Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Words of a mental moron... like Maronti
Say what?!? All this scam ticker ever does is put out misleading information (a.k.a. PURE LIES). Mark's been doing it for over 12 years now.
Nonsense! He's failed for over a decade!!!
Why? Do you just like being lied to???
LOL Always nice to see you post here!
LMAO! I quickly realized what a low bar that was.
Wrong. Those people have an interest in MIKP, they just aren't going to lose their money on the scam ticker
And yes, you did buy shares at .0009. How's that 75% loss working for you? LMAO!
Well, that's just you being shortsighted Something we see often in you
For some weird reason you still believe this is a real company LOL
Are you referring to EVERYTHING MARK SAYS???
Still? Really? Have you ever heard of Occam's Razor?
Apply this well known principle to your statement and tell me what is the most likely of your 2 options (Mark lying or FINRA playing games)?
In philosophy, Occam's razor is the problem-solving principle that recommends searching for explanations constructed with the smallest possible set of elements. It is also known as the principle of parsimony or the law of parsimony (Latin: lex parsimoniae). Attributed to William of Ockham, a 14th-century English philosopher and theologian, it is frequently cited as Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem, which translates as "Entities must not be multiplied beyond necessity",[color=red][color=red][/color][/color] although Occam never used these exact words. Popularly, the principle is sometimes paraphrased as "The simplest explanation is usually the best one."
This philosophical razor advocates that when presented with competing hypotheses about the same prediction and both hypotheses have equal explanatory power, one should prefer the hypothesis that requires the fewest assumptions and that this is not meant to be a way of choosing between hypotheses that make different predictions.
Why? There is nothing he can say about this scam ticker and company.
Sorry Sky, I know it pains you to agree with me
WRONG! It's a great example of who the CEO IS? Everybody seems to know his history of being a lying con except you?
Yeah, that must be it
The problem is that you are trying to make sense of a conman's lies
So, you're saying he hasn't even started the process yet??? LMFAO!!!!!
Awesome summary! As always, love your contributions!
Actually, the idea that he's trying to up-list is utter nonsense.
How to send Trump & Republicans into a tizzy? Show 12 jurors them facts and find Trump guilty of 34 felonies making him a now convicted felon
You can say anything you want, it doesn't change the facts
You must have forgotten that Trump was found guilty by 12 jurors including REPUBLICANS
Actually, NYS has brought similar charges to over 200 individuals/entities in the past 2 years alone, thousands going back a bit longer.
intent to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commission thereof, made and caused a false entry in the business records of an enterprise
LMAO! You still actually believe there's a real business here. Simply amazing..
First, one needs to be able to determine the difference between the TRUTH and a lie. Unfortunately for you, all the comments and statements you label as false & bashing are actually TRUE. WAH!!!!!
One of the key legal implications of stock bashing lies in defamation and libel laws.
You're a pumper clown of known scam tickers a.k.a. A CON!
How can you be surprised? He's done this exact thing over & over & over again. Do you not learn from past mistakes???
LOL, you bought shares at .0009 after it came down from the high.
Sure it is. Everybody patiently watched their investment shrink 60% - 90% LOL
What would you expect from a lying conman?
Epic exchange, kudos! Problem is- he'll never get it...
Exactly! Just look at you, skyr, moronti, Mark, DiPrima, ...
Wah! Go cry somewhere else. At least I know the difference between a CPA and a CFO LMFAO!!!
Really? After over a decade you still don't know who JD is? WOW! Do you even know the difference between a CPA and a CFO?
LMAO! You're a lying sack of chit!
Pathetic is you sitting here pumping a known serial-stock-scammer and fraudulent-ticker in effort to enrich yourself. That's what chitbags do...
WOW! It's simply amazing that every reply reinforces the level of TOTAL IGNORANCE & LACK OF UNDERSTANDING of basic information. It's no wonder they will all lose their money