Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
We will see his June 30th financials. Believing them is another story.
Good thing for spencer his SHs don't require him to take a psych exam. And SEC lawyers are the same as all other lawyers. They must be admitted in each jurisdiction they appear. Hard to believe spencer doesn't know that.
Spencer also doesn't understand the difference between general representation and appearing. Put it on the list.
So did Sims spill the beans about spencer?
So Leinwand practices law in GA without a license?
What did Sims say? That she and spencer conspired to take the shares owned by Mrs. Wallace by filing a bogus lawsuit?
Because the decision only refers to subject matter jurisdiction. It does not help you at all.
And gosy's lawyer is not licensed in GA.
How'd the deposition go yesterday? Did Sims disclose how she and the Wallaces conspired against gosy? LOL
Is claiming you received $750K spreading a false rumor?
Spreading false rumors about a public company is illegal which Wallace and his cronies do.
If that's true, spencer should add spencer to the RICO case.
$750,000 in revenue received.
deal that wasn't a deal with Fubright.
spencer owns the shares.
There's not enough space to list all of spencer's misleading and false statements about the company.
So MicroChip, Intel, Toshiba, not impressive since not Mikuni, Solex, or Weber? Should NITE be added to the Spencers' RICO suit?
Sure--marty should add them to his pretend case. LOL!!!
He is the one who will have to defend the illegal actions they have taken against GOSY.
There is no action or complaint pending against Neil Wallace. If he has engaged in illegal conduct, why isn't there any complaints pending?
Speaking of illegal actions, is falsely reporting income on a SEC filing illegal? Or did spencer make a $750,000 mistake? lol!
Doesn't $20.00/HR seem like a made up number for a wheelchair pusher?
Don't take it personally. spencer makes up most stuff.
spencer would rather talk about eight year old papers than his failure to produce revenue. And he certainty does not want to talk about his fraudulent 2013 financials. We'll soon know whether the latest claims about a licensing deal are true or not. If not, I believe SHs will do whatever is necessary to have an honest and competent CEO.
I said your belief that Wallace and Macleod are using NITE to hold down the share price is a fairy tale. Your tech only has value if someone wants to buy it. We've seen the charts and videos for years. we need to see revenue. Because thus far, revenue has been a fairy tale as well.
Looks like Wallace and his UK co-conspirator, George MacLeod, are using NITE to hold GOSY's pps down. Aren't they scoundrels?
Looks like spencer still believes in fairy tales.
Yep. Wallace isn't very smart. He's actually a moron and terrible lawyer. All he did was obtain a $100,000 judgment against gosy and caused 30% of the stock to be sold for $1,000. Good thing he's not smart. Imagine what he could have done if he was.
Here's what I don't understand. How could someone as dumb as Wallace force the sale of 30% of the company for $1,000 when the company was represented by a brilliant lawyer?
spencer better be telling the truth this time about the licensing deal. If he's lying, the moron lawyer Wallace will make sure it's the last time spencer lies.
Except that Wallace hasn't ever been a practicing lawyer. Yeah, he's done some odd jobs for Daddy, but he never had the brains or ambition to actually have his own career.
So only "practicing" lawyers can represent clients? One of the "odd jobs" for daddy resulted in a $4.2 million verdict against I-R for contract breach.
Still can't explain why no PR from Japan? There better be a signed deal this time. SHs won't tolerate any more lies.
August 4th. Tic Toc.
Isn't Leinwand a member of the FL bar but not GA. And yet he "misrepresents" himself as gosy's counsel. How is that possible? Shouldn't gosy hire a GA lawyer who can legally represent them? How could spencer have allowed this illegal representation?
Or is perfectly legal for a lawyer from FL to represent a GA company? Just as it's perfectly legal for a lawyer from NY to represent a FL resident. Just not in court.
Still waiting for an explanation on the lack of PR from Japan. Will we have to wait for Gouge to explain it?
The Court filing shows a letter where Wallace misrepresented himself as his mother's attorney in a state where he's not eligible to practice law. Amazing!
Wallace is a member of the FL bar. Oops. And he was not representing his mother in litigation. He was not required to be a member of the Fl Bar to send a letter on her behalf to Leinwand. I assume Wallace was the family attorney and had every ethical and legal right to state that he was her lawyer.
And of course, the documents were not forgeries. If they were, Gouge would have objected. He never did. It was EIGHT years ago. marty is just now whining about it.
SHs don't care about a lawsuit eight years ago that spencer lost. They care about spencer who has a fiduciary duty to them, telling them the truth. We'll soon find out if he's lied again. If he has, whining about eight year old papers will not be a useful defense.
I'm not sure if Neil had the best interests of the share holders in mind when he contacted Daya.
Daya walked away from a multi-million business because of something Wallace said? Sure. I'm guessing it's because of something spencer said or did. I doubt Daya cared about something a disgruntled former employee said.
