Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I was aware of that, my surmising is that we have 6 MODS and 5 posts showing and that they show as most recent at top, oldest at bottom. So, my logic is if the 5 mods that did not pin that poopbrain post put newer ones up as pinned than his, that his would disappear. No big deal, that nonsense showing wont be stopping this train anyway, lol.
Not sure how it works but I'm guessing that if GOLDSTANDARD pins a new post and PIVOTOINT1 also replaces his currently pinned post that they will go to the top and thereby push the silly one that has been there forever off out of view.
THE SHORT STORY IS: Thank you Cordova! You are the reason I am here.
And thank you as well to the flock of superstars on this board that have provided substance to the hopes and dreams of being in a big winner. (DJK, FactsMatter, SdHunter, NYCBoss, and a few others).
A BIT MORE: Started with Henry in 2003, in and out many times over the years and have been stealth to the board due to prior experiences with Ihub boards and the games I have allowed myself to be taken by via the usual suspects on IHUB.
This board and the people referenced are the reason I am breaking the stealth norm I developed over time and am jumping in with this post.
I am privileged and thankful to be part of this one of a kind opportunity as a result of the crew of one of a kind board contributors. Currently 24 million @ .002 avg and at retirement age with the newfound hope of doing so with more than SS and some home equity to get me thru my golden years. Actually, at this point, it is more than hope! Sweet Honey Nectar!!
Cordova can attest to my having times of frustration if not downright anger with Henry but patience and hanging in there is now paying off and it is only the beginning of that payoff. GO PHIL!
My plan is to come out of this with enough to be a PHILanthropist in the years to come.
PHIL jingle. The reason I'm IN!
Peachy! Snagged another 120k @ $.065
Too funny Snake! I got out long ago but still check on this now and then. Groundhogs day, bwahahaha.
I guess there is no assurrance that TCNT is in their plan to use on this project but I thought that made sense and had great possibilities and is why I got in a few years ago. For those that have stuck with it you are likely to do quite well here if that is the marriage in the plans.
Here is the news you've been waiting for. I had to bail at a loss a long time ago. Based on this, wish I had dry powder to get back in.
https://www.westcovina.org/Home/Components/News/News/2468/419
Dividend date is past. Believe what you want but I think it is to late based on the info below (and elsewhere).
Record Date: March 1st
Ex-dividend Date: February 28th
Last day to buy shares and receive divi: Feb 27th?
........................
https://www.investor.gov/additional-resources/general-resources/glossary/ex-dividend-dates-when-are-you-entitled-stock-cash (one of many links that say this same general data)
EX-DIVIDEND DATES: WHEN ARE YOU ENTITLED TO STOCK AND CASH DIVIDENDS
To determine whether you should get a dividend, you need to look at two important dates. They are the "record date" or "date of record" and the "ex-dividend date" or "ex-date."
When a company declares a dividend, it sets a record date when you must be on the company's books as a shareholder to receive the dividend. Companies also use this date to determine who is sent proxy statements, financial reports, and other information.
Once the company sets the record date, the ex-dividend date is set based on stock exchange rules. The ex-dividend date for stocks is usually set one business day before the record date. If you purchase a stock on its ex-dividend date or after, you will not receive the next dividend payment. Instead, the seller gets the dividend. If you purchase before the ex-dividend date, you get the dividend.
.........................
Yesterdays purchases are solid for dividend. Not so sure about todays. Not sure how to validate which is correct. I'm all eyes and ears if someone can show verifiable way to know if todays purchases get you the dividend (if Henry doesn't change everything AFTER the fact... AGAIN).
Record Date: March 1st
Ex-dividend Date: February 28th
To qualify for shareholder of record on March 1st divi date, Feb 27th?
........................
https://www.investor.gov/additional-resources/general-resources/glossary/ex-dividend-dates-when-are-you-entitled-stock-cash (one of many links that say this same general data)
EX-DIVIDEND DATES: WHEN ARE YOU ENTITLED TO STOCK AND CASH DIVIDENDS
To determine whether you should get a dividend, you need to look at two important dates. They are the "record date" or "date of record" and the "ex-dividend date" or "ex-date."
When a company declares a dividend, it sets a record date when you must be on the company's books as a shareholder to receive the dividend. Companies also use this date to determine who is sent proxy statements, financial reports, and other information.
Once the company sets the record date, the ex-dividend date is set based on stock exchange rules. The ex-dividend date for stocks is usually set one business day before the record date. If you purchase a stock on its ex-dividend date or after, you will not receive the next dividend payment. Instead, the seller gets the dividend. If you purchase before the ex-dividend date, you get the dividend.
.........................
What forward split? Link?
Thanks. Missed that one. And yup, who the hell knows.
Your claim: 11:19 AM - 20 Feb 2019 - just submitted Corporate Action Notice to FINRA for American Pacific Resources, Inc.'s special dividend distribution (Confirmation Number 2835075). I have had zero luck finding this submission. Have a link??
