Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
let me get this straight...
your comfort level in your investment was met because the company diluted and was able to keep their doors open long enough to invest more and have it go down to almost zero in a perpetual A/S raise?
Perhaps I am naive here, but don't people invest money in stocks in order to watch it grow? Isnt that what usually creates a comfort level?
you do realize that in dec 2009 mgmt indicated they were changing
out what they would pr .. resulting in only 19 pr's issued for all of 2010
What mgmt indicates and what is real are two different things. This is actually a proven fact, not an opinion.
I can post 100 links proving said fact. Can you post 1 that would oppose it?
hundreds of millions of shares traded recently and you have the nerve to ask where are the sellers?
that is funny stuff.
the *source* on the ground near expo has been proven to be unreliable. We all know that. WHy is said source still being quoted or referenced?
It is VERY easy to do a search of all of the past bad information from this source.
Specifics????
Here.
They lied about revenues.
They lied about dilution.
They lied about shares being restricted.
They lied about deals that they never had.
They lied when they said Kendrick wasn't a 10% holder.
JD is a fraud, a liar, and an all around common criminal.
again .. if the goal is to do 100M
with one account over 2 to 3 years
actually the "goal" was 100mm within 2-3 years.
Ready to admit I was right that they had zero chance? Almost two years and they havent even hit ONE million, lolololololololololololol
we know
that once kendrick was appointed to the BOD any buys
had to be filed per corp counsel
What are you talking about???
If you really talked to the SEC half as much as you say you do, you would know there is no such filing requirement. Expo is a nonreporting pink sheet stock. Why on earth would all of a sudden the new guy magically have to file his holdings???
Please show me the sec link to where JD declared his.
there is zero *volume* unless a frenzy
is underway
there is zero volume unless there is volume in which case it isn't real volume it is fake volume until I see the price increase and then the volume is real, right?
Isn't that basically what you are saying?
This is just too rich, lol.
I love how they just recycle the same group of people. Clearly Gary Foster is a game changer.
I bet JD just threw something against the wall when you brought up how he is a recycled name.
OMG a website update!!! remember last time they had a 1600 location order? What did that net them in sales? lol.
this TA has never given the float
Batting a thousand I see as you are incorrect again!
The TA has given the float out in the past proving mgmt lied.
Hey JD, just come clean. You might like prison.
as for WW .. gee shocker .. those who've done the DD
know exactly what *transpired*
of course we know what transpired. Expo tried to use the name of a man that died and they got called out on it and had to retract. It was a shame the way expo handled that. In fact it was a disgrace. Trying to profit off of such a nice guy passing away.
and how *ironic* re: repetition .. the *interest*
has never waned from this co. or her stock wink
the posting frequency has decreased drastically on this board yet you believe that the interest has never waned...
over 40k posts in 2009
around 31k posts in 2010
on pace for less than 20k posts in 2011.
yep interest never waned, lol good one!
SO now you are posting something filed onto pinksheets.com, a site that you yourself have claimed is questionable, which is dated AFTER the SEC filing and attempting to use it as evidence that the SEC form from before was incorrect?
Hmmmmm....
I mean if we are going to listen to pinksheets.com and use them as a reliable source well then we should listen to their stop sign warning where it basically says you can't trust these people.
So which is it 4kids? Is that site reliable or not?
Are we to believe that a form filed with the sec was done incorrectly? I mean it is not like they simply checked a wrong box. They actually had to put his info on there. What did they think the form was asking that they made such a mistake?
Or perhaps the company is now trying to pretend that Kendrick wasn't involved from the very beginning because it makes his involvement look completely staged and supports the accusations that nothing has changed.
Which we all know it hasn't. Once a scam, always a scam. You might want to try and find another one, this cat is out of the bag and has been since August 2009. I am actually shocked they were able to keep it going for as long as they did.
Oh and btw 4kids, you like to say repeatedly that the company first raised the A/S in 2010. This isn't true. The company raised the A/S prior to that. If you are unsure of what I am speaking of, the info is contained on the very site you linked and it is part of their 2006 *audited* fins.
I know you havent read any of those yet, so I will give you some time to actually do so and then we can have intelligent discussion about this scam instead of the misinformed regurgitation of JD speak.
just an FYI 4kids.
November 14, 2007 was and always will be AFTER January 12 2007
It is disingenuous at best to try and refute an SEC document from January 12 2007 with a document that was signed off on 10 months later.
Guess what, he sold shares or the O/S increased so that he was no longer a 10% owner. Pretty simple.
fourkids you are incorrect. JD is not an accurate source.
we have shown you concrete irrefutable evidence that kendrick was involved with this thing from the get go. It is ok to admit you were incorrect.
actually he hasn't .. but
hey that same poster posted
that kendrick was a 10 percent
original too .. WRONG .. try 2%
I realize some people like to go against the grain, but why would you go against what sec filings from the company have stated?
Are you claiming that the company has filed false sec forms intentionally?
It is a known fact that the company has listed Kendrick as a 10% holder back in 2007 SEC filings.
there is also a fee attached by corp counsel
re: review b4 being uploaded
http://www.sec.gov/about/forms/form3data.pdf
please point out where it costs money?
