Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Gateway discusses TPM's and EMBASSY Security Center.
http://www.gateway.com/programs/gwshield/features.shtml
Data Defender: TPM
A security chip that's bound to a computer's motherboard—and that can't be removed—TPM stands for Trusted Platform Module. It provides enhanced protection against information exposure for professional systems. Among other things, TPM:
• encrypts data and files to defend against hackers
• authenticates and protects user passwords
• offers network authentication
• safeguards e-mail communications and file transfers
Besides the TPM chip, TPM software is required to manage the chip. That's where EMBASSY® Trust Suite Gateway Edition comes in. This extensive software suite includes three applications: EMBASSY® Security Center (setting up and managing preferences for TPM), Security Wizards (additional hardware security) and Private Information Manager (password protection and management).
From a friend regarding NAC. Some additional good information.
http://www.cbronline.com/article_cbr_print.asp?guid=48BDFE9F-882D-4E36-900C-3F8E38D235B2
2leelake
I believe current wavoids will be buying in the future by using margin accounts. This will help to drive the SP. While its not my recommendation to buy WAVXD on margin, its going to happen.
2leelake
When was the last time Wave announced a new financing package and had the SP end up for the day?
While I believe the new stock offering is excellent news for WAVX share holders, I do find the timing of the announcement interesting, in that the CC scheduled for next Wednesday could be very positive. With “new institutional investors” on board, I don’t believe WAVX would want to report anything that would possibly move the SP back down into the .60 and .70’s. If so, they would have waited until after the CC to complete the stock offering. JMHO.
2leelake
From a friend regarding naked shorting:
Litigation Release No. 19607 / March 14, 2006
SEC v. Langley Partners, L.P., North Olmsted Partners, L.P., Quantico Partners, L.P., and Jeffrey Thorp, Civil Action No. 1:06CV00467 (JDB) (D.D.C.)
SEC FILES ENFORCEMENT ACTION AGAINST HEDGE FUND MANAGER JEFFREY THORP AND THREE HEDGE FUNDS FOR ENGAGING IN ILLEGAL “PIPE” TRADING SCHEME
Defendants Consent to Permanent Injunctions and Agree to Pay $15.8 Million to Settle Charges
The Securities and Exchange Commission filed securities fraud and related charges today against three New York-based hedge funds, Langley Partners, North Olmsted Partners and Quantico Partners (collectively, “Langley Partners”), and their portfolio manager, Jeffrey Thorp, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. Langley Partners and Thorp agreed to settle the Commission’s charges that they perpetrated an illegal trading scheme to evade the registration requirements of the federal securities laws in connection with twenty-three unregistered securities offerings, that are commonly referred to as “PIPEs” (Private Investment in Public Equity), and engaged in insider trading. As part of the settlement, Langley Partners will disgorge $8.8 million in ill-gotten gains and prejudgment interest, and Langley Partners and Thorp will pay civil penalties totaling $7 million.
The Commission alleges in its complaint that Langley Partners and Thorp, after agreeing to invest in a PIPE transaction, typically sold short the issuer’s stock, frequently through “naked” short sales in Canada. Among other things, the Commission’s complaint alleges that:
• Once the Commission declared the resale registration statement effective, Thorp used the PIPE shares to close out the short positions ─ a practice Thorp knew was prohibited by the registration provisions of the federal securities laws. To avoid detection and regulatory scrutiny, Thorp employed a variety of deceptive trading techniques, including wash sales and matched orders, to make it appear that he was covering his short sales with legal, open market stock purchases. In fact, the covering transactions were not open market transactions because Thorp was on both sides of the trades.
• In each of the transactions, Thorp made materially false representations to the PIPE Issuers to induce them to sell securities to Langley Partners. As a precondition of participation in a PIPE, Langley Partners had to represent that it would not sell, transfer or dispose of the PIPE shares other than in compliance of the registration provisions of the Securities Act of 1933. This representation was material to the PIPE Issuers, who, as the stock purchase agreements made clear, relied on the investors’ representations in connection with qualifying for an exemption from the registration requirements for their private offering. At the time Thorp signed the securities purchase agreements, however, he intended, if he had not already done so, to distribute the restricted PIPE securities in violation of the registration provisions of the Securities Act.
