is...(put something here)...
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Unrestrained Pessimism is as illogical as unrestrained Optimism when you lack real evidence to support either. Any person motivated enough to publish accusation opinion on a subject, should also be similarly motivated to also publish the details of their accusations. What specific distortion, contrivance or unattainable promises? Where is your supporting evidence? What specific “monies are going into his pocket”, Where is your supporting evidence? Apparently you believe the pps would be somewhere else, if management were someone else. Where is your supporting evidence? If you desire to be believed you publish the accusation along with your supporting evidence. If the police pull you over and accuse you of something don’t you expect them to provide their supporting evidence? Broadcasting accusations without supporting evidence is spamification.
wow lots of accusations. Okay, here we go. You claim, “I know what you’re thinking?” No I do not know what you’re thinking, I can only deduce your thoughts by reading your words. “What do I base my facts on?” I base my facts on evidence. You claim that you never said “pump & dump is the reason for plight of stock?” You did say “excessive share dumping and imaginary parabola drummed up by the figment of creative imagination”, many people would take this as being a pump & dump reference. You claimed I’m “trying to manipulate your thought process and opinions without facts”? You’r trying to claim that when I request evidence to back up your claims, that I’m actually “manipulating your thoughts and opinions”? All evidence requests change everyone’s thoughts and opinions because evidence equals truth. If truth doesn’t change your thoughts and opinions then your thoughts and opinions become overwhelmed by lies.
You claim “I’m saying I know what’s going on?” I do not know what’s going on with GAHC and that is why I am requesting evidence to support either positive or negative claims. You claim I’m “relying on an old textbook”, what book? I am just reading what you’re posting and I’m requesting your supporting evidence? “Series 7? “ I do not sell securities products.
You claim “I have provided no facts?” I assume you mean facts or evidence regarding parabolic Bitcoin and the connection between Bitcoin and GAHC? I could tell you my opinion about Bitcoin or I could just direct you to this link
https://www.forbes.com/sites/martinrivers/2021/11/23/hopes-for-a-parabolic-bitcoin-rally-hinge-on-this-critical-support-level/?sh=62274b73d611
Regarding the connection between GAHC and Bitcoin I could give you my opinion or just direct you to this link? https://bitcoinist.com/gahc-integrate-blockchain-technology-arbitration-division/
Your accusations seem to stem from a different definition of what pump and dump really is. I claim pumping and dumping can be done by anyone publishing opinions without evidence.
You appear to be claiming that a person can publish opinions all day without evidence and it’s not pumping and dumping. I am claiming opinion without evidence gives opinion without truth and opinion without truth is self destructive.
you did it again. The definition of pump & dump is manipulation by those with established position. Manipulation of a stocks pps can be achieved by publishing opinion without supporting evidence. You have the position, the opinion and you just listed zero supporting evidence therefore your comment can be considered the negative half of a pump & dump scheme. Then you go on to criticize others for pumping and dumping GACH! You’re like that cop who speeds to the donut shop after just writing a speeding ticket. Pump & dump isn’t just about management manipulation it can come from anywhere. Some do it as part of a manipulative scheme and others do it just because they don’t want to put out the dd effort to actually prove what they are saying. Just about any time you are positioned and publishing opinion (without evidence), you are part of some kind of pump and dump.
Incompetent board members? What’s their names and their incompetent actions? What empty words? What evidence of inevitable collapse? What evidence the CEO doesn’t know what he’s talking about? Pump & dump can happen to any stock without board or CEO participation. Where’s the evidence of company participation? Accusations without evidence are extremely easy to make but accusations with evidence can be very convincing. Where is your evidence
Opinions about buying, selling and successful or flawed business efforts need to be supported by real facts and data. Lacking those reference materials you are as bad as Mathews when it comes to alleged expectations.
Don’t get the anxiety. Anyone can see the 2019 winter pattern right? It did the same then as now and then accelerated in the spring. So you buy millions of shares expecting it to not follow that pattern? Why would anyone see that historical pattern, then buy in expecting a non-historical pattern, and then complain because it won’t obey their expectation? Without news the historical pattern is all anyone can expect.
The parabolic claim I heard says BTC rallies after reaching the 20 month MA just like it did in 2019 and 2020 and then goes parabolic after hitting $90,000 on the 50 week MA. We’re not their yet.