Thought they got rid of fees in 1996...
http://www.sec.gov/rules/final/33-7331.txt
i got bear tramped today. had two bids in at .0003 and .0008 but i got intercepted by etrede accounts and the MM's were dancings with me all day. they says leadballoons,if that is your real names, we watching you.
i says back to them, MM's I found the share washing machines and I reports them. my legit bids at .0003/8 go un shown on level 2.3 ILLEGAL!!! .0008 is 700% gain even barber be a buyer!!!
But there was a secret drive by remember!
Verything was *confirmed* to be great because of the drive by.
that doesn't *NEGATE* the very clear patterns in
play
These patterns apparently aren't too clear or shares wouldnt have been purchased and held since summer of 2008 would they?
hahahahahaha
People don't honestly believe that Expo is a legit company still do they?
I find it hard to believe that anybody is that naive.
i think it is funny that shareholders have to hope today that JD is simply a moron and filled out a form wrong instead of the dreaded reverse split.
Look at the bright side, it can't go down any lower in the short term, lol.
IT WAS A BEAR TRAP!!
the irony is they weren't
issued for 9 days
The irony is that they actually were issued months ago.
oh what a tangled web...
that would be actual DD, so it will not be posted.
just like the dilution is never discussed as a negative and losing millions is no big deal for a ten year old "startup", lol.
the problem is basic
those shares haven't been issued
by the TA yet
This post couldn't be more false. The shares were already issued.In fact they had been continuously issued for months and months prior.
The fact that there was huge volume does not have to mean that it was based on the A/S increase you speak of.
Have you had a chance to read Expo's financial statements yet? I know when we last spoke you had not read them yet.
Their filings don't give the name, just state that it was happening.
my logic keeps coming back
Where? Because your analysis regarding this stock has been proven to be incorrect for over a year now. Where are the facts to back up all of the allegations?
The company's own filings counteract almost all of your claims. Can we get an update on any facts you have?
I will wait patiently, what is another year or two.
I feel like I am debating with the little kids who close their eyes and swear that you can't see them when it comes to EXPH.
People trusting a guy they have never met because that guy swears his visit proves the company is legit? Even though the company's own financial statements contradict everything that this super secret insider allegedly uncovers?
How could anybody "invest" in a company that openly files financials that prove the officers took 400,000 dollars from the company for personal loans? The same financials prove that the company at one time was paying $20,000 a month in interest because of those very loans.
We arent talking about goofy predictions here or a silly table with bills of lading on it or any other conjecture. We are talking about cold hard facts.
That is the very definition of a scam. There is no other way to look at it, eyes open or shut.
You aren't invisible.
for a fact 100M
at full penetration requires 25M in
capital
Wouldnt it require at least a few sales? Maybe even a little interest?
Too bad it has neither.
as i've posted .. being a legit co. in no way assures said co.s survivability
If they were profitable it sure would guarantee it. Too bad Expo is neither. Well except for JD and GH, they milk all sorts of profit.
AND last but not least, the bankruptcy of Steve Sunyich has NO RELATION AT ALL on the company called IDEAL FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS!!
I tend to disagree. I find it very relevant that the CEO of a company that is supposed to be helping people manage their money and debt better, couldn't manage his money and debt.
Would you take golf lessons from a guy that always hits with a slice and has never shot under 100? Yeah, didn't think so.
It is a penny stock debt consulting company that has a that CEO filed for personal bankruptcy and the company got in trouble with their credit card processing company.
A reverse split is the last thing anybody should be worried about.
When the info about steve was disclosed I couldnt believe it. I traded some PM's with some longs and I spoke to Paul about it. There were a few other things I thought looked iffy at best. I sold whatever shares I had left (not many) and moved on. I check in from time to time and was of course shocked to see the PPS at .96
At least they also lowered the AS, which is almost never done.
Good luck to shareholders.
Let me sum up what 4kids is trying to say...
This stock is at .0001. There are lots of shares and no transparency.
Have a good day.
Yeah I guess if JD gave me 100million shares I would shut my trap, lol.
the company doesnt want to do that because it would mean they would have to keep it accurate.
So during the times they have gagged the TA and not released info when the insiders convert back and forth between preferred and common, they would have to keep us updated.
It is also why JD and GH have never filed ownership info. Which they could also do for FREE on their own website. They don't because they don't want to have to update it. If JD owns 100 million shares and sells 20 million shares and doesnt update the info, he has now broken a law. The way it is now JD can trade all day every day and it is perfectly legal.
Why would anybody view it in any other light or make an excuse for it? Mgmt can be completely transparent for free, yet they choose not to be? Integrity? Please. These men are con artists. Look at their connections. Have you ever looked into Greentree, Chad, the TA, etc? They are all connected on multiple levels. This isnt a couple o'county fellas makin cabinets. It is an all out share selling scam.
i long ago asked mgmt why that next level isn't given
and have been told the same thing every time i asked
there is a cost difference that they pay for this service
from memory it runs approx 7k per year
7k that in mgmt's eyes is better spent elsewhere .. again
calls into EXPO can get this info answered .. if interested
They could release the info on the bottom of their filings or on their website and guess what...it is free. the cost issue is null and void.
with transparency out of mgmt .. *record* volume done in july
2009 and sept 2009 will look *paltry* by comparison for a fact :)
Dollar volume? or share volume? I am not sure if you have noticed, but the price has gone down about errr uh 99%, lol
173 million dumped, lol.
I love watching this thing. It is so obvious it is a scam, topped only by efforts to sway that it isn't a scam.