• On seven occasions, Thorp also engaged in insider trading by selling the securities of PIPE Issuers on the basis of material nonpublic information prior to the public announcement of the PIPEs. Thorp engaged in this conduct notwithstanding his express agreement to keep information about the PIPE confidential and/or to refrain from trading prior to the public announcement of the PIPE.
To settle the Commission’s charges, without admitting or denying the allegations in the complaint, Langley Partners and Thorp consented to the entry of a final judgment permanently enjoining them from future violations of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder and Sections 5 and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933. In addition, the final judgment orders Langley Partners, North Olmsted Partners and Quantico Partners to pay, jointly and severally, disgorgement of $7,048,528, prejudgment interest of $1,769,400, and a civil penalty totaling $4,700,000. The final judgment also requires Thorp to pay a $2,300,000 civil penalty.
The Commission acknowledges the assistance of the Investment Dealers Association of Canada. The Commission’s investigation is continuing.
http://www.lawfuel.com/index.php?page=press_releases&handler=focus&pressreleaseid=5717&r...
2leelake
dig,
Don't forget to include the Intel contract in your "fronts" list.
2leelake
Xam,
Thanks for sharing your notes from the Feb RSA. Your comments help us long time supporters of Steven and Lark, to not lose sight of the ball. After a day like today, it was really refreshing to read first hand facts, and not the half truths and garbage we were bombarded with today. I vote your post as "Best Post of the day" and a must read for all Wave longs.
You are a class act!
2leelake
Re: Winbond Electronics
I believe Winbond Electronics purchased from National Semiconductor the Super I/O TPM business in March, 2005. At that time, the Super I/O TPM used Wave's Cryptographic IP. I agree that today's PR does involve Wave.
The website for the CC can be found here: http://biz.yahoo.com/cc/4/62674.html
go-kitesurf,
Post of the day! Thanks for the excellent recap.
2leelake
Yes, the markets will be open Monday, Columbus Day.
kisamura,
I agree with your statement "things might be different this time around". I believe the last PP was announced a day after the CC. This time it was announced the day before the CC. Just may be, with no really good news to report at the last CC, it was decided to hold off the bad news until after the CC. This time, with good news to report, get the bad news out of the way first.
2leelake
OT, Xbox News, bolds are mine.
Testing the water. Although Microsoft (nasdaq: MSFT - news - people ) Chairman Bill Gates has been pretty nebulous about which gadgets will bear the Xbox brand in the future, he implied Thursday the company may soon be letting others in on the secret of the Xbox's architecture. According to today's editions of Japanese business daily Nihon Keizai Shimbun, Gates may license "the basic software" underlying its gaming machine to some outside companies in a bid to increase market share for the platform, which currently lags behind Sony's.
http://www.forbes.com/facesinthenews/2005/06/30/0630autofacescan05.html?partner=yahootix&referre...
2leelake
Whats up? First 9 minutes, wave traded 174,500 shs up .08.
twink,
I did not state this was the bottom.
2leelake
I am the one that purchased 4,800 shs @.65 in after hours. I had a large buy order in, and it was only partial filled. I will be buying tomorrow, as I continue to be very positive of Wave's future.
2leelake
Deferred revenue $453,000 conpared to last quarters $351,000.
I just voted yes to all on the proxy statment.
2leelake
Re: Annual Meeting May 23, 2005
The scheduled Annual Meeting is almost one month earlier than last years meeting held June 21, 2004. Also, this year's Annual Meeting will be held approximately 2 weeks after 1Q CC. I believe this is positive news.
2leelake
Regarding SKS presentation at the Analyst Forum.
I listened to the replay of SKS presentation and thought he did an excellent job. He did a great job of explaining what trusted computing was about and how Wave fits into the trusted environment. I believe it would be good for all shareholders to listen to the 41 minute presentation. A job well done by SKS.
2leelake
Kevin,
Right on and soon!
2leelake
Remember the July PR, little did we know the importance.
http://www.itsecurity.com/tecsnews/jul2004/jul248.htm
2leelake
We have traded over 1 millions shares with more than 3 hours to go.
Doma,
Thanks for the clarification regarding TPM Software/Hardware. You continue to be a great source of information to help me understanding TPM tech.
