Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
You ask:
Completely False:
This link will fill in and bring to light most of the misinformation around the mRNA vaccines...AND SAE under-reported.
IT CONTENT ALSO INDIRECTLY HIGHLIGHTS THE DESPERATE NEED FOR IPIX'S BRILACIDIN!
https://trialsitenews.com/should-you-get-vaccinated/
AMAZING COMPLAINT!:
We should know nothing "by now"...the Clinical trial was Double-Blinded ... and no data was or will be RELEASED or announced until, as cited in the June 3rd PR (or a/ka "RP" for those who can't figure out a typo) announcement until "early August" (very clear and unequivocal):
The statement:
This is for entertainment value while we wait:
Post Stated:
Thank you for giving me the opportunity to correct your "quote" of what I allegedly posted.
You quoted my Post as stating:
Let's be clear... PAYING FOR A "Service" (Testing) provided by an INDEPENDENT REGIONAL BIOCONTAINMENT LABORATORY ("RBL")...
...does not make the results of the Service (Test) ... "NOT INDEPENDENT"
To make that assumption, one MUST ASSUME SOME BIZZARE set of fact and IGNORE OTHERS:
1. RBL's are corrupt and not independent...i.e a Biotech firm can "buy" (bribe the entity) the results it is looking for.
2. The mission statement of the RBL's is, IN FACT, TO SERVE (in Part) private sector Biotech firms in testing their compounds at their request and pay for said service.
3. Additionally RBL seeks and is given GRANTS from Governmental Agencies to investigate, test, and analyze compounds and test them against bacteria and viruses (specific to the interest of the Grantor. kIt has been PR'd that GMU and another RBL HAVE BEEN TESTING BRILACIDIN under THOSE GRANTS! (We don't know how large...but they could be hundreds of thousands or millions of dollars focused at Brilacidin)
Therefore...IPIX utilizing the GMU RBL to do another "test"...( WHILE GMU WAS ALREADY INDEPENDENTLY (ie not paid by IPIX) INVESTIGATING BRILACIDIN ...a service for which IPIX likely saved considerable $ and only paid just over $30K (since GMU researcher was deep into Brilacidin at the time).
Payment for Service and conclusions provided by an Independent Government Agency...remains Independent research.
Grant funding an investigation of Brilacidin by RBL, which Grants are received independent of IPIX, remain Independent research.
If the basic premise is Payment of a Service authorized and mandated to be provided by a Government Scientific Agency is never independent if the Service is required to be paid for ...then ALL TESTING PAID FOR BY ANY BIOTECH IS NEVER INDEPENDENT...
ALL clinical trials Paid for by Private Companies and the ancillary services (CRO's, Hospital Sites, Medical Staff supported by those payments) would in some have to be DEEMED...Not Independent Research...
The only conclusion left...NO RESEARCH SUBSIDIZED, PAID FOR, or SUPPORTED BY A BIOTECH COMPANY IS INDEPENDENT...
Beyond an absurd conclusion!!!
Several posters have posted content that falsely attributes to Leo/IPIX with the ability to change FDA accepted Trial Protocol, as if the sponsor can do whatever it wants whenever it wants...
Strawmen's arguments start with false premises and accuse LEO/IPIX of failing to do this or that...based upon those false premises (pulled out of the air!)
Example...of false premises...and attempts at "knocking" LEO and IPIX
Your erroneous "conclusion" could only be drawn from a failure to apply simple logic to the announced protocol of the trial and FDA dictum on the subject:
Logically:
Reporting on "efficacy" in the middle of a Trial would necessarily require a full and complete breach of the "data-lock", required for the Double-Blinded full trial, thereby negating the entire "Double-Blinded" protocol requirement upon which FDA authorized the trials.
FDA Dictum:
The FDA (as noted by two prior posters...one directly in response to your prior posts) clearly indicated (BEFORE) the IPIX/Brilacidin Clinical Trials that a sponsor put into its FDA approved protocol the process of interim (in IPIX "safety" for the extension of dosing from 3 to 5 days) BEFORE the trial, using an independent DMC!:
"...releasing interim results could have
ramifications on the integrity of the ongoing trial and the ability to collect reliable and interpretable data needed to support regulatory decision-making. If sponsors intend to conduct interim analyses, FDA recommends they consult the guidance for industry Adaptive Designs for Clinical Trials of Drugs and Biologics, prospectively plan these analyses, and incorporate processes to maintain the integrity of the trial (e.g., using an independent DMC)"
Farrell...another "drop the mic" post...
Four reasons why Brilacidin (IMO) "positive" Clinical Trial results cannot be and will not be successfully swept under the rug by BP's friends in FDA/CDC:
1. Rand Paul...who knows Brilacidin and its potential as a Therapeutic against Covid-19/Variants...and also of Brilacidin's potentially huge significance as a pan-corona virus killer...is a formidable Ally for IPIX/Brilacidin (Does Fauci need another major assault?)
2. Dr.Kessler (Operation Warp Speed) and Dr. DeGrado...IMO...very close relationship...both at UCSF
3. Potentially greater IPIX connection to decision-makers in government and resulting awareness, even above #2.
4. Russia - Russian CRO (supervised by U.S. CRO, but) owned by Russian Pharmaceutical Co which has partnered frequently with Russian Sovereign Wealth Fund.
