Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
OT: JD Gator, I presume you went to U of F law school. What year did you start there?
Thanks Corp; I didn't have time to run through all the posts today and was wondering why in bloody hell the negative reaction on the street.
anyone else find it odd that IDCC and NOK are trading at almost the same price?
Thanks MT, although I'm not sure I wanted to see that. LOL
Anyone reviewed this yet?
IDCC: mentioned in today's Wall Street Journal
Friday , December 30, 2005 06:10 ET
The following article appears in today's Wall Street Journal(tm) discussing :
"Small-Stock Focus: Redwood Trust Falls Thu"
(NasdaqNM: IDCC) last traded at $18.59, down $1.04 (-5.30%), on 0 shares.
test
Just saw closing price; WTF!!???
I've been taking an IDCC vacation for a while. What's happening on 12/2/05?
Jim & Corp; nice to see you two getting along. Perhaps there's hope for peace in the middle east. Corp; thanks for that synopsis.
Did I hear that correctly? No $$ yet from Infineon.
b/c it's typical EOM
Q2 2005 InterDigital Communications Corporation Earnings Conference Call
Thursday, August 4, 2005 10:00 a.m. ET
Webcast Presentation Help
Click here for webcast
RUMOR ONLY Thursday , July 21, 2005 11:38 ET
Jul 21, 2005 (JAGfn.com via COMTEX) --INTERDIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS COM (IDCC)$17.40. Rumor that (QCOM) will make a $32 bid for company
Copyright 2005 JAGfn.com All Rights Reserved
If we start a stock buy back, when does it have to be announced?
Yea, Not used to this. Nic's theory makes most sence, given our Hx.
any theories on what's making price mover higher?
Wednesday, July 20, 2005 08:43 ET
Jul 20, 2005 (financialwire.net via COMTEX) --(FinancialWire) Nortel Networks Corp. (NYSE: NT) and the other members of the Wi-Mesh Alliance are working together to help standardize mesh wireless local area networks around the world to promote interoperability of wireless communication devices and services.
As a result of extensive technical collaboration with its partners, the Wi-Mesh Alliance recently presented its proposal for a new global mesh WLAN standard to the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. 802.11 Task Group S meeting on wireless mesh in San Francisco. In addition to Nortel, the Alliance includes Accton Technology Corp., ComNets RWTH Aachen University, InterDigital Communications Corp. (NASDAQ: IDCC), NextHop Technologies Inc, Thomson Corp. (NYSE: TMS) and others.
The Wi-Mesh Alliance is a group of companies with a common view toward rapidly achieving a mesh WLAN standard that will enable seamless communications for wireless users regardless of equipment vendor. The Wi-Mesh Alliance proposal was developed under the guidelines of the IEEE Standards Association. It builds on existing and pending 802.11 protocols to maximize technology re-use and compatibility.
"The ever expanding proliferation of wireless devices and communication services has made the development of a worldwide standard for mesh WLANs critical to their future success," said Mark Whitton, vice president, wireless solutions, Nortel. "Wireless users expect secure seamless access anywhere, anytime, and the new standard proposed by the Alliance is designed to enable mesh WLANs to meet those expectations as wireless communications continue to evolve. Nortel has worked closely with the Alliance to develop the new standard by contributing the best of our company's global experience and leadership in deploying mesh networks."
For up-to-the-minute news, features and links click on http://www.financialwire.net
FinancialWire) is an independent, proprietary news service of Investrend Information, a division of Investrend Communications, Inc. It is not a press release service and receives no compensation for its news or opinions. Other divisions of Investrend, however, provide shareholder empowerment platforms such as forums, independent research and webcasting. For more information or to receive the FirstAlert daily summary of news, commentary, research reports, webcasts, events and conference calls, click on http://www.investrend.com/contact.asp
The FinancialWire) NewsFeed is now available in multiple formats to your site or desktop, free. Click on: http://www.investrend.com/XmlFeeds?level=268
http://www.financialwire.net
(C) 2005 financialwire.net, Inc. All rights reserved.
Thanks MSC! EOM
I haven't been here in a while; has T. Carpenter done an updated report yet?
I've been at work all day. Anyone get this report or is this a scheme?
Jul 06, 2005 (M2 PRESSWIRE via COMTEX) --Today the Bellwether Report has identified Interdigital Communications Corp. (Nasdaq:IDCC), a company that our analysts will be tracking over the ensuing weeks. They recently came out with a significant corporate development this month, causing a positive market correction. For a full report on the below mentioned company, and many more, feel free to visit www.bellwetherreport.com for a free 30 day no obligation trial.
Does anyone else get the feeling that someone/something is messing with our stock?
A lie has speed, but truth has endurance.
Edgar J. Mohn
We have the truth on our side.
Any news if Carpenter has done an updated Report?
Hypothetical; What if NOK had been awarded 18.25 billion dollars in an arbitration ruling? What would happen to it's stock price? That would be about 25% of it's 75 billion market cap. Or any other company for that matter.
I am blown away at the market's response to this. We receive a ruling that means in all likelihood, we will be getting about 25% of our market cap and our stock goes up 10%. Have too many people been burned by IDCC in the past to warrant this lack of respect? WTF!!
IDCC: Volume Spike; 15% > 20-adsv, Stock +12.80%
Tuesday , July 05, 2005 09:50 ET
This is the 1st VOLUME alert for IDCC in the past 7 calendar days.
Trading for Interdigital Communications Corp (NASDAQ NM: IDCC) has been heavier than usual in today's session. By 09:50 ET, the stock had already traded 448,700 shares via 322 trades. The cumulative volume is 15.30% above its 20-day average of 389,175. Normally the stock experiences around 784 individual trades per session.
