Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
When I clearly say an admission that Diwan is siphoning off funds and you ask what admission, it makes me smile. Thank you.
Perhaps he finally has siphoned off enough dough and is old enough that he finally will see what he has come up with?
I stand by everything I’ve said. There is nothing verified to prove it incorrect. As I’ve said before, interesting that you question me as a source but not the sources of “all the good news and progress.”
I wonder when long enough will be long enough. Likely not for another decade or more as it would require admission of being duped. Don’t stop believing! Hope is all you’ve got.
An admission that Diwan has siphoning off tens of millions of dollars, no legitimate verified results (self reporting vague milestones don’t count) but NOW they’re going to go legit because HOPEFULLY Diwan has taken enough.
Sounds like progress.
Hope is not a good investment strategy.
Though I do appreciate that you identify the clear and obvious signs that this is a scam, even if you then go onto rationalize and justify them.
I know, I know, I’m a liar and can’t be trusted.
But that doesn’t make me wrong.
What do you think Diwan's purpose is in taking an incentive in the form of Preferred shares that have no value to him unless there's a change in control?
Don't know. Seems unlikely that there's a change of control coming. Both of his actions could be for tax purposes, but I'm not an accountant, so really not sure.
Why do you think he would take these 2 courses of action?
I don’t need to carefully read the proxy statement. I have you to carefully read my posts.
OK, then I should have said: is the board member who's up for election to a second two year term Todd E. Rokita the current AG of Indiana?
Feel better now?
I was referring to the proxy vote...not elevate, renewed is more accurate.
and yet you'll invest in a company that wants to elevate him on their board?
Is the proposed new board member Todd E. Rokita the current AG of Indiana?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2022/07/19/complaint-rokita-indiana-abortion/
Now do you believe me?
One published one paper already:
https://www.technologyreview.com/2022/09/05/1058933/universal-covid-vaccine-research
Even though they don't have a poster from a conference to prove their work, my money is on these guys more than the charlatans form Nanoscamicide.
But what do I know? Remember, there are claims here that I am "liar" so you should disregard any and all information in my posts regardless of the accuracy or specificity.
Pot, meet kettle, kettle meet pot.
Please read my history of posts and you will see who’s a lackey and who’s been accurate with their pessimistic call on this company for years and years…and who the new carpet baggers are.
Exactly! Now you’re getting it!
Would a company with a legitimate product, that was able to manufacture to scale do this? Or would a company that is a scam and has no legitimate product do this?
But I’m “a known liar” so must be the former. Right? ; )
What about libel? Is that illegal?
And what was the affirmative act of concealment?
But the poster does not believe a felony has been committed so all moot…or is the poster saying there was a felony committed?
You really have no understanding what publishing means in the medical and scientific field.
Look up peer reviewable.
But keep attacking the messenger. That’s a good strategy.
I support the legitimate development of antiviral drugs.
That’s a yes.
sending out a press release or doing actual research and drug development: which one is more likely to lead to a treatment and which one has NNVC done for the last 17+ year?
You still support this company, believe in their technology and think they are legitimate?
Can't you read? Per the press release: "...the timelines are outside its control."
Been that way for almost 20 years now!
Just announced: new flavor of the month!
They are spending their time developing a new way to package gummies. You can’t make this stuff up.
What are you expecting?
What lies are you referring to? Is concealing one’s identity a lie?
Do you still believe NNVC is a legitimate company with a legitimate product?
Never going to happen. Too stubborn to admit they were duped. Always claiming accusations are not based on fact but opinions. And questions posters' motives instead of evaluating the validity of the information.
There are those who Keep Making Bullshit Justifications for Nanoviricides!
Do you believe there is something Diwan can do that is “useful” but he is deciding to not do it?
I can’t fathom what that could be.
If it were just incompetence the financial scheme whereby Theracour owns the IP and cleanses the money paid by NNVC to Theracour to Diwan would not be in place. You can choose to believe Seymour was either too dumb to see it or complicit.
But the way this thing has been structured and operated has been far from incompetent. Unless you were expecting them to actually bring a drug to market. It has, and still is, doing exactly what it was designed to do.
I see Seymour got a new hat.
And if you add in the 1-20 reverse split and the 1-3.5 reverse split, this thing is a 3 penny stock.
Were there only these 2 reverse splits or more?
I see that the medium and high NV-CoV-2 dosage was 160 and 320 mg/kg, while the RDV was 10mg/kg.
The concentration was 1mg/ml for RDV and 16/32 mg/ml for NV-CoV-2 med and high respectively.
I also see total dosage of NV-CoV-2 almost 9x and 18x higher than RDV alone.
If the RDV concentration and dosages in the NV-CoV-2 injections was higher than RDV only injections, couldn't that be the determining factor in the survival? More RDV is the cause for the increased survival?
I am not scientifically literate enough to understand if the concentrations are as I believe this chart indicates:
Perhaps you know?
yes, that is why I mentioned him.
The authors are employees of AllExcel, yet they fail to report that in the conflict of interest statement in the publications.
The research was done by Dr. Krishna Menon. Also not reported as a conflict of interest.
The conclusion of these reports:
For all doses, NV-CoV-2 was detected in Rat plasma producing an initial increase that peaked between 4-8 hours. The results show that Plasma concentrations decreased to below detection level between 24 to 48 hrs.
Meaning the NNVC polymer was detectable after injection and then after 24-48 hours it was not. Unless they meant to say NV-CoV-2 R in their conclusion, there is no conclusion about the presence of Remdesivir. It wasn't present and it wasn't increased.
If the only conclusion is that the polymer is at detected at increased levels after injecting it into rats, that would fall under the medical term: Duh!
Yes, with a 6:1 reverse split.
The only difference between an NNVC bull and bear is time.
Isn’t the explanation simply that paying through Theracour puts an additional 30% in Diwan’s pocket?
Have there ever been any independently versed results announced? I'm not claiming everyone is in on the scam.
The simplest explanation is that it is a scam and the ‘cides don’t work, can’t be made and there is no independent research to say otherwise.
We agree that Diwan is good at protecting what is his, but differ on what that is. You seem to think he’s protecting a process and formula for making a revolutionary treatment that can be adapted and customized to treat virtually any and all viruses…or even a single virus.
I think he is protecting his money and the system he has set up to continue to funnel money from NNVC into his own pocket, directly as payment and indirectly by funneling through theracour.
That’s what I think. Clear enough?
Do you believe the ’cides have worked? Have been produced to scale? Will ever be tested?
On behalf of the angry trolls, I think you are missing the sarcasm in the poster’s answers to you.
I also think you are ignoring the simplest and most logical explanation.
If it’s on the internet, it must be true.
You’re fluffing is transparent.
Are you shaking your pom poms?