Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
wondering the same thing
i do with zecco
I have 900,000 in my account and it still shows MGRN in my positions/holdings. I was wondering if anyone use Zecco and had the same issue. And if they knew when it will change to the new symbol. Thanks
Question: I have a Zecco account but it doesn't seem to reflect the new price. Anyone know what is up? Thanks
Wrong, you are not even looking. They're a holding group. They do own a spandex company. I'm not even bothering to respond anymore. There are plenty of links, all that needs to be done is read them.
Sorry!
I have no argument there
Nope sorry that website is .hk which is Hong Kong. Dot .ca is China. I know they're both in china but mine is very updated, plenty of news, has a branch in Beijing, and loans money. Don't think mine is the wrong one...might want to look in the mirror for that. Try it again here:
http://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=%E5%8F%8B%E5%88%A9%E6%8E%A7%E8%82%A1&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8
PLENTY TO WORK WITH
Use google translator
You could also try this link. It might have something newer about Universal Holdings.
http://www.bing.com/search?q=????&form=APMCS1
You can use google's or bing's translator.
That is awesome DD. Try clicking on one of these links.
http://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http://quote3.eastmoney.com/f10.aspx%3FStockCode%3D000584%26f10%3D002&rurl=translate.google.com&usg=ALkJrhi80bCH_EVnIJNUvpWaKciAZJQBwQ
http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=www.sofcra.com.cn
http://www.sofcra.com.cn/
http://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http://finance.cn.yahoo.com/mark/realstock.php%3Fcode%3Dsz000584&rurl=translate.google.com&usg=ALkJrhizgTeRGmsKLwonatPZD6LnEoxw1w
That is what everyone wants to know. Posted this a few days ago.
AGT Alert
How can they cancel deals that the first alert said they never had? The latest post states "Later today will be release official statement from CEO of AGT Edward Rubinstein to confirm the information stated on Company website. As now they have meeting between board of directors and privet investors to terminate any deals with Triton Distribution Systems and Gregory Lykiardopoulos." How can that be because the post last night read as followed:
RED FLAG ALERT!!! OUR COMPANY SITE ARE NOT HACKED
The AGT Company executive team would like to make an announcement in regards of Triton Distribution Systems, Inc. acquisition of 51% of AGT stocks and merger with our Company. None of the stocks was ever purchased by mister Lykiardopoulos. The AGT are not wholly owned subsidiary by Triton, never been and never will be. We are not associating or affiliating in any ways with Triton and CEO Gregory Lykiardopoulos.
His statements and PR`s was made strictly on his own without any knowledge of AGT Company or executive team of AGT. All released documentation was made up by mister Lykiardopoulos also was falsified by himself and have been published without any knowledge of AGT. Our Company had no knowledge of mister Gregory Lykiardopoulos doing so and released false information and statements. The Company do not authorize anyone and specially mister Lykiardopoulos to release any information or documents regarding of acquisition or merger with our Company and including all Press Releases.
All information will be forward to Security Exchange Commission.
Due to the large numbers of phone calls please contact our office via email for more information and clarification on SCAM from Triton Distribution Systems, Inc. and mister Gregory Lykiardopoulos.
Another question is why do the headings have stock board slag in them (i.e. RED FLAG ALERT, SCAM). They have no reason to be worried about Triton investors. They should only be worried about clearing their name. So maybe a first PR stating the dissolution of the deal and then get everything in order inter-company. Then maybe one more wrap up PR. They aren't on a public exchange hear in the US. They aren't loosing anything. Why update TTDZ investors 3 times in less then 24 hours? The use of that terminology makes it seem like it was written by someone who posts on boards or reads them. In your activities not involved with stocks, how often do you hear those terms? (Scam maybe more then Red Flag) AGT prime goal should be to distance it self from Triton, but their is no need to rush and get it done today...tomorrow would be fine. Again, they are not traded publicly so they aren't losing PPS on this. It seems the SCAM is the Alerts. IMO
I got it, Chee...Chee. I already said I didn't mean to ask you personally. I reposted the question you just responded to browland1's Monday prediction. So don't take offense, Chee...Chee, I wasn't asking you this time.