Based on Henry playing Lucy and pulling the football on the originally promised dividend AFTER all requisites were met by unsuspecting and duped shareholders, I am wondering why I should accept this time as being real. (Supposedly he was able to do that because he never filed some document to make it official).
CEO Eric Ottens replied to an email I sent yesterday.
First off, to me, yesterdays tweet reads like more of the same "planning sessions, discussions, meetings about, working on it" hot air balloons that we have gotten since the nothing burger of "filings to make us current will be completed in 2 weeks" that was put out on Dec 4th. That said, if yesterdays tweet is gospel truth and custodianship has truly "closed" that would mean there has been a filing submitted for that and it will show up in short order. We shall see.
Yesterday morning I decided to take a shot in the dark and see if I would get a response if I emailed Eric. As it turns out I got a pretty prompt reply (even though I was pretty snippy). That fact, along with what he said and how he presented it, bodes well in my opinion. Hopefully, next week we will see some sort of filing(s) or PR's.
................................
MY EMAIL:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 9:55 AM XXXX XXXXXXXXX <XXXXXXXX@gmail.com> wrote:
How about giving us a valid reason to keep the faith with you?
Any plan to come out of the dark and get current with filings as you said would be done before Christmas? And by plan, I mean actual plan and not "weee, we are talking about doing something, and working on a plan, and meeting regularly to talk and plan more". Or better yet, how about an actual filing of ANY kind. Over 2 months late on the announced date of completing that task and not a SINGLE FILING?
PLEASE identify with valid info, filings, etc... that this is a REAL venture and not typical b.s. from pink sheet land.
Thanks.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Unhappy Shareholder hoping that sentiment will change as a result of communication from the Dark World that is currently MGON.
....................................
HIS REPLY:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 3:57 PM Eric Ottens <weottens@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Mr. XXXXXXX:
Thank you for your email. I can understand that there are disgruntled shareholders and you're quite right that we had
announced that that we expected to have up to date filings by Christmas 2018. However we did not expect that we
would have to correct some corporate governance issues related to previous management of MGON. We are working
diligently to solve these matters and are hopeful that we will shortly get current with all our filings to the benefit of
all our shareholders. Positive announcements are forthcoming.
Sincerely,
Wm Eric Ottens .
Today's tweet is basically just more of the same "planning sessions, discussions, meetings about, working on it" hot air balloons that we have gotten since the nothing burger of "filings to make us current will be completed in 2 weeks" that was put out on Dec 4th. That said, if today's tweet is gospel truth and custodianship has truly "closed" that would mean there has been a filing submitted for that and it should show up by tomorrow I would think. We shall see.
In the mean time, earlier today I decided to take a shot in the dark and see if I would get a response if I emailed. As it turns out I got a pretty prompt reply (even though I was pretty snippy). That fact, along with what he said and how he presented it, bodes well in my opinion.
................................
MY EMAIL:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 9:55 AM XXXX XXXXXXXXX <XXXXXXXX@gmail.com> wrote:
How about giving us a valid reason to keep the faith with you?
Any plan to come out of the dark and get current with filings as you said would be done before Christmas? And by plan, I mean actual plan and not "weee, we are talking about doing something, and working on a plan, and meeting regularly to talk and plan more". Or better yet, how about an actual filing of ANY kind. Over 2 months late on the announced date of completing that task and not a SINGLE FILING?
PLEASE identify with valid info, filings, etc... that this is a REAL venture and not typical b.s. from pink sheet land.
Thanks.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Unhappy Shareholder hoping that sentiment will change as a result of communication from the Dark World that is currently MGON.
....................................
HIS REPLY:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 3:57 PM Eric Ottens <weottens@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Mr. XXXXXXX:
Thank you for your email. I can understand that there are disgruntled shareholders and you're quite right that we had
announced that that we expected to have up to date filings by Christmas 2018. However we did not expect that we
would have to correct some corporate governance issues related to previous management of MGON. We are working
diligently to solve these matters and are hopeful that we will shortly get current with all our filings to the benefit of
all our shareholders. Positive announcements are forthcoming.
Sincerely,
Wm Eric Ottens .
It clearly says 2/6/2018 (not 2019). Regardless, I hope you are right about it being done 2019 and that it is just a typo. TNPH
Took my loss a looooong time ago but still watching because I think that one of these days this ticker will pay off. Maybe that day is now on the horizon...
West Covina Neighbors
2 mins ·
Interesting item on upcoming closed session meeting:
Excerpt:
CITY OF WEST COVINA
CITY COUNCIL/SUCCESSOR AGENCY
FEBRUARY 19, 2019, 6:00 PM
REGULAR MEETING - CLOSED SESSION
(AMENDED TO ADD APN NOS)
CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS
Pursuant to Government Code § 54956.8
Property: APN Nos. 8735-002-906, 8735-002-909, 8735-002-910, 8735-002-018, & 8735-001-912
City Negotiators: Freeland, Bresciani, Anderson, Morales, Porter
Negotiating Parties: Singpoli Group, LLC
Under Negotiation: Price and Terms of Payment
Agree. Any day now... Today is the Thursday referenced in last weeks tweet. Guessing mid next week as worst case, maybe as early as posted before tomorrows open.
