Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
https://www.fhfa.gov//SupervisionRegulation/Rules/Pages/Comment-Detail.aspx?CommentId=15541
Absolute and reason-based criticism of the FHFA capital requirements
FNMA
FMCC
The FHFA's capital requirement presented to the FNMA lacks any reason-based foundation, is arbitrary, and at least $ 60 billion overestimated.
The latest results of the annual (FHFA) Dodd-Frank Act stress tests (DFAST) are overestimated by the (safety) factors 6.5 and 13.5 and this is at the expense of the shareholders. In addition, these far too high capital requirements discourage new investors from investing their money in the GSE and enabling recapitalisation.
In addition, there is (actually) no need for recapitalization, the government only has to return the stolen money to Fannie Mae and Freddy Mac, since a lot of help was never required.
And although the 12,000 secret documents up to 2016 prove that the companies never needed state aid in 2008, does the FHFA report claim that the legitimacy of the conservatorship still exists?
President Obama wanted to keep these 12,000 (secret / internal) documents under permanent presidential privilege, which clearly shows that fraud was ordered from above.
The theft by Tresury and FHFA is also proven to the extent that after the notification by Susan MacFarland (7/15/2012) to Tresury, a unilateral and unlawful "contract change" / confiscation of all profits (since 2012) was planned, deprive companies of any chance of getting out of the conservatorship and preventing recapitalization. The profit in 2012 amounted to $ 59.4 b!
This high and wrong capital requirement goes in the same direction, apparently director Calabria doesn't really want F&F to be released from the conservatorship and recapitalized.
In my opinion, director Calabria has a conflict of interest, on the one hand, as FHFA director, he must ensure that the GSE is released quickly and easily from the conservatorship (sound and solvent) and that the GSE does not suffer any financial damage from third parties (including the FHFA) ), on the other hand I see that he wants to transfer larger parts of the GSE business to the big private banks. This does not go together, he does not have the authority to transfer parts of the GSE business to private banks. This is fraud against the shareholders whose interests he must represent. Maybe you should ask him about whose interests he actually represents? The FHFA has acted illegally towards the GSE and has been proven beyond any doubt.
Director Calabria knows very well that the supposed "evidence" of the need for government aid is based solely on accounting tricks, as used by the mafia.
The capital rule is also wrong because Fannie Mae and Freddy Mac have an explicit state guarantee for financial defaults, so the "banking standard" according to Basel I to IV is not applicable here.
Mark Calabria said when he took office that he did not want to harm the shareholders any further, but with this proposed capital increase he is doing just that, and that is (also) contrary to the US Constitution.
The companies belong to the shareholders, not the preferred shareholders (the latter are only entitled to a dividend that has been taken from you by the state through the illegal takeover).
If these preference shares are now exchanged for ordinary shares in an unfavorable ratio for the ordinary shareholders, the ordinary shareholders lose a large part of what you are entitled to after 12 years of arbitrary determination and theft. This also violates Amendment 5 of the Constitution, protection of property, or compensation from the government!
The very fact that the FHFA is considering issuing new shares is fraud against the shareholders, as they are then “diluted“. If necessary, new preference shares could be issued to raise the capital, everything else is (again) deception of the shareholders.
According to current capital requirements, the GSE would never have needed state aid in 2008, this (hostile) takeover of control by the government corresponds to mafia methods, this is also the opinion of Judge Margret Sweeney in the Collins case. It has ordered the release of the 12,000 secret documents that the Obama administration wanted to keep as a secret so that the theft can be covered up.
The proposed capital rule, or the arbitrary capital requirements go back to the business model before 2008, but this was more than improved and reformed, so here again an arbitrary specification for a (intentionally) wrong calculation has been made and the resulting results and consequences (intentionally) misrepresented.
As an additional note, the FHFA is unconstitutional, so all decisions made by this authority are unlawful and must be reversed. The FHFA also does not act in accordance with the legal requirements arising from HERA for your work:
The Third Amendment implemented a “net worth sweep” that strips the
Companies of their entire net worth each quarter and prevents the accumulation of any funds to
repay pre-conservatorship shareholders, or build capital or any buffer against future losses. In
addition, it explicitly eliminates the Companies’ minimal reserve against losses to zero by 2018.
HERA requires FHFA to conduct the conservatorships in order to “preserve and conserve” the
Companies and to rehabilitate them so that they return to a “sound and solvent” condition.
Moreover, Congress consciously chose to vest with FHFA, not Treasury, the sole authority over
invoking and conducting a conservatoror receivership. The role of Treasury is exclusively that
of a creditor. Based on the past precedents, as demonstrated below, the requirement to return to a
“sound and solvent condition” requires at a minimum that the Companies must meet the
minimum capital and other regulatory standards required by the regulators and the market to
conduct their normal business. If the Companies cannot be returned to a “sound and solvent”
condition, then they must be placed into receivership. However, FHFA and Treasury have
ignored these specific requirements and, instead, have used the Companies as “cash cows” to
divert tens of billions of dollars to the Treasury.
See Page 6:
https://www.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/pubs/pdf/working-paper-26_1.pdf
Here are the most relevant criticisms in my opinion in detail about the capital proposal:
Quotes from the following link by Don Layton:
https://www.jchs.harvard.edu/blog/the-new-proposed-capital-rule-for-freddie-mac-fannie-mae-ten-quick-reactions/
2. A strange mix of technical specificity and judgmental arbitrariness.
"The proposal has very specific, complex, and lengthy calculations for a risk-based capital requirement calculation. It then applies no less than three different defined capital requirements (in addition to the statutory requirement, which is functionally obsolete but can’t be changed without legislation) to come up with a “highest of” number, and using 9/30/19 as a baseline, the highest figure for the two GSEs together is $135 billion (the lowest is $76 billion, the average $105 billion). It then adds buffers to that number which total another $99 billion, for an overall total of $234 billion. Yes, almost half of the total (42 percent) is rough judgment numbers that seem to overwhelm the massively complex formulae."
"This puts an aura of arbitrariness into it, which is not a good thing."
(4) "The incompatibility of the proposal with the DFAST results seems to add to the case that the proposal is just (much) too high, likely by a lot."
3. The proposed capital rule and the Federal Reserve stress tests seem incompatible.
"On 8/15/19, FHFA published the latest results of the annual Dodd-Frank Act Stress Tests (DFAST), which are designed to show the loss assuming a “severely adverse scenario” set by the Federal Reserve, which uses the same scenario in setting capital requirements for large banks. The results actually showed two losses for the combined GSEs: $18 billion and $43 billion, depending upon a key issue related to taxes. That means the $243 billion proposed capital requirement is 13.5 times greater than the calculated loss in the severely adverse scenario using the $18 billion loss; it is also 5.6 times greater when using the $43 billion. And while a large financial institution is indeed supposed to have more capital than simply what is necessary to clear a severely adverse scenario loss (the extra amount is generally referred to as a “going-concern buffer”) 13.5 times and 5.6 times do seem rather high."
"So, can the proposed capital rule really be compatible with the published DFAST results? Even using the more conservative (i.e. higher) $43 billion DFAST loss, a total capital requirement of $243 billion, by simple subtraction, makes the going concern buffer equal to $200 billion. That’s over 80 percent of the total, which certainly appears excessive. This doesn’t add up somehow. The proposed rule does not address this major inconsistency with the DFAST results."
"FHFA’s proposed capital rule, by adding in its large buffers, comes up to $243 billion. The incompatibility of the proposal with the DFAST results seems to add to the case that the proposal is just too high, likely by a lot."
