG (f/k/a WestLB AG) ("Portigon"), with prejudice from the action City of Houston v. Bank of America Corp., et al., 13-cv-05616-NRB (S.D.N.Y.) without interest to any party and with each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs. For the avoidance of doubt, this notice of voluntary dismissal applies only to Rabobank, HBOS, Lloyds, and Portigon, and Plaintiff is continuing to pursue claims against other Defendants in this action. So ordered. Cooperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank B.A. (Rabobank), HBOS PLC, Lloyds Banking Group plc, Portigon AG, Portigon AG, Portigon AG f/k/a WestLB AG, WestLB AG, WestLB AG (n/k/a Portigon AG), Cooperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen Boerenleenbank B.A. (n/k/a Cooperatieve Rabobank U.A.) and Cooperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank B.A. terminated. (Signed by Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald on 3/15/2024)
399303/15/2024NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF THE NORINCHUKIN BANK, PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i): PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiff, by and through its undersigned attorneys, hereby dismisses all of its claims against Defendant The Norinchukin Bank with prejudice from the action City of Houston v. Bank of America Corp., et al., 13-cv-05616-NRB (S.D.N.Y.) without interest to any party and with each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs. For the avoidance of doubt, this notice of voluntary dismissal applies only to The Norunchukin Bank, and Plaintiff is continuing to pursue claims against other Defendants in this action. So ordered. The Norinchukin Bank terminated. (Signed by Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald on 3/15/2024)
03/14/2024***NOTICE TO COURT REGARDING NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Document No. [3992] Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, was reviewed and referred to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald for approval for the following reason(s): the plaintiff(s) filed their voluntary dismissal and it did not dismiss all of the parties or the action in its entirety. (Text entry; no document attached.)
03/14/2024***NOTICE TO COURT REGARDING NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Document No. [3991] Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, was reviewed and referred to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald for approval for the following reason(s): the plaintiff(s) filed their voluntary dismissal and it did not dismiss all of the parties or the action in its entirety. (Text entry; no document attached.)
03/14/2024***NOTICE TO COURT REGARDING NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Document No. [3990] Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, was reviewed and referred to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald for approval for the following reason(s): the plaintiff(s) filed their voluntary dismissal and it did not dismiss all of the parties or the action in its entirety. (Text entry; no document attached.)
03/14/2024***NOTICE TO COURT REGARDING NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Document No. [3989] Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, was reviewed and referred to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald for approval for the following reason(s): the plaintiff(s) filed their voluntary dismissal and it did not dismiss all of the parties or the action in its entirety. (Text entry; no document attached.)
03/14/2024***NOTICE TO COURT REGARDING NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Document No. [3992] Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, was reviewed and referred to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald for approval for the following reason(s): the plaintiff(s) filed their voluntary dismissal and it did not dismiss all of the parties or the action in its entirety. (Text entry; no document attached.)
03/14/2024***NOTICE TO COURT REGARDING NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Document No. [3991] Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, was reviewed and referred to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald for approval for the following reason(s): the plaintiff(s) filed their voluntary dismissal and it did not dismiss all of the parties or the action in its entirety. (Text entry; no document attached.)
03/14/2024***NOTICE TO COURT REGARDING NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Document No. [3989] Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, was reviewed and referred to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald for approval for the following reason(s): the plaintiff(s) filed their voluntary dismissal and it did not dismiss all of the parties or the action in its entirety. (Text entry; no document attached.)
399203/13/2024NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice and without costs against the defendant(s) The Norinchukin Bank. Document filed by California Public Plaintiffs, City of Richmond, City of Riverside, County of Mendocino, County of Sacramento, County of San Diego, County of San Mateo, County of Sonoma, East Bay Municipal Utility District, San Diego Association of Governments, San Mateo Couty Joint Powers Financing Authority, Successor Agency to the Richmond Community Redevelopment Agency, David Sundstrom, The Regents of the University of California, The Richmond Joint Powers Financing Authority, The Riverside Public Financing Authority. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers). Filed In Associated Cases: 1:11-md-02262-NRB et al.
