InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 6
Posts 7515
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/05/2010

Re: Goku777 post# 56565

Monday, 07/11/2016 1:28:44 PM

Monday, July 11, 2016 1:28:44 PM

Post# of 56720
So you are saying that just because Neil's lawyer proceeded with the claim then it was consented?

No. I'm saying because the Wallaces hired a lawyer and proceeded is proof they consented. Since they proceeded, it is clear they consented. How was spencer injured by the signatures if the Wallaces consented?

Why didn't Gouge object?

Why did spencer's lawyers quit the RICO case?

Still can't answer?

The forgery/fraud claim is nonsense. That's why Gouge never objected and the RICO lawyers quit. QED