5. Real world implications on guarantee fees (g-fees) and market share.
"In 2019, a very good year for the GSEs in terms of their financial performance, the two companies together produced profit of $21.8 billion. This generates a return on the $243 billion of required capital of 9 percent, which is a reasonable return to shareholders. A first-cut conclusion would therefore be that this all works out, that the companies can carry the capital requirement without having to change much of what they do."
10. This is going to hurt the equity-raising needed to exit conservatorship.
"Director Calabria has said many times that his top priority is to end the conservatorships, and have the two GSEs raise enough equity to be well-capitalized. This capital proposal, however, will make that harder."
"First, the companies will need to raise equity in amounts never before done, by an even larger margin than expected. Second, the projected return-on-equity (ROE) of the companies, which is the single most important measure of financial success for large financial institutions, will be under-market, and thus render the shares in any IPO unattractive, until enough years have gone by to show that increased g-fees and other impacts of the capital rule proposal are able to generate an ROE of at least 8 to 9 percent after tax. Third, the increased pricing required to deliver a return on the $243 billion level of capital will shrink the GSEs’ market share, leading to declining revenues and profits, which investors will not like."
"Buried in the proposal as well is the notion that the full $243 billion isn’t really officially required. It’s only required if the GSEs wish to escape restrictions on “capital distributions and discretionary bonus payments.” They can be considered adequately capitalized at a lower level of capital. That’s nice in a regulatory sense, but in the real world, especially when it comes to capital raising time, it’s a meaningless distinction. No investors will want to put money into a company that has such restrictions on it: the full $243 billion is what they will need. In fact, a large financial institution can’t run at exactly the level of capital required by its regulator but needs a working cushion. Research shows something like a 5 percent buffer is needed, raising the actual required capital for normal operations post-conservatorship to be $255 billion."
"To conclude, this proposal has a lot of good detail and depth to it. However, at key junctures it is strategically backward-looking or driven by ideology more than is appropriate. I hope it receives many comments from interested parties to generate significant reworking, with the result that it develops a reputation as professional rather than political, right down the middle of the fairway. Otherwise, it risks becoming a political football, like so much about the GSEs and housing finance, likely to be significantly revised every time a new FHFA director from the other party is appointed."
Other Remarks:
The NWS was a theft. When the (Obama) Government realized the companies became (too) profitable again, they somehow changed their mind and implemented the NWS, to take ALL profits, so that the companies will never become "sound and solvent" again and cannot leave conservatorship.
This was 2012, as the Company FNMA realized a profit from $ 59.4 b in this year 2012!
The only motivation for this behavior is GREED. A cash cow. Why give it back to the rightful owners (the shareholders) when they can milk this cow forever? This is in my opinion THEFT!
Ultimately, the securitized rights are also disregarded, protection against confiscation of property:
Amendment V [1791]
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise
infamous crime, unless on a pres
entment or indictment of a
Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or
in the Militia, when actual serv
ice in time of War or public
danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to
be twice put in jeopardy of life or
limb; nor shall be compelled in
any criminal case to be a witne
ss against himself, nor be deprived
of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall
private property be taken for public use, without just
compensation.
The confiscation of company profits is a violation of Amendment V and awards the shareholders compensation!
The FHFA is therefore obliged to release the companies from the conservatorship as soon as possible, which can be a fair market valuation of the shares (min. $ 60). FNMA's liquidation assets are approximately $ 100 per share and these assets belong solely to the shareholders! And the company belongs to the shareholders, not the government or the preferred shareholders.
The Democrats changed the law, so that a simple majority is sufficient. The Republicans have the majority for confirm mnuchin.
When will the result of the electoral vote be announced?
@gmorgenson
avatar
gretchen morgenson
@gmorgenson
Good question Josh. What happened to the 4th estate? twitter.com/JoshRosner/sta…
reply
retweet
34
favorite
49
How can I insert the screenshots from the doc´s?
https://twitter.com/JoshRosner
Look at 12/05/16:
Gov't knows #TBTF banks have anticompetitive power & that GSEs are repairable but want to give #TBTFs the GSEs market? @ICBA
With 10.6 Trillion in assets...
http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingPdf?FilingID=11684421
.....the biggest value by a company in world.
Ten Trillon divided by one billion shares are assets per share about $ 10.000,-!
15 x more value as Apple!
The move to sweep all profits...
“violated the rights of thousands of shareholders across America,”
Paulson & Co. said in an e-mailed statement.
It said the government’s action also
violated the law enabling the takeover of Fannie and Freddie. “
This action should be reversed,
and we look forward to an outcome that
restores the rights of shareholders in these companies.”
Carl Ichan is in Trumps team....
he owned min. 24 million shares, or more up to 50 million shares.
http://fortune.com/2016/11/21/donald-trump-carl-ichan-role/?xid=soc_socialflow_twitter_FORTUNE
That´s good for us, he don´t work against his own money!
Hillary and Obama standing not over the law....
[img]Stockman1010101 Member Level Monday, 11/07/16 11:22:40 PM
Re: rekcusdoo post# 358743
Post # of 358789
If Hillary wins tomorrow, FNMA and FMCC stock will go to zero. Hillary along with Obama have sworn to wipe out the GSEs and their shareholders. If you don't believe me, check PRs from a year ago or so. Longs of which I am one, you have been warned. It will be a very sad/bad day for the GSE shareholders if she wins the presidency. GOD HELP US ALL![/img]
....she can´t also legally act against the laws and the Constitution. Wait what is in the documents...I think there is much explosives for the fraudulent goverment, so that they lost the process.
Has anyone create a list with the F&F quarerly earnings since 2008? I think that shows, that the tale of the death spiral is only in the head from Goverment.
If not, let´s create a detail list from the earnings.
Richard A. Epstein
is the Laurence A. Tisch professor of Law at NYU, senior fellow at the Hoover Institution, and senior lecturer at the University of Chicago Law School:
That are the important sentences:
I believe, in a gross dereliction of the duty of loyalty and duty of care imposed on him under the Housing and Economic Development Act of 2008. It was an effective nationalization of both companies, which the courts should invalidate.
Nonetheless the government claims in its brief that the situation was unstable because the GSEs had to draw on the funding commitment to pay the quarterly dividend. Unfortunately, this claim overlooks at least four points. First, the decision to impose the NWS was done only after both GSEs had together posted an $8 billion profit during the preceding fiscal quarter. Second, Fannie and Freddie had no obligation to make any cash dividend payments at all, for both GSEs had the option to defer payment so long as they were prepared to pay a 12% rate of return on the deferred balance. Third, shortly after the NWS was announced the government reversed the decision in 2008 to wipe out about $150 billion of the deferred tax assets (i.e. loss carryovers) of Fannie and Freddie, which resulted in a huge windfall that it alone enjoyed after the earlier NWS sweep. Fourth, since the NWS, Fannie and Freddie have paid into government coffers almost $251 billion in cash on the bailout money, which remained fixed at around $189 billion. That sum was more than $124 billion in payments above and beyond the amount owing under the original deal at the 10% dividend rate. The correct accounting would have been to use the sweep payments to reduce the amount of the outstanding senior preferred, which in turn would have reduced in each successive period after the NWS was put into place.
All of these factors make it crystal clear that there is already much extrinsic evidence of the most serious irregularities in the procedures adopted both at FHFA and the Department of Treasury. In light of the government’s consistent obstructionism, Judge Sweeney on her own motion demanded that the government to explain why it should not have to pay the costs of discovery to the plaintiffs. In light of this lamentable history, it would be a grave abuse of discretion for the Federal Circuit to overturn Judge Sweeney’s order. It seems highly unlikely that it will do so.
