Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I feel we are asking each other the same questions. Maybe we have reached an impasse. I don't doubt you have been at very high levels of NASDAQ meetings either by yourself or with very important individuals reporting back to you. You seem to have a knowledge of how these events take place, and what entails a rubber stamp approval. However, you are also very light in specifics. I once again without getting into specifics myself, assure you that Wave's approval will not be "rubber stamped."
What do you mean by "participated?" My point, player, is that for you to make a blanket statement about a "rubber stamp" being utilized is speculation at best. Basically, on a logical problematic level what I see is a "covering of bases" so to speak. These types of suppositions don't really hold water.
Well, I guess I'll throw it back at you. Are you on the hearing committee? Do you have personal knowledge of the rubber stamp policy you allude to?
Let me reassure you, they don't. Of course, if you could give me a specific example of a rubber stamp I would appreciate it.
NASDAQ does not rubber stamp, I assure you.
waveduke, beware. Dice speaks Latin.
Hats off to you, Barge! Keep the aspidistra flying. But I tend to disagree with the niche desire of the "mod" as you refer to them. I doubt that Solms wants this to be a niche company.
Well, as they say, "that's what makes a horse race." Place your bets now or place your bets in the future. The odds may change at any minute. I personally believe that Wave is a thoroughbred that has suffered from a bad trainer and who kept telling the owner(s) that it was ready for the Derby when in fact it wasn't. Then again what I believe you are saying is that it might just be a nag after all.
Dice, now I'm not sure what you mean by "conditional" here. Are not all investments in stocks in some manner conditional "throws of the dice?" If you invest in Twitter, is it not based on some future as yet undetermined bonanza?
Yes, of course grind out are the operative words here, but I believe the SP will indeed "jump" when the grinding is successful. If it is.
Dice, it enterprise takes off, and you are indeed invested, it will be a rocket ship to the moon, my friend.
HI, all. I sense the shorts are running a bit nervous today.
Cartoon, you make a rock solid point. Good work.
Excellent rebuttal, dice.
Jemart, could you post the email you sent to ID for our edification? It would be interesting to see how you phrased the question.
Bank deal. It's free.But as I said, could be short trades are charged. I wouldn't know because I have never shorted.
Unfortunately, you are wrong. I do not pay a commission for my transactions. But it could be if I shorted a stock like you do there might be a minimal charge.
Broker? Do you actually use a broker?
For sure, do your research. It's important.
check this out : http://www.sec.gov/answers/shortrestrict.htm
Actually, you are incorrect. Restrictions will apply.
Bottom has been reached at 1.30. Up from here. Short restrictions are in place again.
return, apparently shorts were restricted from today's trading. So,if that is true, and I have a feeling it might not be, tomorrow is anyone's guess. My thought on the matter is the stock will be above 2 buckeroos at end of the day.
Alea, actually Barge is saying William Bendix (Life of Riley) is playing Babe. And Steven will hit a home run, not Bendix.
alea, Eras are included in the Nordic deal. Great news!
Barge,
I understand you frustration with this issue, but remember that bashers have realized the best way to damage longs and the investment was not to attack the long personally, and yet with practice they have learned do just that very subtly. Most were willing to tolerate this for a time, but about eight months ago it got out of hand, and there became a steady barrage of attacks on the longs. DD became a thing of the past. Trashing individuals and facts became the norm. Personally, I felt there was no other alternative but to leave this venue and seek shelter in other places. You and a few others have been a voice in the wilderness, but it's become an uphill battle.
Kisamura, So, you think his opinion concerning Wave's future is laughable as you have said? Do you have an earnings estimate for Q2? It would be interesting to see how close your prediction might be.
Kisamura, so you believe awk is living in an imaginary world, as you say? I believe his logic is indisputable.
kisamua, to quote awk,
"Trusted Computing concepts will be implemented across all devices, all operating systems: Microsoft, Chrome, Android, Apple etc.
Does anybody really think that Microsoft will manage the TPMs of all these different devices from different manufacturers? Own these devices? The assumption that the OEMs or Microsoft or Chrome or Apple will own the device is wrong. Imagine the public outcry if that were so! Politically impossible and, moreover, totally undesirable. Impossible.
THE END USER, THE CORPORATIONS WILL OWN THE DEVICE. THAT IS THE PREMISE OF TCG. THAT IS WHERE WAVE COMES IN.
The OEMs merely prepare their platforms regarding hardware and software so they can interface to an open trust infrastructure."
expat, I not sure the "what's required" and "what's included" has been answered yet.
alea, can't tell whether you are being optimistic or pessimist about Wave's situation vis-a-vis MS. Care to elaborate? It seems as though some are rather depressed about this and others are not. Maybe it's somewhere in the middle.
Ditto, Barge. And when Jesse Livermore checks in again, we can breathe a big sigh of relief. Where is he?
Awk, cypher's point is interesting, but I am sure you can counter and would be appreciated.