Come on...You must think it's extra special. Why? "I don't know!! kind of weird!" means nothing. Is there something extra special about it or not worth backing up?
Sorry my mistake. Didn't mean to ask you personally, Chee...Chee.
Yep...Yep got that. Wasn't what I was asking, but thanks though. The question was"Why is the better evidence then what's current on the page?".
I am sorry. I guess I don't follow Why is the better evidence then what's current on the page?
Could you post a link? Not seeing it.
Nope will agree not a very good 1st chart.
Universal Holdings Links These have been on the board for awhile.
http://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http://quote3.eastmoney.com/f10.aspx%3FStockCode%3D000584%26f10%3D002&rurl=translate.google.com&usg=ALkJrhi80bCH_EVnIJNUvpWaKciAZJQBwQ
http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=www.sofcra.com.cn
http://www.sofcra.com.cn/
http://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http://finance.cn.yahoo.com/mark/realstock.php%3Fcode%3Dsz000584&rurl=translate.google.com&usg=ALkJrhizgTeRGmsKLwonatPZD6LnEoxw1w
Hey smokestack
This is what I meant for hasn't change:
dbg1969
Your post 16726 on 1/22/11 was you last post supporting Triton. Seem pretty up beat and supportive, in fact all your posts from 1/22/11 at least 12/16/10 were a very supportive of Triton. What I don't understand there was plenty of question about Triton raised then, with good arguments from both sides but nothing really really solid. Nothing has changed...and defiantly nothing earth shattering. Why sway now? Need something?
Yep, the dates are wrong on the contract. Makes TTDZ look pretty stupid and questionable. Could you tell me if you think it's impossible to honestly make a mistake like this? How do you think a court would rule? Would I be correct on saying your posts about AGT's website alerts were in support of their legitimacy? Were they or were they not full of grammar and spelling errors? Why didn't that seem important for you to point out, but Triton's mistakes are a sign of a scam? Did the fact that the alert's reason for backing out change multiple times? They didn't add reasons they changed reasons. The very first alert, which you posted in post 18155, stated "We are not associating or affiliating in any ways with Triton and CEO Gregory Lykiardopoulos.". The latest has something to due with them decided to back out before closing.
I believe it would be phrased pre dated. Pre dated the check for 2012.
Yep, you're right there is no explanation for it. I am surprised Greg didn't do it in crayon. Thanks for showing me the light. I am only trading stocks on the Dow Jones from now on. Thanks again.
You right it is not very professional, but like I said not as uncommon as it was put.
You right it is not very professional, but like I said not as uncommon as it was put.
You right it is not very professional, but like I said not as uncommon as it was put.
LOL smokestack, you have must really done your DD. I would agree that the wrong date on the contract raises some questions. Could you tell me if there is any laws that pertain to minor errors on "legal document"? Must not be a very significant amount if any...huh. Why would have a law the pertains to something that never happens? I would have at least thought there would have been one case about it that would have some presidency over other cases. Me, I don't think "all made that common mistake", but I do think there are others, which leads me to think there is probably a law that helps address such an issue. So IMO I think it is more common then you have put it. Let us know what you find. Then again there is probably nothing if the problem doesn't exist. It doesn't need to addressed. Triton needs to work on their proof reading. Mistake like this don't look positive for them, but it isn't the end of the world.
Yep sure does have the wrong date. I think Triton and AGT both have there mistakes. I don't think it would effect the validity of the contract in a court. I think that would be considered a "Harmless Error".
Does your thoughts about one hand not knowing what the other hand ( one being Triton and the other AGT) is doing take note of the last 3 PRs? If so please and have the time, explain how you took the PRs into consideration. Thank You
Easy there big fella...I don't see anywhere that I made am accusation about you. I am not a website guru, and needed alittle help understanding why it would be so easy. I respect your opinion. I do have two more questions though. Is there more that one why to hack a website? If so, are they all fixable rather quickly? Again not attacking you just looking for clarify to better understand.
