You hold up free trade as the prime example of Democrats supporting big business over the working class. However, this is not a black and white illustration of your point. While free trade has been traditionally opposed by US labor unions, the record of which groups have benefited the most is pretty murky. It's not as clear cut as tax breaks for corporations.
Workers have benefited from NAFTA and other trade agreements as prices came down or were held in check on goods purchased by the poor and middle classes. While many jobs were lost to cheaper labor overseas, many jobs were also created here in the US. Going back to my distinction between the warrior and empathetic classes, an argument can also be made that lower prices for the poor and raising of living standards in Latin America and the Asia Pacific countries struck a chord in the empathetic class.
Consequently, pointing to this as proof that Democrats gave up on the poor and somehow went all in on Big Business doesn't fly. Moreover, free trade has always been promoted primarily by Republicans. What opposition there was usually came from Democrats...
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.