Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Thanks!
Yup
Has anyone thought about making a synthetic long call with this? October put option selling for no extrinsic value. Thoughts?
Thanks yeah I missed that.
How much of today's drop was because of GSAT not showing up on the open meeting agenda? Vs traders doing what traders do, that is.
Thanks for the article. Your right, it's very pertinent. Can't wait for the big day.
I wonder if Google is trying to harpoon this thing because it threatens their planned service?
Hey all, need a little help. I have been trying to get the RSS feeds for the International Bureau and the Report and order one as well to work with my RSS app but it won't take the feeds. Is anyone else following these feeds and if so which feed reader are you using?
Any help appreciated.
Thanks for the input. Always appreciated.
After 8 long years, I'm out. Y'all take take care, I've enjoyed it.
Has anyone ever seen a study of price movement to % of shares held short? I'm trying to figure out an exit strategy and was thinking that it might be instructive. Balancing risk and reward is hard when your always guessing at what the up side is. So I was wondering if there was any data on this to give me a better idea of where this thing might end up short term. It would be great if it spiked to $10 but what percent chance is there of that actually happening in this scenario? Right now I'm basing everything off $6. Any thoughts?
I might be missing something but I'm not seeing it. The more I think about it the more I think this is a discounted equity purchase agreement, not debt or some kind of stock option where you see " customary anti-dilution clause".
It might be there but I can't find it.
Without having referenced the co face or terrapin agreement here I would think that the remedies provided by the co face which prevent default would keep GSAT out of default with the terrapin agreement. Have to research it though. I don't see how terrapin would profit by forcing a RS either. I believe that it would undermine their own cause. Again, gotta look at the agreements.
Do you know where this came from? Would love to see the full thing.
Interesting, no fiber in Canada or Alaska
Much appreciated.
Did anyone hear the earnings call? Highlights?
Does anyone know what percentage of the companies stock we got in return for LTAS?
If we got 1%, yup we got hosed but if we got 50%, then It might not be such a bad deal.
Guessing it's somewhere in between though
It's new. I think it was part of the Dodd Frank act if memory serves me correctly.
I don't suppose anyone is able to attend the annual meet. Wish I had known it was going to be limited to shareholders of record.
The accounts receivable from related party at September 30, 2013 reflects trade receivables from Global Telesat Communications, Ltd. (“GTCL”) of $20,359. GTCL is a related party based in the United Kingdom and controlled by a current officer of GTC. Total sales to GTCL for the three and nine-months ended September 30, 2013 were $95,641 and $391,646, respectively, and account for 47% and 33% of GTC's total sales for the respective periods. In 2012, GTC began charging a 10% handling fee on all GTCL orders.
95,641 / .47 = 203,491 for Q3
Not that I am aware of. We know the part of it that came from GTCL because it was listed in a footnote of (I believe it was) the income statement. But that's about it.
May 15th will tell.
May 2 2012
Might not be possible to spell it out. Might be something along the lines of an indefinite quantity indefinite delivery contract. Also there are a lot of funny rules that go along with doing business with the government so they may not be able to say due to some obscure regulation. (Eg not being able to say the name of the organization). Just a guess.
I seem to remember the company level being mentioned in a previous PR or article. Couldn't tell you were I saw it though.
You can set up to receive an email if something matches your custom search results on fed reg. click on the RSS in the advanced search and it will give you the email option.
I don't know if y'all saw this. I scanned back through the post and didn't see it mentioned so forgive me if it is old news. Got it off of Fedbizopps after searching "aerostat". Maybe another lead?
HQ Supreme Allied Commander Transformation
Request for Information 13-14
Page 2 of 7
1.0 Description
1.1 HQ Supreme Allied Commander Transformation (HQ SACT) is issuing this Request for Information (RFI) announcement to call for collaboration with ACT to determine possible utility of using aerostats for JISR capabilities.
Disregard my previous. I got it now.
Is anyone else really perplexed by the fact that they just gave back 12,000,000 shares with nothing in return? I must be missing something here. Also the agreement that is referenced is not listed in the SEC docs. At least not on February 7 2013. Just a bunch of Form 4's.
Will some kind soul please help me out.
Are you thinking along a preservation of cash strengthening financials? Or something else?
I think the pop today might have to do with a WSJ article entitled a gold rush in wireless spectrum ( or something near to that).
Thanks for the follow up. It was Titan aerospace was the company. It was the correlation of New Mexico and the altitude that made me think of this.
Wasn't the company building that solar powered fixed wing UAV based out of New Mexico?
Found this and thought it was an interesting tidbit. Assuming that these ratios held true for 14.1 there must be some real interest.
NIE 13.1 will conduct several program tests for record, additional tests for record from distributed sites, and less formally evaluate more than 20 industry and government capabilities, called Systems Under Evaluation, or SUEs. The incorporation of theses SUEs in NIE 13.1 resulted from pairing down more than 140 capability submissions using formal white paper evaluations and assessing potential candidates in government laboratories prior to the start of NIE integration.
Just read the first paragraph and this looks like a good thing but is it something to get supper excited about since its not the final order? I started to do some homework on the "success ratio" of proposals to final rules but haven't gotten very far. Has anyone else looked into that?
This seems to be a very contentious proposal. I thought that the exparte from Media Freedom was particularly scathing and we saw the immediate response from Globalstar to tamp that out (a good thing IMO).
I don't mean to rain on the parade because I am sure Monday will be a good day for all of us, but how good? RW, treat yourself, I am!