The Government is deliberately against the even adopted laws.....
....sorry for the not so good translation by Bing.
Die Regierung handelt vorsätzlich gegen die selbst erlassenen Gesetze um sich zu bereichern und die Aktionäre zu enteignen. Das steht im Widerspruch zu vielen US-Gesetzen. Auch wenn ich nur ein Außenstehender bin, so erkenne ich das sogar aus dem fernen Deutschland.
The Government is deliberately against the even adopted laws to enrich and to expropriate the shareholders. This is contrary to many U.S. laws. Even if I'm just an outsider, I recognize that even from the distant Germany.
Ich kann nicht nachvollziehen, warum die Gerichte in den USA so lange brauchen um eine Entscheidung im Sinne der betrogenen Aktionäre fällen. In Deutschland wäre der Fall schon lange zu gunsten der Aktionäre abgeschlossen, schon allein wegen der E-Mail Beweise von Jim Parrott, Aussagen zur Kapitalisierung und Vormundschaft - das sind in der Summe mit Vorsatz und Absicht ausgeführte Straftaten. Wer das letztendlich zu verantworten hat (Hank Paulson - war auch bei der Zerschlagung der WAMU beteiligt), ist letztenlich egal, da diese Herren eh nie zur Verantwortung gezogen werden.
I can not understand, why the courts in the United States need so long time to make a decision within the meaning of the deceived shareholders. In Germany would in completed evidence by Jim Parrott, statements regarding the recapitalization has long been in favor of the shareholders, because the email and guardianship - running crimes are in total with intent and purpose. (Hank Paulson - was also involved in the dismantling of the WAMU), who ultimately to answer for that is ultimately matter, because these men are never held accountable..
a) HERA
The Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 (HERA)
‘SEC. 1367. AUTHORITY OVER CRITICALLY UNDERCAPITALIZED REGULATED
ENTITIES.
‘‘(b) POWERS AND DUTIES OF THE AGENCY AS CONSERVATOR
OR RECEIVER.—
‘‘(2) GENERAL POWERS.—
‘‘(B) OPERATE THE REGULATED ENTITY.—The Agency
may, as conservator or receiver—
‘‘(iv) preserve and conserve the assets and property
of the regulated entity; and
‘‘(D) POWERS AS CONSERVATOR.—The Agency may, as
conservator, take such action as may be—
‘‘(i) necessary to put the regulated entity in a sound
and solvent condition; and
‘‘(ii) appropriate to carry on the business of the
regulated entity and preserve and conserve the assets
and property of the regulated entity.
Source:
https://www.congress.gov/110/plaws/publ289/PLAW-110publ289.pdf
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/110/hr3221/text
Beweiß / Proof: E-Mail Transcript Jim Parrott (no end of conservationship / no recapitalization)
b) Verschleierung / zurückhalten von Beweisen / Concealment / withhold evidence
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2071
Title 18. Section 2071.
a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
(b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States.
c) Handlungen gegen den Freedom and Information act / Acts against the Freedom & Information Act
http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_ifg/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_Information_Act_%28United_States%29
d) Handlungen gegen die Bill of rights - Eigentumsdelikt / Enteignung
Acts against the Bill of rights - property crime / expropriation
e) Verletzung der Rechte der Aktionäre / Violation of the rights of shareholders
Ich bin neugierig auf die Reaktion der Richterin über die Weigerung der richterlichen Anordung diese 56 wohl entscheidenden Dokumente vorzulegen. Die Verweigerung werte ich als uneingeschränktes Schuldeingeständniss.
I'm curious to present these 56 probably decisive documents on the reaction of the judge over the refusal of the judicial order. I take the refusal as an unconditional debt recognition.
No document inside:
Patswil Monday, 06/20/16 11:11:16 PM
Re: rocco2 post# 344190
Post # of 344214
Ethics Violations by DoJ Lawyers in Perry Capital et al. (Court of Appeals)
https://www.dropbox.com/s/wxpdjrsr8uqy6l7/Complaint%20of%20DoJ%20Attorneys%20%28Doc%201618181%29.pdf
You know, that the important proofs are hidden by goverment!
But they have to present the documents by freedom and information act. Judge Sweeney is here with us / with the freedom and information act.
The freedom and information act is not to protect fraud documents!
The last protection from the fraud documents is the presidents privilleg - and it´s a shame (in the homeland of demokratie) , this to use to hide a fraud!
So we have to wait...what makes the judges...
Than wrote...
... to the press, I have make it to all adresses, which I have (I have post it here).
The most shareholders are in USA, also do something for your investment and against the fraud from the goverment.
Make a complaint against the goverment, do it!
Make a suit against the infringement of constitution / constitutional complaint, do it!
They broken the constitution:
Mr. Rosner was tweeting last night the fact that the MBA BOD is apparently a bunch of mature white males and that one cannot find a person of color among the trade groups that are lobbying to allow the Government to steal the GSEs from their Shareholder Owners in violation of our United States Constitution and the 5th Amendment of the Bill of Rights.
Do anything, but do it now!!!!!
Don´t sleep in this time, make action against the fraudulent Goverment!!!
No one ...
...has used my email address, I find that sad. I have now written a brief summary for the press and sent to the addresses. I got 80 error responses, the remaining 900-1000 addresses got the info.
We see it in brief, whether interested in more journalists for the case.
Sorry,
what is that for a stupid post:
navycmdr Member Level Tuesday, 06/07/16 09:39:33 AM
Re: None
Post # of 342441
asked the MAGIC 8 Ball ... smile
Also short-posts are.....
Property rights
I see Mr. Bradford ignore my posts with the e-mail-adresses, he ignore so the posibillity to reach more press work for the shareholders. That´s sad. I don´t understand it, we can work here together.
Which article secure the personaly property rights in the USA?
I found this here, maybe it´s important: (I don´t know if it´s right)
Against measures of the
public authority of the Federal amendment protects the (article) V
private property, amendment XIV, section 1 applies this
Property protection according to the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court
also on the individual States:
Amendment V [1791]
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise
infamous crime, unless on a pres
entment or indictment of a
Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or
in the Militia, when actual serv
ice in time of War or public
danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to
be twice put in jeopardy of life or
limb; nor shall be compelled in
any criminal case to be a witne
ss against himself, nor be deprived
of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall
private property be taken for public use, without just
compensation.
Amendment XIV (1868)
Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States,
and subject to the jurisdiction ther
eof, are citizens of the United
States and of the State wherein
they reside. No State shall make
or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or
immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State
deprive any person of life, liber
ty, or property, without due
process of law; nor deny to any
person within its jurisdiction the
equal protection of laws.
I put now some fact´s together and can sent it in my not so good english to the e-mail-adresses to the press.
A German proverb says:
Have right and getting right are two pair shoe.
A cabal of government officials has deliberately violated the law – that is proven.
Thus, the 3rd change (NWS) is not legally compliant - fraudulent and illegal.
But how will the Court based on the evidence decide now?
What impact does expect the shareholders?
Repay of the stolen funds to Fanny & Freddy? Termination of the NWS?
The beginning of the end of conservatorship???
Mario Draghi is also a Goldman Sachs Puppet!
I don´t trust him, what he make with the € and the zero interest / rates!
One time a Goldman Sachs bangster, ever a Goldman Sachs bangster!
955 Friday, 05/27/16 12:56:23 AM
Re: rocco2 post# 340469
Post # of 340536
Campaign contributions
Job security after politics
Self-serving interests
Political Advancement
Power
Greed
Disregard for Oath of Office
Agendas adverse to the Freedom Documents
Misplaced loyalties
Infiltration of Banking Execs into Gov
and many more...