399103/13/2024NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice and without costs against the defendant(s) The Norinchukin Bank. Document filed by City Of Houston. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers). Filed In Associated Cases: 1:11-md-02262-NRB, 1:13-cv-05616-NRB.
399003/13/2024NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice and without costs against the defendant(s) Cooperative Centrale Raiffeisen-Boernleenbank B.A., HBOS plc, Lloyds Banking Group plc., Portigon AG. Document filed by California Public Plaintiffs, City of Richmond, City of Riverside, County of Mendocino, County of Sacramento, County of San Diego, County of San Mateo, County of Sonoma, East Bay Municipal Utility District, San Diego Association of Governments, San Mateo Couty Joint Powers Financing Authority, Successor Agency to the Richmond Community Redevelopment Agency, David Sundstrom, The Regents of the University of California, The Richmond Joint Powers Financing Authority, The Riverside Public Financing Authority. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers). Filed In Associated Cases: 1:11-md-02262-NRB et al.
398903/13/2024NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice and without costs against the defendant(s) Cooperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank B.A., HBOS plc, Lloyds Banking Group plc, Portigon AG f/k/a WestLB AG. Document filed by City Of Houston. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers). Filed In Associated Cases: 1:11-md-02262-NRB, 1:13-cv-05616-NRB.
398803/06/2024NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF SOCIETE GENERALE PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i): PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1) (A)(i), Plaintiff, by and through its undersigned attorneys, hereby dismisses all of its claims against Defendant Socit Gnrale ("SocGen") with prejudice from the action City of Houston v. Bank of America Corp., et al., 13-cv-05616-NRB (S.D.N.Y.) without interest to any party and with each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs. For the avoidance of doubt, this notice of voluntary dismissal applies only to SocGen, and Plaintiff is continuing to pursue claims against other Defendants in this action. So ordered. Societe Generale, S.A. terminated. (Signed by Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald on 3/6/2024)
398703/06/2024NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF MUFG BANK, LTD., F/K/A THE BANK OF TOKYO-MITSUBISHI UFJ, LTD., PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i): PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1) (A)(i), Plaintiff, by and through its undersigned attorneys, hereby dismisses all of its claims against Defendant MUFG Bank, Ltd., f/k/a The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd. ("MUFG"), with prejudice from the action City of Houston v. Bank of America Corp., et al., 13-cv-05616-NRB (S.D.N.Y.) without interest to any party and with each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs. For the avoidance of doubt, this notice of voluntary dismissal applies only to MUFG, and Plaintiff is continuing to pursue claims against other Defendants in this action. So ordered. Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd. terminated. (Signed by Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald on 3/6/2024)
398603/06/2024NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF MUFG BANK, LTD., F/K/A THE BANK OF TOKYO-MITSUBISHI UFJ, LTD., PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i): PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiffs, by and through their undersigned attorneys, hereby dismiss all of their claims against Defendant MUFG Bank, Ltd., f/k/a The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd. ("MUFG"), with prejudice from the actions City of Richmond, et al. v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-00627; City of Riverside, et al. v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-00597; County of Mendocino v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-08644; County of Sacramento v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-05569; County of San Diego v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-00667; County of San Mateo, et al. v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-00625; County of Sonoma, et al. v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-05187; East Bay Municipal Utility District v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-00626; San Diego Association of Governments v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-05221; and The Regents of the University of California v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-05186, without interest to any party and with each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs. For the avoidance of doubt, this notice of voluntary dismissal applies only to MUFG, and Plaintiffs are continuing to pursue claims against other Defendants in these actions. So ordered. Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd., Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd., Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd., Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd., Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd. (a Japanese Company), Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd and Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd. terminated. (Signed by Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald on 3/6/2024)
