Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
BBB, things are looking VERY promising here! I wouldn't be surprised if the. pps finishes close to $.30 today with 40k or more traded.
LG, great to know that it's up to Ramos (new judge) and not Jones!!!!
LG, thus Judge Jones and friends have the power to block our appeal?
So, Judge Jones eliminated the automatic 14 day stay, to be able to appeal/not be muted the stay must be reinstated, Okin told the Judge they would appeal and the Judge instructed Okin as to the process of appealing, yet the stay has not been reinstated by Judge Jones. Is this an accurate summary?
Is it legal for Judge Jones to make a comment well before his ruling, to paraphrase: "be sure to keep some dry powder" available, which implies he knew well before the ruling what it would be and then, to give investors an "inside" indication of how he would rule with that statement in court?
BBB, outstanding post! Is there room for you on the AHEC? There should be!
LG, great news! Thanks for your post!
On the form there are two questions: 1.Opt in or Opt out, 2.Accept or Reject.
JP, to possibly get a bond payoff, is it as a bond holder necessary to have opted in to the current POR or not? Thanks.
BBB would NEVER say something like that if it wasn't true!
LG, do we know who filed this?
JP, how do you interpret this?
BBB, could it be he knows an appeal is in the works?
mrpenny, I can't find what you are reporting.
Exactly. Where does it say this?
Best wishes to all VETS! Thanks!
CORRECT! I fully support Okin.
Google ice cube bonds. Some interesting information and it sounds like they were involved in these proceedings relevant to the push for a speedy conclusion, maintaining cloudy valuation, and possibly, collusion.
mrp, if Okin said we would appeal the judge's ruling, why not believe what he said in court and therefore, on the record?
Stockminder, what/who are "holders of allowed general unsecured claims"?
mrpenny, do you know whether bondholders need to opt in to qualify for the payment and earned benefit you detail? Thanks.
Kim, it's not over.
BBB, thanks!
What's the deal with redaction!? This bk is not related to national security!
pistoncity, thanks!
Gary, thank you!
Is court now in session?
mrpenney, thanks for sharing important information, your thoughts, and your plans!
inventor, I agree! Well said!
mrpenney, I agree!
Absolutely a hard punch to the groin! I will do the same!
Exactly!!! It stinks!!!
As a non poster but regular reader and investor, there was not pumping by the regulars here who are highly informed. The pps action the last couple of days fooled myself and others that significant news was forthcoming.Why the pps went as high as mid $7 with no significant news after all, is a mystery, though one can guess why.
Kick As## letter!
So mrpenny did you opt in or opt out?
I was told by Schwab they had no info. regarding the COTRS offer. Per the letter the contact person is Cindy Woodward and she can only be reached by email which is on the letter. She is the official, knowledgeable person regarding this offer, I was told.
kr, not yet.
BBB,thanks.
BBB, thanks! Welcomed opinion.