Still waiting for an explanation as to why no PR from the Japanese licensee. (allegedly)
Wallace contacted the partner and torpedoed the relationship.
Nonsense, but even if true, it doesn't explain the deliberate fraud committed by spencer in the filing. He said he received the revenue and had cash on hand. You're saying he never did because of Wallace.
I don't care what the reason is for his fraud. It's still fraud.
And what could Wallace have done to dissuade Daya from partnering with the world class tech? spencer always blames someone else for his failures. But his financials were false and he knew it.
It sure ain't spencer's version
Statement of Income (loss)
For the Year ending June 30, 2013
Revenues $750,000
Expenses 189,706
Net profit Before Taxes $560,294
What happened to all that money?
I think the reason why the pps didn't move much is because there's been no verification of the alleged licensing agreement. We will know in 2-3 weeks if the agreement is real. If it isn't, spencer will have a lot of "splaining to do."
It's fortunate the SHs have someone fighting for the truth.
SHs are tired of hearing how great the tech is. spencer has announced a licensing agreement that will generate revenues and make gosy "net profitable." Wallace is seeking a copy of this agreement and as a creditor he is entitled to see it.
If there is no agreement or if it will not generate revenues, spencer will have to explain it in an uncomfortable legal venue. He lied about Daya. That was his one bite of the apple. He won't get a second without consequences.
The fact that there has been no public statement from the alleged licensee raises serious questions. IMO
100+ videos over 15+ years on GOSY's website!
And zero revenue. Let's hope that changes.
The August 4th motion is on the docket. 2 PM in Courtroom 2 at Kent Co. Courthouse. Still no answers? Not a surprise. Making stuff up is a talent spencer and his supporters have.
GOSY had to have been public for the Wallaces buy stock, LOL!
Exactly. Glad you agree with me. Wallace could not have asked his parents to buy stock before the reverse merger. Then 18 months later the Wallace sued spencer when he tried to stiff them. Instead of settling, spencer hired a lawyer, then lost 30% of the company. Brilliant decision. LOL!!
Different agreement being sought. More legal fees for spencer. Yawn?
Case ID: SK09C-02-030 - NEIL WALLACE VS GECKOSYSTEMS INTERNATI
Filing Date: Friday , February 20th, 2009
Type: CF - DEBT / BREACH OF CONTRACT
Status: CSO - CASE SCHEDULING ORDER
Related Cases
No related cases were found.
Case Event Schedule
Event Date/Time Room Location Judge
CIVIL MOTION HEARING 04-AUG-2016
02:00 PM SCK COURTROOM 2 1ST FL (SMALL) SUPERIOR CT KENT COUNTY FREUD, ANDREA M
LOL! Then how did Wallace recommend that his parents invest in the ISHO/Big Apple debacle?
His parents bought shares in the public company after the reverse merger. Duh. And it was spencer who asked Wallace to get his parents to invest. Wallace had never heard of Big Apple. spencer and macleod collaborated on that scam.
Still can't answer either question? Cite one fact Wallace collaborated with Macleod on ProDem, whatever ProDem is?
Why has there been no PR from Japanese company?
Motion to compel Ms. Sims to answer discovery is scheduled for court tomorrow. She is a defendant in the RICO lawsuit. Will she expose Wallace as the ringleader in the racketeering activities against GOSY?
Or will she state she has never met Wallace and has no knowledge of spencer's ridiculous allegations? Then what will marty do? Get a Ouija board and depose Harold Wallace?
Still no answer to my question as to why no PR from the alleged Japanese licensee?
What court and what action is generating this motion to compel?
DE Superior Court 09C-02-030
It was hooking GeckoSystems up with an abusive MM for an S-1 that was a continuation of the con. Burt Martin Arnold - I've posted the SEC & FINRA disciplinary record recently.
But no evidence Wallace had anything to do with this.
Wallace also collaborated with MacLeod on the ProDec scam.
Cite one verifiable fact that Wallace was involved. More nonsense.
spencer went public before Wallace ever heard of him. Wallace was the one who advised him to end his relationship with Big Apple.
spencer has issued a PR saying he has signed a licensing deal that will generate profits. Is there a PR from the Japanese company making the announcement of the deal? If not, why not? This Japanese company issued a PR before spencer's trip saying it was looking forward to discussing the market with him. Wouldn't signing a deal be a much more significant event? Makes no sense to issue a PR announcing a meeting, but no PR about the result of that meeting when a deal was done.
The "deal" spencer implied he had with Fubright turned out not to have been signed. An admission spencer made only after facing a motion to compel. spencer faces another motion to compel August 4th seeking a copy of this new agreement. It will be interesting to see his lawyer's objections which must be filed prior to August 4th.
I doubt new videos will generate much interest. There needs to be verifiable income.
We've been hearing for years how great the tech is. But if no one wants to buy it, it has no value.
spencer now claims he has signed a deal that will generate revenue in the low $100s each quarter. He has stated, for the second time, that the company is net profitable. (The first time turned out to be a lie).