398503/06/2024NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF SOCIETE GENERALE PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i): PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiffs, by and through their undersigned attorneys, hereby dismiss all of their respective claims against Defendant Socit Gnrale ("SocGen") with prejudice from the actions City of Richmond, et al. v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-00627; City of Riverside, et al. v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-00597; County of Mendocino v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-08644; County of Sacramento v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-05569; County of San Diego v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-00667; County of San Mateo, et al. v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-00625; County of Sonoma, et al. v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-05187; East Bay Municipal Utility District v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-00626; San Diego Association of Governments v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-05221; and The Regents of the University of California v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-05186, without interest to any party and with each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs. For the avoidance of doubt, this notice of voluntary dismissal applies only to SocGen, and Plaintiffs are continuing to pursue claims against other Defendants in these actions. So ordered. (Signed by Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald on 3/6/2024)
03/05/2024***NOTICE TO COURT REGARDING NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Document No. (346 in 1:13-cv-05616-NRB, 3984 in 1:11-md-02262-NRB) Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, was reviewed and referred to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald for approval for the following reason(s): the plaintiff(s) filed their voluntary dismissal and it did not dismiss all of the parties or the action in its entirety. Filed In Associated Cases: 1:11-md-02262-NRB, 1:13-cv-05616-NRB. (Text entry; no document attached.)
03/05/2024***NOTICE TO COURT REGARDING NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Document No. (3983 in 1:11-md-02262-NRB, 345 in 1:13-cv-05616-NRB) Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, was reviewed and referred to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald for approval for the following reason(s): the plaintiff(s) filed their voluntary dismissal and it did not dismiss all of the parties or the action in its entirety. Filed In Associated Cases: 1:11-md-02262-NRB, 1:13-cv-05616-NRB. (Text entry; no document attached.)
03/05/2024***NOTICE TO COURT REGARDING NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Document No. (314 in 1:13-cv-08644-NRB, 351 in 1:13-cv-00626-NRB, 337 in 1:13-cv-05186-NRB, 3982 in 1:11-md-02262-NRB) Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, was reviewed and referred to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald for approval for the following reason(s): the plaintiff(s) filed their voluntary dismissal and it did not dismiss all of the parties or the action in its entirety. Filed In Associated Cases: 1:11-md-02262-NRB, 1:13-cv-00626-NRB, 1:13-cv-05186-NRB, 1:13-cv-08644-NRB. (Text entry; no document attached.)
03/05/2024***NOTICE TO COURT REGARDING NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Document No. (346 in 1:13-cv-05616-NRB, 3984 in 1:11-md-02262-NRB) Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, was reviewed and referred to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald for approval for the following reason(s): the plaintiff(s) filed their voluntary dismissal and it did not dismiss all of the parties or the action in its entirety. Filed In Associated Cases: 1:11-md-02262-NRB, 1:13-cv-05616-NRB. (Text entry; no document attached.)
03/05/2024***NOTICE TO COURT REGARDING NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Document No. (314 in 1:13-cv-08644-NRB, 351 in 1:13-cv-00626-NRB, 337 in 1:13-cv-05186-NRB, 3982 in 1:11-md-02262-NRB) Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, was reviewed and referred to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald for approval for the following reason(s): the plaintiff(s) filed their voluntary dismissal and it did not dismiss all of the parties or the action in its entirety. Filed In Associated Cases: 1:11-md-02262-NRB, 1:13-cv-00626-NRB, 1:13-cv-05186-NRB, 1:13-cv-08644-NRB. (Text entry; no document attached.)
03/05/2024***NOTICE TO COURT REGARDING NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Document No. (3983 in 1:11-md-02262-NRB, 345 in 1:13-cv-05616-NRB) Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, was reviewed and referred to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald for approval for the following reason(s): the plaintiff(s) filed their voluntary dismissal and it did not dismiss all of the parties or the action in its entirety. Filed In Associated Cases: 1:11-md-02262-NRB, 1:13-cv-05616-NRB. (Text entry; no document attached.)
03/05/2024***NOTICE TO COURT REGARDING NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Document No. (314 in 1:13-cv-08644-NRB, 351 in 1:13-cv-00626-NRB, 337 in 1:13-cv-05186-NRB, 3982 in 1:11-md-02262-NRB) Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, was reviewed and referred to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald for approval for the following reason(s): the plaintiff(s) filed their voluntary dismissal and it did not dismiss all of the parties or the action in its entirety. Filed In Associated Cases: 1:11-md-02262-NRB, 1:13-cv-00626-NRB, 1:13-cv-05186-NRB, 1:13-cv-08644-NRB. (Text entry; no document attached.)
