Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Steve, valuation, as viewed by an acquiring entity, would also depend on very tight patent protection. Not much would be offered if it is determined that LWLG IP cannot be well defended. Sometimes it is cheaper for a company to infringe than it is to pay.
Not a patent attorney, just lost a ton of money on an IPR at the US PTAB.
KCC, that is the first time I have seen that term.
"second opto-electronic susceptibilites"
Is that another way of saying third order photonic properties?
Pit and Steve, may I add this?
The price reflects only the uncertainity of those who trade the majority of the thin volume we tend to see. .9 dollars is insanely expensive for essentially a black hole investment, the kind that very little meaningful information gets out and is useful to those that desire to back a company with their own resources. Conversely, the price is ridiculously cheap if they have what we all think(hope) they have.
LWLG is both cheap AND expensive, depending on what it is to the individual making the investment.
If this black hole of information seems expensive to you, very little should be invested relative to your risk aversion. If this black hole of information seems cheap, bet as much as you cqn stand to lose. Either way, until the company tels us something tangible to commerce. Money in these shares will remain a bet, with the payout being the value determinator.
Not preaching. I will go back to learning from everyone else and hopefully cashing in one day.
Duplicate, Sorry
Duplicate, Sorry
Wise,
That has been the smart cover all along, though I am not holding any QCOM.
Lol, them spurs hurt.
Techsonian also has Parkervision as an apparel manufacturer. They are automated hooey.
Don't know if it is a better source or not but I have to think it is easier to corral. I don't think Lauro gets any piece of the PP based on the wording of how his compensation works, not to mention that if he does, then he does not seem to have much clout after all and I doubt that is the case.
Pun somewhat intended.
If the warrants and such are not the same per dollar invested and that was not disclosed I imagine it would blow up in their face. The smaller dollar amount may have been chosen after/if they determined that they were not going to get the amunt they need.
The bigger issue would be if there were different perks involved.
It says that zero non accredited individuals have subscribed so far.
With that number and the small inside buys the average participant looks to be in for over 65 grand. They sold a good number of shares to a small number of people and it is a safe guess that many of those were already holding.
Inverso, it could be that they are but have only been paid for some of the intended/expected sales.
Fact!
Snez, check Netflix.
So WHO needs to see this? The company? I get the what but not the how. How does one become accredited?
Do I get a letter from my brokerage? A recent statement from bank? Both? Neither?
Hey inversor, how does this accreditation work?
I would like to get in on the PP and I believe another person would as well. She is well over the asset mark but is also not "accredited"
My broker requires 500k to get a few extra perks but they can see account values at a glance. This obviously is not difficult to do but who do you show assets to? It is all kind of vague.
So how does one become accredited? Send the SEC your statements?
That is a shame. Have the cash and willing to buy but not accredited. I think I qualify on assets but nowhere near on income.
Dlucky, is the PP only for accredited investors?
Sean, agreed, warrants are the only reason to buy in at near market.
I am interested but there would need to be a significant discount if I am required to hold for any period of time.
Conversely, a 50k bid today held out. No restrictions. Seems like the open market is not too far off from the PP.
GOOD DEAL! I may when I hear from Steve.
Not accredited but looking for a good size piece.
Walter, does that mean you will be buying more?
Wise, I still have not found out if it is limited to AI. As I am not one, I can only speculate on the nature of benefit but I am interested in a large bargain buy if one is to be had.
Any details on the minimum investment(100k shares, 500k shares, etc) or minimum hold time, or warrants?
Is it over?
Scope, possibly warrants or the possibility to purchase a large volume without having to piece meal it for a decent price. It would be even better if you somehow got a realtime update of what is going on(doubtful). I would still wait for inversor's reply however.
This may be one of the few publicly traded companies that "control premium", "premium", "book value", "relief from royalty", and risk valuation provide an equation nastier than the science we are trying to value.
I really avoid sh*tting on anyone if I can help it but he is very bad at responding to new/soon to be investors it seems. I know he must deal with flakes galore but there just cannot be so many people looking to invest in the company that he would not respond.
It is too bad that this website serves as the investor's best shot at any kind of information.
Maybe, the company website shares some blame but with the situation they seem to be in there really is no reason for anyone to need to make more than one request for information.
Is the placement for Accredited investors only and what is the minimum investment/holding period?
I will have whatever he's having.
Pure guess Scope
Maybe the POS AM is now in effect/ no longer amendable.
Rickface, you may like this.
http://today.ucf.edu/ucf-researcher-aims-shatter-world-laser-record/
Short Sightedness
"...or those who want to look negatively at the licensing deal I think they are quite a bit short sighted."
The licensing deal is the end all-be all. This is how Lightwave Logic is either made, or broken. The complimentary optics and photonics properties between the "Perk materials" and the Corning library go quite far beyond Telecom and the associated certifications.
By no means am I calling for a rocket-liftoff but this is where we learn whether or not the material has "the right stuff".
6 months of industrial edge has been driving the CPU market for a long time Pitcook. There will be a continuation of this as photonics matures. Either way it is time to define the path to revenues to pay for the future science.
Reds, think about it from the time expense as well as dollar cost of deveoping a single application such as Oleophobics on Sapphire. If there are tons of chromophores with known characteristics that LWLG can use with Perks to achieve a desired function, there would be little sense in oing through all of the development and testing to produce something already protected by patent AND ready to use today.
Pitcook and Steve,
It showed up yesterday on MarketWatch GLW page but not certain what it linked to.
"nuhn nuhn nuhn nuhn, nah noop."
Steve, pay this no mind. It is mostly the same shares going back and forth. Until some new investors choose to bid for the shares of the majority of the longs out there the prices will just putted around the same flag.
What would a room full of cats with laser pointers attached to their heads look like?
Now that's agenda!
Chips, I know some chaps at Permira(they bought Genesys Labs) but I truly would not know where to begin in making a case here. If the more proactive shareholders wanted to "sell" this company we really would need more in the way of historical goal meeting to show as we don't have anything else to flaunt.
I would gladly sign a non-disclosure and take on a mass of shares if they would give us something to push. As they gave no response to an inquiry, all I can surmise is that they either have all the big money that they need lined up, or that they are looking for something much larger than what they already have committed.
Nothing new here but the comment you make about shareholders rings load and true here.