Refurbing that Longhorn would be rewarding as hell.

Would have preferred an AMX but couldn’t pass up this CA car with no rust.

‘69 AMC Javelin. Got to post a more recent pic after she was all fixed and painted.

K. Was just trying to garner actual factual info.

Oh, that would certainly count, all right. I must’ve missed it.

Maybe I’m missing something, but I cannot remember reading a single post wherein selling was encouraged. Can you direct me to a post or two that qualifies? Thanx.

Should all of the 'BS' mentioned be eliminated, all that would remain would be the company, King Reggie and Lady Linda, alone in the newly constructed OTCQB turret. Can't wait! Should be a hoot.

In terms of number of days, weeks, or even holidays, might it be safe to assume the NSS issue has run its course? Asking for a friend.

Back in their 'heyday', prior to all the SEC unpleasantness, they indulged in two (2) r/s's of 100/1 and 1000/1. Would that, in your opinion of course, qualify as counterfeiting shares?

IF the highly touted and hoped-for moass doesn't take place, there will be no place to hide. All the bravado proffered as to what lies in wait once the CE is removed will be up for scrutiny.

Stay tuned, indeed.

Huzzah!

Just skulkin’ and lurkin’. Hoping for the best but prepared for the worst. Every day a challenge. Thanks for asking.

Huzzah!

From your fingers to Linda's ears. Here's hoping!

Please don't forget to mention that the company has promised lotsa great news once the return to 'normal' has taken place. We shall see.

Do I 'hear' a faint sliver of doubt in your statement?

Your grasp of the obvious is heartwarming.

Inference being?

Healthy skepticism is not necessarily a bad thing. If the company were to produce a K or Q with even the slightest inkling of optimism other than; 'Look what we're gonna do once the CE chains are released', the powers that be would be much more likely to acquiesce. Right NOW would be the time for some positive numbers being shown in the highly anticipated K. All IMO, of course.

"We about to get a written statement from Kramer as part of the plea deal."

Where in the actual hell did you acquire that sliver of information?

Hate to break the news, but letting it play out is your only option.

It seems as if anyone not actively taking sides with hyperbole du jour is being labeled as one of those big-bad NSS holders. Maybe, just maybe, there are those of us hoping for the best but, based on past performance, are content to let this thing play out on its own.

IAW most posts these days, .01 is a pee-hole in the snow compared to what could take place. In addition, the vast majority of those holding at .01 (IMO) are the Canadians that boosted it up there --- BASED ON COMPANY-PROVIDED MISINFORMATION. If the CE drop doesn't take place, they're left holding the bag like the rest of us.

All IMO, of course.

Inference being?

Please be advised that the lofty close of above .01 was predicated upon the euphoria created by the company's release of the following information: From 10/27/22. "This means US shareholders can buy and sell. The restriction for US buyers has been lifted. Shareholders are also advised to do their own Due Diligence and hence ignore nonsense, opinions, and misinformation."

As we are all aware, we (US shareholders) are NOT able to buy and sell as per said company missive. The CE dismissal is a carrot still dangling juuuuuust a little out of reach.

One cannot help but observe the irony of being told that we can now buy and sell in one sentence and in the very next sentence be told to: From 10/27/22. "This means US shareholders can buy and sell. The restriction for US buyers has been lifted." Then, in the very next sentence be told: "Shareholders are also advised to do their own Due Diligence and hence ignore nonsense, opinions, and misinformation."

FACT

Today is Saturday.

"One has to be very close to the kramers to know their dealings"

Inference being?

I guess that makes it official, then. Good to know. It's always a pleasure having a pleasant tete-a-tete without the seemingly obligatory caps and lol's.

One would think that her expertise would be called for in the matter. Nest-ce pas?

Is the CE dropped yet? Maybe I missed it.

No one is doubting Atty Fritz's credentials. But, even if she is still on the 'payroll', I'm guessing even she is having trouble making a "silk purse from a sow's ear". All IMO, of course.

Misinformation -- I.E., "according to rules from OTCM the CE will be removed."

The irony of Linda not "fixing things" when she had the chance is that, predicated upon their stellar K's and Q's as well as other misc fundamentals, is that there wouldn't be a chance in hell of their survival, let alone the possibility of a huge payday. IMO, of course.

Given the fact that LP added in one of his posts that it might take a little longer than expected for the CE drop shortly after the 10/27 bulletin, I'd say that's certainly a good guess. Going forward, one might proffer that dotting i's and crossing t's class at Harvard be re-visited.

Truth is, the company's words looked great to just about everyone, myself included. Wouldn't it be a gas if those words had been totally accurate?

Repeat: From 10/27/22. "This means US shareholders can buy and sell. The restriction for US buyers has been lifted. Shareholders are also advised to do their own Due Diligence and hence ignore nonsense, opinions, and misinformation."

Repeat: From 10/27/22: "On 10/26/2022, FINRA processed a Form 211 relating to the initiation of priced quotations of DBMM, which means that the submitting broker-dealer has demonstrated to FINRA compliance with FINRA Rule 6432 and therefore has met the requirements under that rule to initiate a quotation for DBMM within four days of 10/26/2022.

Repeat: the removal of the Caveat Emptor follows a careful process. No amount of misinformation will change that.

Misinformation, Linda?

SPOT. ON.!

The MARKET can't do crabs until the Fed removes the shackles.

Quote: "Just opinions with no evidence."

Agreed! That's what this entire thread is -- day after day after day. Pro and con, back and forth. The final say is in nobody's hands but the Fed.

"Prove me wrong"!

...1 ...2 ...3

Well, here's a gut-wrenching scenario for consideration; What if, prior to a final ruling by the SEC, the Kramer crew files for bankruptcy and cannot cover?

And yet, when "logic and inference" is utilized in defense of arguments opposite the popular 'moass' prediction, said points are dismissed immediately. Until such time as final rulings actually take place, all posted logic and inference -- pro and con -- are little more than hyperbole. All IMO, of course.