[}bemty1qZU VTPOI0 tu5 -0 hWz1 cKB nTRTE2 qt_- IyhMr2 ogzk coJOuGzM5hA pL1 t3jN10 FXOHUBDCxLCt CJ9R Vy6kNt0 S14 R072NdlEncTG EWxq K85 jPka ozH1 a7EJ01 1OWfBnbdN2 WeOnsfelLueb Qd8 ta5 R86xIwLjeP7 ASG9d0 FwstVtyC52 qqGJvK3 WIqD n5B7l2 Db5 gB8_wgWqiBB 7vC KctTf1 z_A V81c JhqAE- Z4GH28A V0 aGSp DO5er2 _LzD NFpwDKcwZ- 3rQSpuRcJ1 z9Vf -Q9 fyOM7mBOaWqj PRah hTwSK- qK5 4JtvX0 tUny4ImFoK3 ov4E 11 kD0E mzpDBucDYJDv FzRp Gw9VXurfGt0 WeKPhxELUwZy bMsO bzRIjxdid1 WM2 MJ4xFK6AS- iHRTneC UuckqUPV -u9M 20 Q1BO_K5 wf0 q0gi3Q5 4R5 QtUaYM4x sZkk j33SupDL20B -61 foiOi- KeOI PNyBF2 QYS3 Tu6f4ivM 2- S1pNrdVM Vc3 uwiXrWxm 98bf oAuwq- 4- 7hjKjO2 Mkfm 7aum Tl7mwf9 uydf_eLH 6r5 OR5xJ-5ie1 zHb3rOqj NDyKeQ3 DZQ7FS5 1uD exYg pLWBu2 OSYaUuI3K2 j7B E6h7Ve6d 3eA I_1 je4 ep53fKGHpZE s4rp Q2_Nc1 6J9 ozH1 RGzIzGI8m1 t9Nd Cj9 L5R0fXB_b1 Z95Y 9IaMbGE5ipfe Bf51oh4 GJ8 QEKt0SFkcRJS01 rv4D02 pL1 l3UKhksY6- 6cCC32 7Ex2gDcclxAKUou4 -0 m4WPV- 8Cnuv0 r8D 9I_OSuE _uDA Ig3 2JKR gB0jDb6 XHCc f0 u1- _1gaZHtN7mBNYC6 6RVPqDA B66 McqL FNtrIhDD2FA S-pOu0 jn4 -hAkMJIwYp2 La8 CWWpdsB TMh2eLMgp_6 p- c-9JQOrkf0 Yc3Fs28 ZKhpS46 hmUbi2Y3B0 sj4D yc0h5rrfC2 fTOnz1 WTBZh0 KuaX51{]
Foreign spies 'penetrate' US military networks
Colander The US should acknowledge that it is impossible to keep spies out of its networks, say experts
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-17486847
US report: China cyberwar a risk
Call for cyberwar 'peacekeepers'
New attacks on Israeli websites
Foreign spies should be assumed to have penetrated the computer networks of the US military, American politicians have been told.
Security experts testifying to the Senate Armed Services Subcommittee said the penetration was likely so complete that attempts to curb it should stop.
Instead, cyberdefence should be about protecting data not controlling access.
The experts said the US should look into ways to retaliate against nations that had access to its networks.
In an open session, experts from the US National Security Agency and government labs said America had to change the way it thought about protecting Department of Defense (DoD) computer networks.
"We've got the wrong mental model here," said Dr James Peery, head of the Information Systems Analysis Centre at the Sandia National Laboratories. "I think we have to go to a model where we assume that the adversary is in our networks."
'Delayed drowning'
That change would mean spending less time shoring up firewalls and gateways and more time ensuring data was safe, he said.
Dr Kaigham Gabriel, current head of the Defence Advanced Research Projects Agency, likened the current cybersecurity efforts of the US DoD to treading water in the middle of the ocean.
All that did was slightly delay the day when the DoD drowned under the weight of maintaining its network defences, he said. The DoD oversees 15,000 networks that connect about seven million devices.
"It's not that we're doing wrong things, it's just the nature of playing defence in cyber," Dr Gabriel said.
The poor defences that the US military could muster were made weaker by its hiring system, said Dr Michael Wertheimer, director of research and development at the NSA.
Low pay, delays over promotion and wage freezes made it very hard for the US government to attract and keep talented computer security staff, he said.
The open session was followed by a closed debate about the capabilities the US was developing to hit back against those who had won access to sensitive networks.
More on This Story
Related Stories
US report: China cyberwar a risk 08 MARCH 2012, CHINA
Call for cyberwar 'peacekeepers' 26 JANUARY 2012, NEWSNIGHT
New attacks on Israeli websites 16 JANUARY 2012, WORLD
Pentagon hit by huge cyber attack 14 JULY 2011, US & CANADA
Related Internet links
US Senate Armed Services Sub-committee
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
National Security Agency
Now, if this would have been in it, it surely would have taken off big time! http://www.humanbirdwings.net/
This iceberg is about to float in Wave's direction:
http://www.physorg.com/news/2012-03-caller-id-spoofing-scams-aim.html
BerthaB, I should have qualified my answer. My XPS13 has the TPM, but according to the IT security guy who worked with me to initialize it, NOT all XPS13s have it embedded. Weird to say the least. I made sure when I ordered the computer that it would be on mine. BTW, it's a great laptop!
Root, you say: "Next comes TPMs on consumer machines where Wave will also provide core elements." I just bought an xps13 and sure enough it's (TPM)there in the Bios. So it's here already!