Buy PM's
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Yes Serious Typo. WALLER NOT WITH ACS
Not just that Project, Everything is Moving along like a well oiled Machine on Most Fronts. PPS will Follow.
Yeah Z - FIDO, & CYGATE Heads Up
FIDO - I had PM someone on this board about FIDO before in December about FIDO as I was worried about NOK NOK Labs (founder of FIDO) using MFA.
Ended up writing Kay and got a reply, then about a month or 2 later on the SFOR website were the words, "FIDO Coming Soon" nothing since then though.
The 3 levels of members :
Board, Sponcers and Associate.
And as of yet, do not see ACS or SFOR Listed.
https://fidoalliance.org/participate/members/
Although seeing Waller a founder of SFOR as Executive VP of ACS was different and somewhat of a surprise to see in blazen on the Slide.
T-21 days and Counting to the webinar.
At least CyGate is no longer just coming (grin)
Re:"SFOR not eligible for govt computers since 2010."
SFOR is eligible through their DOD Distibutor Alvarez.
First you're misquoting me
"First you say "they have found a distributor in the DoD since 2011"."
No I said "For" not "in" the DoD.
Their status is inactive as they have found a distributor for the DoD since 2011.
"But you want me to believe that "alvarez" is the distributor of SFOR products to the DOD. Yet there has been no announcement of this, or money, or contracts, or anything other than what you post for that matter. Can you show me something, anything that says "were selling SFOR products to the DOD for X amount" "
If a Contract comes in they have a DoD GSA Distributor for their products.
"THEY STILL HAVE TO MEET MANUFACTURER REQUIREMENTS"
Who is saying they Don't meet Manufacture Require Requirements ? You ??? Or GSA
This sounds like the tired old augment that SFOR does not meet Banks FFEIC Critera.
"Then you say Do you know how easy it is to reactivate.
Well, which is is, do they need an active sam or not.... I know.. They do, because the instructions on how to do business with the govt SAY SO."
Yes an Alvarez has an active DoD SAM,
Well theirs has been expired 6 years now, so Mark Kay is taking his sweet time. Thanks for pointing this out, this really stands out as a "red flag" IMO.
It's not expired. Expired and inactive are two different things.
And the SAM Account word would be deactivate, not expired.
Go play changing of peoples words Stated and twisting of words games some place else.
Perfect answer
In the future we can tell say, Just go look it up.
YeaH your right
Like Intel or McAffee..
George has been Doing Videos for ACS awhile,
It always made since to me, he might be working for ACS too.
Yes and Rreverse Merger was my first thought, but then that would just be Speculation. But food for thought.
Usally quicker to just ask Google.
Why ask people to post the answer ?
Lucky Mr._Drifter is nice
I did it yesterday too for him.
He just keeps up with the same BS.
Thanks.....
Re: SFOR doesn't have active registration
Re: "Did you license this photograph?"
No, it made one hell of a Point
Yea, I think so Jtech.
We all know Bo owns ACS, we know that "CJ" is the President and CEO.
Do we know the rest of Management within ACS ?
By the way Jtech, I'm not sure if I said thank you for sharing that email or not ???
That in my opinion was Gigantic Confirmed piece of Information.
The webinar was the best we've heard both are at least equal in Value.
I know there's more out there on the Webinar, I just can't bring myself to write the various sources as I would hate to see people getting email from a few or more StrikeForce shareholders.
Writing Washington is a different story.
This post yesterday got no Replies ?
The premise of the Picture was to say, I was Blown Away by what I found.
Zzzzzzzz Now I'm asleep at the wheel.
Time for dinner.
5.1.3. Out-of-Band Devices
authenticator An out-of-band authenticator is a physical device that is uniquely addressable and can communicate securely with the verifier over a distinct communications channel, referred to as the secondary channel. The device is possessed and controlled by the claimant and supports private communication over this secondary channel that is separate from the primary channel for e-authentication. The out-of-band authenticator can operate in one of the following ways:
- The claimant transfers a secret received by the out-of-band device via the secondary channel to the verifier using the primary channel. For example, the claimant may receive the secret on their mobile device and type it (typically a 6-digit code) into their authentication session.
- The claimant transfers a secret received via the primary channel to the out-of-band device for transmission to the verifier via the secondary channel. For example, the claimant may view the secret on their authentication session and either type it into an app on their mobile device or use a technology such as a barcode or QR code to effect the transfer.
