Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
"As soon as they can announce they will."
You are so right about that... pertaining to so much of the information we've heard from BVTK and DPT, without 'details'... Seems sometimes it's difficult for some to understand the reality (and extreme reach and extreme limitations established) of NDAs in the government and security arenas. Even if it seems 'harmless' for BVTK or DPT to release certain information, the customer, prime, team member, etc, may not want information out... resulting in the specifics of the NDA... resulting in BVTK and DPT not able to put out certain information, like who the customer is... or virtually any other details about the contract/potential contract. It is not only up to BVTK/DPT what they tell about the contract/potential contract, it is also just as much up to the customer, as written in the NDA. The restraints can include 'if' a certain detail can be made public, which details can be made public, and when any details can be made public (many of the details may NEVER be allowed public)... If BVTK/DPT wants the contract, they have to abide by the customer's NDA requirements, even if they see it as extreme, or unnecessary. Otherwise, they won't get the contract. That's the reality.
I guess in the OTC, with the tendency toward distrust, that's not an easy pill to swallow.
imo
BVTK
He can keep it if he is a consultant for even one company that needs it. With all his experience it is likely that at least one company (with a facilities clearance) somewhere uses his services somehow. That company could "hold" him so he could maintain his eligibility and not go inactive or to lose it after 2 years of not being listed in the government database under any company (as an employee or consultant).
Bvtk
Nope, that's not how it works. Wait and see.
imo
BVTK
Might want to read up on the patent process... NON-final rejection.
BVTK
fixed.
bvtk
If they had sub and prime contracts with the government, that's "Contracting".
bvtk
DPT doesn't currently have publicly traded shares since it's not a public company.
imo
BVTK
And if DPT were a Subcontractor, then the Prime would have the DUNS/CAGE, and receive payment from the Government, take their 'pass thru fee', and pay DPT.
imo
BVTK
Patience will pay off on this one. Happy New Year to you, too!
imo
BVTK
Exactly... the only ones who know where everything is headed! Even though they can't share everything that's going on behind the scenes (due to NDAs, etc), the info they are able to share gives us an idea of the great things ahead!
imo
BVTK
Seems that in order to make it to "round 2", they would have had to prove that if they won, they would qualify... no? In my experience with submitting proposals to the Government (10 years), the proposal MUST show the company meets the requirements (including financial [cost/price], past performance, ability to meet the deliverables or manage the work [technical], whatever the solicitation requirements are, etc) before they pass ANY sort of selection, which is part of the proposal review process. If DarkPulse made it to "round 1", they would have had to show they met ALL the requirements, and those requirements would have been checked out by the reviewers before being accepted into "round 1".
DPT never made it past round 2
BVTK
Thank you for sharing real life experiences as an example for BVTK. It is much appreciated by some of us who are not familiar with the way bonding/financing works.
BVTK
New tweet: It's Thursday and Friday coming up...You know what that means...News, news and news...See what BVTK was doing when everyone else was on holiday...
bvtk
Same reason I bought IDDR when the first BVTK / IDDR announcement came out. The CEO of BVTK knows what the gov't needs, and imo, wouldn't waste time on something not worthwhile... so I figure there must be something to IDDR...
imo
BVTK
It is also showing on my TD Ameritrade.
bvtk
The one on the FB page was posted directly by Dennis O... it is posted by his FB page, not a 'he said' type of 'repost,' or screenshot posted by someone else, so that one is definitely from him.
imo
BVTK
It is on one of the BVTK Facebook shareholder pages... I read it there, too. (the Facebook "timestamp" says it was posted "12 hours ago")
BVTK
Check out the first picture of the speakers here...
https://www.the-great-conversation.com/
BVTK
Figured. Looking forward to watching BVTK unfold... so many great things to look forward to here.
imo
BVTK
Thank you for the clarification. That's what I was thinking.
imo
BVTK
Is there a link to Dr. Cellucci saying it would be paid all in one lump sum? I have seen that it was a finder's fee, but I missed him saying it would all be paid at once?
imo
BVTK
Folks need to do their own DD, and also listen to the conference call... so much great info out there about the positive place this stock is going... I'd rather listen to Tom's own words, and read all of the great DD about him and his connections and accolades, than believe what any stranger says online (negative or positive).
imo
BVTK LONG
Since BVTK will OWN part of the JV, it seemed to make sense that BVTK owns the shares to equal that part of the JV... not that the new JV shares would just 'go up for sale' somehow. I have a friend who owns a company, but he still owns all of the shares. Just because shares exist in the new JV, doesn't mean they have to go up for "sale" to outsiders, right? (i have no idea)
imo
BVTK
If Bravatek owns, say, 40% of the JV, does that mean that BVTK "owns" 40% of the shares somehow in the new JV?
imo
BVTK
Thank you for the explanation... that makes a lot of sense.
imo
BVTK
Yes, if I pulled it out now, I'd make that, but since I'm long on this because of the potential of this company, the DD says it will go WAY beyond that "tiny" 400% gain a few weeks ago.
I am not going to flip this because I have a plenty of shares and I am not willing to lose any by being 'out' when it goes up.
imo
BVTK
Agreed... I'm way in the green, too.
Thank you for the reminder of the great DD on TC and BVTK!
Looking through that windshield!
imo
BVTK
I think everyone knows it... that's why we need to be persistently positive.
TC isn't a penny stock CEO. He's turning around a company, and patience is all that is needed. Look through the windshield, not the rear view mirror.
imo
BVTK
Not when people are impatient because the process isn't "fast enough"... but that's okay...
imo
BVTK
It's great that there's no new "negative" (so-called) info about BVTK, so it's just all about the 'old' irrelevant stuff. That's great for BVTK!
imo
BVTK
No, it's not an official BVTK Twitter.
Also, it has a disclaimer: DISCLAIMER: This is an account which will assist in the roll out of important EcryptOne related information.
imo
BVTK
They (Sibannac) had a 10-Q come out on December 11th, so maybe something in that sent up a red flag?
https://seekingalpha.com/filing/3794148
imo
BVTK
"MERRY CHRISTMAS early!"
https://twitter.com/bravatek
imo
BVTK
whoa.
bvtk
Make sure it's last year's version (or even 2015), so it's well 'tested' commercially! Nothing new, or cutting edge...
imo
BVTK
Have to be in the right place, at the right time (and sometimes, know the right people, especially in Government contracting)... which TC and his connections can help with...
imo
BVTK
So the Government never buys NEW TECHNOLOGY? Okay.
The Government has the ability to test new, cutting edge technology that hasn't been used before, and purchasing upon successful testing.
Since DPT is not a public company, time will tell. I just don't want to be 'out' of BVTK, once time tells...
imo
BVTK
When it comes to getting into Government contracting, it is not unusual to have a home/office address... I have worked for and with several companies involved in Government contracting that used a residence address (or even a PO Box)... in getting the contracts, it's the capabilities that matters... not the address of the company. If the company is the best for the job, the Government doesn't care if his company (and home) address is a studio apartment in NYC.
Once the contracts are won, the revenue will follow, and then the PPS...
imo
BVTK