Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I, for one, appreciate Madtigs insight into charting and how he plays this stock. Very interesting - Thanks Madtig
Sano - That's not what KKG is asking. He's askin gwhere it says the DVIS doesn't work, not where it may be a deal breaker. Care to elaborate?
hahahaha. Mugs..buddy - They are answering those questions now. They are doing so very thoroughly, which is why it's taking so long for them to resubmit. You're under the impression they cannot answer all of the questions. Do you care to divulge which questions you think they cannot answer?
The FDA says so? Can you site where they SPECIFICALLY say that? And please do not use the NSE as a blanket response...you're better than that.
THIS IS ONLY A TECHNICAL DEMONSTATION - THERE WILL BE NO ACTUAL LIVE 3D DEMONSTRATION. This has already been stated, so don't get your hopes up.
KKG - I'd also like to know if you'll be attending. Is anyone going to be able to report back if they signed an NDA to see it?
Box - What do you think a "technical" demonstration is? You think people will see it in all of its glory? Think again.
Whoa whoa whoaaaa. Is this legit or what? When and where was this released?
It's really hard to say what he's going to do. None of us know the leagl boundries he needs to walk to make this happen. I think it's pointless to speculate unless we know the legalities that are involved. Many here will speculate that it's this and that, but who really knows? Anyone? What is the absolute most Dean is allowed to do?
At this point I would think Dean will do the most he can, law permitting.
Make sure you legitimize your post will links, please.
He's not going to waste his time with agenda created by this board. It's absolute nonsense that this has been created out of thin air. This blows my mind.
Where has this seed been planted? Where did the thought of this originate and why?
Kimble - NO ONE knows this yet. Until we know for 100% sure and what implications that might have, relax. you are still jumping to conclusions about this whole thing. Chill out...
I'm not surprised if that's the case. With how much they probably cost it's no wonder why we haven't heard of I3 needing to raise more capital. I bet they are working with MWE off and on so they can be as economical as possible with their limited funds.
I'd be more concerned why Dean isn't upfront about it. If this truly is the case, which I don't believe until I see valid proof, he needs to understand that when things are found out through the board (like the NSE letter) that don't come from his mouth are detrimental to us stockholders. And the many of you here smell the drop of blood in the water and feast.
I'm under the impression that the 3 phase resubmission was to systematically achieve exactly what the FDA wants. There will be no "FDA buying in" as we all know the FDA gets what the FDA wants...or you go pound sand - That's the bottom line. The 3 phase is to identify, confirm, submit, confirm again...and repeat for every different criteria missed on the last submission. I understand what they're doing. They're basically getting consent from the FDA that they have completed each action item to the liking of the FDA before they submit. This is why MWE's relationship with the FDA is critical. The back and forth dialogue can exist because MWE knows better of what they want.
I only know what I know and that is what I've seen and been told by legitimate, or should I say official, sources. Dean, SEC, etc..I am not one to pontificate on chaos and conspiracy theories. I don't buy into it because I know that there are individuals on this board that have hidden agendas. It exists and it is present here to some degree.
I look at it this way: Dean may make a lot of money off of this if it were a scam. If Dean is truly Mensa smart, do you think he'd want to leave his legacy behind as being labeled a fraud, crook, lying CEO? I would think not. I truly think that Dean wants to be remembered as the guy that brought about a technology that revolutionized the medical industry and saved many lives. This part just doesn't add up to me.
Lambster - What has changed since his interview on MTV and now? Was there anything released saying that he is setting something up, or do you THINK this is going to happen. To the best of my knowledge, he said he was going to try. Don't get your hopes up on this one. If it sounds too good to be true, it usually is.
Where did you read he is committed to doing that?
That where we're at. Waiting for news....
whats the buzz all about? What's being said?
Nah...it was a stupid question. I guess if pictures are bad, it could cause a misdiagnosis.
Thanks Guru. Why is the FDA concerned with picture quality? My understanding is the FDA reviews products for safety purposes. The DViS needs to have a certain picture quality to be approved? Are they stepping over their bounds with concern over picture quality? Does the quality have to do anything with safety?
Who in their right mind would guarantee that? They assume an inordinate amount of liability if they did that. Common sense
Where are all the other pages?
This is a great question. I'd like to know what he says about this as well. He, technically, was telling us the truth, but not the whole truth. I vividly remember him saying this on the CC, because we were all holding our breath for the reason of NSE. I believe it was financial information and some other "administrative" things. So, I am hopeful, but some serious explaining needs to be done here.
-Timeline for resubmission
-Is McDermott still backing us and to what degree are they helping
-Each reason for NSE thoroughly explained.
-I'd find some reassurance if McDermott and Dean conducted this next conference call together.
Sano - Can you at least give us the jist of it beofre you upload? Can you tell us if the long list of issues were major issues? Or was it mostly admisinstative issues like Dean had stated? Thanks for doing this DD...much appreciated
I was as well....and back to .16. Looks like the MM are getting a bit worried as well, doesn't it? How many times must the .152 be tested until we conclude that it's a 10 ft thick steel barrier that can't be penetrated?
If Polk's theory is right about submission being 2nd week in Jan, or around, then me thinks this .152 wants to hold until then.
Tig - What are your feelings on that?