IMO... the 5-day dosage of the last patient has likely finished...Now countdown (could have started a few days ago) for the 29 day (hold and final follow-up) begins...then 60 days from today (or a few days ago) Unblinding of all data and analysis...
Meanwhile expecting as per PRs...UC and OM updates/announcements and additional RBL pan-corona virus and additional virus results...
Also...is it Time for Fungus Licensee to get into the brawl?
IMO...Fungus in India/Russia will bring on more Brilaicin focus IPIX license to FOX CHASE...for Brilacidin/Fungus research/grants.
"Innovation Pharmaceuticals Grants Licensing Rights to Fox Chase Chemical Diversity Center, Inc. for Antifungal Technology"
https://www.ipharminc.com/press-release/2020/7/22/innovation-pharmaceuticals-grants-licensing-rights-to-fox-chase-chemical-diversity-center-inc-for-antifungal-technology
It is quite possible that some Russian patients who participated in the IPIX/Brilacidin C.T. also had the India/Covid-19/Fungus ...and that we could see unexpectedly and prematurely...Brilacidin's effect on the Fungus indication of those Russian patients/participants with the Covid/Fungus combination...speculative but possible...Humm?
Perhaps Russian would be a little interested in Brilacidin/IPIX?
The market knows nothing...except:
1. Trials were never stopped by FDA for some "Alleged" SAE...because there apparently WERE NONE!
2. Trials were never stopped by FDA because people died from Brilacidin...because apparently there WERE NONE...
3. Trials proceeded at a quick pace, post-Safety Review, as PR indicated...which IMO means positive attitude by "on-site" medical personnel at clinical trials ... Did they see one arm walkout earlier than the other arm? IMO sounds encouraging...Apparently, patients were not deterred from participating...Was something positive being observed?
All the above speculative, via reading of the tea leaves...
IPIX's Brilacidin and its NEED...will exponentially increase...with the dissemination of this "terrifying" mRNA report cited in yesterday's article.
More evidence ... cited in an article (link below) from a Canadian Cancer Vaccine Researcher, published yesterday, May 31st, on the adverse effects of mRNA Vaccines ...
A case of the "Cure Worse than the Disease?"
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/vaccine-researcher-admits-big-mistake-says-spike-protein-is-dangerous-toxin
FDA, CDA, and Fauci...rushed circulation of mRNA vaccines with "spike proteins" (a toxin) which enter the circulatory system ... and which in some, creates its own medical complications in the recipients’ organs.
QUOTING FROM THE ARTICLE..." 'Terrifying' new research finds vaccine spike protein unexpectedly in the bloodstream. The protein is linked to blood clots, heart and brain damage, and potential risks to nursing babies and fertility."
“We thought the spike protein was a great target antigen, we never knew the spike protein itself was a toxin and was a pathogenic protein. So, by vaccinating people we are inadvertently inoculating them with a toxin ,” Bridle said on the show, which is not easily found in a Google search ...but went viral on the internet this weekend." (LOL...wonder why?)
The Article continues...
“It’s the first time ever scientists have been privy to seeing where these messenger RNA [mRNA] vaccines go after vaccination,” said Bridle. “Is it a safe assumption that it stays in the shoulder muscle? The short answer is: absolutely not. It’s very disconcerting.”
Vaccine researchers had assumed that novel mRNA COVID vaccines would behave like “traditional” vaccines and the vaccine spike protein — responsible for infection and its most severe symptoms — would remain mostly in the vaccination site at the shoulder muscle. Instead, the Japanese data showed that the infamous spike protein of the coronavirus gets into the blood where it circulates for several days post-vaccination and then accumulated in organs and tissues including the spleen, bone marrow, the liver, adrenal glands, and in “quite high concentrations” in the ovaries.
“We have known for a long time that the spike protein is a pathogenic protein. It is a toxin. It can cause damage in our body if it gets into circulation,” Bridle said."
"Effects on heart and brain
Once in circulation, the spike protein can attach to specific ACE2 receptors that are on blood platelets and the cells that line blood vessels. “When that happens it can do one of two things: it can either cause platelets to clump, and that can lead to clotting. That’s exactly why we’ve been seeing clotting disorders associated with these vaccines. It can also lead to bleeding.” Bridle also said the spike protein in circulation would explain recently reported heart problems in youths who had received the shots.
The results of this leaked Pfizer study tracing the biodistribution of the vaccine mRNA are not surprising, “but the implications are terrifying,” Stephanie Seneff, a senior research scientist at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, told LifeSiteNews. “It is now clear” that vaccine content is being delivered to the spleen and the glands, including the ovaries and the adrenal glands."
SINCE PFIZER KNEW IT...so did the FDA. Just Foxes of a different color fur? And...
A case of The Fox watching the Chicken Coop?
The publication of this NEW NEWS...should put an end to mRNA vaccines...
IMO Brilacidin...will be shown with the CT coming to an end, as the only safe and effective KILLER of Covid-19
Brilacidin...IMO...the only answer...the IV first, then an aerosol, then the pill...