2leelake
Doma,
I have a question for you. You posted "Intel offers Infineon's
TPM software to turn on & take control of the TPM as well as TPM key management software. But Intel Now bundles Wave's TPM Key Management software as well as ETS. If Intel were to bundle Wave's ESC software as well, then Infineon would only supply the TPM chip & no software." Is the TPM software to turn on & take control of TPM separate from the CTSS software?
2leelake
Good Morning Zen,
My records only go back to 2001, but in Q3 2001, revenue was $224,768. The total revenue for 2001 was $692,125. Interesting that in 2001 the Q3 earnings per share was -.22 cents.
2leelake
Regarding the revenue discussion, my estimate for Q3 revenue is $275,000.00. The following (IMHO) is the breakdown.
Q3 2004 Revenue estimate:
Wave’s IP $90,000
Wave’s ESC 30,000
ETS and KTM Bundled 25,000
Wave’s CSP License 10,000
Software 30,000
Server’s 30,000
TV Tonic 20,000
Carryover Q2 Revenue 40,000
_______
Total $275,000
2leelake
RWK
Thanks for providing the Wall Street Journal Online article.
2leelake
Has anyone seen the article in The Wall Street Journal Online titled "Sun Micro Plans Utility Service, charging by the hour"? Sounds like metering service to me. I am not a paid subscriber and cannot read the article.
2leelake
Good Morning Barge,
Great post and I believe as you do with your short term and long term assessment. Thanks for sharing all your knowlege regarding the "INTEROPERABILITY ADVANTAGE." For the reasons you noted, I remain invested in Wave Systems. I get it!
2leelake
UncleverName,
Thanks for the CC Transcript. Great reading. For me, the following are a few of the high points from Steven's comments:
“The market is definitely starting to get underway. Our pipeline is showing a significant revenue growth in third quarter and into fourth quarter and I think that that will continue to drive ongoing quarters after that. We see the OEM volume coming. It has certainly taken longer than we expected. It’s probably at least a quarter if not two quarters behind where we really wanted it to be a year ago. But they’re making good progress. Nobody’s changing their plans away from this. This is a train rolling down the tracks, it’s just not going quite as fast as everybody expected. But it’s making very solid progress in the marketplace.”
“There continues to be a nice strong undercurrent of support from the major media brand and distribution networks for the use of WaveXpress in broadband. It’s something that’s been cooking along for two or three years. We think we’re making really good progress on it and we’ll see how it continues to develop, but we hope to see something out of that in the not too distant future.”
“Finally, let me talk a little bit about eSign. We have been working on our SignOnline group in a couple of different projects and are getting to the stage where I think we’re going to have a good distribution partnership with SignOnline. We’ve made a lot of effort inside the individual standards groups in both banking and financial services standards groups with eSign. That market continues to move pretty slowly. I think that the advent of Trusted Computing on lots of platforms to strongly hold certificates and identity will help loosen up some of the pieces in that market. And I think SignOnline is well positioned to be an aftermarket value added service.”
“I think we have, in our own little world, we have created a space for Wave where we are clearly leading in supplying interoperability on a Trusted Computing platform. And when you look from a competitive landscape, our products provide the easiest to deploy solutions for any organization who wants to take advantage of Trusted Computing and have the tools to do useful work with a Trusted Computing Platform, can buy any Trusted Computing Platform and have the software interoperate across all those platforms, and interoperability is absolutely key to make this market happen. And also have the management tools, so that I can manage keys, control keys and keep track of keys. Over the course of the last six months we’ve had a lot of feedback from our customers into our product, we continue to refine and ultimately release new versions of our product. We’re coming up on a next release of our product in the not too distant future which incorporates a number of different capabilities that were asked for.”
“Let’s focus on the fact that we have the major vendors shipping. Wave has the best interoperable platform. We’re beginning to get customer feedback that says, “Hey, we don’t care which platform we buy but we want Wave’s software on the platform.”
“The market to adopt Trusted Computing is coming. It is clearly developing. The major players that are out there are supporting it strongly, articulating their support and their building stuff internally. That’s what excites us. That’s what keeps us motivated. It’s not three years away. It’s happening now. You know, any market that ships ten million of anything is the beginnings of a market.”
“I think we’re, you know, we’re seeing the early stages of that. Is it going to generate a million dollars in the next quarter? No. But is it a product that can grow to generate a million dollars in sales in a quarter? Absolutely, yes.”