So far, today's volume surge has caused a net rise in IDCC's stock price. At the time of this alert, the stock was trading at $19.740, up $2.240 (+12.80%).
One year ago, the Company's shares closed at $17.640. The price has gained more than 11 percent since then.
Over the last 10 trading session IDCC has traded in a range between $0.000 and $17.860 and is currently trading 16.00% below its 52-week high of $23.500 set on December 30,2004 and 42.94% above its 52-week low of $13.810 from May 04,2005.
In the previous 3 sessions, IDCC trading has displayed a mixed trend. Closing results have been as follows:
July 01, 2005 --- closed at $17.510 up $0.010 (+0.06%) on 148,700 shares
June 30, 2005 --- closed at $17.500 down $0.200 (-1.13%) on 418,400 shares
Ronny, these are rhetorical questions. Why would management even mention this in the CC? Doesn't it raise more questions than answers? As a shareholder, I prefer a CC to answer some of my questions, not create more. And hence, doesn't their reference to Cost of Capital create more uncertainty, especially with analysts like Frank Marsala? Ironically, impacting the "Cost of Retained Earnings".
Corp, what do you mean "Co will take on debt"? I missed the CC.
Corp- Thanks for your posts and efforts on this board. IDCC is my primary holding and I am long. I come to this board to get a wide range of views. The higher the % IDCC becomes in my holdings (which it will with the anticipated appreciation) the more I want to know about it; that includes the good with the bad. Some folks, like me, don't come to this board everyday so if your posts are repetitive, perhaps that is a good thing. For new lurkers, they see it for the first time and for infrequent lurkers, it may also be a first time reading for them also.
For the anti-corp crew, your approach just makes a lot of people more interested in what he has to say. I would take Bill Daglish's advice and let it go.
Happy 4th all and let's not forget why this country was founded.
Ronny, For those of us infrequent posters and lurkers, who is Joel?
Thanks Corp. EOM
Here's only Albert Bianchi I could find that does ADR; this one doesn't sound qualified for this type of case.
ADR EXPERIENCE AND SPECIALTIES
Mr. Bianchi has extensive expertise in real estate, business litigation, construction, insurance, land use and municipal law. Additionally, he has successfully mediated complex multi-party cases, with emphasis on employment, insurance coverage, probate, will contests, etc., partnership and fee dispute matters. Mr. Bianchi has represented many employers, employees, businesses, property owners and developers throughout the Bay Area. He has heard numerous arbitrations, served as discovery referee on numerous occasions as well as Judge Pro-tem and mediator for the Marin County and San Francisco Superior Courts. Mr. Bianchi brings a serene, calming demeanor - combined with a no-nonsense approach, to his successful ADR practice.
BACKGROUND
Formerly, the senior partner in the San Rafael law firm of Bianchi, Engel, Keegin & Talkington, Mr. Bianchi is currently of counsel to Clement, Fitzpatrick & Kenworthy in Santa Rosa, specializing in real estate, land use and civil litigation. He has tried numerous jury trials to conclusion, as well as, court trials, arbitrations and mediations for both plaintiffs and defendants.
Mr. Bianchi was a Deputy Attorney General for the State of California, and has served as long-term General Counsel for the Marin Association of Realtors and the Marin County Housing Authority. He is also the former Attorney for the Town of Corte Madera and the City of El Cerrito, and Ass't. City Atorney for the City of Hercules. . Mr. Bianchi has served as Special Counsel for numerous other cities and districts. He also is a columnist for the North Bay Business Journal.
MEMBERSHIPS & SPECIAL HONORS
Member, Sonoma County Superior Court Early Mediation Program, Sonoma & Marin County Bar Associations, California State and American Bar Association; Former President of Marin County Chamber of Commerce, Marin Property Owners Association and Marin Park & Open Space Foundation; Instructor, Zoning, Planning and Land Use courses at University of California, Berkeley, San Francisco and Irvine; Instructor, Real Estate Law - Indian Valley College and College of Marin; Member, Marin County Bar Association and America Bar Association
EDUCATION
J.D., Hastings College of Law, University of California.
Thanks Mchere; the post before yours might answer the Q, if it is accurate.
Corp, you have the answer?
Me: What are the chances that Nok will Appeal the Arb decision.
HC: Slim to none. Al Bianchi(?) is the arbitrator IDCC chose for the panel in New York. He is know as the man who wrote THE BOOK on how to reach an arb decision that won't get appealed. An appeal can only be made on the basis of fraud- I guarantee you there is no fraud in this case.
Does anyone have the names/backgrounds of the three arbitrators, particularly the "neutral" one?
Ronny's post is more logical.
Thanks Cap; this is the most detail we've gotten so far on this issue.
Nice post AMS. EOM
Stress and anxiety perpetuate the herd mentality. A positive arb decision should help.
I found this in my inbox archives. Does Corp do this to others are have others done this to Corp?
Q. What is a "personal attack"?
A. In essence, a personal attack is attacking a person, rather than a person's ideas. The written word provides wide latitude for the most fervent of debates: efforts to short-cut the debate process by attempting to discredit or disparage a person rather than a person's ideas usually fall into the personal attack category.
e5oo, Amen brother. EOM
Interesting turn of events. Yesterday a poster makes an anti-semetic remark about Corp. He apologizes and all is forgiven. Now this board is compiling a list of those against Corp's posts. Maybe you are making this "list" for the wrong poster. I for one prefer to weigh both sides of an argument/discussion. Does anyone else find this odd or 1984ish? DO NOT INCLUDE ME ON YOUR LIST.
This just makes me more interested in what Corp has to say.
Long IDCC