Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I wish that it was as I see it but unfortunately everything that I have written is governed by Boeing and can be found on the Boeing website.
OK, so I have been told that I can not post anything obtained directly from the Boeing Supplier Portal but I can post a list of all suppliers that are approved to a certain Boeing BAC. Anyone know what BAC TPAC has been Qualified to?
Here is a link to the qualification flow charts. Give attention to page 4. TPAC will have to be listed on the D1-4426 in order to supply Boeing with parts. I know this because of twitter traffic from TPAC stating that they have Boeing authorized suppliers supplying them with the piece parts to manufacture bearings for distribution to Boeing.
http://active.boeing.com/doingbiz/d14426/ApprovalFlowChart.pdf
Look, I want this to be true as much as anyone else but until TPAC shows up on the Boeing portal, which I have full access too, it simply can not be verified that they are an approved source of parts of any type or configuration to Boeing. And until there is proof that they are AS9100 certified they can not supply parts of any configuration to any company governed under the guidelines of the FAA or NTSB.
OK I will bite. If you can supply me with the BMS specification that TPAC is using to make the Boeing parts I will download the QPL from the Boeing supplier portal and post it for all to see. I would post a link but no one without Boeing supplier portal access would be able to access it. I will however post a link to the Boeing's D1-4426 list which has every company approved by Boeing to process parts for them.
http://active.boeing.com/doingbiz/d14426/GetAllProcessors.cfm
Are they Boeing approved. I posted a couple days ago about how Boeing supplies a list of every manufacture, vendor, and supplier in their pipeline. Well their website was recently updated, 7 January, and Trans-Pacific is not listed anywhere on Boeing's website as being an approved source. With that I would have to say that they are not Boeing approved.
With that being said, it may be that the company was approved by Boeing to start, FPQ, First Part Qualifications. This is one of the first steps to becoming an approved vendor and the rest of the process takes nearly a year to complete before the company can supply Boeing with any parts. This is due to a lot of different factors such as Boeing engineering approvals, Boeing stress analysis, and other Engineering and Quality Management inspections and tests of FPQ parts. They also have to have multiple inspects by Boeing on Quality Assurance processes and such. I have to say that we need better clarification as to what TPAC is doing in regards to Boeing. A press release or twitter post is simply not enough. They either need to be put on Boeing's approved vendor list for all to see or provide some sort of written proof from Boeing as to their status. Source below.....
http://active.boeing.com/doingbiz/d14426/bfmanuf.cfm?Type_cd=B
If you click the links of each manufacture on the list it will show you their approved vendors. TPAC is not on there, I checked before I wrote my first post.
I look at that list daily in my line of work and I have inked contracts with Boeing. Its feast or famine with them, takes a long time and a lot of work to get a contract but when you do they throw everything at you that they can. If this turns out to be true, and I hope it is, this company will have no up side foreseeable limit on PPS. It will simply rise.
A tweet from TPAC stated that they were a manufacture of the bearings with vendors for NADCAP approval, which would put them on the list either on their own or under one of the current manufactures as a vendor. Either way you look at it they will have to be on the list in some form or fashion or manufacture every part of the bearing which would require them to be NADCAP qualified, and they stated that they didn't need to do that.
Quote:
We use NADCAP approved vendors for those services. We are a manufacturer, not a processor. So NADCAP is inapplicable for us.
We use NADCAP approved vendors for those services. We are a manufacturer, not a processor. So NADCAP is inapplicable for us.
— TPAC Bearings (@TPACbearings) January 6, 2016
Normally Boeing will update the lists at the beginning of the month. They may be backed up with the holiday season, contrary to popular believe they do go into holiday mode this time of year, but I would expect it any day.
Click on the links to the left side of that page and they will give you a lot of insight as to what you are looking for.
If that were to happen this stock would go well past $1.00 PPS in a very short time. Getting on that list is an extremely big deal. It would solidify their place in the market for all to see. I, however, will remain on the fence with a small position until the proof shows up on Boeing's website.
Boeing is the biggest fish in the pond and they are very difficult to get a purchase order from. They didn't become the biggest fish by giving multi-million dollar contracts to micro-cap companies.
The company can play down or spin off NADCAP qualifications all they want. The fact still remains, until their name shows up on the Bearing Authorized Distributors list in the link below they will not be a distributor for Boeing. For the record, Boeing and all of the other aircraft manufactures supply vendors with this information so that individuals like myself can verify who we can order parts for larger assemblies from. As an example; there is bidding going on for the manufacture of a major sub-assembly for Boeing's 777X platform, I can not obtain the bearings required for this project from Trans-Pacific because they are not listed on the link below. Now we can talk about AS 9100 and ISO 9001 if it wants to be debated on whether they need these certification or not.
http://active.boeing.com/doingbiz/d14426/bfmanuf.cfm?Type_cd=B
I am not saying that the company is not legit, I'm just pointing out that if they want to get in a game with the likes of Alcoa and Aurora they need to be a lot more transparent on just what industry qualifications and standards they plan to obtain and where they are in the process. The big investors that are needed to move out of the pink sheets will never come until all of this information is given. Penny flippers like myself and most others on this board are not going to cut it. I would love for this to be another SIRI type stock, .06 and almost bankrupt to over $1.00 PPS in a year, but its not going to happen feeding on the bottom dwellers. Happy trading.
