Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
In light of the recent voting, I have not sent my releases, should i still send it?
My other question is since I have not been following and I own both wampq and wamuq. and in light of the plan rejection of tpsc how should I vote mine? (please no sarcastic answers) TY in advance.
My broker is Fidelity. Thanks
Thanks for responding, i dont even have the ballots and am still oversees, but i will try to call them during business hours.
As i have been away oversees I have not been able to follow what is going on...I was not able to vote and am wondering what i can do...any of the longs (withcatz) can help me.
"the GSA is a little tougher nut."
ANICO and STERN doesnt help kill GSA?
So whats next for us?
Thanks.
Voting question, On the Dimeq Ballot I dont see an option to "REJECT" the plan. only OPT-in OPT-out.
If you vote your H and Dimeq against the releases and the POR do they lock your P's?
I just received my ballots for my WAMPQ, WAHUQ and DIMEQ...How would UIE vote these?
Question to everyone...How close is equity to be in the $$$?
I am holding till the end and I support your analysis, Thank you.
I have a question to the legal eagles...What kind of evidence the EC would be looking for aside from what is already presented in court to be damning enough?
Any post from BOPFAN?
Can someone with legal mind post the opinion in leymans terms?
The PPS means nothing to me, I had to ask since I am not of a legal mind and this is Greek to me and I really have no idea of what is going on but to read other peoples understanding of whats going on. Thanks for the response.
Based on your assesment of where we are and your understanding of whats going on, what is your WAG of whats going to happen in the next couple of weeks, considering that we get 5.5 addition?
Happy Holidays to all and good luck Wamuers!!!!
Happy Holidays to all and good luck Wamuers!!!!
Is this the document that made THJMW change her mind about the examiner?
Is this good for equity?
Is THJMW still going to hear SH meeting? (this is to anyone who knows)
So what do you think(This is for the board eagles)? now that the hearing has ended?
I have a question for the board, If the vote for the POS POR failed, How does that affect the POR hearing?
WithCatz: what do you think of mary's post on Y boards?
http://messages.finance.yahoo.com/Stocks_(A_to_Z)/Stocks_W/threadview?m=tm&bn=86316&tid=616004&mid=616534&tof=-1&rt=2&frt=2&off=1
So what do you guys think (including you withcatz) of the most recent Debtors motion? Debtors' motion to abandon WMI's equity interests in WMB
all yous P holders question: did you elect to opt out or not? just wanting to know how everyone else is voting on this, Im getting a lot of conflicting information.
Thanks, did you get a return envelope with your ballot? (its kinda weird that the return envelope is not official)
I received ballots for my prefs.
Anyone have Fidelity as their broker and received ballots for vote? did you get a return envelope for them?
I got my ballot for my prefs but no return envelope with it, I think they are playing dirty.
Will the Federal Reserve Cause a Civil War?
This is an interesting article...
http://www.disclose.tv/frameset.php?url=http://curiouscapitalist.blogs.time.com/2010/10/19/will-the-federal-reserves-next-meeting-lead-to-civil-war/%23ixzz12uVQ0j00
Interesting post by BOPFAN from Y Board
Posted on GB:
People might want to learn more about the requirements for approval of a disclosure statement. At the barest minimum it is intended to provide information necessary for "a hypothetical investor typical of the holders of claims or interests in the case, that would enable such a hypothetical investor of the relevant class to make an informed judgment about the plan...."
As to what information is adequate, the legal standard is that assessment of adequacy is within the discretion of the court and to be determined on a case by case basis. For an excellent discussion of standards Judge Walrath might apply, check out: http://www.tneb.uscourts.gov/opinions/st... at p. 8. This case cites In re Scioto Valley Mortgage Co., 88 B.R. 168, 170-71 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 1988) (cited in In re Source Enters. Inc., Ch. 11 Case No. 06-11707 (AJG), 2007 Bankr. LEXIS 4770, at *7-8 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2007) (using similar list). Scioto is cited by Weil Gotshal in its motion for approval of the GM Disclosure Statement (see http://docs.motorsliquidationdocket.com/... the hearing on which is scheduled for October 21, 2010. While Scioto is Sixth Circuit law and Judge Walrath sits in the Third Circuit, as Scioto appears to be the prototype for the standard enunciated by the Southern District of New York, the nation's premier bankruptcy forum, and as it is cited by Weil itself the case should carry weight with Judge Walrath.
It would behoove board posters to apply the 19 criteria of Scioto against the facts in WMI for themselves. The examiner will certainly do this, and I do not believe WMI's disclosure statement satisfies Scioto.
Finally, everyone should be aware that civil antifraud laws are only preempted if the plan proponent acts in good faith and in compliance with Chapter 11. See 11 U.S.C. 1125(e). We've discussed sanctions for Weil such as disgorgement of fees and professional discipline, but prosecution under the securities antifraud laws would also apply.
Finally, in addition to disgorgement of fees, Weil may be held personally liable for fees and costs (i.e., reimbursement to other parties and to the estate) based on a finding that the DS is grossly misleading. See In re Ligon (Bankr. M.D. Tenn. 1985).
As I've said before, I have not the least concern about Oct. 18. The court did not appoint the examiner so that she could undercut his work by approving the debtors' DS and then having the examiner make her look a fool by brilliantly discrediting the DS and Plan.
http://messages.finance.yahoo.com/Stocks_(A_to_Z)/Stocks_W/threadview?m=ts&bn=86316&tid=569517&mid=569517&tof=1&frt=4
Me too!!!
What does this mean? Do we have a shot at this?
I have a question for the more experience people on the board...when THJMW appoints a trustee...what happens then? Does PPS go up? to what price? Does trading gets halted then re-emerge with higher price? Im not sure if this has been discussed already.
To my understanding the Ps will get resolved first before it gets to the commons.
so if A > when does EC takes over?
I feel the same way about this stock, something is pulling me to not sell, I want to buy more but with my wife giving birth to a twin a couple of weeks ago, I have exhausted my funds.GLTA