Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
IkeEsq,
does Fidelity take a portion of income when you lend your share to them?
My Ameritrade account says it will split 50/50 bewteen theirs and mine.
Thanks
Agreed on all points.
Those numbers, i.e., 0.63 bound by 0.4 and 0.99 for age>65 group, must have been extracted from the Gaussian fit judging from the fact that different Confidence Level numbers are printed on the plots in page 32 through 37, meaning they are not flat distribution and majority of the data points are in the middle. For example, if you quote 99.9999% confidence level, everything will have points above 1 (dotted line) no matter what (with ignorable probability).
So, it is almost non-sense to call this data "marginal". I am not concerned at all.
BTW, I am a PhD physicist with good background on Statistical analysis, though it is not medical or biotech related.
Even in that case, the numbers below the chart are confusing at best, and shouldn't have been there without further notes.
This needs to be reported to NWBO before they PR TLD.
H2R, you are the one who discovered it, and would you be comfortable to do it?
I agree that there are clear inconsistencies.
While this is the kind of thing why there is peer review process for publication on the refereed journal, I thought they had ample amount of time to rectify internally, and it gives me an impresion they might have hurried for the presentation.
Self-proclaimed biotech guru still doesn't understand by 2018 the trial became virtually single arm trial, yet this random bear argument is succesful in creating fear.
What a world we are living in !
I wonder these people will seek DCVAX when they get GBM.
What an irony!
My 2.5m shares are unchanged since about 1.5 years ago. I am planning to hold all of my shares at least until $5.
"Now he says….” virtually all public companies disclose.” — Ex
Thanks for confirming some don’t.
I got your pink pony right here. You lost. You are making up numbers again. The fact remains a percentage of companies choose not to publicly announce filing. It proves my point. Now get on your pink pony and ride out a here."
It is not about who wins or loses on the message board.
It is his OBVIOUS ill-intention being on this board that makes him so disgusting despite his average intelligence.
They need to bring down SP further, yet shorts know it has bottomed. So lots of despair.
Why not?
He thinks he knows more.
It's really comical.
I have lived long enough to see all, and I can say this.
The short thesis is not any more comical than your 'NWBO's management sitting on the failed trial' thesis. Haha..
I am really anxious to see what your thesis going to be after a successful TLD followed by a journal paper. 'We can't really trust the referees on the journal' perhaps?
Your obvious intention here makes my time to reply to you unworthy.
But, what the hell. I became a multi millionaire already, and expect to become much more due to a 'scam' as you call it.
And I am proud to support this gem to become fully mature to be hope for all the people who suffer from the cancer.
It is not worthy of my time, but what the hell.
Judging from your desperateness, I sense your job is about to be terminated. Haha
The last couple of days were exceptionally noisy with the shorts desperate
attempts. Will the shorts on this board be able to claim credit for last couple of day's decline in SP from their boss? Just curious how others think.
Has anyone been called by T. Rowe Price fund regarding the proxy?
I have all my NWBO shares in TD Ameritrade account and have voted my proxy through them. But, this lady from T. Rowe Price fund called and said it's about NWBO, and they haven't received the vote yet.
Does anyone have similar experience?
It's been a while since I left them, so I don't remember the detail.
I don't buy the resident scumbag here claiming the management was scum, but the biggest difference was PPHM's management was not vested in the company as much as LP is. That alone gives me a lot more confidence in NWBO, frankly. Both Thorpe and L. Liau are top notch scientists, but Thorpe passed away prematurely which added misfortune to PPHM.
I lost a big time in PPHM, but made all those up and even bigger now with NWBO.
Or a serious ADHD patient. He needs a treatment.
I have been away from the board last couple of months. Excuse me if the answer is given already, but your post seems to assume we were given 6 months extension. Is it true ?
Thanks.
It may turn out to be wasted effort. But, this has gone too far and I will give it a try. I sent you an email to your private address.
Thanks for spearheading the effort.
chees
The difference now will be if the poison pill is allowed to expire then any entity can accumulate on the open market and make a tender offer which the BOD would be legally obligated to disclose to the shareholders, if not put to a vote.
Somewhere in the middle is reality.
Too bad. Money can make this world so ugly, otherwise filled with absolute beauty and virtues which I eyewitnessed in my whole scientific career.
Whether science is correct or not, seems to be almost irrelevant at this point in terms of PPHM's situation, hence that of my investment. But, for the sake of the inventor’s defense, I would say this.
In the science community, it's given that any theory, no matter how perfect it might look, has to be confirmed/demonstrated by experiment as a final proof. In this case, it would be through pre-clinical/clinical trial. First pass of one's claim is through publication in the peer reviewed scientific journal where it goes through a scrutiny of world experts in each field. Upon successful defense, it will have much bigger audience where additional layer of scrutiny will come in. It can be lengthy process of scientific argument back and forth, but until it is proven through some kind of experiments (in this case clinical trial), it still is a theory. I am a physicist, so I will give you physics examples. When Einstein published General Relativity, there were handful of skeptics about his tensor equations despite its elegant math, until it was proven by a solar eclipse event in 1919. The Higgs boson is a must particle that should exist to hold standard model (explaining all 4 distinct forces in the nature with one equation) valid, and no matter how beautiful/perfect the theory was, until its discovery in 2012, it was just a theory.