- The claimant compares secrets received from the primary channel and the secondary channel and confirms the authentication via the secondary channel.
The purpose of the secret is to securely bind the authentication operation on the primary and secondary channel. When the response is via the primary communication channel, the secret also establishes the claimant's control of the out-of-band device.
5.1.3.1. Out-of-Band Authenticators
The out-of-band authenticator SHALL establish a separate channel with the verifier in order to retrieve the out-of-band secret or authentication request. This channel is considered to be out-of-band with respect to the primary communication channel, even if it terminates on the same device, provided the device does not leak information from one to the other without the authorization of the claimant.
The out-of-band device SHOULD be uniquely addressable and communication over the secondary channel SHALL be private. Methods that do not prove possession of a specific device, such as voice-over-IP (VOIP) or email, SHALL NOT be used for out-of-band authentication.
The out-of-band authenticator SHALL uniquely authenticate itself in one of the following ways in communicating with the verifier:
Establish an authenticated protected channel to the verifier using approved cryptography. The key used SHALL be stored in the most secure storage available on the device (e.g., keychain storage, trusted platform module, trusted execution environment).
Authenticate to a public mobile telephone network using a SIM card or equivalent that uniquely identifies the device. This method SHALL only be used if a secret is being sent from the verifier to the out-of-band device via the telephone network (SMS or voice).
If a secret is sent by the verifier to the out-of-band device, the device SHOULD NOT display the authentication secret on a device while it is locked by the owner (i.e., requires an entry of a PIN, passcode, or biometric). However, authenticators SHOULD indicate the receipt of an authentication secret on a locked device.
If the out-of-band authenticator sends an approval message over the secondary communication channel (rather than by the claimant transferring a received secret to the primary communication channel), it SHALL do one of the following:
The authenticator SHALL accept transfer of the secret from the primary channel which it SHALL send to the verifier over the secondary channel to associate the approval with the authentication transaction. The claimant MAY perform the transfer manually or use a technology such as a barcode or QR code to effect the transfer.
The authenticator SHALL present a secret received via the secondary channel from the verifier and prompt the claimant to verify the consistency of that secret with the primary channel, prior to accepting a yes/no response from the claimant. It SHALL then send that response to the verifier.
5.1.3.2. Out-of-Band Verifiers
If out-of-band verification is to be made using the public switched telephone network (PSTN), the verifier SHALL verify that the pre-registered telephone number being used is associated with a physical device. Changing the pre-registered telephone number SHALL NOT be possible without two-factor authentication at the time of the change. Verifiers SHALL use known and verifiable routes to deliver the secret, for example, by using Class 2 SMS. Verifiers SHOULD be aware of indicators such as device swap, SIM change, number porting, or other abnormal behavior before using the PSTN to deliver an out-of-band authentication secret.
Note: Out-of-band authentication using the PSTN (SMS or voice) is discouraged and is being considered for removal in future editions of this guideline.
If out-of-band verification is to be made using a secure application, such as on a smart phone, the verifier MAY send a push notification to that device. The verifier then waits for the establishment of an authenticated protected channel and verifies the authenticator’s identifying key. The verifier SHALL NOT store the identifying key itself, but SHALL use a verification method such as use of an approved hash function or proof of possession of the identifying key to uniquely identify the authenticator. Once authenticated, the verifier transmits the authentication secret to the authenticator.
Depending on the type of out-of-band authenticator, one of the following SHALL take place:
Transfer of secret to primary channel - The verifier MAY signal the device containing the subscriber’s authenticator to indicate readiness to authenticate. It SHALL then transmit a random secret to the out-of-band authenticator. The verifier SHALL then wait for the secret to be returned on the primary communication channel.
Transfer of secret to secondary channel - The verifier SHALL display a random authentication secret to the claimant via the primary channel. It SHALL then wait for the secret to be returned on the secondary channel from the claimant’s out-of-band authenticator.
Verification of secrets by claimant - The verifier SHALL display a random authentication secret to the claimant via the primary channel, and SHALL send the same secret to the out-of-band authenticator via the secondary channel for presentation to the claimant. It SHALL then wait for an approval (or disapproval) message via the secondary channel.
In all cases, the authentication SHALL be considered invalid if not completed within 5 minutes. In order to provide replay resistance as described in Section 5.2.7, verifiers SHALL accept a given authentication secret only once during the validity period.
