Retired
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Can't wait 'til DBMM does something, ANYTHING -- positive or negative acuz the "conversations" here are becoming more and more mundane and ridiculously stupid!
As long as you, et al, are of the opinion that the 'bad' guys and girls (not you, Sylvia) must engage in a game of "whip-out", perhaps the suggestion be elevated to iHub for consideration?
Proving your "point"? What point was that, JJ? That only those ruled as the baddies must adhere to the ad hoc committee rules?
But, if "proving your point" made you happy, I guess my job here is done.
This board has less and less to do with dbmm as time goes on. BUT to acquiesce to your suggestion, should not the absurd proof suggestion result in everyone here ponying up their screenshots, or are the self-proclaimed owners given a free pass? Of all the posters here, YOU, Gusher, (with the possible exception of ol' Jimmy Joe) would have been the last one I would have thought couldn't see the tongue-in-cheek aspect of my missive.
Serially though, what good would screenshot "proof" accomplish anyway? None of 'em would be believed. It WOULD, however, provide another level of entertainment whilst everyone awaits our band of gypsies to actually produce something other than words.
Again, just illustrating absurdity WITH absurdity.
Hey, I've got a terrific idea. Instead of just posting proof that one is a shareholder, how 'bout posting a screenshot of our Birth Certificates, Drivers' Licenses and Social Security numbers? Let's get it all out there!
(Just illustrating absurdity WITH absurdity)
Rinse and repeat, lady(?). Rinse and repeat.
LP -- With all due respect --- and I mean exactly that.........
Back when this was RTGV which, I understand fully was a generation ago, I drank the kool-aid and bought in at $2.00 per share. Ancient history, for sure, but two things have remained constant from that period right up until now --- Linda Perry and busted promises.
You point out that dbmm has run "up" 10,000% on a couple of occasions. BUT try, if you will, to decipher the percentage of the precipitous decline from $2.00 per share to 0.005 AFTER two r/s totaling 100,000/1. The negative zeroes would astound, I'm sure.
The similarities between then and now, progress-wise, are staggering. Linda's knack for creating positivity was amazing. At just the right junctures, when the pps was falling and it was apparent that the company's (and Linda's) popularity was failing, well placed 'conference calls' were orchestrated and a new shot of adrenaline was injected into the mix. But, the so-called alliances never materialized, as did the "cadre of investors" and "mezzanine financing" (remember those, Linda?). Might today's adrenaline IV drips be just more of the same, especially given the very same leadership?
Back then, I was certainly among those who thought rtgv was a goldmine, particularly after merging with dbmm. After all, dbmm actually had honest-to-God customers and a battery of employees that were introduced to us along with their capabilities. I've often wondered where they all are now.
And so it was that I and a few others from those "golden" years who USED TO BE solid supporters are now firmly on the other side of the fence predicated solely on projections and promises that never came to pass. These days, the BIGGEST difference being there are now 6 moderators and the board has turned into ------ well, let's just say that the only ones missing are James West and Artemus Gordon.
Sp please, anyone who wishes to respond in a civil manner to discuss today's situation or this post -- please bring it. Those wishing to message simply to read themselves in print --- save it.
Inference being that you DO "know better", of course.
Just another well thought (?) response to a serious query.........
In your zeal to criticize dbmm critics, why not just, for once, have something positive to say about your company?.........
That asking too much?..........
Oh well.......
If you don't appreciate two sides of the story.......
If you don't wish to acknowledge that there ARE two sides to every story.......
Why criticize those who do?
That's what "chat" boards are for...........
'Stepford Wives' this ain't................
Oh well ....................
Lol! Belushi at his absolute best!
Congratulations! You managed to get through an entire post without sniping at anyone and staying on-point with your favorite pinkie. Betcha you can’t do that two days in a row.
How long ago were those public market shares purchased, if I might ask?
Of course they can (get a "reset" from the "bashers"). Whattaya think that something might be?
Quote:
Company knows exactly what it is doing.
So, sub-penny for over two decades has been the plan all along, then?
Quote:
The DC Acquisition, the right decision, was finalized in 2012.
And yet, when I point out the West Coast debacle in the same era, you immediately Poo-Poo the recollection as having exceeded the "statute of limitations"!!
Lemme hear a Huzzah!
All of this attack and defend nonsense began a couple of years ago when dbmm was targeted as a potential money-maker. Whether that money was realized as a result of pumping or company production made (or makes) no difference. There's money to be made in either event. So, the drive to attract investors began. Non-stop posting was done in an effort to make dbmm the leader in number of posts on iHub. Mission accomplished. More and more folks were attracted to this seemingly "diamond in the rough" based very little on facts but more on post volume. Along with massive volume comes infighting and, as the saying goes, any publicity is good publicity. Then, the rules were relaxed insofar as verbiage was concerned, followed by the approval of various emoji's, some of which are clearly designed to irritate. The result has been a disgusting daily display of one-upmanship by probably normal individuals that cannot seem to help themselves. Okay, Poo........ step in and tell everyone how much "shareholders know", as opposed to how much shareholders are being manipulated.