Armp,
Best post since the CC. I agree with your well thought out post. Also, I agree with Barge that we will hear about a new contract very soon. I will continue to buy all I can next week. IMO, at these prices this stock is the buy of the year, a no brainer.
2leelake
Steve,
What makes this board great are opinions and good DD. And your opinion is valid and contributes to making this a great board.
2leelake
D&O
Thanks for your response and I know your opinion is shared by many on this board. The best of luck with your investment.
Kevin,
Great post and I agree with you. This board is full of Monday Morning Quarterbacks, and unless you were in SKS or Feeney's shoes, you cannot know all the details that have led to their decisions. For the record, SKS, Feeney, and the BOD have my full support and I will continue to buy shares at this level.
Please note that in the Corpfin PR that the buyer is a "institutional investor".
Attn: eamonnshute
Have you considered including a section in your TPM Matrix for listing resellers of Wave's EMBASSY ETS?
2leelake
The recent good news from WAVEXPRESS regarding the use of TV Tonic by YES Network and Todito TV may provide a pleasent surprise in revenues being reported for the just ended 2Q.
2leelake
More information regarding Windows Media Rights Manager
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowsmedia/knowledgecenter/technicalarticles.aspx#digitalrightsma...
Digital Rights Management
Learn about the digital rights management (DRM) solutions that are integrated into Windows Media technologies, and how you can use them to protect your content.
Architecture of Windows Media Rights Manager
Provides an overview of how Windows Media Rights Manager works and how licenses and keys are used to protect content.
Developing a License Provider Service for Windows Media Encoder
Provides an overview of Microsoft digital rights management (DRM) technology, and describes how to use DRM with Windows Media Encoder and applications based on the Windows Media Encoder SDK. This article is intended for developers who want to encode content with DRM or set up a license provider service for Windows Media Encoder users.
Introducing DRM for Portable and Networked Devices
Gives a high-level overview of Windows Media DRM 10 for Portable Devices and Windows Media DRM 10 for Network Devices, two new Microsoft technologies that permit devices to play content protected by the Windows Media Rights Manager SDK.
Download white paper
(87 KB 24 sec @ 28.8 Kbps)
Protecting Audio and Video Content with Digital Rights Management
Describes how you can use the Windows Media Rights Manager SDK to protect audio and video content hosted on your Web site.
Using DRM for Portable and Networked Devices
Provides a technical overview of Windows Media DRM 10 for Portable Devices and Windows Media DRM 10 for Network Devices, two new technologies that permit portable and network devices to play content protected using the Windows Media Rights Manager SDK.
Download white paper
(138 KB 39 sec @ 28.8 Kbps)
Using Windows Media Encoder to Protect Content
Provides an overview of the DRM process and describes how to protect content by using Windows Media Encoder.
Metering the Use of Digital Media Content with Windows Media DRM 10
Describes the concept of metering the use of protected digital-media content, and explains how a content provider can use the Microsoft Windows Media DRM 10 platform to implement metering.
For additional a
Metering the Use of Digital Media Content with Windows Media DRM 10
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowsmedia/howto/articles/metering_with_drm10.aspx
Metering the Use of Digital Media Content with Windows Media DRM 10
Feedback
E-mail us with your comments and feedback about this article.
Abstract
Describes the concept of metering the use of protected digital-media content, and explains how a content provider can use the Microsoft Windows Media DRM 10 platform to implement metering.
Andrea Pruneda
Microsoft Corporation
June 2004
Applies to:
Microsoft® Windows Media® Rights Manager 10 SDK
Microsoft Windows Media Device Manager 10 SDK
Microsoft Windows Media DRM 10 for Portable Devices
Porting Kit
Contents
Introduction
How Metering Works
Implementing a Metering Aggregation Service
Issuing Licenses for Metered Content
Recording and Reporting Metering Data
Reporting Metering Data from a Computer
Reporting Metering Data from a Device
Processing Data from a Metering Challenge
For More Information
Introduction
Metering is a technology that allows digital-media content providers to count the number of times that protected content is used (for example, played or copied). Metering is not used to track the listening habits of individual users, but rather it is a simple tally of how many times a particular content item is used. At no time does Microsoft access any metering data.