The verifier SHALL generate random authentication secrets with at least 20 bits of entropy using an approved random bit generator. If the authentication secret has less than 64 bits of entropy, the verifier SHALL implement a throttling mechanism that effectively limits the number of failed authentication attempts an attacker can make on the subscriber’s account as described in Section 5.2.2.
Re: "chance that no settlements materialize."
There are 7 Lawsuits Currently.
I like to play the odds on Craps, The easiest # to Roll is 7.
Markman hearing from the PhoneFactor case was Completed.
After PhoneFactor could not stall any longer on presenting it's Discovery Documents. PhoneFactor finally stated it does not have the Documents. They are in Microsoft's possession.
SFOR File patent Lawsuit on Microsoft. Microsoft Settled in minimum time. Why ? Read on.......
_______________________
Back when PhoneFactor would not turnover Discovery Documents, stating they belonged to Microsoft and then SFOR sued Microsoft.
Some choice wording was used in the Docket Snipits Below.
As I've stated before Microsoft Settled quickly, because it was already rolling out its MS Azure Multifactor Authenticaton Service.
As it was Ready for the World.
I'm sure Microsoft was saying, Can't Live, If Living is Without You !
This was a Huge push in making MFA the Defacto Standard.
Again I state, SFOR got more out of Microsoft than Just a $9.7M Settlement. By Filing a Patent Lawsuit against MFST, SFOR gained far more than a mire $9.7M, it gained World Wide Acceptance of MFA in 120 Countries.
So again, when you hear Mark Kay or Craig "CJ" Brunet President and COO of ACS say " If you are at authenticating utilizing Microsoft Azure, that's us.
You know it's true by reading the Docket Snipits Below, whether SFOR gets any Royalties or not. SFOR got far more than Royaliies out of the Deal , they became the World Wide Defacto Standard.
And You Can't Put a Price Tag on That !
StrikeForce states Microsoft participated in early, unsuccessful, settlement discussionswhich included claims against Microsoft in addition to those asserted against PhoneFactor.20 Lastly, StrikeForce avers in-house counsel for Microsoft attended the Markman hearing held in November 2014.21 Accordingly, StrikeForce insists Microsoft cannot claim prejudice and that the amendments are not the product of bad faith or
undue delay and should be granted.22
________________________________________________
StrikeForce believed Microsoft infringed its '599 patent months before
filing its initial complaint in this matter. On October 10, 2012, StrikeForce's CEO, Mark Kay, sent a letter to Microsoft's CEO "giving him actual of the '599 patent."34
In a January 30, 2013 email, CEO Kay wrote: "Microsoft is now one of our largest infringers and growing in use since they acquired Phone Factor."35
On March 4, 2013, Microsoftannounced "our new phone based two factor authentication" for administrators ofWindows Azure Active Directory.36
________________________________________________
On September 26, 2013, Microsoft announced the "General Availability of Windows Azure Multi-Factor Authentication."38 On October 9, 2013, Microsoft announced its work over the past year "getting the Azure Multi-Factor Authentication service ready for the world" and reporting that since the announcement of "the general availability of Windows Azure Multi-Factor Authentication ..we've seen a LOT of interest in this service and have even closed several large enterprise deals .
Well Guess what, Now so has SFOR/ACS. Just Read the email from ACS below:
Don't forget First Data uses Out-of-Band Authentication
And First Data Corp's Chairman & CEO
In April 2013, First Data's Board of Directors announced that former JPMorgan Chase Co-COO Frank Bisignano had been named Chief Executive Officer of the company. In March 2014, Bisignano assumed the role of Chairman.[31] Upon taking office, Bisignano launched an equity ownership plan for all 24,000 of First Data owner-associates.
ACS President and COO:
" Additionally, as a security tool, some of our clients have are under non-disclosure. That said, BLACKROCK, AON, BANK OF AMERICA MERCHANT SERVICES and FIRST DATA CORP Represents the Largest Clients as well as have done extensive due diligence
First Data has a global footprint of 6 million merchants, the largest in the payments industry. The company handles 45% of all US credit and debit transactions, including handling prepaid gift card processing for many US brands such as Starbucks. It processes over $1 trillion in card transactions annually, with an 80% market share in gas and groceries.
SAM - StrikeForce
Do you know how easy it is to reactivate an inactive Acct. in Sam ?