03/05/2024***NOTICE TO COURT REGARDING NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Document No. (313 in 1:13-cv-08644-NRB, 351 in 1:13-cv-00625-NRB, 351 in 1:13-cv-00667-NRB, 335 in 1:13-cv-05569-NRB, 3981 in 1:11-md-02262-NRB, 336 in 1:13-cv-05186-NRB, 350 in 1:13-cv-00626-NRB, 335 in 1:13-cv-05221-NRB, 341 in 1:13-cv-05187-NRB, 352 in 1:13-cv-00597-NRB, 350 in 1:13-cv-00627-NRB) Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, was reviewed and referred to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald for approval for the following reason(s): the plaintiff(s) filed their voluntary dismissal and it did not dismiss all of the parties or the action in its entirety. Filed In Associated Cases: 1:11-md-02262-NRB et al. (Text entry; no document attached.)
398403/04/2024NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice and without costs against the defendant(s) Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd. Document filed by City Of Houston. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers). Filed In Associated Cases: 1:11-md-02262-NRB, 1:13-cv-05616-NRB.
398303/04/2024NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice and without costs against the defendant(s) Societe Generale S.A. Document filed by City Of Houston. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers). Filed In Associated Cases: 1:11-md-02262-NRB, 1:13-cv-05616-NRB.
398203/04/2024NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice and without costs against the defendant(s) Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd. Document filed by California Public Plaintiffs, City of Richmond, City of Riverside, County of Mendocino, County of Sacramento, County of San Diego, County of San Mateo, County of Sonoma, East Bay Municipal Utility District, San Diego Association of Governments, San Mateo Couty Joint Powers Financing Authority, Successor Agency to the Richmond Community Redevelopment Agency, David Sundstrom, The Regents of the University of California, The Richmond Joint Powers Financing Authority, The Riverside Public Financing Authority. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers). Filed In Associated Cases: 1:11-md-02262-NRB et al.
398103/04/2024NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice and without costs against the defendant(s) Societe Generale. Document filed by California Public Plaintiffs, City of Richmond, City of Riverside, County of Mendocino, County of Sacramento, County of San Diego, County of San Mateo, County of Sonoma, East Bay Municipal Utility District, San Diego Association of Governments, San Mateo Couty Joint Powers Financing Authority, Successor Agency to the Richmond Community Redevelopment Agency, The Regents of the University of California, The Richmond Joint Powers Financing Authority, The Riverside Public Financing Authority. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers). Filed In Associated Cases: 1:11-md-02262-NRB et al.
398002/29/2024LETTER addressed to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald from Henninger S. Bullock dated February 29, 2024 re: [3976] Pre-Motion Letter. Document filed by Societe Generale.
397902/28/2024ORDER granting [3973] Motion for Anna Porter to Appear Pro Hac Vice. (Signed by Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald on 2/28/2024)
397802/28/2024ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE granting [3977] Motion for Nicholas Murphy to Appear Pro Hac Vice. (Signed by Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald on 2/28/2024)
02/27/2024>>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. [3977] MOTION for Nicholas Murphy to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-29001204. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (Text entry; no document attached.)
02/27/2024>>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. [3977] MOTION for Nicholas Murphy to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-29001204. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (Text entry; no document attached.)
397702/27/2024MOTION for Nicholas Murphy to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-29001204. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Mayor and City Council of Baltimore.
3 Attachments ?
397602/26/2024LETTER MOTION for Conference addressed to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald from Henninger S. Bullock dated February 26, 2024. Document filed by Societe Generale.
1 Attachment ?
397502/23/2024NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF SOCIETE GENERALE PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i): PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 (a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiffs, by and through their undersigned attorneys, hereby dismisses all of their claims against Defendant Societe Generale ("SocGen") with prejudice from the action Triaxx Prime CDO 2006-1 Ltd. et al. v. Bank of America Corp. et al., 14-cv-00146-NRB (S.D.N.Y.), without interest to any party and with each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs. For the avoidance of doubt, this notice of voluntary dismissal applies only to SocGen, and Plaintiffs are continuing to pursue claims against other Defendants in this action. So ordered. Societe Generale, S.A., Societe Generale S.A. and Societe Generale S.A. terminated. (Signed by Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald on 2/23/2024)
123456789?