Using the Microsoft® Windows Media® DRM 10 platform, media players on computers and portable devices can meter content that has been protected with Windows Media digital rights management (DRM) technology. Metering provides several benefits, the greatest of which is to reduce royalty fees for those content provider services that license content and then resell it to their customers. Royalty fees are based on the type of sale, such as whether the sale is a permanent transfer or a metered single play. The cost of a metered single play is much less than the cost of a permanent transfer, therefore metering content is often much more economical for the content provider.
Metering also provides other benefits. By metering content, a content provider can:
Determine which content is more popular.
Identify and pay the artists whose content is played.
Track the number of times an advertisement is viewed.
Back to the top
How Metering Works
Metering requires coordination between the content provider service (the content owner and license issuer), a metering aggregation service (a service that collects and processes metering data), and participating device manufacturers.
The basic process of metering is as follows. The numbered steps correspond to numbers in the diagram in Figure 1:
The metering aggregation service gives the license issuer a metering certificate, which contains a metering ID and a URL indicating where metering data will be reported. Then, the license issuer includes the metering certificate in the licenses for content that requires metering.
End users acquire this content and receive a license for it through the standard license acquisition process.
A media player on a computer or device opens this content license. The DRM component of the media player records metering data, which includes a tally of the number of times the content is used, the type of action performed, and the metering ID.
A metering plug-in or application on the computer periodically requests metering data for a specific metering ID and then sends the data to the corresponding metering aggregation service. If a Web-enabled device is used, the device can send metering data directly to the metering aggregation service.
This metering data can be decrypted only by the metering aggregation service that owns the metering certificate containing this ID.
For example, suppose a user subscribes to two music services and downloads metered content from each. The metering plug-in for one of the services requests metering data for its metering ID. Only metering data for that ID is gathered, and then it is sent to the corresponding metering aggregation service.
After the metering aggregation service receives and processes the metering data, the service returns a response to the media player, prompting the player to clear the metering data that was reported.
Figure 1. Diagram of the metering process
Back to the top
Implementing a Metering Aggregation Service
Requirement: Windows Media Rights Manager 10 SDK
The metering aggregation service is a service that collects metering data, and can be run by the license issuer or by someone else. Before it can meter content, the service must first create a metering certificate, which identifies the metering aggregation service with a metering ID and a URL. License issuers include this certificate in licenses, and then metering data is collected and organized based on the metering ID.
To create a metering certificate, the metering aggregation service generates a public-private key pair (by using the WMRMKeys.GenerateSigningKeys method of the Windows Media Rights Manager 10 SDK) and sends the public key to Microsoft, along with the URL of the metering aggregation service. Microsoft sends back a signed metering certificate, which contains a metering ID and the URL.
The private key is stored securely by the metering aggregation service and is not shared with Microsoft. Metering data that is reported is encrypted with the public key of the metering certificate, but is decrypted with the private key. Therefore, only the metering aggregation service that owns the metering certificate can access the data.
Back to the top
Issuing Licenses for Metered Content
Requirement: Windows Media Rights Manager 10 SDK
For a media player to meter content, the content license must include a metering certificate. So, the license issuer must first acquire a metering certificate from a metering aggregation service. Then, when the license issuer generates a license for metered content, the license issuer includes the metering certificate in the license by using the WMRMLicGen.MeteringCertificate property of the Windows Media Rights Manager 10 SDK. The result is that all actions for this content will be recorded along with the metering ID from the metering certificate.
Note When recording metering data, the media player records the license key ID as a way to identify the content. So, to accurately meter content, you must use a unique key ID for each content item. For more information about key IDs, see the Windows Media Rights Manager SDK documentation.
Back to the top
Recording and Reporting Metering Data
Content can be metered only if the end user uses a media player that supports metering. A media player on a computer must be based on the Windows Media Format 9.5 SDK, such as Windows Media Player 10. A device must be based on the Windows Media DRM 10 for Portable Devices Porting Kit. Metering data is then recorded automatically by the DRM component of the media player.
When a player uses metered content, the count for the action just performed is incremented in the metering section of its data store. The key ID (which is used to identify the content), the metering ID, and a transaction ID are also recorded with the count.
The transaction ID is saved until a reporting transaction has been completed. If the process of reporting metering data is interrupted, the transaction ID identifies which data to resend, thereby ensuring that a transaction is complete before clearing the data store.