You have your listing expectations backwards. I say uplist is more likely. Something like the EAC finally listing True Vote is undergoing testing driving the pps up to .005 and then .01-.12 once True Vote is approved by the EAC. Then $1-$5 after the EAC makes True Vote Checksum technology mandatory for all its other nine EAC approved election systems manufacturers. I claim this is highly likely because all the other manufacturers will become “EAC liabilities” unless they carry the same security and privacy capacities as True Vote. GAHC would then need to consider Nasdaq and NYSE uplist requirements. Uplisting to the Nasdaq would require 1.25 million public shares with at least 550 stockholders with a $45 million market value. NYSE uplist requires having 1.1 million publicly held shares and a minimum of 2,200 shareholders and a with a $100 million market value. Once on the Nasdaq or NYSE rather than just the OTC, GAHC would be likely to attract institutional investors and hedge funds that cannot currently trade the OTC because there’s not enough liquidity.
As far as your delist concern goes, delist is rare in the first place but it comes from non-compliance of exchange rules. Not aware of any GAHC violations. NASDAQ has a $1 minimum bid for 30 consecutive trading days before you get a letter and you could go back and forth with them forever... To avoid delist some companies will use a reverse split to raise the pps. If you did get delisted you would arrive at the OTC Bulletin Board, OTC-BB. As a penny stock you could get an OTCBB delist notification. You don’t just get auto-delisted, it takes some time. The letter would be an invitation to fix the mess you made by addressing the problem. If the exchange accepts your explanation or new plan, it will probably just monitor you to make sure you stick to the plan in a timely manner. If you don’t respond in 10 business days they would probably proceed with the delist process.
Some appear to not understand what is so exclusive or special about True Vote. That may be because of the complex nature of shifting election industry technology. Currently most of America’s elections are run by election technology companies that are approved by the Election Assistance Commission, EAC but their technology can be easily hacked leaving no absolute verifiable way to prove a tamper-proof, secret ballot election. Therefore questionable election integrity is currently a huge worldwide problem. This is the problem True Vote has resolved.
True Vote has taken this haphazard election process and secured it with a provable, tamper-proof immutable ballot. What would it be worth to anyone to know (with 100% certainty) that the ballot they cast was counted the way they cast it? I would be willing to pay a lot to know for certain my ballot was counted the way I cast it.
TrueVote accomplishes this tramper-proof ballot through a data integrity pattern known as a “checksum”. Checksum basically uses Bitcoin Blockchain technology to scramble or encrypt your ballot data into a code. Any change to your ballot results in a detectable change to that original code. Your ballot code may be later checked by anyone to confirm it remains in the same condition as when you entered it. True Vote technology allows ANYONE to confirm that ANYONE’s vote remains intact as they cast it WITHOUT revealing the details of what you actually voted for. 100% security along with a 100% secret ballot.
None of our nine currently EAC approved election companies can prove anything close to 100% security or a 100% secret ballot. This True Vote election technology operates directly from Bitcoin blockchain technology, so as long as Bitcoin exists True Vote election technology will be a provable, tamper-proof immutable ballot. Do you now see the Bitcoin connection?
Not only should this technology be approved by the EAC but it should be required by Federal law.
What do you think is going to happen when the EAC finally discovers True Vote election technology is the only provable, tamper-proof immutable ballot available in America?
https://truevote.medium.com/why-truevote-chose-bitcoin-for-immutable-proof-of-ballot-94ca3a8e84dd
Anyone know if TrueVotes System Testing Application Package has been sent to the U. S. ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION. EAC?
GAHC directly owns at least 30% of TrueVote and maybe another 10-20% through GES owning 4,500,000 shares of TrueVote. GAHC probably own at least half of TrueVote.
http://globalarenaholding.com/globalelectionservices.php
Voatz’s voting system has a lack of transparency which makes it really hard to do a post election audit for accuracy. Their system basically depends on the secrecy of its system architecture which means “security by obscurity”. Using secrecy for your main security mechanism is illogical because all it takes is a single security breach to compromise the entire system. “Security by obscurity” was the security used to contain the United States atomic secrets after WW2 and now the entire world has those secrets.