Login and in a few clicks you are reactivated.
In inactive status you still maintain your DUNS # and Cage Code.
Meanwhile Alvarez has a DUNS # and 2 Cage Codes.
I've explained the SFOR Business Model to you before.
If you want to continue this same old line, then contact Kay and ask him how they would Proceed on a DOD Contract.
If you receive a different answer other than StrikeForce's Distributor Alvarez, please let us know.
Otherwise, end of discussion on the Topic.
Alvarez LLC is a proud distributor of StrikeForce Technologies—the most unique, and perhaps the best, keyboard encryption solution currently available. Organizations can now protect valuable information from the most common form of data theft in the market today—keyloggers.
https://www.alvarezit.com/what-we-do/strikeforce
noun
1.a person or thing that distributes.
2.Commerce.
a person, firm, etc., engaged in the general distribution or marketing of some article or class of goods.
a wholesaler who has exclusive rights to market, within a given territory, the goods of a manufacturer or company.
Yep, something for you to think about.
One Might as well make a Bet with
the Tooth Fairy, one would stand about the same chance of getting paid for a winning Bet.
For a Company that has Few PR's
Almost never a week goes by without finding something that just makes me want to Go What, something else to knock my socks off !
Like Jtech's email from ACS last week, Hello !
Damn it's only Monday, and before the Market opened, and I go What !
If SFOR and ACS has not done it again. Man the stuff you find by accident while snooping around.
I should have guessed.
To those who keep saying,"What Shorts"
http://www.venturecapnews.com/vcn/3-technology-companies-helping-not-wannacry/
Newer write up on StrikeForce.
Although not dated, it is from April/May I believe this was put out in the last week.
It's newish as it mentions Push in ProductID.
Although I especially liked the last sentence.
http://www.insightssuccess.com/strikeforce-technologies-start-computing-securely-today/
Honest Answer
Speaking of "Black & White"
Back when PhoneFactor would not turnover Discovery Documents, stating they belonged to Microsoft and then SFOR sued Microsoft.
Some choice wording was used in the Docket Snipits Below.
As I've stated before Microsoft Settled quickly, because it was already rolling out its MS Azure Multifactor Authenticaton Service.
As it was Ready for the World.
I'm sure Microsoft was saying, Can't Live, If Living is Without You !
This was a Huge push in making MFA the Defacto Standard.
Again I state, SFOR got more out of Microsoft than Just a $9.7M Settlement. By Filing a Patent Lawsuit against MFST, SFOR gained far more than a mire $9.7M, it gained World Wide Acceptance of MFA in 120 Countries.
So again, when you hear Mark Kay or Craig "CJ" Brunet President and COO of ACS say " If you are at authenticating utilizing Microsoft Azure, that's us.
You know it's true by reading the Docket Snipits Below, whether SFOR gets any Royalties or not. SFOR got far more than Royaliies out of the Deal , they became the World Wide Defacto Standard.
And You Can't Put a Price Tag on That !
StrikeForce states Microsoft participated in early, unsuccessful, settlement discussionswhich included claims against Microsoft in addition to those asserted against PhoneFactor.20 Lastly, StrikeForce avers in-house counsel for Microsoft attended the Markman hearing held in November 2014.21 Accordingly, StrikeForce insists Microsoft cannot claim prejudice and that the amendments are not the product of bad faith or
undue delay and should be granted.22
________________________________________________
StrikeForce believed Microsoft infringed its '599 patent months before
filing its initial complaint in this matter. On October 10, 2012, StrikeForce's CEO, Mark Kay, sent a letter to Microsoft's CEO "giving him actual of the '599 patent."34
In a January 30, 2013 email, CEO Kay wrote: "Microsoft is now one of our largest infringers and growing in use since they acquired Phone Factor."35
On March 4, 2013, Microsoftannounced "our new phone based two factor authentication" for administrators ofWindows Azure Active Directory.36
________________________________________________
On September 26, 2013, Microsoft announced the "General Availability of Windows Azure Multi-Factor Authentication."38 On October 9, 2013, Microsoft announced its work over the past year "getting the Azure Multi-Factor Authentication service ready for the world" and reporting that since the announcement of "the general availability of Windows Azure Multi-Factor Authentication ..we've seen a LOT of interest in this service and have even closed several large enterprise deals .
