Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
It is public information. Minimal effort reveals the truth.
That is an interesting post since I am Brenda Hamilton and there is no case against Carl Duncan. There are multiple bar grievances in Illinois, Maryland, D.C. and Ohio. The investigation in D.C. -the only state where Mr. Duncan is authorized to practice law is ongoing. The bar grievanceS have not been dismissed. One state Maryland required Duncan to change his letterhead to specifically state he is not an attorney licensed in their state.
Lucky
I am the attorney for Cloud and am somewhat shocked by your statement. I have spoken to numerous Cloud Shareholders and returned calls and/or emails to each who called. We have provided legal opinions without charge as a courtesy to the Company. You have obviously dialed the wrong law firm.
It is official.
If you are a shareholder and you want to submit your shares for transfer or DTC eligibility please call Brenda Hamilton - Hamilton & Associates Law Group, P.A. at 561-416-8956. Please have a copy of your stock certificate or buy order -- brokerage firm statement.
Great analysis, Cassandra.
You are in denial... The difference is not relevant. Proof is relevant. In this environment they will be proven guilty...
Willful is subjective. They will be proven guilty without much effort.
You are in denial...
Willful is subjective. They will be proven guilty without much effort.
Of course it isn't too much to pay. These scammers destory lives. The impact on those they prey upon is devastating...
The penalties are not strong enough in this country. They destroy lives.
At the end of the day - without the attorneys who sign those legal opinoins like Carl Duncan and Kimberly Graus there would be no scams.
As for this scam- the SEC's job is done. If it leads to others it is a different story. The SEC had what they needed to shut down EIGH which is exactly what they did. Why drag it out. Game over.
EIGH is played out.
In light of the role of Carl Duncan,only a fool would fall for this one.
Like it or not it is the new reality. You scam - you pay with your liberty.
Penalties..well lets see each act.... easily 20 years,,
The days of slaps of a wrist are over. Securities violators do more time in prison than murders and rapists. The sky is the limit.
Willful violations of the securities laws. Any person or entity may be subject to criminal prosecution for “willfully” violating the federal securities laws. A separate statute, the Securities Act of 1933, generally regulates the offering of securities to public investors and prohibits the making of any false or misleading statements in a registration statement. Any person who “willfully” makes a false or misleading statement in a registration statement (or otherwise violates a provision of the Securities Act of 1933 or any rules or regulations promulgated thereunder) can be fined up to $10,000 and/or imprisoned for not more than five years. See 15 U.S.C. § 77x. There are also criminal penalties for violations of the Investment Company Act of 1940 and the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. See 15 U.S.C. §80a-48; 15 U.S.C. § 80b-17.
Securities Fraud... See 18 U.S.C. § 1348. Violators of this provision can be fined and/or imprisoned for up to 25 years. Id. This provision was added by Congress as a broad, general securities fraud statute to supplement the already-existing criminal statutes.
Mail Fraud. The mail fraud statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1341, generally prohibits the use of the mails to execute a scheme to defraud a victim of money or property. To prove mail fraud, the government must generally prove that the defendant knowingly participated in a scheme to defraud using false statements, representations or omissions, acted with the specific intent to defraud, and that the defendant mailed something for purposes of carrying out the scheme. The penalty for mail fraud not affecting a financial institution is a fine and/or imprisonment for up to 20 years.
Wire Fraud. The wire fraud statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1343, generally prohibits the use of wire communications to execute a scheme to defraud a victim of money or property. The government must prove the same elements as for mail fraud, except the defendant must have used interstate wire communications facilities Aiding and Abetting. The general aiding and abetting statute, 18 U.S.C. § 2, provides that anyone who principal commit it.a proceeding, such as acts done before an investigation has even begun.
Every securities violation has a corresponding criminal statute. You are wrong. It is criminal.
And of course Duncan and the Orlando Rotten Apple.
What is the address of this so called Casino?
Deadly misrepresentation for the Company.
Yes.
I think that that is changing and many older attorneys and scammers never fully appreciated the impact that the internet would have on their activities. When Duncan came out of law school 50 years ago they did all their research by looking in books. Imagine life without google and chat rooms. It is a new day for investor information and it continues to evolve.
Now with the new SEC bounty program paying whistle blowers up to 30% of the recovery many scams will be exposed.
Read the Cloud Centric Disclosure. It is pretty obvious.
My favorite is when they try blame short selling for the dilution.
And...there are additional Companies he represents where he is not disclosed as counsel where other attorneys do the opinions.
Am I the only one seeing the pattern here. Many of these companies have dilution that is blamed on short selling. They have non-disclosures about millions of free trading shares being issued without registration and they have common lawyers. What is so hard to figure out?
Carl Duncan is the Big Apple escrow attorney who held zillions of free trading shares in his account that were not registered and not disclosed.
He is the Big Apple escrow attorney who holds zillions of free trading shares that aren't registered.
The old shareholders of Trimax have a lot to say about Infrax Systems and I suspect they will be telling their story very soon. There is a gap in the disclosure and has anyone looked at the identity of the new beneficial owners?
It is a criminal act when a corporation uses a state court civil proceeding to commit securities fraud.
It is all about proper disclosure.