TrueVote or “GAHC” uses transparent software that enables anyone to download the Election ballot data, run the same algorithm that TrueVote uses to generate the checksum, and then validate the checksum stamp on any node running Bitcoin blockchain. This gives TrueVote a system that is transparent, immutable, provable, trust-less and secured by the most secure monetary network in the world, Bitcoin blockchain.
TrueVote transparent, Voatz not transparent.
https://slate.com/technology/2019/07/west-virginia-blockchain-voting-voatz.html
http://globalarenaholding.com/globalelectionservices.php
GAHC Has A Connection To Bitcoin.
TrueVote Inc has proprietary software that enables “anyone” to download the election ballot data, run the same algorithm that TrueVote uses to generate the checksum, and then validate the checksum stamp on any node running Bitcoin blockchain. THIS is how TrueVote gets an immutable, provable, trust-less, election system, secured by the most powerful monetary network in the world, Bitcoin.
“Blockchain” is not the magic solution looking to solve all the worlds’ problems, but Bitcoin blockchain can solve at least two of them. Bitcoin will fix money, TrueVote will fix voting and GAHC owns 30% of TrueVote.
http://globalarenaholding.com/globalelectionservices.php
https://truevote.medium.com/why-truevote-chose-bitcoin-for-immutable-proof-of-ballot-94ca3a8e84dd
——-
It appears GAHC is looking to assist GES in its operational growth in the U.S. and worldwide. VanDeWeghe has a Visa Information Security Executive background and a UCLA degree in economics. https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2022/01/28/2375050/0/en/Global-Arena-Holding-Will-Present-at-the-Emerging-Growth-Conference-on-February-2-2022-as-the-Global-Election-Services-Advisory-Board-is-Formed.html
wow that’s some accusation, where’s your supporting evidence? “hiding negative news and looking to break it without having the company go bust?” Where’s your evidence? If that were true why would Matthews be publishing that he’s going to be at the upcoming Emerging Growth Conference 24, on February 2, 2022, at 1:00 p.m. EST? Including that he’s planning to take the opportunity to expand on the information he provided shareholders at the previous EGC webinar? “Matthews will also offer insight into the future of GAHC and GES and once again give the investment community an opportunity to connect and interact with management.”
https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2022/01/28/2375050/0/en/Global-Arena-Holding-Will-Present-at-the-Emerging-Growth-Conference-on-February-2-2022-as-the-Global-Election-Services-Advisory-Board-is-Formed.html
If your avoiding public exposure to hide something you certainly don’t go making public announcements that you’re about to address issues from the previous EGC webinar, you just let events happen. You also don’t start claiming your going to offer insight into the future of GAHC and GES and give shareholders an opportunity to connect and interact with management. You want to speculate without evidence? I can do that also. The way the webinar was shortened makes me believe something big is brewing and they wanted to get their ducks in order so they could make a complete announcement Feb. 2nd, rather than opening a can of worms they weren’t fully ready to address at that moment. My speculation is that since Smartmatic has tried to acquire GES intellectual property before “maybe” they are making another attempt? The only thing we know for sure is that we don’t have real evidence as to what future issues they are about to discuss.
GAHC will be raised by a crypto increase like an ocean tide raising everything around it. Crypto will raise anything based on blockchain around it.
There is a problem with keeping everyone informed in a sue happy world. You tell someone what you’re trying to do and people go absolutely crazy. Half will try to sue you for doing it and the other half will try to sue you for not doing it. Because people love litigation, companies are better off saying absolutely nothing until they are forced to, and then only because someone will try to sue them for concealment. The constant demand to release information along with destructive litigation actually ends up reducing communications. Then everyone complains about reduced communications when they are the actual reason for it.
Exactly, seeing a glass half empty instead of half full is bad behavior.
If you have better idea’s let’s hear them negativity isn’t helping. patience goes a long ways in this game.