TTDZ hasn't came out and said they still have a deal? The PR yesterday addressed the facts that the deal has been finalized. It also touched on the fact that current negative accusation about the deal were false. Today's 2nd PR continues further about the fact the site has been compromised and that they're are gathering further proof about the deal with AGT to release tomorrow, which will probably be Monday. Please provide specific information you are looking for about the deal that haven't been addressed in the PRs so we can future understand or help address.
You must be an authority on website security. Could you please provide the correct steps to remedy the situation and prevent future issues on AGT's website, so we can all fully understand at which the ease of issue can be corrected.
Correct AGT shouldn't waste any time or money on this if the deal fell through, but I seemed very important to them yesterday. The site's updates changed numerous times. If they were and it seems still are very concerned about Triton, the proper way to handle it is by issuing a PR. Again shouldn't be concern about releasing a PR or even making any statements, but they seem to be making it priority.
Freken Bok was the webmaster since day one of the "AGT" site coming on line.
You don't know anymore about the possibility of the site being hacked then anyone else. There are reason to believe it wasn't or was hacked. You have no more proof then anyone else in either direction. Holes in both stories. All you have are your interpretations and opinions.
The number is on the bottom of the pages
Your opinion on the stock and the current happenings are quite possible what's happening, but it also not without it's holes. I have already mentioned the possible hacking, but you choose to only see it as not possible. I have no problem with the website. There is no solid proof either way that it hasn't been hacked. Many of the PRs have been very sketchy. Now you think this one is spot on shall I say al carte. An early alert was a announcement from Ed, how is that even close to being solid proof? I can at least say possible Scam or not Triton goes thru some sort of reputable service to make their announcements. It's not AGT problem to inform TTDZ stock holders. So then why do they care so much updating the alert far more times then needed, and if the care so much why isn't done thru more professional channels. Some opinions only are seen when it beneficial. I'll leave you to yours.
AGT Alert
This Russian article has been posted on the board before. I would like to point out a few facts against AGT on the on going alerts. Here are the first two and a half paragraphs of the article:
Novosibirsk . January 20, 2011 18:21 - 50 Note the Date
Source: news.ngs.ru
Novosibirsk CJSC Itomak has signed an agreement with Advanced Gold Technology INC. (U.S.) for the delivery of prototypes of processing equipment for the gold mining industry.
About this with reference to the management of AGT on January 18 reported English-language online edition Marketwire.com The only Marketwire PRs were release by Triton
According to chief engineer and president of AGT USA Gregory Yudashkin, this agreement opens up opportunities for U.S. production equipment developed by ZAO Itomak, and its sales worldwide. It seems they interviewed Gregory Yudashkin. he had to have know about a good amount of Triton PRs. The reporter was referencing them for the reason behind the article.[/b]
General Director of ZAO Itomak Sergei Afanasenko NGS.NOVOSTI confirmed that a tentative agreement with the Americans was signed in November Right about the time Triton announced AGT for the first time. Here is a quote from that PR"Triton's transfer agent Action Stock Transfer Corporation announced today that it has received all the stock certificates from the depository Trust Corporation ("DTC") to be exchanged for the new certificates under the new CUSIP number approved by FINRA for the November 17, 2010 Reverse Merger. The new certificates were FDERAL EXPRESSED to DTC yesterday December 8, 2010.
Most of the alert's points today are proved wrong by this article. Attached is the article in Russian and English. You can find it yourself by searching ?????k and ???.
http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=ru&u=http://dkvartal.ru/nsk/news/140484693&ei=fkRLTYzHFYP78Abk77SrDg&sa=X&oi=translate&ct=result&resnum=5&ved=0CE0Q7gEwBA&prev=/search%3Fq%3D%25D0%2598%25D0%25A2%25D0%259E%25D0%259C%25D0%2590%25D0%259A%2BUSA%26hl%3Den%26lr%3Dlang_ru%257Clang_en%26client%3Dsafari%26rls%3Den%26tbs%3Dlr:lang_1ru%257Clang_1en%26prmd%3Divns
http://dkvartal.ru/nsk/news/140484693
It does seem that way, but do you have any other scenarios of what could be happening? Or just the one?