Well Guess what, Now so has SFOR/ACS. Just Read the email from ACS below:
How to take something obscure at one point, and then suddenly make the whole world stand up and take notice.
Microsoft was the First to say it, Now the Whole World is Screaming for it, in a Pure Voice Just Like Harry.
MFA, What a Lady !
KS - Yep 2.3B shares worth.
Company was hurting for cash back then, it's been around 20 years, waiting for Cyber Security to hit the Front Pages.
The Mountian finally came to Mohamd.
Everything turned around after the Microsoft Settlement early last year.
Everything huge began happening about the time I made this Video.
Forget the Dragon, that's an inside joke, the rest Might be helpful.
If it's still available.
Best of luck
What we're you saying ?
Yes I can see.
And I'm out here on Cocoa Beach and I have the Beach all to myself, not a Person here.
Just click on
ZPaul's name and read his posts today.
If you want to see all the BS refuted today, read mine.
Z presented some excellent links today.
Re:R&G__Old news does not mean Jack.
Re: "all those deals, and no money". Met Jack?
Didn't think so.
Let' just say the Money will come rolling in by the 2nd Half of 2017 as stated by Mark Kay.
[color=red]I'll go by the CEO that knows the Inside Scoop, not someone who does not know Jack about what's going on behind the Scenes.
9 tech companies that came back from the dead to become wildly successful
Growing tried of hearing the same old arguements, that just never seem to happen, when they are reduced to utter Nonsense by statements and Actions by SFOR.
Q4 2016 - Major Major Deal Major Major Players Coming.
Q1 2017 - Major Major Deals with Major Major Players can be seen on their ( Intel & McAffee ) repective Websites with ACS.
Major Major Deals with Major Major Players stated as ACS's Largest Customers in the ACS Email, by the President and COO of ACS.
Q4 2016 - TV Shopping Store Coming,
Begining Q2 2017 - HSN happened.
Since the above happened as stated it would, I don't not expect it to be any Different than Mark Kay has Stated below:
Q2 2017 Interview Quotes by Mark Kay,
"we expect some tremendous very very sizable revenues"
"we are starting to CLOSE some deals we see as the key deals we talked about"
"by the second half will be seeing some sizable numbers that I think will be quite remarkable"
"we're starting to see a lot more retail sales getting done, so we're starting to see a real push out in the retail space"
"We're actually at a point now where were right this minute where we have some very strong sales in front of us, these are some of the big sales we've been working on quite a while now"
"the retail space we do manage and spend a lot of time on and starting to see some major steps getting done."
"But definitely the sales are developing, some large numbers out there that we are getting done we're getting involved in more discussions and we should start seeing again the second half of this year as very very sizable, at least that's what we see now and hope, we'll see what transpire"
"until the second half when we do see some I think big numbers hitting us and if we see some of the numbers we expect to see by the end of the year I think we should start seeing some major upscale, I can't saw how the market works, I can't say what people should do but we have a lot more shareholders out there now we deal with them constantly, and definitely they should hold on
We're up for a very very, very positive ride. "
No Pump - Just Facts.
Re: "Struggling" Now that's Funny !
Struggling ? P&D ??
Should be working the Comedy Club Scene.
Q4 2016 - Major Major Deal Major Major Players Coming.
Q1 2017 - Major Major Deals with Major Major Players can be seen on their ( Intel & McAffee ) repective Websites with ACS.
Q4 2016 - TV Shopping Store Coming,
Begining Q2 2017 - HSN happened.
Q2 2017 Interview Quotes by Mark Kay, I don't not expect to be any Different than he has Stated.
"it's really going to be the 2nd half of this year where we expect some tremendous very very sizable revenues we are starting to CLOSE some deals we see as the key deals we talked about most of last year and of course we don't have a say when Companies want to do these deals, Now they are doing them and we will see the revenues hitting our books probably by the 2nd half of this year, it takes about 3 months for them to come to us, we are getting them done through the channel Partners their closing some major deals were involved in some big players that I can't mention of course.
"we expect some tremendous very very sizable revenues"
"we are starting to CLOSE some deals we see as the key deals we talked about"
"by the second half will be seeing some sizable numbers that I think will be quite remarkable"
"we've been on HSN, that took us over a year to get therein our minds and the good news is we'll probably be on that show a few more times most likely but we're not sure"
"we're starting to see a lot more retail sales getting done, so we're starting to see a real push out in the retail space"
"We're actually at a point now where were right this minute where we have some very strong sales in front of us, these are some of the big sales we've been working on quite a while now"
"the retail space we do manage and spend a lot of time on and starting to see some major steps getting done."