Just sayin'.
Yes. She DID respond "politely". That may just be a first! Kudos to Poo!
Oh, golly-gee. Hadn't thought of that. Thanx for the assist, even though that question was addressed elsewhere, but I've got money says the answer to my query doesn't lie there.
Well, that certainly didn't answer the question, but thanks for the venomless response.
Just a quick question to Poo re: the 2012 acquisition of Digital Clarity, if I may: How many employees did Digital have on the payroll at the time of acquisition? Where are they now? Gonna take a SWAG and guess that said acquisition probably wasn't the high point of their careers.
Not really. The RTGV era was certainly "bash-able" as, during that period, PPS went from over $2.00 per share to ..... well, let's just say it tanked. If you like, we can maybe contact 'Threeflight' for verification. RTGV is, more-or-less, wiped from the docket because it disappeared from the IHUB radar after the merge. Kinda like your "statute of limitations" hidey-hole. Working from memory, however, I can recall almost mirror-image similarities taking place back then with what's happening now; I.E., lots of talk and little to no actual performance. Back then, Linda was gangbusters against "flippers" whom, she said, were keeping the PPS from rising. Never mind the fact that there was never any positive revenue BUT plenty of red numbers. Today, it's the bashers who are blamed. "Blamed for what?" you may ask. Thanks for asking. Bashers are blamed for deigning to point out non-existing performance, revenues and history. You know, due diligence stuff.
Although it's been stated many, many times, the fact of the matter is that the PPS is TOTALLY IN THE HANDS OF THE COMPANY..
Please be sure to note that this entire missive was done without name-calling, swearing, denigrating or other unpleasantness designed to piss anyone off.
Just sayin'.
You are 100% correct re: company updates with some meat attached. That is now the case, has always been the case and will remain the case. The long and the short (no reference intended) of it is that the onus lies completely on the company's shoulders.
Poo: You state that;
Re: your selection of “facts”. Shouldn’t they all fall into the realm of the dreaded “statute of limitations” that you refer to when it fits your narrative?
Just sayin’
Acknowledged.
Obviously a hired gunslinger to come into town and stir shit. Had his birthday 2 weeks ago and asks nothing about the company, what it does, who's in charge, when did they last earn a dollar --- nothing. Another possibility is it's someone who was relegated to only one post per day by admin, so they change their moniker, sign on and make some noise.
One might wonder if, given the frequency in which Kramer's name was brought up, they (Kramer) might have legal options available?
Just for shits and giggles, can you answer exactly how the "bashers" differentiate from the "basher"-bashers? Seems as if the "bashers" mention the actual company far more often than the "basher"-bashers. (Let's go DBMM or DBMM Baby taglines don't count).
Might want to consider referring to the Presentation as the Emerging Cicada Company. Seventeen years of hibernation before finally "emerging".
If memory serves, very similar jargon was uttered over 15 years ago -- by the very same person -- via conference call. How is today's utterances to be more believable? Are you still "jazzed"?
Well then, the prerogative answer swings both ways, now doesn't it? Insofar as your company being trashed 24-7 is concerned, that wouldn't be the case had they not deserved it. Once (if ever) they produce something solid, all the baddies will silently slink away. BTW, you "seriously doubt" my participation in the form of sharing in this great, once-in-a-lifetime, opportunity ---- DILLIGAF?
I try to keep to one-liners so's y'all understand, but seriously doubt that's the case.
Another pertinent question might be; Why do YOU care so much what anyone else thinks, says or does? If you're so very pleased with your company, your company's leaders and the direction in which it's headed, why not just sit back and enjoy the ride? Why not place all the nefarious naysayers on ignore and go about your day?
Just sayin'.
I would proffer that it's equally obvious that yourself, et al, really don't give a damn should the company " fail, go bankrupt, and disappear" so long as it manages to take one last deep breath and rise to a nickle where everyone can finally get the hell out of this madness with a few bucks in their pocket. At that point, a brand-new batch of bagholders can take over this robust forum. All IMO, of course. Please don't attack me!
1. Sorry, I don’t use ‘OUT’, but could be convinced to begin.
2. What, specifically, ‘aggression’ have I used against shareholders unless, of course, in defense of my right to post here like everyone else?
You are really losing your shit, Poo. Should Due Diligence not trespass further than 6 years. Are you actually invoking "statute of limitations" privilege to those here interested in knowing the (shudder) FACTS?