When TPAC's company name gets entered onto the Boeing approved list this will rise in a real big hurry. Sorry to tell everyone this but it is not there yet and it can take years to go thru the NADCAP accreditation process that Boeing requires to be one of their special processor, or part vendors. Who knows maybe TPAC has been working on NADCAP in the shadows for awhile and are on the verge of obtaining it. The good news is that it appears that the company is taking the correct first step to obtain this, which is meeting with Boeing to set up dialog for approval. People may want to get more information on where TPAC stands on NADCAP qualification before they get too deep into this stock.
Here are the links to Boeing's approved processor lists:
http://active.boeing.com/doingbiz/d14426/GetAllProcessors.cfm
http://active.boeing.com/doingbiz/d14426/bfmanuf.cfm?Type_cd=B
Looked like it was calibrated correctly to me.....lol
PHOT, MJNA, and HEMP are all three good plays at this point. I bought all three with my stardard $$$$$ amounts to spread the wealth, so to speak. AT LEAST one of the three is going to go viral in the coming up 3 tradeing days or so.
Just wanted to point out that if a product is NOT selling well in one area doesnt mean that its not selling in another. Thats why you can get somthing at a walmart in Florida that they dont sell at the walmart in Michigan. If you wanted to confirm the sales rate of this product you would have to call every walmart that it is being sold at not just the one down the road from your trailer park. Additionaly, the next report that we see is GOING to show a huge jump in sales and revenue because Walmart buys in bulk. That doesnt mean that its going to continue after the next report.
If you are not going to flip this stock the best play would be to buy a large possition now while the price is low and sell once the price climbs to a level that you can live with. Which I beleive will be in the .02 to .03 range right after the next report from the company comes out.
I can tell you that some online brokers have criteria for a stock to be sold thru them. TD Ameritrade and Sharebuilder are the only two that I have first hand experience with. I moved to Etrade for this reason. If you look around on the frequintly ask questions section of those sites it will explain what the criteria is for each of them. As a disclaimer, I do not own this stock, just looking around. Good luck.
You are correct on half of that statement. I dont have free trading shares, no one does at this point. I sold my shares a while back at a bit of a loss, better then most I guess. As for the restricted, I suspect that I will be holding them for a long time.
I would appreciate it if you didnt try to start any of that garbage about me lieing on the message board. Its not called for and therfore you can take it some place else. Statements like that are why I stop posting on IHUB a few months ago.
From my account:
508579293 - PEGASUS TEL INC CONTRA CUSIP
3,708 Cash 0.00 0.00
I tend to have a conservative aproach. I do 10% incriments and get out of these types of stocks. This one just went up to fast while I was not looking. I am out now at the tune of 232% profit, I wish all of you the best and hope that you all get out untouched by the dump.
Its all about prospective value. Every once and a while a company comes around with just the right claims at just the right time with just the right amount of pump. If you play it correctly you make a ton of money, if not you loose. A betting man would short the heck out of this stock right now and ride the profit all the way back down.
I can not believe that this stock has not consolidated yet. Riding from $.50, what a ride.
I may be incorrect but I think now that Etrade has put out the DIVI that all DIVI have been paid. It sure would be nice if this stock would optain a bid price again so that some of the trapped traders, or I guess nontraders....lol, could get out of this stock. I am glad that I got out while I did, now I just need to get rid of this worthless DIVI that I have.
Another one of these types of products. Hope it works out good.
What is all this chat about 20Mil LOC?
I would be interested in seeing how many shares have been bought v/s sold in the last couple of months. I realize that most have been buys but it seems like the number would be so high at this point that we would have exeeded our AS in sales alone. MMMMMMMMMMMMMM, just curious.
Is it possible for ENTI to become DTCC eligible again with out a name/symbol change?
and multi millionares
Does anyone have a resource to see historical buy and sale volume?
Dont forget the 8K put out by PTEL with the conversion rate in it.
As hard as this stock is to be in right now, I will stay in. One thing is for certain, if Tony makes us DTC eligable again there will be a buying frenzy. Where the PPS will go at that point is anyones guess
Well the 8K has been filed for the PTEL DIVI, more good news today.
Thats what I was thinking, but who knows
CEO has list of over 3000 shareholders now
Sorry and yes we will know in two days
I wish that I didnt have all of my money tied up into other stocks today when this went below .005.
Can you explain to me why shorts will be covering. Its not becausse of the DIVI, the DIVI should drive the stock down not up.
Nothing said about the DTC. Sure would like to get an update on that.
I have emailed Tony a few times now about it with no response, which is weird because I have over 10 emails from him about other topics.
Who even cares one way or another at this point. We know that we are no longer part of the DTC and it shows in our lack of volume. Tony is going to realize the stupidity in what he has done and fix it eventually. I only hope for the sake of his investors that it is not to late by then. unfortunatly not everyone invests only money that they can afford not to have like some of us.
Nap time for me so Good luck to all, I hope I wake up to a better PPS.
Mastertrader.com makes every effort to keep your trading costs as low as possible. The above search utility will provide accurate results for the majority of symbols with additional clearing fees. However, it is not all-inclusive and there may be additional symbols not yet added. We recommend that you exercise caution when trading OTCBB and Pink Sheet issues, as they are not subject the basic financial and reporting requirements used by various exchanges. If you have any questions or concerns about these fees, please do not hesitate to call our support desk.
We shall see and I hope all of us the best, because as of right now I am holding 60.37 Million shares at a new price of .0001. Needless to say, if you have been reading my posts, I am not very happy about it one bit.
Man you are barking up the wrong tree. Tony said himself in his last podcast that both stocks were ineligible because he maid them that way.
"ENTI is not a get rich quick scheme"
Plus, if we all were looking for long term investments it would not be with a company tradeing in the pink sheets.
"ENTI is not a get rich quick scheme"
Could have been that and more.