Not quite...Science is Science ... Propaganda is BS and calling it Science, does not make it Science.
IMO With the Brilacidin's Clinical Trials ending...the public and society will begin to finally wake up to the desperate need for BRILACIDIN, courtesy of IPIX:
1. Link below is a recent interview with Dr. Peter McCullough, an internist, cardiologist, epidemiologist, and Professor of Medicine at Texas A&M College of Medicine. He is warning against the Vaccine.
NOTE: @ minute 11, Dr. McCullough notes that the regulatory authorities will try to SUPPRESS THERAPEUTIC DEVELOPMENT ... until every person is vaccinated. In other words, they don't want an effective CURE...they want to continue vaccinations.
Link: https://citizenfreepress.com/breaking/i-would-love-to-see-this-dude-debate-fauci/
2. NO wonder, Medical Staff at Texas A&M hospital is suing the hospital over the MANDATING of Vaccines, as breaking the Nuremberg Code... but they are NOT ALONE IN THE CLAIM!
Link: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/texas-hospital-staff-says-vaccine-mandate-breaks-nuremberg-code/ar-AAKuDR9
3. A large team of more than 1,000 lawyers and over 10,000 medical experts, led by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, has initiated legal proceedings against the CDC, WHO, and the Davos Group for crimes against humanity.
Link: https://sorendreier.com/1000-lawyers-and-10000-doctors-have-filed-a-lawsuit-for-violations-of-the-nuremberg-code/
U.S Government...forcing Vaccines on U.S citizens, which should be a COMPELLING ARGUMENT for Prosecution by team of more than 1,000 lawyers and over 10,000 medical experts, led by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich...in International Courts as a clear violation of Crimes against Humanity under Nuremberg Code...
The “Experimental” Vaccine Violates All 10 Nuremberg Codes – (see link below), which is noted carries The Death Penalty For Those Who Try To Break These International Laws.
Link: https://www.shiftfrequency.com/1000-lawyers-and-10000-doctors-file-lawsuit-for-violations-of-nuremberg-code/
USE OF COERCION, CENSORSHIP, PUBLIC SHAMING, and DENIAL OF BASIC FREEDOMS to..."FORCE" the public into taking EXPERIMENTAL DRUGS...(which the Biden Administration is clearly doing) ...appears to be a ...CLEAR VIOLATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS...PUNISHABLE BY DEATH.
Totalitarianism/Authoritarianism via taking away our FREEDOM OF CHOICE must stop...ESPECIALLY FORCING PARENTS TO HAVE CHILDREN VACCINATED WITH THIS CLEARLY EXPERIMENTAL DRUG which our FDA HAS NOT "APPROVED"...as a predicate for attending School.
IMO FLORIDA's BAN of VACCINE PASSPORTS...will become Law of the Land if it ever got up to the Supreme Court... (which IMO FL is hoping for)
4. Media (online and off) is again complicit in CLAIMING that it is "FALSE"...that 40-50% of CDC and FDA employees HAVE NOT TAKEN THE VACCINE...of course, the question is WHY?
Read the interview...do the math!
From a recent Senate hearing.
Senator Burr: “Okay, this question I’m gonna go to Dr. Fauci, Dr. Marks, and Dr. Walensky,”
“What percentage of employees in your institute, your center, or your agency, of your employees, has been vaccinated?”
Dr. Fauci: “You know, I’m not a hundred percent sure, senator, but I think it’s probably a little bit more than half, probably around sixty percent” (40-50% of CDC employees have NOT been vaccinated...question is WHY?)
Dr. Marks: “I can’t tell you the exact number, but it’s probably in the same range, some people vaccinated at our facility, and others at, uh, outside of the facility” (Same as CDC - (40-50% of CDC employees have NOT been vaccinated... the question is WHY?)
Dr. Walensky: “We’re encouraging our employees to get vaccinated, we’ve been doing town halls and education seminars we have our staff have the option to report their vaccination status, but it’s you, understand the federal government is not requiring it, so we do not know” ... (In other words..."I don't want to answer that question")
5. Innovation Pharmaceutical's therapeutic, BRILACIDIN (to kill the virus), is in its final stages of CLINICAL TRIALS ...perhaps coming to an end as soon as this week.
Link: https://www.ipharminc.com/press-release/2021/5/27/patient-enrollment-reaches-90-percent-in-innovation-pharmas-phase-2-clinical-trial-of-brilacidin-for-covid-19
You can buy through Inter-active broker...stocks on TASE exchange. Good Luck (sent you a private message)
Sotrovimab has no effect on the NEED FOR BRILACIDIN AS A THERAPEUTIC!
Sotrovimab is just another IV based Antibodies...before worsening illness...for mild to moderate...ineffective against Brilacidin's target "moderate to severe" hospitalized patients.
More on GSK/VIR Sotrovimab...antibody by their own admission:
1. "That's no reason to call off the hunt for effective COVID-19 treatments"
(https://www.marketwatch.com/story/vaccines-are-here-thats-no-reason-to-call-off-the-hunt-for-effective-covid-19-treatments-11616116805).