Time will tell, but SHs are long past trusting his PR. Wouldn't it make sense if he signed a deal in Japan that there would be a PR from that company praising the tech and announcing the agreement? Anyone got a link for that?
As soon as Mr. Spencer learned that George McLeod was running a scam on GOSY, he fired McLeod according to court documents. Wallace and MacLeod have been working to destroy GOSY ever sense. Guess they didn't think about a RICO lawsuit being filed.
What RICO lawsuit? The one that was dismissed against Neil Wallace? the one that hasn't been served on his parents for over a year? The one that didn't name Macleod as a defendant? The one that spencer's lawyers quit? That one? Yeah--I'm sure Wallace is losing sleep over that.
gosy has offered robots for sale and lease as far back as 2007. Not one has been sold or leased. Is this a marketing problem or is there no demand for these specific robots?
Wow--Wallace was a Facebook friend of Speciale since 2012? Wasn't Wallace fired in 2007? It took him 5 years to acknowledge his friendship with Speciale? And being a Facebook friend is the same as being an actual friend, associate and business partner, correct? Any evidence that Wallace ever met Speciale? Ever talked to him? Or are all of Speciale's Facebook friends responsible for anything he does simply by virtue of being a Facebook friend?
Here's an easy question for you--has Wallace ever posted any message on Speciale's Facebook page? What nonsense.
Is every Facebook friend of Wallace's guilty of manipulating the DE courts? What complete nonsense.
but Tom Speciale was the friend of Wallace that worked with Big Apple and Fairhills.
Got a link showing that? I heard Speciale was a friend of spencer's and spencer introduced him to Wallace. spencer signed the Big Apple deal before Wallace even came on board. spencer had the relationship with Big Apple. And now spencer's lawyer is Jonathon Leinwand. Nuff said.
So you're saying you're proud of spencer for refusing to obey the court order and having an arrest warrant issued for him? Very foretelling.
I have no idea what Sims will do or not do. But spencer's claims that she conspired with the Wallaces to commit two felonies in violation of RICO is wacky. He doesn't even allege she received any benefit from the RICO scheme. Now do you understand why his lawyers quit?
We'll see what she knows when Spencer asks her.
There is no deposition on the 14th. spencer will not ask her any questions. Read the motion papers.
Are you saying now that she will fail to report to the court as ordered?
Isn't there an arrest warrant issued for spencer in DE for not appearing when ordered? That's gotta make the SHs proud.
This could be a new start, beginning with the deposition on the 14th.
There is no deposition on the 14th. And you think Sims has knowledge of the papers submitted in DE EIGHT years ago and participated in the conspiracy to allgedly forge Harold's name?
If the evidence was that strong, why did his lawyers quit? Still can't answer?
If you want to talk about fraud, there's a list with spencer's name on it.
What are the damages then?
Jail. His fraud is criminal, not civil. Although SHs could sue him civilly for his deliberate deceit.
Not sure that just hiring lawyers exactly proves that Neil has or had consent regarding the estate.
spencer has objected now.
His parents hired a lawyer to pursue the case. This proves they consented to filing and pursuing the case. And spencer's objecting now?????? Why didn't he object when he believed it could have ended the case and he would have kept his stock?
No, It means they didn't want to see Neil go to jail. You can't consent after an illegal deed is done and make it legal. If Harold had agreed before hand he would have signed a power of attorney, IMO.
Wrong. Harold's consent was not required in writing to make it legal. Please check out the definition of "ratification" if you dont believe consent can be given after the fact. Although you have no evidence. And if it was illegal, why didn't Gouge object? Was he incompetent?
What I find funny is the claim that Harold didn't want to proceed but agreed to so Neil wouldn't go to jail. Except only Harold had standing to complain and put Neil in jail. spencer had no standing to do so.
It's hilarious that some believe that conduct which occurred EIGHT years ago and was never objected to will now be the basis for a remedy for spencer. Not even his former lawyers believe that.
If you want to talk about fraud, there's a list with spencer's name on it. Let's start with elaine's sworn statement to the court that Mrs. Wallace was the legal owner and spencer's ownership had been canceled. And thereafter, spencer files a quarterly report stating he is the owner. (He then filed a subsequent one with a footnote). and how about his fraudulent claim of receiving $750,000 in revenue? The last thing spencer should want to talk about is fraud.
So you are saying that just because Neil's lawyer proceeded with the claim then it was consented?
No. I'm saying because the Wallaces hired a lawyer and proceeded is proof they consented. Since they proceeded, it is clear they consented. How was spencer injured by the signatures if the Wallaces consented?
Why didn't Gouge object?
Why did spencer's lawyers quit the RICO case?
Still can't answer?
The forgery/fraud claim is nonsense. That's why Gouge never objected and the RICO lawyers quit. QED