"But definitely the sales are developing, some large numbers out there that we are getting done we're getting involved in more discussions and we should start seeing again the second half of this year as very very sizable, at least that's what we see now and hope, we'll see what transpire"
"until the second half when we do see some I think big numbers hitting us and if we see some of the numbers we expect to see by the end of the year I think we should start seeing some major upscale, I can't saw how the market works, I can't say what people should do but we have a lot more shareholders out there now we deal with them constantly, and definitely they should hold on
We're up for a very very, very positive ride. "
Re:"we have a new P&D here" - LMAO
StrikeForce's Channel Partner ACS is working with some of the Largest Companies in the Planet, using StrikeForce's Intellectual Property, and we are hearing statements like P&D ??? LOL
StrikeForce has two of the Best Law Firms on the Planet Defending their Intellectual Property and and we are hearing statements like P&D ??? LOL
Numerous Standards Bodies and Organizations are Stating Out-of-Band MFA Must Be Used. StrikeForce has the Patents on OBB MFA and and we are hearing statements like P&D ???? LOL
StrikeForce has 7 Patent Lawsuits on going against 7 different Companies, to think they don't have people/sharehiolders associated with them, with their own agenda, making statements on SrikeForce's Stock Boards would be Ludicrous. LOL
Ok Now, let's get Back to Reality.
To Drive the Point Home - Let's take a look at ACS's Largest Clients as stated by an Email from ACS President and COO included below.
In their Respective Areas, ACS's Clients are the Largest in the World, and who knows what Companies may Lie behind the NDA's due to the StrikeForces Intellectual Property is Dealing with Cyber Security.
We know at least NDA is with one Large DOD Contractor according to the ACS Webinair.
If this stuff doesn't grab ones Attention, then one has to be 6 feet under or had a Lobotomy.
At minimum you are working with the Largest Companies in the World.
At perhaps Maximum you maybe getting a Small Percentage of every Transaction made.
These companies have done Extensive Due Diligence and are going with StrikeForce's Intellectual Property and ACS.
There is not much more I can say at this point to DRIVE THE POINT HOME. It's self-evident and Speaks for itself.
JW@KSC
Statement by the President and COO of ACS:
" Additionally, as a security tool, some of our clients have are under non-disclosure. That said, BLACKROCK, AON, BANK OF AMERICA MERCHANT SERVICES and FIRST DATA CORP Represents the Largest Clients as well as have done extensive due diligence. "
BlackRock, Inc. is an American global investment management corporation based in New York City. Founded in 1988, initially as a risk management and fixed income institutional asset manager, BlackRock is the world's largest asset manager with $5.4 trillion in assets under management. BlackRock operates globally with 70 offices in 30 countries and clients in 100 countries. Due to its power, Blackrock has been called the world's largest shadow bank.
Aon plc is a British multinational corporation headquartered in London, United Kingdom, that provides risk management, insurance and reinsurance brokerage, investment banking, human resource solutions and outsourcing services. Aon has approximately 500 offices worldwide, serving 120 countries with 72,000 employees.
In 2011, Aon was ranked as the largest insurance broker in the world based on revenue. Aon was the principal partner and global shirt sponsor of the Premier League team Manchester United F.C. from 2010 until 2014.
Bank of America Merchant Services, LLC is a wholly owned subsidiary of Bank of America specializing in handling credit, debit, stored value, and electronic benefits transfer (EBT) card transactions.
BA Merchant Services was formed in 2004, when Bank of America purchased National Processing Company from National City Corp. for $1.4 billion. Bank of America then consolidated its own Merchant Services division into the Louisville, Kentucky-based company. A call center for the company is located in El Paso, Texas.
First Data Corporation is a global payment technology solutions company headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, United States. The company's STAR interbank network offers PIN-secured debit acceptance at ATM and retail locations.
First Data has a global footprint of 6 million merchants, the largest in the payments industry. The company handles 45% of all US credit and debit transactions, including handling prepaid gift card processing for many US brands such as Starbucks. It processes over $1 trillion in card transactions annually, with an 80% market share in gas and groceries. First Data has also provided shopping metrics for national news networks such as USA Today, ESPN, The New York Times and Vox.
