Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
FYI, BTZI is not on the Expert Market as you claim in your post. It's classified on OTC Markets as "Pink - Current Information".
LOL, While I don't approve, I do wonder why we need a law for that.
You hold up free trade as the prime example of Democrats supporting big business over the working class. However, this is not a black and white illustration of your point. While free trade has been traditionally opposed by US labor unions, the record of which groups have benefited the most is pretty murky. It's not as clear cut as tax breaks for corporations.
Workers have benefited from NAFTA and other trade agreements as prices came down or were held in check on goods purchased by the poor and middle classes. While many jobs were lost to cheaper labor overseas, many jobs were also created here in the US. Going back to my distinction between the warrior and empathetic classes, an argument can also be made that lower prices for the poor and raising of living standards in Latin America and the Asia Pacific countries struck a chord in the empathetic class.
Consequently, pointing to this as proof that Democrats gave up on the poor and somehow went all in on Big Business doesn't fly. Moreover, free trade has always been promoted primarily by Republicans. What opposition there was usually came from Democrats...
Are the Republicans Switching Places with the Democrats on Trade?
Please explain exactly what laws were sponsored by a majority of democrats that favored big business and made the population poorer. Apparently you enjoy regurgitating GOP propaganda...
Apologies, that was the Price to Book Value (P/B ratio), which is derived by dividing the company's current stock price per share by its book value per share. So using the current values (P/B = .4183 and pps = $.195), the Book Value (BV) would be...
$.195 / BV = .4183
$.195 / .4183 = BV
BV = $.466/share
As of today, IDEX book value is:
Ideanomics Price to Book Value:
0.4035 for Jan. 11, 2023
Company Price to Book values
At the time that report was filed, Farm On, mCig's JV partner, had ceased communication with mCig and had initiated a lawsuit. The report was submitted to the state, not to mCig, and mCig did not learn about it until later. mCig had no way to verify the information and there has never been any independent confirmation that the crop died since it was immediately destroyed. Even though Farm On's crop was an apparent failure, several other groups were successful with their test crops.
There is no value in dredging up these old debunked claims. Paul Rosenberg is no longer in a management role and Bot's has an entirely different management and ownership team than mCig had.
Not quite true...
I gave up on Xfinity about a year ago. I was paying over $230/month for internet, TV and all the premium channels. I downgraded to just unlimited internet data ($85/mo) and added YouTube TV for about $55/month to get all the basic live cable channels (e.g. MSNBC, ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN etc). I replaced their router with my own purchased router and purchased a Roku streamer on all my TV's. I added a monthly Amazon Prime and Netflix subscription and I'm saving over $80/mo and getting more TV for less money.
That's your interpretation of events. No proof. It was a JV and mCig had to sue to find out what happened after they were locked out of the farm.
LOL They also have over $370 million in assets.
The problem with the pps has to do with their exposure in China. I think once they restructure and reduce their dependence on China we'll see this stock take off.
It's one thing to say that like most other Marijuana and Cryptocurrency companies, mCig/Bot's found little success, and quite another thing to say that they were intentionally trying to rip off shareholders. About 90% of new businesses fail. That doesn't mean that they were all trying to rip off their shareholders.
mCig met with some success for several years but the whole MJ industry has been tanking since before Covid. Paul Rosenberg saw the writing on the wall and tried to convert Bots into a blockchain/crypto company only to find that the same thing was happening here.
There's still a chance that Bot's can recover, they still own a sizeable chunk of Everything Blockchain and several other companies. However, they need to define their business plan and convince shareholders that they can execute.
You have absolutely zero evidence that anyone participated in a scam. The lawsuit came from a disgruntled employee who was fired for incompetence and misrepresentation, which cost the company millions in lost revenue.
Bots/mCig post # 94191
Bots/mCig post # 94307
Moreover, I haven't promoted any stock in the past several years. What I have done is debunked several of your baseless claims.
Fair criticism! Unlike some others.
Even if you believe that management is somehow secretly buying and selling shares without being caught by the SEC, or that they are conspiring with third parties to secretly dump shares, there's no evidence of any sustained pump. Other than SEC required filings there have only been a handful of company PR's, spread out over the past three years, and virtually no third party articles about the company. When was the last time you even saw a PR? I count three over the past year. Where's the pump?
There's no evidence of
I'm 71 years old and have been closely following, observing and participating in politics since I was 16, both as a volunteer and Democratic party official. The one truth I've observed is that roughly a third of the electorate will always vote Democratic/Liberal and one third will vote Republican/Conservative. The other third will migrate from party to party or to Independent/Non-Partisan status. This last third actually controls most elections and is the least interested in following what's going on or committing themselves to a specific ideology.
While it would be difficult to show an exact correlation, in my personal opinion, as primitive as tribalism is, so is the division of the population along the lines of empathetic and utilitarian vs warlike and conspiratorial vs leave me alone and I'll only take a position when I have to. Throughout human history there was a need for a warrior class who would risk their lives solely for a belief in their tribe or their leader while a need also existed for care givers and peacemakers who looked for ways to improve life. An equal number of people just wanted to get by and live their lives. This is playing out in today's political parties and the extreme divisions are forcing everyone into their respective primitive genetic groupings. JMO
Transgender ideology??? ooooo That sounds so bad. What is it, and what made you an expert in it? What are you afraid will happen if kids are exposed to this? You think every little boy will want to become a girl and vice versa? Please give us your worst case scenario. I really want to know what harm is in your mind or are you just trying to invent scare words to frighten people about boogeymen.
Here's more. It seems that BTZI is now a majority owner of BULT..
Supplemental Disclosure for Change of Control Events
Here's some interesting news from over a month ago. Sounds familiar...
Bullet Blockchain Completes the Acquisition of the IP Portfolio Consisting of Bitcoin ATM Patents; Will Proceed With Licensing to the Industry
The difference between you and me, I don't "want to spread them" (i.e. conspiracy theories).
So all these sources for that story published lies and the only truth comes out of your cult leader's mouth (you know, that guy who was shown to have lied over 30,000 times while president)...
Again, I'm not defending cryptocurrencies here, just Blockchain technology which you seemed to lump together with Crypto. I chose that article because it seemed to explain things without getting too technical but, since you didn't care for the source, here are several others. I'll let the readers click on the link to explore the full articles...
From IBM
Benefits of blockchain
Neither I nor the author of that article were defending crypto, especially for retail or credit card sales although there are work arounds to the problems you mentioned. The point of the article was to point out the usefulness of blockchain as a software technology for coding certain types of applications.
Blockchain coding is not limited to crypto currencies. As you pointed out, it is a database technology that is a distinguishing feature of crypto but has uses well beyond tracking currency.
OBITX changed its symbol several weeks ago to EBZT. It is currently trading at $2.80/share.
Here's another view...
Why is Blockchain Important and Why Does it Matters
Billionaires donated to both parties but most of their money went to Republicans...
American billionaires spent a record $880 million on the U.S. midterm elections
I've been married/divorced twice and dated too many women who thought like that. It's a shame what religion and social norms do to people's attitude about sex.
I'm not defending Bots. I'm simply telling you to keep the criticism honest. Their record this past year sucks. However, there's been no pump and dump. In fact, there's been only two PR's since January. So stick to the facts.
A stock is not a pump and dump unless someone or some group is actively pumping (i.e. successfully making the price go up by publishing positive reviews) and personally profiting from the price increase. From the SEC...
Pump and Dump Schemes