Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Did they supplement / update the old PR? You had said the CEO claimed April revs "Would" exceed March revs. Now, you say he implied it?
You do understand that the upcoming financial report is for the first quarter, and the first quarter is January to March? The update they released said'
What part of "seeing they'll break 2 million in revs this quarter" don't you understand? You realize they'll = they will, and break = go over?
So, first the CEO said April revs "will" exceed March, now this morning he "implied" they would. Did they supplement/update that old PR overnight.
Oh, it's like that .20 soon, huh?
I think that's what most are hoping for. We'll see.
Again, we aren't talking about a business you start tomorrow. We're talking this business. You continually refer to "profit". Well, the only column in an earnings section of a Q or K, which refers to "profit", is the gross profit. In LTNCs case, they show 1.2 million in gross profit. The net loss/net earnings column is hard for some to understand. New company's often show good gross profit, but a net loss. Often, some figures represented in this column aren't representative of actual cash the company spent or lost. It includes write offs and representative numbers. Have you really looked into this column on LTNCs last 10K?
They did show a profit(gross) for the year, and a loss(net). Just using proper terms as shown on their 10K.
Well it's obvious there are big differences in gross profit and bottom line net. For some, it's hard to understand. I think most people expect to see good revs. Then, it's up to folks to educate themselves to understand the rest.
Oh, so let's move away from improperly quoting filings, and talk household income, LMAO. I was merely saying to use proper terminology. They do show a profit and a loss.
Good. You acknowledge he only said they may exceed. For a while now you were saying the CEO lied saying the revs would exceed the previous month. Glad we got that straight. There's a big difference in "might" vs will, promised, etc.
How is that funny? I posted that was what I said. Here's my post;
No, I had trouble finding the PR that reported April revenue. Then, I had trouble finding any PRs that matched what you claimed they said. Once I read the PRs, I saw the twists that were put on them.
I agree. His comments there haven't been quoted accurately.
Yes, I see that now.
When I was reading your posts, I assumed the CEO had said "April revs WILL be larger than March revs. He actually said;
Can you post a link to the April revs? I don't see them in the PRs. BTW, not out of touch. I just started looking at it?
So, someone told you two more weeks several times? Well hey, it should be in the next 2 weeks.
Someone told you 2 weeks, lol? Folks who "know", don't care when it comes out.
Looks like these guys are pulling in some nice revs. Curious to see the financials when they're out.
Oops, ask is back to having $75,000 worth of .0002s on it.
Oh, so you're talking over 3 days the ask lowered, lol. When you post the following, it didn't sound as if you meant cumulative over 3 days.
Really? LMAO. Based on what?
I see some revenue updates and projections much more recent than 6 weeks ago.
Those 4 MMs have a total of $71,000 on the ask at .0002. You should be more interested in the amount of shares, not the amount of MMs.
What would you expect? The truth about IMDS sure won't bring any buying.
You're gonna need a bunch of sheeple. $70,000 left on the ask at .0002.
The IMDS 510K submitted back in 2011 was rejected by the FDA in 2012. Read the filings buddy.
You'll need at least 35 $2,000 Block Buys.
No it hasn't. The ask was 364 million at the open, and 361 million now.