E-mail list for press contacts
(it´s 4 jears old - some will be remove).
Maybe you will find some adresses to send the facts from the goverment fraud against Fannie & Freddy.
members@thestreet.com
info@cnbc.com
philjberg@obamacrimes.com
AmericanVoices@mail.house.gov
traum@ap.org
letters@nytimes.com
oped@nytimes.com
editorial@nytimes.com
nytnews@nytimes.com
executive-editor@nytimes.com
managing-editor@nytimes.com
news-tips@nytimes.com
national@nytimes.com
washington@nytimes.com
letters@washpost.com
national@washpost.com
sundaysource@washpost.com
oped@washingtontimes.com
yourletters@washingtontimes.com
Tim.Garrison@latimes.com
Michael.Owen@latimes.com
Tenny.Tatusian@latimes.com
David.Johnson@latimes.com
Marc.Olson@latimes.com
Michael.Muskal@latimes.com
Roger.Smith@latimes.com
Ashley.Dunn@latimes.com
Steve.Padilla@latimes.com
Mark.Barabak@latimes.com
Connie.Stewart@latimes.com
Robin.Abcarian@latimes.com
Bob.Drogin@latimes.com
tips@tribune.com
bdold@tribune.com
ctc-editor@tribune.com
JHirt@tribune.com
JWinnecke@tribune.com
KAlleynemorris@tribune.com
Rxbecker@tribune.com
SBenzkofer@tribune.com
oped@sacbee.com
letters@sacbee.com
bsteiden@ajc.com
cwarmbold@ajc.com
cynthia@ajc.com
gmathis@ajc.com
hklibanoff@ajc.com
hpost@ajc.com
jmallory@ajc.com
jbookman@ajc.com
jdwallace@ajc.com
letters@ajc.com
insideajc@ajc.com
pgast@ajc.com
rnarayanan@ajc.com
rhenry@ajc.com
goodman@globe.com
kcooper@globe.com
johnson@globe.com
letter@globe.com
brelis@globe.com
oliphant@globe.com
lettersbwol@businessweek.com
richard_dunham@businessweek.com
netaudr@abc.com
nightline@abcnews.com
2020@abc.com
evening@cbsnews.com
earlyshow@cbs.com
60minutes@cbsnews.com
48hours@cbsnews.com
ftn@cbsnews.com
today@nbc.com
comments@foxnews.com
Special@foxnews.com
Foxreport@foxnews.com
Oreilly@foxnews.com
Hannity@foxnews.com
Colmes@foxnews.com
Ontherecord@foxnews.com
aaron.brown@turner.com
andrea.koppel@turner.com
bill.schneider@turner.com
bruce.morton@turner.com
candy.crowley@turner.com
dateline@nbc.com
hardball@msnbc.com
joe@msnbc.com
nightly@nbc.com
info@cnbc.com
newshour@pbs.org
ombudsman@npr.org
ElRushbo@eibnet.com
phil.boyce@citcomm.com
jgreber@bloomberg.net; jgreen16@bloomberg.net; jhamilton@rubenstein.com; jholl@knight.com; jhughes5@bloomberg.net; news@tulsaworld.com; joe.worley@tulsaworld.com; susan.ellerbach@tulsaworld.com; jim_bohman@coxohio.com; jim.barnett@newhouse.com; newstips@thenewstribune.com; jim.gerety@nbc.com; jim.puzzanghera@latimes.com; jimc@spokesman.com; jimpei@star-telegram.com; jimseybert@standardspeaker.com; letters@nytimes.com; oped@nytimes.com; editorial@nytimes.com; nytnews@nytimes.com; executive-editor@nytimes.com; managing-editor@nytimes.com; news-tips@nytimes.com; national@nytimes.com; washington@nytimes.com; acostag@washpost.com; letters@washpost.com; national@washpost.com; sundaysource@washpost.com; cnnpresents@turner.com; aaron.brown@turner.com; andrea.koppel@turner.com; bill.schneider@turner.com; bruce.morton@turner.com; candy.crowley@turner.com; topstories2@turner.com; Larry.King.Live3@turner.com; Lou.Dobbs2@turner.com; Jeff.Greenfield2@turner.com; LarryKing@turner.com; LiveToday@turner.com; Paula.Zahn2@turner.com; jnash@essence.com; jo.winterbottom@thomsonreuters.com; joan.magee@dowjones.com; oped@washingtontimes.com; yourletters@washingtontimes.com; Tim.Garrison@latimes.com; Michael.Owen@latimes.com; Tenny.Tatusian@latimes.com; David.Johnson@latimes.com; Marc.Olson@latimes.com; Michael.Muskal@latimes.com; Roger.Smith@latimes.com; Ashley.Dunn@latimes.com; Steve.Padilla@latimes.com; Mark.Barabak@latimes.com; Connie.Stewart@latimes.com; Robin.Abcarian@latimes.com; Bob.Drogin@latimes.com; tips@tribune.com; bdold@tribune.com; ctc-editor@tribune.com; JHirt@tribune.com; JWinnecke@tribune.com; KAlleynemorris@tribune.com; Rxbecker@tribune.com; SBenzkofer@tribune.com; bsteiden@ajc.com; cwarmbold@ajc.com; cynthia@ajc.com; gmathis@ajc.com; hklibanoff@ajc.com; hpost@ajc.com; jmallory@ajc.com; jbookman@ajc.com; jdwallace@ajc.com; letters@ajc.com; insideajc@ajc.com; pgast@ajc.com; rnarayanan@ajc.com; rhenry@ajc.com; jpmcinvestorrelations@jpmchase.com; jpressley@bloomberg.net; jraedupree@usnews.com; goodman@globe.com; kcooper@globe.com; johnson@globe.com; letter@globe.com; brelis@globe.com; oliphant@globe.com; jschapiro@timesdispatch.com; jscott14@bloomberg.net; jsearles@hearst.com; jshenn@bloomberg.net; jsledge@mobileregister.com; earlyshow@cbs.com; stu.schutzman@abc.com; netaudr@abc.com; 2020@abc.com; nightline@abcnews.com; evening@cbsnews.com; 60minutes@cbsnews.com; 48hours@cbsnews.com; ftn@cbsnews.com; lettersbwol@businessweek.com; richard_dunham@businessweek.com; juliuspierpont@spudgoodman.com; juro.osawa@dowjones.com; justin.lahart@wsj.com; jweil6@bloomberg.net; jweisenthal@alleyinsider.com; jwhitlow@starledger.com; oped@sacbee.com; letters@sacbee.com; today@nbc.com; nightly@nbc.com; lisa.hsia@nbc.com; mtpquestions@nbc.com; comments@foxnews.com; Special@foxnews.com; Foxreport@foxnews.com; Oreilly@foxnews.com; Hannity@foxnews.com; Colmes@foxnews.com; Ontherecord@foxnews.com; philjberg@obamacrimes.com; 