Unfortunately that was an error, it was for another ticker, Dampskibsselskabet NORDEN A/S, (DPBSF)
February 10, 2022 deadline for shareholders to submit proposals to be included on the agenda for the annual general meeting 3 March 2022.
blockchain tech does appear to be setting itself up for another big run if conditions remain constant. Constant conditions being the secret ingredient. Those conditions would then logically carry GAHC along within that (2017 Bitcoin parabolic wind), going vertical in April of 2022 and maxing out near the .06 target sometime during the first quarter. Just my opinion, do your own dd.
if someone told you everything you say will be used against you but everything you don’t say will be used to crucify you, what would you do?
iBio (NYSEMKT:IBIO) has risen more than fourfold in value over the past six-month period amid COVID-19 vaccine hopes. That has not discouraged Cantor Fitzgerald to initiate the stock’s coverage with an overweight rating with a price target of $3, more than double the previous close. The shares have added ~13.7% so far today
https://www.google.com/amp/s/seekingalpha.com/amp/news/3653648-ibio-surges-after-cantor-fitzgerald-initiates-with-overweight-rating
here come the 5’s, anyone heard any news?
why would a software company like Devvio with secure, inexpensive, scalable crypto blockchain be using Strong for one of it's nine "advisors"? Devvio's in Albuquerque, Strong's about 50 miles away in Santa Fe. what's Strong up to? maybe shopping for a crypto acquisition. they did that same sort of thing with cwir just before acquiring it. Strong, Benske and Mondragon names showed up on cwir otc markets weeks before announcing the acquisition...
estimate to be able to make 500 million doses of high-quality product annually. https://www.ibioinc.com/news/ibio-estimates-500-million-dose-capacity-for-covid-19-vaccine-from-its-fastpharming-facility
In many cases the line between reality and delusion is just a matter of time.
wow, up 300%, someone must know something, cwir hasn't moved. anyone see anything official?
Appears to be a developing market for IBIO’s lichenase booster molecule (“LicKM”). It’s designed to give a single dose prolonged potency immune response. With the predicted shortage of adjuvants all those vaccines out there requiring booster chemicals will probably be looking to either use or buy that patent.
Agreed, many times the name of the game is pure pps manipulation and nobody has a clue until someone starts buying huge blocks back a lot cheaper. It begins with deliberately releasing public sell information and ends with them secretly buying it all back cheaper $$.
Reading between the lines says the vaccine issue along with all the other related issues is a guaranteed free for all, with it being impossible to predict a final solution to anything. Therefore investing in final solutions will be like throwing a handful of darts hoping to hit the target. That means there is no real way to predict what is going to happen to Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer AstraZeneca, Moderna, Novavax AstraZeneca, Emergent Biosolutions, Catalent, Texas A&M University, Lonza, GlaxoSmithKline adjuvant, the use of the Defense Production Act or IBIO.
Betting big IBIO plant-based coronavirus vaccine beats out all the old standbys, inactivated or weakened viruses, genetically engineered proteins, and even the RNA (mRNA) technology in the Moderna vaccine. I don’t want a half dead bug or genetically manipulated protein shot into me even if it works better. Plant-based will either take it all or become a required option.
Someone ran out of shares about 11:30 unless they went home for
more.
laughing or crying, cwir not the target just an adtm subsidiary
They need a new financing package. Interesting how Specks resigns June 27 and then chapter 11 gets announced two days later. Probably messed up big time and was replaced by Nicholas Winter. Winter just needs a real plan to reset their capital structure to address financial weaknesses and capitalize on strengths. He appears to be their high-stakes banker/business problem solver guy. Transforming some petrochemical companies profitable previously. Restructured right they could emerge stronger.
https://www.linkedin.com/in/nickwinter/
volume and pattern says shorty is about to get sneezed big cause they are running out of margin. When they finally realize what's going on it will be way to late for them to pull the plug. She will probably jump to a dollar. Shorty about to lose some serious cash...
Here we go again back to .60 probably headed for a dollar eventually.
take a guess... Why would otc markets post a warning about adtm NOT making material information publicly available? Better yet why would adtm NOT publish material adtm information instantly? Obviously something is going on within adtm and it is so disturbing that they decided to not make it public. That not published news would no doubt radically change the adtm pps if it were made public. The remaining question then asks if the news is positive or negative? The non-disclosure of negative news would help expose the company to non-survivable future litigation losses. The non-disclosure of positive news would help increase future company profits. Non-disclosure appears to support future positive company news. The only remaining question being what that news actually is. Just my opinion do your own dd.
Warning! This company may not be making material information publicly available. Buying or selling a security on the basis of material nonpublic material information is prohibited under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rules 10b-5 and 10b5-1 thereunder. Violators may be subject to civil and criminal penalties.
RS tanking assumptions are like rejecting a cake that you like because of a possible frosting that you don't like. Most here will probably be long gone by the time a possible RS could happen.