Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
HUH??? never tried to directly or indirectly talk you or anyone out of your shares.
good grief, charlie brown!
all, don't be a victim of MFLI.
Stay away
just to be ""crystal clear"", i do not post incorrect or false information, never, ever, have....
i simply can't understand all the denial woven into the fabric of conversations. do you know, "denial is not a river in egypt"? think long and hard about it??
and, no, i will not rub anyone nose in it. i just expect people to exhibit nobility.
norhting wrong with "agree to disagree".
just to be fair, i am very, very rarely incorrect in my assessments of ANYTHING. AND, I sincerely doubt, I am incorrect in my assessments here.
for posterity sake, lets revisit this subject at 3, 6, 9 and 12 month intervals.
i have complete confidence in my analytics and opinions. again, i sincerely doubt i am incorrect.
GLTU
très bon - French
sehr gut - German
molto buona - Italian
muy Buena - Spanish
each translated; very good
I speak four; count them, four languages. Fluently. How many foreign languages do you fluently speak? Never mind, I know, ZERO!
To the point, it is ashame you failed to comprehend my critique on Sunday. Did you know reading is FUNDAMENTAL? To the contrary, I did in fact fulfill my obligation. I did watch, it’s a scary world, in the company of my friend. And my friend validated my thoughts before given the chance.
Heck, even monica understood my post. But then again, monica is probably the only level headed one of the bunch. Truth hurts, huh!
BTW, what became of beachbum? i know he is no longer a assistant. actually, not long ago, beachbum send me a lengthy pm. beachbum shared his personal toughts to me on EVERYTHING. he appears to have a high degree of business accumen and complemented me the same!
I know beachbum is very disappointed and rightfully so.....
au contraire mon frère.
MFLI sera bientôt tester de nouveaux creux
fou au revoir!
very true!
read post #24439
it is self explanatory
Is this national exposure enough for you.
"product placement"
er, NO!
In summary, the production of the Bravada message (according to a advertising executive) appeared a "after thought" and "did not appear to stand on its own".
look into ogilvy & mather.
NO!
PERIOD!
no, that's called NETWORK television. that's what Dancing With The Stars is on. you know, that hit network tv show that stars KARINA SMIRNOFF, who is now SPONSORING BRAVADA?
it is a cable broadcast on limited channel access. BIG DIFFERENCE. NOT, NATIONAL; ABC, NBC, CBS.
E! network is nationally recognized as tabliod fodder. that is a fact. NOT, NATIONAL; ABC, NBC, CBS.
to my previous question, show me tangible revenue?
show me the money!
how does this message directly translate to tangible revenue and ultimately net income on the financials??
fact is, it is just a reality show with zero ratings in commercial ratings.
when ac nielsen rates this, then reality becomes actual!!
A friend who is a advertising executive of 30 years with Ogilvy & Mather provided a critique of the Bravada advertising on MELBs show; it’s a scary world. I suggest researching Ogilvy & Mather and their prestigious client list of companies.
In summary, the production of the Bravada message (according to a advertising executive) appeared a after thought and did not appear to stand on its own.
In closing, I am not a advertising executive, and never claimed experience in advertising, however, I value the professional opinion of my friend who is a advertising executive of 30 years with Ogilvy & Mather. Cant argue with professional experience.
On another note, it was mentioned people watch by the millions. I ask a obvious question, what organization/company (ie. AC Nielsen) provided the viewing number “millions”? To assert a viewership claim, a rating organization/company (ie. AC Nielsen) would provide a attestation. I see no mention or information from a rating organization/company to provide attestation. I’m simply saying.
I have fulfilled my obligation of watching it’s a scary world and the presence of Bravada. That was the intent of this post.
ok, i can spare ten minutes to watch the program. i'll reserve my right to critique if and when appropriate. i can not guarantee anyone will appreciate my assessment or critique, i guess that is a inert quality of what defines a person.
i have not viewed the spin crowd, no desire for me. although, i've heard others speak to the demoralizing and degrading theme of that production. imo, spin crowd is not quality programming "made for tv". and, people wonder why society is dysfunctional, hummm.
i have not viewed it's a scary world, i understand it is melb's program. no offense to melb, but, i'll pass.
it takes alot to captivate and arouse my curiosity. i'm just saying.
anyone ever hear of science channel, national geographic or smithsonian? i guess i'm a lost breed in society, a traditionalist!
first, congratulations on initiating this forum. long overdue, imo.
it takes courage and fortitude to recognize and expose the rhetoric and trash within the OTC markets. further, the kool-aide "hooligans" who pump the OTC trash are a band of thiefs looking for fresh and naive investors to buy into the otc rhetoric.
i've seen much rhetoric and trash in my days, among my favorite are OTC CEO's who posture "threats" of litigation pointed to the contrarians who expose the empty and listless promises and rhetoric. question, ever witness a OTC CEO use a investor conference call or a PR as a means to threaten litigation towards contrarians?? I have, and that type of behavior is a typical warning sign of a CEO with dirty hands.
OK, I generally do not watch much TV; due a lack of quality programming. The Bravada "short" feature on Entertainment TV was a decent production from "TLK", nothing more, imo.
I still don't comprehend all the "hype". Really!
Why frustrating? Doesn't anyone recognize what is truly going on??
Anyone?
pennyrich
no need for that. the public float is ""plenty"", as in good and plenty!
churn, rinse, repeat. good and plenty!
the historical charts matched to the PR's suggest, OH, NO!!
stay away.
Period.
from a historical perspective, a constant and perpetual ""reset"".