Understanding MOA is a theory, and there have been countless publications on pre-clinical study which went through mountains of scrutiny that convinced more than few people that the theory is correct. Unless you go through an effort for final proof, there is no way to say either way. So, I would say one's skepticism about the theory is valid, but until it is finally proven through clinical trial, it is just another theory.
I have a strong belief in the scientific community, and when a theory survived its scrutiny, I thought it deserved my investment to finally prove it.
CSM debacle was so damaging, because at that time the landscape was still chemo! the 3 yr delay opened the door for I/O.
I would take your answer as you can accept the scenario of your return being nowhere near astronomical, and I will go back to other resources for reading. Thank you.
Eb, I don’t want to engage in fruitless arguments like many here, and actually, I don't. But, for the sake of the argument…
You say your expectation is still to make astronomical sum (fold) of money. But, from objective and balanced point of view, your astronomical appreciation will be only realized when PPHM becomes Microsoft of biotech. I've always thought, and still think whoever has Dr. Thorpe's IP can become Microsoft of biotech. But, are you still betting on this no matter how long that will take through all possible negativities of RS, dilution, yet another sabotage, you name it, even if PPHM eventually becomes Microsoft of biotech ?
Otherwise, you must have other scenario which will make your bet plausible.
Wouldn’t it be better off betting your money on the company where PPHM’s IP/technology is transferred and realistically produce the end result to fullfill Dr. Thorpe’s science ?
But, again, that’s only my position now.
keep in mind they could care less about shareholders.... how do they make it work for themselves under current circumstances is what will drive end game value....
Thanks for your reply.
IMO renewing the PP without communicating a viable strategy for restoring shareholder value will not be a good thing...
Thanks Jake.
I came back from the normal day duty to catch up to read.
As I stated, I have given up the hope of 100 fold of my initial investment by now, and I am in the process of collecting as much as possible information available including this board to make a right decision.
It's interesting that people debate the possibility of the trial stoppage due to the suspicion of tampering.
A possibility such scenarios bring to the outcome which will put PPHM in a driver seat again, or any other rosy scenarios might change the outcome of all longs investment very differently. And, it even might change my decision later on to invest in this company again.
I came into this due to my belief in science which was praised by my colleagues comprised of top research universities , and I thought the science deserved my investment. But, after 15 years long, I finally gave up the hope that PPHM might be the right place to realize the science, or it might take too much longer than 15 years I have been invested, which was my initial time frame when I started to invest on this company.
In retrospect, I wonder things might have been much different, if Dr. Thorpe is still alive.
I wouldn't have invested into a Tobacco company even if it promised a 100 fold return in much shorter time period. Some here might say it's stupid, it's the same money. But, people have different values, and I acknowledge that. I, also, know there are kind of people who would virtually do anything, if they benefit from it.
Having said that, I am still looking for a fastest way out with as much as possible, for now.
You seemed to be the one with the position pretty much middle of the spectrum on this board, and I want to ask this question. What is your position on the poison pill ?
I know PP is the only one ingredient to this complex equation, but non-the-less, very important one. I would appreciate your position on this, and why.
Thank you very much.
I am a PhD bio physicist, and I got into this because of the connection to late Dr. Thorpe. I have believed his theory for so long, but I came to lose my belief that PPHM might be the right place that can materialize his theory/inventions.
I truly regret that I have arrived to this conclusion.
The 20k was $5 that day now it is 0.40
We all knew/know the biotech investment's risk/award. I can't say my investment on PPHM was my rent money, but I can't say it was something I can live without, either. But, if worst comes worst, so be it. I am ready to lose ALL.
I regret that I arrived at this sentiment, but please understand that I am looking for an opportunity to break even or least amount of loss. So, my acceptable scenario is company accepts a reasonable low ball offer or hostile takeover happens as soon as possible. Along that line, RS MIGHT not have much effect.
If I remember correctly, he flipped his position sometime ago...
Let's face it. I have been through RS once in this company. So, I know how bad it CAN be. RS may not be avoidable, but if we have reasonable offer, or progress toward partnering after RS, RS might not be all that bad as we think now.
Thanks 4OurRetirement.
Even if I don't come here often, it has been a good source of info otherwise I wouldn't have gotten. There have been always extreme optimisms and pessimisms on this board, but as all other aspects of life, the truth is ALWAYS in between. So far, PPHM has been no exception.
No body else is responding to my PP concern except you. So, I will ask you, 4OurRetirement.
I know it might not be relevant as for the decision BOD will make, but how many longs do you think would want for PP to expire given the information available now ?
Is there anything we can do against BOD's decision ?
BTW, I am not new at PPHM. I've been in PPHM for 15 years. But, rarely posted/read this board. After the disaster, I am collecting all possible info to make a right decision.