InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 26
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/10/2009

Re: None

Sunday, 10/30/2016 6:13:11 AM

Sunday, October 30, 2016 6:13:11 AM

Post# of 799558
The Government is deliberately against the even adopted laws.....

....sorry for the not so good translation by Bing.

Die Regierung handelt vorsätzlich gegen die selbst erlassenen Gesetze um sich zu bereichern und die Aktionäre zu enteignen. Das steht im Widerspruch zu vielen US-Gesetzen. Auch wenn ich nur ein Außenstehender bin, so erkenne ich das sogar aus dem fernen Deutschland.

The Government is deliberately against the even adopted laws to enrich and to expropriate the shareholders. This is contrary to many U.S. laws. Even if I'm just an outsider, I recognize that even from the distant Germany.


Ich kann nicht nachvollziehen, warum die Gerichte in den USA so lange brauchen um eine Entscheidung im Sinne der betrogenen Aktionäre fällen. In Deutschland wäre der Fall schon lange zu gunsten der Aktionäre abgeschlossen, schon allein wegen der E-Mail Beweise von Jim Parrott, Aussagen zur Kapitalisierung und Vormundschaft - das sind in der Summe mit Vorsatz und Absicht ausgeführte Straftaten. Wer das letztendlich zu verantworten hat (Hank Paulson - war auch bei der Zerschlagung der WAMU beteiligt), ist letztenlich egal, da diese Herren eh nie zur Verantwortung gezogen werden.

I can not understand, why the courts in the United States need so long time to make a decision within the meaning of the deceived shareholders. In Germany would in completed evidence by Jim Parrott, statements regarding the recapitalization has long been in favor of the shareholders, because the email and guardianship - running crimes are in total with intent and purpose. (Hank Paulson - was also involved in the dismantling of the WAMU), who ultimately to answer for that is ultimately matter, because these men are never held accountable..


a) HERA

The Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 (HERA)

‘SEC. 1367. AUTHORITY OVER CRITICALLY UNDERCAPITALIZED REGULATED
ENTITIES.
‘‘(b) POWERS AND DUTIES OF THE AGENCY AS CONSERVATOR
OR RECEIVER.—
‘‘(2) GENERAL POWERS.—
‘‘(B) OPERATE THE REGULATED ENTITY.—The Agency
may, as conservator or receiver—
‘‘(iv) preserve and conserve the assets and property
of the regulated entity
; and

‘‘(D) POWERS AS CONSERVATOR.—The Agency may, as
conservator, take such action as may be—
‘‘(i) necessary to put the regulated entity in a sound
and solvent condition; and
‘‘(ii) appropriate to carry on the business of the
regulated entity and preserve and conserve the assets
and property of the regulated entity.

Source:
https://www.congress.gov/110/plaws/publ289/PLAW-110publ289.pdf
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/110/hr3221/text

Beweiß / Proof: E-Mail Transcript Jim Parrott (no end of conservationship / no recapitalization)



b) Verschleierung / zurückhalten von Beweisen / Concealment / withhold evidence



https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2071

Title 18. Section 2071.

a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

(b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States.

c) Handlungen gegen den Freedom and Information act / Acts against the Freedom & Information Act


http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_ifg/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_Information_Act_%28United_States%29

d) Handlungen gegen die Bill of rights - Eigentumsdelikt / Enteignung

Acts against the Bill of rights - property crime / expropriation

e) Verletzung der Rechte der Aktionäre / Violation of the rights of shareholders

Ich bin neugierig auf die Reaktion der Richterin über die Weigerung der richterlichen Anordung diese 56 wohl entscheidenden Dokumente vorzulegen. Die Verweigerung werte ich als uneingeschränktes Schuldeingeständniss.

I'm curious to present these 56 probably decisive documents on the reaction of the judge over the refusal of the judicial order. I take the refusal as an unconditional debt recognition.