360@cnn.com; caffertyfile@cnn.com; primenews@cnn.com; cnn.feedback@cnn.com; daybreak@cnn.com; moneyline@cnn.com; headlinenews@cnn.com; late.edition@cnn.com; harper@twtmail.com; harry.wilson@dowjones.com; hblack@mdp.com; hblodget@alleyinsider.com; hdraper@express-news.net; heaberlin@star-telegram.com; Headliners@msnbc.com; health@app.com; health@washpost.com; heimj@washpost.com; helfes@bloomberg.net; help@nytimes.com; hemmer@foxnews.com; henry_finder@newyorker.com; henry.pulizzi@dowjones.com; hgray@kcstar.com; histnews@historicnewspaper.com; hitalie@ap.org; hkisor@suntimes.com; hlancast@wsj.com; jjackson@sjmercury.com; jkeehner@bloomberg.net; jkelly14@bloomberg.net; jkennedy@bhamnews.com; jkew1@bloomberg.net; jkicklighter@dailyfx.com; jkishbaugh@citizensvoice.com; jkostrze@projo.com; jkroll@plaind.com; jlevine@forbes.com; jlindgren@starnews.com; jlumley1@bloomberg.net; Jluo6@bloomberg.net; jmahoney@statesman.com; jmairs@knight.com; jmalone@timesdispatch.com; jmanning@news.oregonian.com; jmarshall@knight.com; jmazzella@knight.com; jmcreynolds@oklahoman.com; hardball@msnbc.com; joe@msnbc.com; countdown@msnbc.com; hardball@msnbc.com; Joe@msnbc.com; newshour@pbs.org; ombudsman@npr.org; ElRushbo@eibnet.com; phil.boyce@citcomm.com; jnxtrade@aol.com; contact@moneyrates.com; Editors@newsweek.com; Letters@newsweek.com; jmichaels@timesunion.com; jmulligan@belo-dc.com; jmuncie@AOL.com; jwiant@nwherald.com; jwong@sacbee.com; karen.brettell@thomsonreuters.com; karing@chatfreepress.mindspring.com; dtletters@telegraph.co.uk; stletters@telegraph.co.uk; dtnews@telegraph.co.uk; stnews@telegraph.co.uk; letters@dailymail.co.uk; editorial@dailymailonline.co.uk; mailonline@newspaperdirect.com; news@mailonsunday.co.uk; letters@mailonsunday.co.uk; telegrapheditorial@telegraph.co.uk; editorial@rttnews.com; Karl@Rove.com; kate.haywood@dowjones.com; kate.kelly@wsj.com; kathy.kristof@latimes.com; eholm2@bloomberg.net; acremer@bloomberg.net; mpittman@bloomberg.net; bivry@bloomberg.net; afitzgerald2@bloomberg.net; craigk@bloomberg.net; p@bloomberg.net; agfw@bloomberg.net; blaw_us@bloomberg.net; blaw_eu@bloomberg.net; agfw@bloomberg.net; lion1916_zambrini@bloomberg.net; LION1916 ; vbrocco@bloomberg.net; rockenden1@bloomberg.net; taylorc@bloomberg.net; mkondo3@bloomberg.net; craigk@bloomberg.net; zmider1@bloomberg.net; schen37@bloomberg.net; sli31@bloomberg.net; wrochelle@bloomberg.net; drovella@bloomberg.net; fcinelli@bloomberg.net; wlee37@bloomberg.net; aghosh@bloomberg.net; wgcheng@bloomberg.net; cthomas16@bloomberg.net; jviljoen@bloomberg.net; helfes@bloomberg.net; jvanloon@bloomberg.net; dvoreacos@bloomberg.net; jzacharia@bloomberg.net; kchua6@bloomberg.net; burgos4@bloomberg.net; Hfouquet1@bloomberg.net; wleung12@bloomberg.net; scha2@bloomberg.net; lwang8@bloomberg.net; ebarrales@bloomberg.net; skawano1@bloomberg.net; lwang8@bloomberg.net; afrye@bloomberg.net; eholm2@bloomberg.net; jburgos4@bloomberg.net; sjones35@bloomberg.net; sraja4@bloomberg.net; wkisling@bloomberg.net; atprial@bloomberg.net; sraja4@bloomberg.net; tbarraclough@bloomberg.net; kathy.shwiff@dowjones.com; "kathyb@fresno" ; insidescoop@cbsnews.com; 48hours@cbsnews.com; dij@cbsnews.com; earlyshow@cbs.com; mail@uttm.com; info@WallStreetStockReview.com; NightlyBackchannel@nbcuni.com; joan.solsman@dowjones.com; joann_rouse@coxohio.com; joanne.saltzman@abc.com; jocelyn.cordova@nbc.com; joe.belbruno@dowjones.com; joe.kernen@nbcuni.com; elaine.lies.reuters.com@reuters.net; dominic.lau.reuters.com@reuters.net; gina.chang.reuters.com@reuters.net; harry.suhartono.reuters.com@reuters.net; kevin.plumberg.reuters.com@reuters.net; rhysl.jones.reuters.com@reuters.net; ryan.vlastelica.reuters.com@reuters.net; leah.schnurr.reuters.com@reuters.net; news.feedback.asia@thomsonreuters.com; shinichi.saoshiro.reuters.com@reuters.net; JoeD@phillynews.com; joelt@roanoke.com; Beltway@foxnews.com; Studiob@foxnews.com; Special@foxnews.com; Ontherecord@foxnews.com; atlarge@foxnews.com; Hannity@foxnews.com; Colmes@foxnews.com; Foxnewsonline@foxnews.com; Foxwire@foxnews.com; Foxreport@foxnews.com; pluggedin@foxnews.com; oreilly@foxnews.com; Newswatch@foxnews.com; skinnerville@foxnews.com; Myword@foxnews.com; Cavuto@foxnews.com; FNS@foxnews.com; foxmagazine@foxnews.com; Friends@foxnews.com; john_homans@primediamags.com; john.crawley@thomsonreuters.com; john.crudele@nypost.com; john.kell@dowjones.com; john.miller@dowjones.com; john.poirier.reuters.com@reuters.net; john.poirier@thomsonreuters.com; john.rivera@baltsun.com; john.stancavage@tulsaworld.com; johnengstrom@seattle-pi.com; johngitt@bloomberg.net; johnharvey@news.oregonian.com; johnkillen@news.oregonian.com; johnmarshall@seattle-pi.com; joliphant@latimes.com; tucker@msnbc.com; jon.stempel@thomsonreuters.com; JonahNRO@gmail.com; jonathan.cheng@wsj.com; jonathannicholas@news.oregonian.com; josephg@phillynews.com; josh.getlin@latimes.com; josh.meyer@latimes.com; Other.Anchors@turner.com; 2020@abc.com; netaudr@abc.com; niteline@abc.com; WNN@abc.com; WorldNewsTonight@abc.com; evening@cbsnews.com; ftn@cbsnews.com; SAT@cbsnews.com; nightly@nbc.com; letters@MSNBC.com; letters@newsweek.com; editors@newsweek.com; Today@nbc.com; weekendtoday@nbc.com; PowerLunch@CNBC.com; sternshow@howardstern.com; rush@eibnet.com; netaudr@abc.com; niteline@abc.com; letters@latimes.com; editor@usatoday.com; editors@interactive.wsj.com; ombudsman@washpost.com; letters@time.com; letters@usnews.com; betsy.fischer@nbc.com; swalsh@thestandard.com; swalton@ajc.com; swells@ajc.com; tappenzeller@usnews.com; sharon.newman@abc.com; realitycheck@cbsnews.com; sal.giangrasso@dowjones.com; browne@foxnews.com; sullivanc@csps.com; sundays@cbsnews.com; support@abcnews.go.com; tawalker@airamericaradio.com; gramshaw@newshour.org; pls@cbsnews.com; stella.dawson@reuters.com; thismorning@cbsnews.com; stolberg@nytimes.com; dateline@nbc.com; dateline@news.nbc.com; metro@nytimes.com; jon.hilsenrath@wsj.com; joshua.mitchell@dowjones.com; journalcommunity@wsj.com; joy.shaw@dowjones.com; 60m@cbsnews.com; 72624.3562@compuserve.com;
teil 2 adressen !