Sotrovimab joins a growing pool of IV-based COVID-19 treatments that pump antibodies in patients at high risk of worsening illness, hospitalization, or death.
2. Sotrovimab cannot address Moderate to Severe Covid-19 Patients ... not Hospitalized patients, which Brilacidin is meant to address.
"It can be prescribed to people with mild-to-moderate forms of COVID-19, who are at least 12 years old, have tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, and are at high risk of disease progression because of conditions (https://www.fda.gov/media/149534/download) like obesity, pregnancy and heart disease. The therapy isn't thought to benefit already hospitalized COVID-19 patients (https://www.marketwatch.com/story/nih-tells-vir-that-experimental-covid-19-therapy-may-not-benefit-patients-2021-03-04).
In light of numberous posts (CONTENT) criticizing LEO FOR NOT MAKING RECENT PURCHASES OF IPIX SHARES ...a/k/a...
...the "LEO DOESN'T BELIEVE IN IPIX - STRAWMAN"...
The post quoted below is Hilarious...as it attempts to link a Classic Inside Trading case, reported by the SEC today...to Leo.
REVIEW OF RECENT "CONTENT" (about Leo and IPIX) AND CONSTRUCION OF THE "STRAWMAN"
THE CONTENT OF SOME RECENT POSTS constructed THREE (3) "STRAWMAN" (negative false premises arguments) and are highly critical Leo and, by implication, IPIX (...not Brilacidin, of course! ).
This CONTENT is to be expected to appear at this time...as the preverbal noose is tightening on the neck of purveyors of false negative narratives are sensitive to IMO the probability of imminent success of Brilaicidin's Clinical Trials.
IMO INVESTORS are about to reaped through the current Clinical Trials...The probability of Brilacidin's great success against Covid-19, and the even more importantly, the dangerous "Variants" from Brazil and India is IMO upon us (Investors).
Examine the latest attempted CONSTRUCTION OF STRAWMEN :
1. "THE LEASE VILLIAN - STRAWMAN" ...
IMO Leo is doing "a superb job as CEO", and if still paying on a "contestable" lease obligation, for space not used...WELCOME TO LIFE FOR 50% COMMECIAL TENANTS in the Northeast...not using or underutilizing their space IS THE NORM. Finding a legal basis for terminating...is not only the norm, but the OBLIGATION OF A CEO to its SHAREHOLDERS.
Contesting an "evergreen clause" event in a lease...to TERMINATE the continuation of a lease of property... NO LONGER REQUIRED... IT IS FINANCIALLY PRUDENT and THE OBLIGATION of THE CEO!
IF there were no basis or facts for alleging the termination LEASE PROVISION, the LANDLORD would have moved for SUMMARY JUDGEMENT to dismiss the contested allegations AND WOULD HAVE BEEN SUCCESSFUL. OBVIOUSLY the court in question, has AGREED WITH LEO...there is a question of fact regarding the termination. Meanwhile, Leo obviously has a Landlord-Tenant attorney handling the matter, and likely is and should not be the least bit "distracted"...as he should not be. That is what you higher attorneys for...to argue for you and enforce the company's legal rights.
VERY RESPONSIBLE OF LEO TO SAVE THE COMPANY $.
(I have a wildly successful entrepreneur associate/partner, who owns over 40 closely held companies (has a little piece of Brilacidin personally), owns 50% of production company with 2 of the top 5 Netflix/cable series running... and has a $250,000 A MONTH RENT on NYC Mid-Town Manhattan space (across from St. Patrick’s)...put $2M into it for renovation and it is has been totally vacant for 18 months...He has been paying each month while CONTESTING THE LEASE obligation...on every ground he can find...and will do so until he either dump the lease or is successful in court...He discovered during Covid that he could operate successfully without the space...became an unnecessary expense to him. Found a better way to operate...out of NYC and VIRTUALLY...Dumb too?...not at over$500M net worth...LOL!)
Bottom line...Shareholder's should thank Leo for attempting to cut costs!
2. "GUILTY BY NON-FACTUAL EVENTS AND INUENDO AND FALSE ASSERTIONS (ALLEGEDLY ANONYMOUS SOURCED) - STRAWMAN"
Classic set up...inuendo, no facts of occurrence, implication without facts, suggestion and emotion...
Farrel's post deserves a repeat and further review:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=163974260
Brilacidin in contrast to Remdesivir ...
AH...love "Monday morning quarterbacking"
Decisions are always made in the context and circumstances at the moment...
"coulda, woulda, shoulda" assertions are IMO worthless...unless the context and circumstances at the time are used.
No affiliation unless FCCDC (a IPIX licensee of Brilacidin vs. Fungus) provides its cancer research services to FCC, which is a Cancer Research Hospital and an arm of Temple U in Philly
FCCDC is a separate company, owned by PharmaCircle Professional which delivers a comprehensive view into drug, biologics and combination product development and innovation worldwide, and a complete perspective of the competitive market landscape. With an intuitive search interface and easy to use apps, Professional examines more than 170,000 pipeline programs and marketed products, and the business portfolios and transactions of 22,000 companies.