Integrated Ventures, Inc @IntVentures Jan 11
"Auditors received all required files for Q1 2019 review. Should be done by wed/thu."
Im not seein it. Have a link to specific docs? Everywhere I see commons referenced in the 10Q and 10k's it identifies value at the standard .001
Dec. 4th ... they said OTC filings to become current would be completed and submitted within 2 weeks. Approaching 6 weeks now and no update. So is expecting an update on that too much to ask? Cmon MGON!
I find absolutely nothing validating rights to convert shares after 6 months and/or before the maturity date. Nor to I find anything regarding a time frame to having the floodgates opened and/or regulated in volume prior to the maturity date. By extension, not finding that, there is nothing identifying any structure or criteria relative to how much of the note value can be converted at a "6 month window" or anything of the sort.
Have any links showing this "after 6 months" allowance?
Convertible Notes. I'm not at all savvy on these bad boys. Trying to comprende a few things. Any help is appreciated.
1. What qualifies or prompts shares to be distributed prior to the maturity date? Everything Henry writes seems to have a maturity date a year after issuance yet shares always seem to begin pouring into the market around halfway to maturity.
2. Once that floodgate is opened can it be executed in full to convert the entirity of shares needed to satisfy the note or is it structured over time somehow? (That full value is around 70 million shares relative to the note shown below).
On June 12, 2018, the Company issued a new convertible promissory note to Crown Bridge Partners, LLC for $55,000, with an interest rate of 10% and convertible to Common Stock of the Company at 50% discount to the average of the two lowest trading prices or closing bids during the twenty trading days immediately prior to the date of conversion. The maturity date of this note is 06/12/2019.
He doesn't reply to my emails anymore but I send them anyway... I sent him an email Tuesday night after seeing the 8k making that exact point. Absolutely agree.
This is wishful thinking but I wonder if this "new dividend ratio and the new Record Date" is part of a new (additional) dividend offering to the original and already completed and qualified for dividend?
I think your thought is flawed. The available shares are what they are and the dispersal was set to go to only the group that qualified. He has now opened up to a group of 4x as many shareholders based on the dilution since the qualifying date for shares. He has also opened it up to however many MORE might occur before this new date of 3/1/2019. That just isnt right no matter how you slice it.
Hopefully the SEC says f**k no Henry, it stays as originally promised and executed! (might as well fantasize some...)
i agree. Knee jerk may not be best bet, maybe wait the 5 days for financials and review things with that and whatever else he may put forth.
My suggestion is that as many people as possible email Henry with unhappiness at all of the current goings on with him providing zero intel as to why (assuming there is a why beyond being played...).
Just my 2 cents.
I wouldn't have imagined changing things like this after the fact could be legal. SMH
Kind of stating the obvious to answer with this but Brian needs to find a way to get new eyes on it and some trading volume. My bet is once it begins the climb north it will rock for a while relative to the strengths and positives you mentioned. SURG
Thanks! I had quickly perused it and thought it was just about those notes. The waiting continues. Just need crypto to find some legs.
Wasn't yesterday the deadline for filing the 10k off that last extention?
Just needs volume to go ballistic. One of these days a new group with significant buying power will take notice and SURG will go north quickly, imo. Go SURG!
10K will be out Monday. Will it be Good, Bad or Ugly? Looking forward to finding out. If it is free of red flags I will be buying as much as I am able.
The link you all have shown that takes you to Surge page for that interview wont come up to the point it will play for me.
This link at ceolive.tv did though...
https://ceolive.tv/surge-holdings-surg-grows-market-share-with-fintech-upgrades-aggressive-wireless-pricing/
SURG is ready to rock.
Went there. Link to the "article" works and so do all the links about the announcements to the multitude of "intent" PR's
but NOT the link at the bottom... "A complete disclaimer can be viewed HERE" That goes nowhere.
Also, what and where did you search to find TheStreetNow.com?
I find no reference to it. Additionally, when I take the letter to the link and remove the /spotlight/phil portion to make it simply www.thestreetnow.com, it goes to Kramers sight, www.thestreet.com. Using his search on his sight I find nothing about "thestreetnow" or PHIL.
Last note... my original post said the link could be found on PHIL website which is not the caee. The appearance fooled me because it looked just like pages on the PHIL website... Sorry about that mislead.
Link at bottom says go HERE to see full disclosure but it is a dead link. Doing a google on The Street Now brings nothing. As much as I would like to, I find no link to credibility.
At the very least your opening line is misleading as it is not The Street, but rather, thestreetnow.com which doesnt seem to exist except to your original link that is actually on the PHI web site it appears.
I would love to be wrong so correct away, please...
I dont find an 8/30 filing. Have a link?
Hopefully that is for the closing activities relative to MGON deal.
the april to june 1/4 is the 4th qtr for PHIL. So annual return is what we are waiting on. With every extension used that would mean into October.