The company has been recognized by the UK's Information Commissioner's Office as one of the companies whose binding corporate rules for data privacy are aligned with the EU's Data Protection Directive.
Re: "pump and dump..." - ROTFLMOA
StrikeForce's Channel Partner ACS is working with some of the Largest Companies in the Planet, using StrikeForce's Intellectual Property, and we are hearing statements like P&D ??? LOL
StrikeForce has two of the Best Law Firms on the Planet Defending their Intellectual Property and and we are hearing statements like P&D ??? LOL
Numerous Standards Bodies and Organizations are Stating Out-of-Band MFA Must Be Used. StrikeForce has the Patents on OBB MFA and and we are hearing statements like P&D ???? LOL
StrikeForce has 7 Patent Lawsuits on going against 7 different Companies, to think they don't have people/sharehiolders associated with them, with their own agenda, making statements on SrikeForce's Stock Boards would be Ludicrous. LOL
Ok Now, let's get Back to Reality.
To Drive the Point Home - Let's take a look at ACS's Largest Clients as stated by an Email from ACS President and COO included below.
In their Respective Areas, ACS's Clients are the Largest in the World, and who knows what Companies may Lie behind the NDA's due to the StrikeForces Intellectual Property is Dealing with Cyber Security.
We know at least NDA is with one Large DOD Contractor according to the ACS Webinair.
If this stuff doesn't grab ones Attention, then one has to be 6 feet under or had a Lobotomy.
At minimum you are working with the Largest Companies in the World.
At perhaps Maximum you maybe getting a Small Percentage of every Transaction made.
These companies have done Extensive Due Diligence and are going with StrikeForce's Intellectual Property and ACS.
There is not much more I can say at this point to DRIVE THE POINT HOME. It's self-evident and Speaks for itself.
JW@KSC
Statement by the President and COO of ACS:
" Additionally, as a security tool, some of our clients have are under non-disclosure. That said, BLACKROCK, AON, BANK OF AMERICA MERCHANT SERVICES and FIRST DATA CORP Represents the Largest Clients as well as have done extensive due diligence. "
BlackRock, Inc. is an American global investment management corporation based in New York City. Founded in 1988, initially as a risk management and fixed income institutional asset manager, BlackRock is the world's largest asset manager with $5.4 trillion in assets under management. BlackRock operates globally with 70 offices in 30 countries and clients in 100 countries. Due to its power, Blackrock has been called the world's largest shadow bank.
Aon plc is a British multinational corporation headquartered in London, United Kingdom, that provides risk management, insurance and reinsurance brokerage, investment banking, human resource solutions and outsourcing services. Aon has approximately 500 offices worldwide, serving 120 countries with 72,000 employees.
In 2011, Aon was ranked as the largest insurance broker in the world based on revenue. Aon was the principal partner and global shirt sponsor of the Premier League team Manchester United F.C. from 2010 until 2014.
Bank of America Merchant Services, LLC is a wholly owned subsidiary of Bank of America specializing in handling credit, debit, stored value, and electronic benefits transfer (EBT) card transactions.
BA Merchant Services was formed in 2004, when Bank of America purchased National Processing Company from National City Corp. for $1.4 billion. Bank of America then consolidated its own Merchant Services division into the Louisville, Kentucky-based company. A call center for the company is located in El Paso, Texas.
First Data Corporation is a global payment technology solutions company headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, United States. The company's STAR interbank network offers PIN-secured debit acceptance at ATM and retail locations.
First Data has a global footprint of 6 million merchants, the largest in the payments industry. The company handles 45% of all US credit and debit transactions, including handling prepaid gift card processing for many US brands such as Starbucks. It processes over $1 trillion in card transactions annually, with an 80% market share in gas and groceries. First Data has also provided shopping metrics for national news networks such as USA Today, ESPN, The New York Times and Vox.
The company has been recognized by the UK's Information Commissioner's Office as one of the companies whose binding corporate rules for data privacy are aligned with the EU's Data Protection Directive.
Trump - Cyber Security
Fairly Good Coverage. Of course we know Trump does Slump off on a Project. Hoping he takes the Bull by the Horns once all accessment's are made.
Excellent !
Definitely Excellent, Lucified.
Like & Subscribe and Share Lucefied's Channel, help him build his Subscriber Base.