Also, FCCDC is located in Downington, PA... about an hour northeast of Philly
Brilacidin vs Remdesivir...
More to come on Fauci's "faux therapy" (left over HIV/Ebola or infected toenail prospect...with which Fauci was hoping to become "famous" in "promoting” ...
...at least they got wise in India...IMO unlikely now Remdesivir will get extremely far (vs. Brilacidin) in Russian approval after CT process...
ps One day closer to finishing CTs! Also WHERE ARE ALL THE SUB-PENNY NON REPORTING COMPANY INVESTORS GOING TO INVEST? (after their stocks are shut down from quotes...they will leave those stocks well before September!) IMO time to buy before they wake-up to IPIX/Brilacidin
Yes... "pending good trial results"...IMO It is reasonable to speculate and it is not a stretch to see those DOLLARS, esp. when the current Russian CRO (supervised by U.S. CRO) monitoring the Russian leg of the Brilacidin/Covid-19 Clinical Trial is owned by one of the Largest Russian Pharmaceuticals...which Pharmaceutical has been partners with Russian Sovereign Investment Fund...before!
By connecting those (public) dots… It is not unreasonable to speculate and assume that a "toxic-free" Brilacidin (vs. Remdesivir) demonstrating even just slightly more efficacy than Remdesivir, would prompt a request by a Russian pharmaceutical (and maybe with Russian Sovereign Fund as its partner) for a License from IPIX to manufacture/distribute Brilacidin...(at least in Eastern Europe and Central Asia...and maybe beyond) with a reasonable royalty...resulting in a much more reasonable cost then (toxic prone) Remdesivir, to the counties to which it would be availed.
A little pressure on FDA and U.S./Western pharms? (ya think?)
...with even a modest royalty IPIX...IMO SP would soar in the dollars!
IMO, a GOOD possibility...
"Christmas in St. Petersburg"? (more beautiful than Moscow)
Leo's constrained PR's on Brilacidin/Covid-19 Cliinical Trails...appears to be "prudent and wise" based on the obvious "Slap Down" of CY*Y by FDA...
https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/statement-leronlimab?Mon,%2017%20May%202021%2014:59:28%20EDT
A company "Complaining" or "jumping the gun" in public re: FDA protocol / analysis of results of Clinical Trials could be hazardous to a small Biotech's regulatory health...even if one could argue facts and circumstances are in your favor!
The FDA "lip service" at the end of the "Statement on Ler*nlimab" is HILLARIOUS...
"If Cyt*Dyn plans further studies of ler*nlimab to determine whether the drug can provide clinical benefit to individuals with COVID-19, FDA will continue to provide advice to the company on their development program."
LEO and STEATH REPORTING ON BRILACIDIN/COVID-19 C.T.
IMO there is no doubt BP via FDA can twist Small Biotech's b*lls...if one challenges or states in public (PR) more than FDA would care to have revealed!
More on Brilacidin vs. Remdesivir…
Article from BMJ cited this AM…all positive news and direction for Brilacidin…
As pointed in the post commenting on article: https://www.bmj.com/content/373/bmj.n1109 (content in parenthisis added)
1. “no drugs are recommended for prophylaxis” (including Remdesivir, BUT BRILACIDIN has been cited as a serious Prophylaxis Therapeutic prospect ), and
2. “none have been shown to prevent Covid-19 infection” (including Remdesivir, BUT BRILACIDIN has been cited by RBLs as such)
3. (there is an )”…important gap to tackle (which REMDESIVIR does not fill) as we think ahead to next winter when, despite vaccination, we expect there will be significant numbers of patients.”
“…In general, researchers’ options are limited in terms of existing drugs to test for efficacy against the disease, notes Saye Khoo, professor in the Department of Pharmacology at the University of Liverpool. “We have a moderate pipeline of drugs—we’re not swimming in lots of new candidates and lots of new classes of drugs at the moment,” he says."
"Antivirals, (for which BRILACIDIN is being TESTED AS in Clinical Trials and cited as in RBLs) which could be given to inpatients who have not yet reached a critical stage of illness, could perhaps have a prophylactic function. This was one of the reasons for excitement over Remdesivir, but sadly, says Richards, “We still don’t have a decent antiviral.” (meaning Remdesivir it does not function as and is not a Prophylactic, nor even a “decent antiviral”)
"That could change if the UK government’s recently announced Antivirals Taskforce finds success.13 This ambitious initiative will support the inclusion of antivirals in covid-19 clinical trials and aims to identify two or more effective treatments by the autumn."
https://www.bmj.com/content/373/bmj.n1109
More on Brilacidin (non-toxic) vs. Remdesivir (high toxicity)…
Below, is more about Remdesivir’s Toxicity (from one of our good DoctRead on about the potentials organ toxicity exposure with Remdesivir, which might be the perfect case where “the cure is worse than the illness!”
IMO Remdesivir will become Gilead & Fauci’s “Biotech Chernobyl” … [/color]
Remdesivir's Toxicity Potential demonstrates WHY BRILACIDIN “426 SI” is so valuable. (significantly more strength and efficacy potential, with virtually no toxicity)
From our good MD/Reseach Fellow...