aabney@sfchronicle.com; abaca@abqjournal.com; abavley@kcstar.com; abbyhaight@news.oregonian.com; abeim@hfmmag.com; abenson9@bloomberg.net; abraeske@starledger.com; abraly@chatfreepress.mindspring.com; AbramsReport@msnbc.com; abryan@newsweek.com; achapman@startelegram.com; acimino1@bloomberg.net; aclurfeld@app.com; acomarow@usnews.com; acostag@washpost.com; aczuczka@bloomberg.net; admin@drpennystock.com; afixmer@bloomberg.net; afrye@bloomberg.net; agalvani@nature.berkeley.edu; agiestaj@washpost.com; aglennon@ajc.com; ahardie@ajc.com; aharvey@bhamnews.com; ajester@herald-leader.com; aknightly@reviewjournal.com; akrosel@nwherald.com; alan_rosenberg@projo.com; alan.bernstein@chron.com; alank@onwis.com; alevy5@bloomberg.net; alex.pevzner@dowjones.com; alex.pham@latimes.com; RemingtonA@washpost.com; alexander.remington@gmail.com; alice_truax@newyorker.com; alison_brower@condenast.com; alister.bull@reuters.com; allister.fowler@jpmorgan.com; aloder@bloomberg.net; amccabe@bloomberg.net; amerriman@timesdispatch.com; amorales2@bloomberg.net; Amoses5@bloomberg.net; amy.or@dowjones.com; andersonn@washpost.com; andicoop@aol.com; Andrea_Sachs@timemagazine.com; andrea.thomas@dowjones.com; andrew_davis@adg.ardemgaz.com; andrew.morse@dowjones.com; angelem@phillynews.com; ann.keeton@dowjones.com; anna.katterjohn@reedbusiness.com; annie.gasparro@dowjones.com; anschmidt@nwherald.com; anusha.shrivastava@dowjones.com; aortolani1@bloomberg.net; arascouet@bloomberg.net; aries.poon@dowjones.com; armstrj@phillynews.com; arthur.salm@uniontrib.com; arts@detnews.com; artsleis@nytimes.com; artthiel@seattle-pi.com; asachdev@tribune.com; Asaraiva5@bloomberg.net; ascott@bizjournals.com; askannie@fortunemail.com; AskNewswires@dowjones.com; asross@sfchronicle.com; atlanta@bizjournals.com; audi@freepress.com; aumminger@yahoo.com; austina@csps.com; avanzados@washpost.com; avekshin@bloomberg.net; avent@knews.com; avogt@tribune.com; awan3@bloomberg.net; Awebb@knight.com; ay.palmer@barrons.com; azambuja@newsweek.com.br; balnews@thewbalchannel.com; Banfield@msnbc.com; barbara.demick@latimes.com; barbaradurbin@news.oregonian.com; bauerm@sfgate.com; bbjr@desnews.com; bbuckley@knight.com; bbundy@star-telegram.com; bbutgereit@bhamnews.com; bchernetz@mccalls.com; BCondor@tribune.com; bcronin@knight.com; bcrosset@nytimes.com; bcurrenc@thebeaconjournal.com; bcurtright@wichitaeagle.com; bdancis@sacbee.com; bdaniels@abqjournal.com; bdavidson@express-news.net; bdyer@thebeaconjournal.com; begelko@sfchronicle.com; Ben.Sherwood@nbc.com; bencivengaj@csmonitor.com; bernie.woodall@thomsonreuters.com; bernsteinl@washpost.com; bertc@spokesman.com; betty.beard@arizonarepublic.com; bevd@skies.com; bfrick@kiplingers.com; bgraham@sfgate.com; bhu5@bloomberg.net; bill.dwyre@latimes.com; billgraves@news.oregonian.com; billlumaye@wptfmail.com; billvirgin@seattlepi.com; bizday@nytimes.com; bkelly@usnews.com; bkeogh4@bloomberg.net; bkeoun@bloomberg.net; blammerd@thebeaconjournal.com; bliu17@bloomberg.net; blongino@ajc.com; bmcdonnell@opubco.com; bmckeown@knight.com; bminzesh@newyork.gannett.com; bob.greenberger@wsj.com; bob.mcgough@dowjones.com; bobby_oley@yahoo.com; bolton@azstarnet.com; bonko@pilotonline.com; books@nytimes.com; boorsteinm@washpost.com; bradfo@twtmail.com; breaking@uniontrib.com; breakingnews@theolympian.com; breakingnews@www.nwherald.com; brett.philbin@dowjones.com; brian.baskin@dowjones.com; brian.j.marchiony@jpmorgan.com; brian.rosen@weil.com; brikkchat@yahoo.com; browland@nwherald.com; BrownCharity@washpost.com; bslupski@nwherald.com; bstarr@thestate.com; bsullivan10@bloomberg.net; bullseye@CNBC.com; burton.frierson@thomsonreuters.com; business@miamiherald.com; business@starledger.com; business@washpost.com; businessnews@dallasnews.com; bwomack1@bloomberg.net; byerak@detnews.com; byerak@tribune.com; Calesci2@bloomberg.net; calexander1@bloomberg.net; carey_winfrey@peoplemag.com; carlosmr@bloomberg.net; carmantv@sfgate.com; carol.hymowitz@wsj.com; carole.vaporean@thomsonreuters.com; carrick.mollenkamp@wsj.com; carvajal@nytimes.com; caryn.trokie@thomsonreuters.com; cas@cbsnews.com; cat@pressdemo.com; cathy.logan@tulsaworld.com; cavuto@foxnews.com; cbinham@bloomberg.net; cbourke4@bloomberg.net; cbrady@glennbeck.com; cbrewer@enquirer.com; cchancel@thebeaconjournal.com; cchanjaroen@bloomberg.net; ccirequest@washpost.com; cclarridge@seattletimes.com; ccommon@startribune.com; cdefelippo@knight.com; cdufner@dallasnews.com; cgelernter@seattletimes.com; cgordon@newsday.com; cgorman@aol.com; cguglielmo1@bloomberg.net; CHaddix@tribune.com; chapmaf@phillynews.com; charper@bloomberg.net; cherylhall@dallasnews.com; choney@gr-press.com; chouinard@incorrect.com; chris.dufresne@latimes.com; chriskrug@nwherald.com; chrisr@leader.net;
christian.hudson@turner.com
christine.holevas@chase.com; christoph.rauwald@dowjones.com; chuck_arnold@peoplemag.com; chuck.abbott@thomsonreuters.com; chuin-wei.yap@dowjones.com; ciara.linnane@thomsonreuters.com; citydesk@seattlepi.com; cjbooks@louisv02.gannett.com; cjindra@plaind.com; ckalonzo@crain.com; ckatz@nydailynews.com; ckrug@nwherald.com; ckurz@usaweekend.com; clindell@nwherald.com; closingbell@cnbc.com; cmadigan@tribune.com; cmarin@suntimes.com; cmassar@bloomberg.net; cmccauley@bhamnews.com; cmcgrath@nytimes.com; cmerrill@sfexaminer.com; cmorphew@pioneerpress.com; codyl@roanoke.com; CohenJ@washpost.com; colette.c.campbell@jpmorgan.com; collinsc@csps.com; comments@komo1000news.com; comments@wnyt.com; connolly@maximmag.com; consumer.complaint@ots.treas.gov; consumerhelp@federalreserve.gov; conversation@kuow.org; cooks@csps.com; coolidges@csps.com; corn@nando.com; counterpunch@counterpunch.org; cparsons@tribune.com; cpassy@pbpost.com; cpento@knight.com; cphilipps@cincypost.com; cpotter@wichitaeagle.com; cpucci@seattletimes.com; cpwong@bloomberg.net; craasch@gns.gannett.com; crichard5@bloomberg.net; crime@mercurynews.com; croley@freepress.com; cs@comtex.com; cscinta@bloomberg.net; cstern3@bloomberg.net; csula@knight.com; cthall@sfgate.com; cthomason@express-news.net; ctorres3@bloomberg.net; ctruman@herald-leader.com; curleyj@sfgate.com;
teil3 adressen:
customercare@nytimes.com; customersvc.japan@newsweek.com; cwarmbold@ajc.com; cwilbert@ajc.com; cwolf@bloomberg.net; cynthia_howell@adg.ardemgaz.com; czachariahs2@bloomberg.net; d_lewis@globe.com; d.sheppard@thomsonreuters.com; damian.paletta@wsj.com; dan.cunningham@chron.com; dan.fitzpatrick@wsj.com; dana_coffield@ziffdavis.com; dana.cimilluca@wsj.com; danw@spokesman.com; darcy.crowe@dowjones.com; darlene.r.taylor@jpmchase.com; darrell.hughes@dowjones.com; Dateline@NBC.com; dateline@nbcuni.com; dave.berg@nbc.com; david.enrich@wsj.com; david.graham@uniontrib.com; david.m.wells@jpmorgan.com; david.olmos@latimes.com; david.pierson@latimes.com; david.weidner@dowjones.com; davidsarasohn@news.oregonian.com; dawn@sltrib.com; dayk@washpost.com; dbacha@onwis.com; dbauder@ap.org; dbenaaron1@bloomberg.net; dboykin@ajc.com; dbradley@kcstar.com; dbrowning@startribune.com; dcarroll@starledger.com; dcarter@democratandchronicle.com; dcazentre@syracuse.com; dcnews@nbc4.com; dcondren@buffnews.com; ddepass@startribune.com; ddesilver@seattletimes.com; ddivis@upi.com; deagles@orlandosentinel.com; dean.calbreath@uniontrib.com; debbie.jackson@tulsaworld.com; debbie.vickers@nbc.com; deborah.solomon@wsj.com; deedeestrickland@charlotteobserver.com; deelane@news.oregonian.com; dempsey@courant.com; dena.aubin@thomsonreuters.com; dennispeck@news.oregonian.com; denvernews@bizjournals.com; devans@thebeaconjournal.com; dewolfr@phillynews.com; deyring@orlandosentinel.com; dfitzgerald@nwherald.com; dgame@cbs.com; dglovin@bloomberg.net; dharrison@pe.com; dhaynes@onwis.com; dholthaus@cincypost.com; Diane.Bartz@ThomsonReuters.com; dickmorris@dickmorris.com; dining@nytimes.com; directory@nytimes.com; ditommaso@bergen.com; djevens@suntimes.com; dking@express-news.net; dkkruger1@bloomberg.net; dkopecki@bloomberg.net; dkraut2@bloomberg.net; dlagesse@usnews.com; Dlawrence6@bloomberg.net; dlee2@tribune.com; dlevitt@bloomberg.net; dlevy13@bloomberg.net; dlore@dispatch.com; dmccaffe@usaweekend.com; dmccaleb@nwherald.com; dmckinney@suntimes.com; dmildenberg@bloomberg.net; don.lee@latimes.com; don.mason@chron.com; don.shirley@latimes.com; donna.childs@dowjones.com; doreilly@phillynews.com; dp1@salisburypost.com; draffel@hearst.com; dreilly14@bloomberg.net; driggs@projo.com; drovella@bloomberg.net; DRUDGE@DRUDGEREPORT.COM; drutherford@mail.wwnytv.net; dscheer@bloomberg.net; dsowiens@mdp.com; dsroka@nwherald.com; dsteinberg@abqjournal.com; dtepps@sjmercury.com; duffy@det-freepress.com; duLacJ@washpost.com; dustonharvey@seattle-pi.com; dwatson@pilotonline.com; dwayney@roanoke.com; dweintraub@sacbee.com; dwhitten2@bloomberg.net; dwyer@nytimes.com; eadler@kcstar.com; eaglenws@aol.com; eallday@sfchronicle.com; eatsmart@usaweekend.com; ecrowell@statesman.com; ed_gray@adg.ardemgaz.com; edelstei@newsday.com; editor@cursor.org; editor@nctimes.com; editor@sltrib.com; editor@weeklystandard.com; editoralaska@paradigmcg.com; editorial@harpers.org; editorial@nwherald.com; editorial@nytimes.com; editorial@observer.com; editors@barrons.com; Editors@newsweek.com; edwards@mdp.com; eeveld@kcstar.com; efitzgerald@starledger.com; egolder@gr-press.com; egrunder@recordnet.com; ehester@bloomberg.net; eholm2@bloomberg.net; eileen.ambrose@baltsun.com; ejohnson28@bloomberg.net; elaine.srnka@aa.com; elizabeth.williamson@wsj.com; emartinuzzi@bloomberg.net; ematsushita@tribune.com; emily.barrett@dowjones.com; emily.kaiser@thomsonreuters.com; enoch@granitetv.com; enoch@ksee.com; entertainment@csps.com; eolson@nwherald.com; eric.morath@dowjones.com; eric.schrier@readersdigest.com; escapes@nytimes.com; eschatzker@bloomberg.net; espicer@express-new.net; estanton@bloomberg.net; estoianoff@familycircle.com; estoner@vaildaily.com; etriplett@oklahoman.com; ewelling@newsobserver.com; ewieffering@startribune.com; experience@foxnews.com; falves3@bloomberg.net; famradio@familyradio.com; fastmoney@cnbc.com; fastmoneycnbc.com@nbcuni.com; fdemoura@bloomberg.net; features@recordnet.com; feedback@foxbusiness.com; feedback@insidevc.com; feedback@lasvegassun.com; feedback@myoc.net; feedback@startribune.com; feldberg@bergen.com; Felicia@mortonpr.com; felicia@nando.com; ffisch@fdic.gov; ffrailey@kiplingers.com; fgibson@tennessean.com; financial@uniontrib.com; fj@flintj.com; flaum@gomemphis.com; flewis@kcstar.com; flowchart@usnews.com; forbes@foxnews.com; foreign@nytimes.com; fosterchurch@news.oregonian.com; fred.monyak@baltsun.com; fredleeson@news.oregonian.com; friends@foxnews.com; fritz.lanham@chron.com; ftutal@flpress.com; ga.arka.reuters.com@reuters.net; ga.arka@thomsonreuters.com; gail.evans@turner.com; ganderson@express-news.net; gardnerm@csps.com; gazette@wvgazette.com; gcallen@knight.com; gcarter@usaweekend.com; gcondon@courant.com; gdelama@tribune.com; geoffrey.rogow@dowjones.com; geoffrey.smith@dowjones.com; george.matlock@reuters.com; george@ctwatchdog.com; geraldine.baum@latimes.com; germ42002@yahoo.com; gerry_khermouch@businessweek.com; ggarrison@bhamnews.com; ggombossy@gmail.com; gjensen@onwis.com; gjohnson@courier-journal.com; gknapp@sfchronicle.com; glang@opubco.com; glennbeck@foxnews.com; gmeyer@kcstar.com; gmyersjr@dispatch.com; gombossy@courant.com; goodmanc@washpost.com; gopnikb@washpost.com; gordonoliver@news.oregonian.com; gossip@nypost.com; granvill@newsday.com; graye@phillynews.com; greeves@bhamnews.com; greg.miller@latimes.com; gregg.cockrell@msnbc.com; groomr@washpost.com; gshaw@newsday.com; gsnews@thecarolinachannel.com; gstricharchuk@tribune.com; gstut@ix.netcom.com; gtheunissen@bloomberg.net; guerrag@fairchildpub.com; guy.faulconbridge@reuters.com; gvb@app.com; halversong@csps.com; hannity@foxnews.com; hap_erstein@pbpost.com; Hardball@msnbc.com; hardy_green@businessweek.com; jparker@express-news.net; jpethokoukis@usnews.com; jpilios@ackerley.com; jreich@ots.treas.gov; jricciardi@knight.com; jriseborough@bloomberg.net; jrosenblatt@bloomberg.net; jsalant@bloomberg.net; jsarkin@vf.com; jstevenson@nwherald.com; jstrang@plaind.com; jstrickler@startribune.com; jtalton@seattletimes.com; jtemple@sfchronicle.com; jthaw@bloomberg.net; judith.burns@dowjones.com; judy.cartwright@newsday.com; judy.randle@tulsaworld.com; julien@courant.com; julietripp@news.oregonian.com; hlee@sfchronicle.com; hoffer@lj.cahners.com; home@csps.com; hotline@oig.treas.gov; hotspotservice@knight.com; hotstocks@dowjones.com; howard.packowitz@dowjones.com; hrresume@nytimes.com; hsmith@buffnews.com; huck_arnold@peoplemag.com; HuffPostFund@gmail.com; humanresources@knight.com; hwilkinson@enquirer.com; hyuan@bloomberg.net; hziegler@app.com; ibanalyst@interactivebrokers.com; ikatz2@bloomberg.net; Imus@msnbc.com; inbox.business@latimes.com; info@PanettaInstitute.org; info@vinatrading.com; ingwersonm@csps.com; internationalsubs@newsweekmag.com; ishaq.siddiqi@dowjones.com; iTeam@seattlepi.com; j_watson@globe.com; j.gale@bloomberg.net; jackson@forbes.com; jallen@usnews.com; james_katz@peoplemag.com; james.avenell@warnerbros.com; jamie_katz@peoplemag.com; jamie.allen@turner.com; jamie.talan@newsday.com; jamien@spokesman.com; janesang@aol.com; janetgrimley@seattle-pi.com; Janin@cbs.com; jarowley@bloomberg.net; jasmin.melvin@thomsonreuters.com; jason.cahill@turner.com; jason.szep@thomsonreuters.com; jattwood3@bloomberg.net; jay.colon@dowjones.com; jayweiner@aol.com; jbliss@bloomberg.net; JBoatwright@CITIZEN-TIMES.com; jbrunswick@pioneerpress.com; jcarrigan@bloomberg.net; jcebula@starnews.com; jcoen@tribune.com; jcruz6@bloomberg.net; jdetrixhe1@bloomberg.net; jdiamant@starledger.com; jdornbusch@bostonherald.com; jdubik@citizensvoice.com; jduchnowski@nwherald.com; jeanie_pyun@condenast.com; jeff.bater@dowjones.com; jeff.bennett@dowjones.com; jeff.mccracken@wsj.com; jeff.rose@uniontrib.com; jeffo@wiredmag.com; jeffreyintel@gmail.com; jefstathiou@bloomberg.net; jennifer.cummings@dowjones.com; jennifer.ruark@chronicle.com; jeremy.gaunt@thomsonreuters.com; jessica.holzer@dowjones.com; jfarrell@mccalls.com; jfineman@bloomberg.net; jfischman@usnews.com; jgoldman6@bloomberg.net; jgorner@tribune.com; jgraffam@pe.com; members@thestreet.com; AmericanVoices@mail.house.gov
Link to the unsealed docs?
Once more - e-mail adresses
Nobody wants to have thousend e-mails for writing the facts / fraud proove to the press? I thought you will fight here for your rights as shareholder!
Pink-Orange Wednesday, 05/25/16 07:18:38 AM
Re: None
Post # of 340164
E-Mail list press contacts
The HK Investor Wednesday, 05/25/16 06:25:55 AM
Re: rekcusdoo post# 339943
Post # of 340113
I guess the general public, including many politicians and probably the POTUS are misled by their fellow members. So, we need some media coverage to correct the mis-understandings:
1. FnF did not cause the housing crisis. (It was the bad mortgage loan from TBTF banks with default rate as high as 30%.)
2. FnF did not require the bailout. (Book-loss using worst-case scenario that no financial institution could meet. $50B DTA was not taken into account, ...etc.)
3. NWS is clearly illegal taking of private property and unconstitutional.
4. FnF model is proven and extremely cost efficient, which ensure liquidity and low mortgage interest rate.
5. C-ship is supposed to re-build FnF to solvency. (People who invested in FnF before and after the crisis should be protected.)
The media coverage must be easy to understand and less than 2 minutes. I found many materials presented so far are far to complex for people to understand, especially when they are not really interested in the topic.
I can´t send here a privat message, once more the question: Who wants to have my 7 pages e-mail list for press contacts? Than give me a e-mail adress and I will send this document to you.
E-Mail list press contacts
The HK Investor Wednesday, 05/25/16 06:25:55 AM
Re: rekcusdoo post# 339943
Post # of 340113
I guess the general public, including many politicians and probably the POTUS are misled by their fellow members. So, we need some media coverage to correct the mis-understandings:
1. FnF did not cause the housing crisis. (It was the bad mortgage loan from TBTF banks with default rate as high as 30%.)
2. FnF did not require the bailout. (Book-loss using worst-case scenario that no financial institution could meet. $50B DTA was not taken into account, ...etc.)
3. NWS is clearly illegal taking of private property and unconstitutional.
4. FnF model is proven and extremely cost efficient, which ensure liquidity and low mortgage interest rate.
5. C-ship is supposed to re-build FnF to solvency. (People who invested in FnF before and after the crisis should be protected.)
The media coverage must be easy to understand and less than 2 minutes. I found many materials presented so far are far to complex for people to understand, especially when they are not really interested in the topic.
I can´t send here a privat message, once more the question: Who wants to have my 7 pages e-mail list for press contacts? Than give me a e-mail adress and I will send this document to you.
The HK Investor Tuesday, 05/24/16 01:24:33 AM
Re: navycmdr post# 339794
Post # of 339832
We need more public awareness and support. We need to let them know:
1. FnF had fully repaid the bailout.
2. FnF might not need the bailout. It was book-loss using worst-case scenario that no financial institution could meet. FnF was not in real trouble during and after the crisis.
3. It was strange that the $50B DTA was not taken into account.
4. If needed, FnF should be allowed time to replenish their position from the open market.
5. FnF did not cause the housing crisis. Bad mortgage loans from TBTF banks with default rate as high as 30% was the major cause.
6. FnF model is proven and extremely cost efficient. It ensures liquidity and low mortgage interest rate to millions of US households for many years. And, the model is working well again.
7. Other alternative implies 1-1.5% higher mortgage interest rate.
8. Other alternative implies handing the mortgage market back to the TBTF banks, which does not lower the risk to taxpayers.
9. NWS is an illegal taking of private property.
10. C-ship is supposed to bring the GSEs back to solvency.
We need to repeat the above points until the public hears. With their support, the Congress will support. IMO & GLTA,
That´s important, maybe some us-shareholders (navicomander?) can be send important information to the press. I have from the Ambac case a list with e-mail adresses (7 pages full of e-mail adresses).
I think the stuff is very interesting for some people.
Knows somebody the case numbers?
Where can I find the case numbers from the FNMA shareholder actions? (Berkowitz, Auckman....)
Where can find I the court documents? (court server)