PERIOD.
newdon
before considering a entry, ""carefully"" study the company fundamentals and technicals.
never, ever, substitute your personal due diligence over the blind and popular consensus of a message board.
after all, it is YOUR money.
study, study, study, before considering a entry.
to be forewarned is to be forearmed.
Katxninja,
I concur. The charlatans are peacocks, proudly displaying their true colors.
BEACHBUM,
Thank You for your private message during the evening of Saturday September 11. Unfortunately, I lack private message response.
If interested, please privately reply with a private email. It is always refreshing to correspond to a professional with a eye towards business accumen.
Cordially and Sincerely.
glad you are amused. glad to please.
obviously, you missed the point of the post.
beach bum understood the point.
beach bum,
define your personal criteria of "good" stock trading on the pink sheets and/or OTCXB?
the market is plenty with "good" valuations in the pink sheets and/or OTCXB.
Contrary to popular belief, the current and near term market lacks positive confidence in MFLI.
MFLI is a prima madona operating in the midst of a global recession.
The current market trumps all pumping, and the market is telling MFLI, "show me proof, not fluff".
the recent decline in pps is nothing short a positive indicator of the negative market sentiment.
think long and hard.
Danny’s form 144 sales likely through marker maker; PART - AMERICAN PARTNERS, L.P. – LARCHMONT, NY., was a very brief participant. After PART, departed, BID support dropped.
The presence of marker maker; PART is ironically timed with todays promotions . In and out.
Coincidence, or no coincidence?
Wondering?
To the watchful eye on L2 or the privileged few who access L3, market maker; PART - AMERICAN PARTNERS, L.P. – LARCHMONT, NY., was a very brief participant. After PART, departed, BID support dropped.
The presence of marker maker; PART is ironically timed with todays promotions. In and out. No closing support at the 50 DMA.
cryptics,
110% AGREE your statement.
"Denial is NOT a river in Egypt"
naturalborninvestor,
thank you for your interest. per my previous posts, the Dow Jones news of the MFLI form 144 filing is NOT A PR per se, rather a news release from Dow Jones news service.
I stand behind the authenticity of my previous post, as it is 110% authentic. It is highly doubtful Dow Jones will willingly publish false information.
As for posting a link or screen shot, I leave the oweness upon others to post a link or screen shot. I am 110% certain folks who have premier client status at; ETRADE, FIDELITY, BofA/Merrill Lynch, etc., have access to this Dow Jones news release. Again, I stand behind the authenticity of my previous post, as it is 110% authentic. It is highly doubtful Dow Jones will willingly publish false information.
The fact the SEC database lacks CURRENT information reference to the recent form 144 does NOT lack credence to the 08/19/2010 Dow Jones news of the form 144. PERIOD.
It is VERY HIGHLY doubtful Dow Jones editors and management would willingly post a incorrect news item. PERIOD.
Fact is, the recent form 144 is legitimate. If the sale of 13,136,762 restricted shares represents a MATERIAL change in the holdings of company insiders (ie, CEO, officers, directors) , those insiders are required to submit a Form 4 to include directors and officers of the company as well as any shareholders owning 10% or more of the company's outstanding stock. A Form 4 is mandatory within (2) two business days starting from the end of the day the material transaction occurred; (ie. approximate date of sale: 09/30/ 2010).
this transaction (prior to 08/19/2010) will require further review to determine if the 13+ million shares are in part or fully absorbed into the O/S.
Based on the SEC form 144, Danny Alex, CEO, is the filer. No mention of Sid.
I am aware of this information since (08/19/2010) the Dow Jones news was submitted to Fidelity and ETRADE clients.
I can only assume other Fidelity and ETRADE clients had privy to the dates/times as well. Not to mention numerous other brokerage clients.
knowledge is power.
Obviously, registered date of 08/18/2010; is filing date with S.E.C.. Obviously, Madison transfer agent will lack information to receive and act upon registered date of 08/18/2010.
Again, focus on the "Approximate date of sale": 09/30/ 2010. The 13+ million shares will hit the O/S, around the 09/30/ 2010 date of sale and days after, until all sold.
This is a sale.
Found a interesting news item. Not a PR but a S.E.C. form 144 filing. For Power ETRADE PRO and Fidelity PRO Active traders the information is readily accessible.
Dow Jones news agency published (08/19/2010) the SEC form 144.
Filer: Bravada International, LTD. MFLI
Danny Alex CEO
Broker: Questrade, Inc.
Sale of 13,136,762 restricted shares
Registered date: 08/18/2010
Approximate date of sale: 09/30/ 2010
sean,
of course, i am correct. i am very confident regarding my financial expertise. after all, i have a BIG 4 financial background.
i highly doubt i missed your point. yes, this is a development stage pink company.
if memory serves correct, the previous quarter financials were late and otcmarkets.com downgraded to limited information.
from a credibility perspective, consistency is KEY, and development stage companies need to establish consistency to establish credibility in the overall market.
just my 2 cents. i know i am correct ;)
InterNATL-INVESTOR
to your point, "murphys law"
Murphys law, does NOT apply regarding a contractual engagement letter between a CPA engagement partner and the end-client CEO.
It is suggested to focus on the engagement letter.
If the end-client CEO is tardy providing financial information, then the obligation of delay is "owe" the end-client CEO. PERIOD. Speaking from experience, the CPA firm will "then" positively "adjust" staffing requirements as appropriate to meet the contractual obligations of the engagement letter. If late, the CPA firm will advise the end-client CEO of a "scope creap or deviation in the terms of engagement delivery". This is standard operating practice if the end-client CEO is late submitting timely information to the CPA firm.
Based my experience, the end-client is tardy providing information to the CPA firm. No doubt.
the information is unsubstantiated.