Petemantx...
Regarding Brilacidin vs. Remdesivir competition for the only safe and effective Therapeutic
The Remdesivir liver damage causation question (vs Brilacidin) could be answered with the Russian leg/patients...RUSSIA REJECTED/BANNED REMEDSIVIR for use in Russia as Therapeutic or for any use, therefore the Russian leg of Brilacidin C.T. will be Remdesivir Free and clean.
Also, there has never been a hint or any question of Liver or any SAE in the 400 plus IV Brilacidin ABSSSI trials...
Therefore, if there is no evidence of LIVER DAMAGE in the Russian Brilacidin/Covid-19 trials ...which (as PR'd) is going represent at least 75% of the IPIX Brilacidin/Covid-19 Clinical Trials, then if liver damage found in Remdesivir/Steroid/Brilacidin arm...the event could not be attributed to Brilacidin..the only variable would appear to be Remdesivir...the likely culprit.
More likely Fauci and Gilead will try to bury the question and keep it quiet...or try. But if Rand Paul gets a hold of it...watch out!
BRILACIDIN SI *426* IMO HAS REAL MEANING AND CONSEQUENCES...as a massive positive for Brilacidin over Remdesivir.
ps. Also note: EU, EMA committee is probing the connection of Remdesivir to Kidney damage...(of course, after EU had already approved it) https://news.yahoo.com/ema-committee-probes-possible-kidney-163701783.html
Content of Post...Company (Product) and Management:
IMO...our latest PR points to the fact that everyday from this point on...SHAREHOLDERS are one day closer to where Clinical Trials will be completed, data analyzed and IMO FDA will receive in the data report IPIX's glowing data on Brilacidin's stellar results. (and Dr. DeGrado, not Fauci, will be closer to receiving the Nobel Prize in Medicine 2022..ok, maybe 2023 when IMO FDA grants full approval after EUA)
Negative content on this board is never factually about the failure of Brilacidin...because Brilacidin has never failed a HUMAN Clinical Trials and has only received glowing results in In Vitro tests by ALL RBLs...
It is why Brilacidin is continuously being tested for efficacy against more and more viruses and bacteria while successfully chugging along in current Covid19 C.T...toward the 120 patient completion goal. The only measure and goal worth talking about right now. (My estimate is 90 done out of 120...IMO thanks to Russia) ...
The "glowing" will appear when Brilacidin is disclosed that IPIX is far superior to Remdesivir in efficacy and safety. (Love that 426!)
Brilacidin vs. Remdesivir toxicity...
In comparing IPIX'S BRILACIDIN to Gilead's REMDESIVIR, I previously disclosed that I attended a meeting with a C-staff member of a major Brooklyn hospital, several days ago. The hospital was highly publicized for having 3 refrigerated containers in the street...continuously being filled and "dumped" at morgues, during the height of the deaths in NYC. We covered many issues among them vaccines mRNA and Remdesivir.
Startling, since Brilacidin is Remdesivir's only potential threat, that it clearly appears to be another Fauci/FDA F'UP ... the C-suite individual stated that no one is publicly reporting or even discussing a very high incidence (a SAE!) of LIVER DAMAGE of those covid-19 patients taking Remdesivir. He noted that apparently has a deterent effect on Covid...but for many...at what physical cost. He noted that a Very high incidence of liver damage it showing up in his Hospital after Remedesir drip.
In furtherance of this issue, I received from a former Medical Research Fellow and Dr. with further evidence of this fact. It arose during the Remdesivir/Ebola Clinical Trial, which failed. In fact All of Remdesivir's prior Clinical Trials failed... except, of course, the Covid-19 trials on which Fauci moved the goal posts, (ie. the end points to be achieved) to prevent total failure again) that:
"I read Remdesivir in its phase 1 Ebola study that hepatic complications set the maximum tolerated dose and (which is) the current dose (in Covid therapy and ) is at the maximum level (permitted) so there is no wiggle room to increase the dose. That means any drug interaction that increases the blood levels or any hepatic problems from Covid or its complications would put the individual at risk for hepatic toxicity."
Hummm...IMO look for FDA to grant IPIX/BRILACIDIN EUA...to eliminate Remdesivir's toxicity issues "quietly" (Fauci doesn't need a Wuhan Redux scandle with his handling of Remdesivir...his HIV failure drug)
ps. Wait for the Remdesivir "failure to disclose" is DISCLOSED or to "fade" from use! Then how much more will Brilacidin be worth?
pps. More to come from the C-Suite Hospital Admin...on Remdesivir and Liver damage issues...
Regarding the content of this post:
Everyday...many alleged unfounded allegations and iuendo are posted here about IPIX and LEO,...but NOTICE:
Posts are never about the failure of Brilacidin...because Brilacidin has never failed a HUMAN Clinical Trials and has only received glowing results in In Vitro tests by ALL RBLs.
...which is why Brilacidin is currently and continously being tested for efficacy against more and more viruses (Pan-coronaviruses and Alpha Viruses)
... as it successfully chuggs along in the current Covid19 C.T, inching closer toward the 120 patient completion goal, which is most important measure and goal worth talking about right now.
Brilacidin's need is not going away...the DIRE NEED and DEMAND will only increase...
I had long meeting this evening with a top administrator of a major hospital in Brooklyn (one that was constantly in the news at the height of Covid-19 infections)...he stated that the U.S. will NOT achieve Herd Immunity...NYC (Manhattan) is stalled at 35% vaccine rate...his hospital gets 40 new patients a day, they hospitalize on the average of 25 a day and 5 a day still die. He stated that if C.T. proves out (in several forms), and is developed in time he sees Brilacidin as essential to curtail, control and end covid.
It likely will ... but as disclosure, I decided to look into and move on to the Israeli exchange
I spoke with Jeremy Feffer on Thursday after the close...anyone investing in this particular issuance (vs. Stock traded on Israeli stock market) should proceed with caution and should speak with Mr. Feffer (look for last company PR for contact info). I existed this issuance and intend on buying on the Israeli exchange... Love the technology...do not trust this OTC issuance. Mr Feffer informed me that it will not convert to the Nasdaq stock when and if approved by Nasdaq.
Luckytouch... appreciate your concern...and about my reference to waiting for Brilacidin.
But, I must point out, that you are making some basic false assumptions about my experiences and basis upon which I have made my decision and how I am going forward...which by the way, I have discovered that 60% of my immediate family have also independently taken my position too (perhaps for different reasons). IMO it is up to them.
I am NOT AN ANTI-VAXER. I don't tell anyone NOT to take the vaccine. It is their personal decision. I just tell them, in kind, not to tell me what to do. I only listen to Medical/Science individuals and arguments on both sides, then make my decision, which I have.
I don't know the "cult" or "cult leader" to which you refer. If it is Tucker...I believe he is not an anti-vaxer conspiracist...but he is a Libertarian and an Anti-brainwashing and no BS independent thinker...and will not tolerate non-fact based, irrational, contradictory and hypocritical, ever changing "explanations" regarding the subject. The CDC/Fauci has proven itself, AT BEST, to be IMO totally full of Sh*t and shooting from the hip while in the pocket of BP...
So my decision is based upon listening to medical doctors and scientist on both side and combining it with my personal experience. Knowing your own body and how it reacts to prescription drugs/supplements is also critical. I know my body and the people around me...so I incorporate my own health/eco-environment into my decisions.
With that said, I have every "vulnerable" condition that has been identified as "high-risk" for Covid-19 and on top of that live and work (and continued to go to my office) on Long Island, 3 minutes from the NYC boarder line.
IMO the only questions is for me (and anyone) "how is my immune system?" and "what am I doing to support it." Coincidentally, for over 20 years, I have been taking every day, all the "right" (and "recommended to ward off Covid-19)" supplements in individual capsules (no single One-a-day BS) and in greater quantities then recommended...(depending on the supplement). Eat no sugar (or fruit) and no junk food.
I have never taken a flu shot. The last time I got the flu was 60 years ago. I can't remember the last time I got the common cold...had to be 5 years ago from getting extremely runner down.
You can conclude I am lucky...perhaps you would conclude "You might not have been exposed to someone with Covid-19??? Of course, you would be dead wrong... (no pun intended). I know of three serious cases in my office where the Covid individuals were literally in my face, in closed environments (window-less conference room) for hours...one hospitalized for two weeks on oxygen, the other 2 very difficult symptoms for over a week. None fit the Covid-19 candidate profile, except the hospitalized one was 76 yrs. old, but otherwise perfect shape (worked out at the gym 3 days a week).
Ironically the owner of my company was one of the three people was infected with Covid-19, with whom I was in direct contact, and who chastised me for not getting the vaccine "for society". I laughed and retorted...you walked around this office for a week coughing in everyone's face, sat in front of my desk and was insulted that I put a mask on (which masks scientifically could only have marginal effect since virus particle are much smaller than the mask holes) and then had me go to your house and meet for 4 hours...and only got tested 5 days later!
I do everything Drs say to keep my immune system in order, keep myself healthy with proper supplements, wash hands constantly ... for myself...which in turn, becomes "for Society" ...
Everyone has to take care of themselves in their own way...the real problem is most don't...and then follow the herd (whatever big government "experts" say)...without critical examination.
When (more like IF) the FDA goes through the process AND APPROVES the vaccines, AND REMOVES IMMUNITY granted to BP... then I will revisit the issue. But I doubt I will ever put it into my body. Why do so if my immune system is functioning quite well?
I do my part...which inures to the benefit of society...its society (via big totalitarian government...PRC types) I have to worry about Big Government (totalitarian) forcing me (and anyone) to do something against their individual good.
Agree...following the herd...and not engaging is critical thought and review can be fatal...both in health of one's body and our country...
End of story.
ps. Brilacidin, C-diff bacteria and ALS/MS/Parkinson's/Alzheimer’s connection...In Vitro experiments demonstrated destruction of C-diff (DeGrado)...and how effective would IV dosing be to wipe out C-diff in the brain ("Leaky-Gut/Leaky Brain") A corollary issue to that question is how it might also affect good bacteria in the Gut. If Brilacidin destroys C-diff completely, and some good bacteria, how quickly can good bacteria be added back into the gastrointestinal system to proliferate and keep any new C-diff at bay. Eliminating the condition of leaky gut (IPIX's UC proposed trials will no doubt look at bacteria count...good and bad) Leo signaled in PR planning and conducting CT for UC this year.