kool-aid 50% off do miss it...lol

I received detail information it's April 28th will get good deal

Sorry ..try again that number need to go way down

why the forever 75/25 Regardless of who is right and who is wrong nobody can change or Affect The outcome Correct?No need for negative energy & jinx it. if you trust in God leave it to God and have peace

Keep up the average work lol

The good thing about lodas he keeps my hopes alive that there is some money 💰 no
One waste years 24/7to prove there's nothing thank you loads 🙏

I understand that the ones who believe anywhere from %1 to%100 that we will get something will keep on posting here iam at %10 to %15 but who believe in 0% possibilities should move on ..would you think of course everyone free .but for the logical reasons.!!!!

I signed . I have over 423000 Common shares yes we all have some hopes from 1% up to 100%
as time passing by my hopes under 10%

For bucket one and bucket 2 Can you elaborate If this bucket's with or without mop

How about we get Profesional opinion what I mean by that someone who can confirm or deny AZ expectations

IF YOU GOT YOURSELF TO HAVE PEACE AND
ACCEPTANCE WITH WHATEVER THE OUTCOME DISTRIBUTION COMING TO P. U. AND K ..(please do) we will see the light at the end of the tunnel

Every time I Google the (xxxx) to see if I can find what's all about it took me to some funny website until I realized I put xxx instead of xxxx lol

The answer is in code (xxxx ) but I will never tell you what is that code is. that way you will never prove iam wrong lol

No one will tell you the xxxx because it's huge top secret that make earthquake in the financial and real world seriously, get a life

Agreed

Just to be fair xxxx .coop is the tell & know what you own it's steps towards the big revealing of the abracadabra lol

xxxx=wamu

Sound like we need DNA test.

Big news I got paid ?? ?? ?? ??

If my/your friends happened to be the ones who handle know and control payments. wouldn't you ask them if any money coming in if yes when and how much? I know I will do

Understood I am just trying right to make sense of what's going on here. someone got paid and the rest was left behind?just Because they don't have connections?? seriously?

for THEM (the equity) to GO AFTER LATER ..is that mean we have to go after it. do we have to SUBMIT A CLAIM? like he claimed he did???

AZ is a good man he did help many of us for many years by sharing his DD and responding to many questions. with so much going on and nothing came.I was a critic .harsh sarcastic. either way money coming or not I want to say sincerely IAM SORRY

If that's correct so I'm sure all of us can take the same steps to achieve the same result which get whatever money assigned to us And it should not be any difficult right??

I do not think he meant that he received the money I think he just got account ready to receive A potential money in it But again with all the respect many people get lost btween wishful thinking and vague of expression

we can save some time get a headstart and let your skepticism go way up to the roof now

I think We will get paid in January 2023 but if not by 2025 then for sure by 2041 We will be singing the blues

Wow that's Very encouraging I have td ameritrade too and the only thing I notice the big fat zero...

quote. not a single Piep has come out and there goes my Anger to the Escrow Holders not uniting to least make a petition, ..any slightest suggestions in that direction even mention anyone involved ( expects us, old shareholder), without saying thanks and giving them praises & admiration will draw immediate attack and anger from specific posters and as always it's coming tomorrow never ever today even they gave us or themselves until 2042...

If we can get some government /personal officials who can confirm or validate any or some of these Scenarios that been talked about ..or at least acknowledge that we are not done yet.. or confirm that we are DONE. So every one can have peace and move on. for years &years some posters keep posting the same thing ( Distribution is eminent) by the end of the month, year and now 2041 seriously....

You forgot to mention a Very crucial point ...you have 195000 shares..lodas

Does anyone notice that the((( shorts ))can cover and get an easy way out when amc shares become half price after we get the new shares ???? is that what adam aron doing?? IAM not sure anyone??

That was my original thought. Until some posters try to connect coop with escrow so will wait and see

I decided to be positive about the escrow and to prove it to my escrow fellowship I I I reserve my Lamborghini 800 horsepower year model 2041. Hhhhhh

Is there anyway that we can find out why the hold up?

For the group of yes sayers let's try new thing try to answer the question of tomorrow now (why we did not get paid?

I think bk shadow was the honest poster that many people didn't like including me. honest people not necessarily tell what you want to hear while some keep lead you on nowhere....

Can we just seek professional answer From professional law firm that can tell us what to expect or not expect Just for the right to know? without any farther action