Rhetoric at its finest! Yes, yes aaaaannnnd......yes
NO...MATERIAL INFORMATION
Thank you!! I don't know how many times we've been over this topic. Are there any people out there that don't understand this? Speak now or forever hold you peace. This is not illegal. If you don't know what "material" information is, please visit the SEC website.
CP - It's also illogical to say "They'll do another PPM soon". They are both speculative. Both outcomes are possible. There are ways to get by without doing a PPM. CP - What happens if WE get approval before $$ runs out, We then partner with a sloppy, rich company who's going to fund production and all other aspects of IMMG moving forward? It's a very possible scenario. I'm not saying that one isn't more probable than the other - just that it's all SPECULATION. You profess like you read out of the bible. Who wrote the bible any?
I was looking at IHUBs info. It is corrected now, but at 7am on the nose, it was showing that!! Someone was playing with it I bet
Get a load of the bid and ask right now at 7am EST. Bid - .059...Ask - .30...Anyone want to take a stab at this?
This makes sense....
"In other words the people putting up the financial risk need to prove it works before the people who have no financial risk (they could care less) prove that it doesn't work."
The company is the only entity that can prove it works (right now). I believe the CEO because I believe he doesn't want to go to jail. I also believe that he has gone through a number of steps not needed if he wanted to prolong his scam.
Wrong - One does not come before the other. They should happen simultaneously. It does, however, make perfect sense that a statement like that comes from you.
CP - There is no proof that it doesn't work. I believe it works from what the CEO says. Dean not showing the images is NOT proof it doesn't work - End of story. There is a strategy for not showing us the images; and it's not because the whole thing is a scam. Wake up, you are not making sense.
Anyone who picks up. Roll up your sleeves and dig in!
This is weak if it's all you have to stand on. What happens when they resubmit? Will you singing a different tune? Fair weather fan?
I think you misunderstood. One of your lemmings conceded that there weren't 1000 orders - Alls I asked for was proof of this, which he/she is having an extremely hard time doing (or any example of Dean saying this, or that any proof exists). I understand Dean mentioned he has "verbal" orders, or potential customers lined up once the machine is approved. I am also aware that nothing can be marketed before FDA approval.
I agree that sales is an integral part of this post approval process. I believe, providing everything works as planned, that the actual "selling" will not be as important as creating awareness of the product. Once people understand features and benefits, the machine will sell itself.
Who knows what marketing channels Dean plans to use.
Let's not get ahead of ourselves. The only reason for my post is to refute another posters nonsense.
The post came from you. I'm asking you to get this info. If you can prove it, I'll get off your back. You still haven't shown me proof of your claims. Be a big boy and stand behind what you profess!
"What makes you think Dean can outsell a giant corp with a big gun sales-force and connections with every end user on the planet?"
Because he has a superior, revolutionary product that will outperform his competitors. Sales force will not matter when people come to you - And I'm not saying they won't need a sales force.
He had NDAs signed by some large interested parties. Are you kidding me with this headline bit? You think the hospitals didn't sign the NDAs as well? The hospitals are not going to talk, per Deans orders.
Dean's not a retard. For crying out loud - If you are going to post ridiculous content, at least think it through.
No orders....right...of course Sano would know. I don't know if they do and not saying they do.... Only taking the CEOs word for it.
Ok - Now we're talking! What images did he promise to post? Not the ones he's already posted, correct? Different, new images? Please elaborate what he promised.
"DD was done which indicated a confident CEO, a revolutionary technology, an easy 510(K) approval, NDA agreements signed, RSNA shows which helped exposure, 1,000 of orders pending FDA approval, talks with major OEM's regarding buyouts, a device that can be used for multiple applications in the industry, etc."
All of this is still the case besides it being an easy 510k process. We know because the CEO told us so. What you're suggesting, of course, is all based on the premise you think the CEO is a scam artist.
"However, NONE of this is the case" ---- CP, prove it....YOU HAVEN"T DONE IT YET!!!!
It's not a revolutionary technology? - Prove it
CEO is not confident it'll get approval? - Prove it
There aren't 1000's of orders pending approval (how the hell do you know? - Prove it
Here is something you don't get. Dean will not tell us if he has received bids for the company to be bought. Let's assume he has for now. Do you think he'd sell for a buck so the shorters out there can flip and make a buck. NO - A company looks in the best interest of their long term shareholders; and we will be best served if we achieve FDA approval, and then sell (if that's what we do) WHY, CP?!?!?! Because now we become a threat, now we are worth more. I can draw you a picture if you want.
All your posts have been supposition and subjective with ZERO substance ---- I'm talking on-paper-proof.....Let's see it baby!!!
Big words here: "What has recently occurred can convince anyone that the DD done on this stock was false and something was wrong this entire time. Those were the guys that sold you their shares! "
Care to prove it?
Our application will be back in their hands very soon, I'd imagine. Law firm is making sure FDA will have everything they need to get it approved this time. We are cutting to the chase. Something that should have been done the first time, yes. Progress is being made no matter how you flip it.
Why do I even bother?
It's the round-about-conversations we've had 1,000,000,000,000 times. Once there's an update or PR, it'll start back up again. The steam is gone until we start on the resubmission.