Connection of C-diff bacteria with serious neurological diseases... YouTube interview of Dr. Jay Lombard, Neurologist, by Dr. Mark Hyman (Director of Functional Medicine, Cleveland Clinic) link below:
MinnieM...exactly why 40% won't go near them.
IMO...supporting immune system and washing hands frequently...are the most important actions to take to prevent contracting.
My 97 year old mother, took Pfizer...against her wishes, because to her assisted living facility in NY was pressuring her. The second shot almost killed ... having gone through sharp abdominal pains and vomiting for a week straight, she went to the hospital to be sure her symptons, were not related to some other condition...they were not...it was the reaction to the second dose of the vaccine.
...I'll wait for Brilacidin...if it becomes necessary to address contraction.
Hungry_Ghost...
Can't disagree with anything you posted. (My thoughts 2-cents in red.)
"My post had nothing to do with a individuals choice of being vaccinated or not. Your body, your choice." (Oh, how conveinent for some that when the object of the debate changes, you can tell me what to do! A correlary to "What is mine, is mine, what is yours is mine!")
"No matter how you want to digest the numbers 35% of the new cases are those vaccinated is not a insignificant number." IMO VERY SIGNIFICANT.
"The last few PRs have stated that researchers have been doing extensive work involving BRILACIDIN. It would indicate to me that the initial lab studies never stopped, have been running continuously since and are still on going." (LEO's PR have continuously run a thread regarding RBL reseach, continuing and expanding, both deeper into Covid1-9 AND BROADER into Pan-coronavirus/Alpha-viruses...one just needs to READ and believe in the veracity of the statements...which SUBSTANCE have ALL PROVEN OUT...timing not in his control )
"The researchers have obviously seen something that has caught their interest." (IMO have seen something SIGNIFICANT in BRILACIDIN...just because IPIX does not receive grants for Brilacidin does not mean RBL's and others don't receive GRANTS WHICH INCORPORATE FURTHER RESEARCH into the potential efficacy of Brilacidin for Pan-coronavirus/Alpha-viruses...which was noted in yesterday's letter to Shareholder)
"My post was for the hope that BRILACIDIN can be formulated for use as a inhaler after the upcoming successful phase 2 CV trials." (Agreed...but detractors of LEO, IPIX and BRILACIDIN...will use raising funds for that purpose as a weapon against all three..."Oh no...more dilution!" Big F'n deal ... I'm with you on it...the multiple will just get larger...Dilution is a straw-man. Getting multiple dollars more in valuation because of inhaler...will pay off in spades)
"The successful trial should bring grants, government funds, partnerships, something of monetary significance to move BRILACIDIN and IPIX forward."...(and of course EUA...and LICENSING!)
"My wish is for BRILACIDIN SI *426* to be available to everyone in a variety of forms. The quicker the better. The fact is Covid isn't going anywhere anytime soon. A BRILACIDIN nebulizer would be a great help to both the vaccinated and unvaccinated. Both will need that option." (Agreed!).
Hugon ... to attempt to compare RVVT* to IPIX/BRILACIDIN...fails miserably...
As you well know ... comparing the two is like comparing Apples with a single Grape.
1. IPIX is AT LEAST ONE (1) YEAR AHEAD of RVVT* entry into a Phase II clinical trial for Hospitalized Moderate to Severe Patients and only Weeks Away form of proving out Brilacidn's Covid-19 efficacy.
IPIX is IN Phase II Clinical Trials for Brilacidin (which is beyond 50% completed) for Hospitalized MODERATE TO SEVERE Covid-19 patients..
RVVT*** IS NOT currently in Clinical Trials AT ALL for Moderate to Severe Covid-19...in fact the press release to which you refer clearly states...it is in PRE-CLINICAL RESEARCH...
...meaning...they are at least ONE YEAR BEHIND IPIX/BRILACIDIN:
"...to explore the utility of Bucillamine as a treatment for severe COVID-19. The agreement will support research in the laboratory of Dr. John Fahy to test the efficacy of Bucillamine in pre-clinical models of COVID-19 and to design protocols that test the utility of Bucillamine in human trials.
2. Brilacidin is a PATENT PROTECTED, proprietary compound of IPIX... RVVT* is only now attempting to enter "pre-clinical" lab testing on a GENERIC DRUG!...many companies have and do manufacture it...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9754677
https://www.mimaki-family-japan.com/item/detail?item_prefix=TF&item_code=007344&item_branch=001
3. Brilacidin being investigated as three prong therapeutic...RVVT*'s ..one dimensional.
...AND THE ABOVE you state: "seems to be transforming into a legitimate company" REALLY???? Or “NOT REALLY”!!!!!
imo This should take off ... in the next 6 weeks...by the end of Q2...icusf SHOULD BE UPLISTED TO NASDAQ