Reporting Metering Data from a Computer
Requirement: Windows Media Device Manager 10 SDK (included with Windows Media Format 9.5 SDK)
When an end user acquires content that requires metering, the content provider service must provide the end user with a metering plug-in or application that periodically collects metering data and reports it to the metering aggregation service.
Important Microsoft recommends that you notify end users that you will be collecting metering data.
The IWMDRMDeviceApp and IWMDRMDevice interfaces of the Windows Media Device Manager 10 SDK provide methods to request metering data and to process the metering response from the metering aggregation service.
When the plug-in or application requests metering data, the DRM component in the media player retrieves the data for a specific metering ID from the data store. The plug-in or application forwards this data as a metering challenge to the corresponding metering aggregation service.
When the metering aggregation service has finished processing the data, the service returns a metering response to the plug-in or application, which forwards the response to the media player. This response indicates to the media player which items were successfully reported, and those items are then cleared from the data store.
Reporting Metering Data from a Device
Requirements:
Windows Media DRM 10 for Portable Devices Porting Kit
Windows Media Device Manager 10 SDK (included with Windows Media Format 9.5 SDK) for devices that are not Web-enabled
The process of recording metering data on a device, such as a portable media player, is similar to the process on a computer—the device must use a media player that supports metering, and metering data is recorded automatically by the DRM component of the media player. To support metering, the device must be based on the Windows Media DRM 10 for Portable Devices Porting Kit.
If the device is Web-enabled, it can connect directly to the metering aggregation service to report metering data. This process includes the following two steps:
The device creates a metering challenge and sends it to the metering aggregation service by using the DRM_MGR_GenerateMeterChallenge function from the Windows Media DRM 10 for Portable Devices Porting Kit.
After the metering aggregation service processes the metering data, the service sends the metering response to the device. The device processes the metering response and clears its data store by using the DRM_MGR_ProcessMeterResponse function.
If the device is not Web-enabled, it must connect to the metering plug-in or application on a computer to report metering data. That process includes the following two steps:
The metering plug-in or application requests metering data from the device and generates the metering challenge by using the IWMDRMDeviceApp or IWMDRMDevice interface from the Windows Media Device Manager SDK. This challenge is then sent to the plug-in or application, which sends it to the metering aggregation service.
After the metering aggregation service processes the metering data, the service sends the metering response to the metering plug-in or application on the computer, which then sends it to the device. The plug-in or application processes the metering response and clears the data store on the device by using the IWMDRMDeviceApp or IWMDRMDevice interface.
Back to the top
Processing Data from a Metering Challenge
Requirement: Windows Media Rights Manager 10 SDK
The metering aggregation service receives the metering challenge, which has been encrypted using the public key of the metering certificate. The service decrypts the metering challenge with the private key of its metering certificate. Then, the metering data can be extracted into an XML string or into an object. The data is grouped into collections by content item (such as a song), and then further grouped by action type and count. For example, the service can determine that Song A was played 10 times and copied once, Song B was played 20 times, and so on. The metering aggregation service uses the following interfaces from the Windows Media Rights Manager 10 SDK to process the metering data:
WMRMMetering
WMRMMeteringData
WMRMMeteringContentCollection
WMRMMeteringContent
WMRMMeteringActionCollection
WMRMMeteringAction
After metering data has been collected, the metering aggregation service sends back a response that instructs the media player to clear the data store for the items that were just reported. The metering aggregation service uses the WMRMMetering object to generate this response.
Back to the top
For More Information
For general information about Windows Media technologies, see the Windows Media Web page (http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowsmedia/).
To learn more about the components of the Windows Media 10 SDK, see the Windows Media SDK Components Web page (http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnwmt/html/wmsdk.asp).
To download the Windows Media Rights Manager 10 SDK or the Windows Media DRM 10 for Portable Devices Porting Kit, go to the Windows Media Licensing Form Web page (http://wmlicense.smdisp.net/licenserequest/) and submit a License Request Form online. You will receive a License Agreement from Microsoft by e-mail. Sign and return the agreement. You will then be sent a password and a link to download the SDK or the porting kit.
To download the Windows Media Format 9.5 SDK, which includes the Windows Media Device Manager 10 SDK, go to the Windows Media Downloads Web page (http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/downloads/list/winmedia.asp).
Back to the top
Support / Newsletter / Newsgroups