Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
depositions cannot go longer than 8 hours unless agreed to by both parties. they can be done over the phone or at an agreed upon location. the person being deposed is not obligated to travel over 100 miles to the deposition. At the discretion of counsel, the dep. can be video taped and that video is admissible in front of a jury. these facts are based on the federal rules of civil procedure. this just gives you an idea of how this game can be played.
Both paul and sam can be in Cal and the dep more than likely is taking place there. no need whatsoever to do this in Del. just my thoughts on how a good part of the truth is going to be revealed.
great work scott50 The reason why lindsey and ben did not want to be deposed is because it is common practice for corporate officers to avoid depositions because they are high ranking officers of a public company and by design they are in the public domain. however i am glad that they are being forced to be deposed and hopefully samm too. the truth needs to come out
The following is the briefest of summaries gleaned from the legal documents on XMDC's website. Here is my take.
1) Paul never updated the website, because there is so much going on behind the scenes legally he can't. Besides, he doesn't own the bioharp and there is no settlement! Sam totally backed out. So in good conscience, how could Paul be expected to update the website. On that score paul is conducting himself professionally.
2) Sam filed a lawsuit against paul for changing the corporate structure and increasing the share count by some 750 MM more shares. Sam is accusing paul of undermining his position and diluting him from 50.1% stake holder to 38% stake holder. Sam is accusing paul of fraud amongst other things.
3) To be clear, Sam has never turned over any asset worth anything and as we already know, he is flagrantly in violation of the contract he signed and the court mediated settlement. Sam just doesn't give a hoot about legalities... period. If you or I had behaved like this we would have been found in contempt and locked up long ago. So much for pushing the envelope, because this new judge seems to be on Sam's side, because he is the owner of the asset.
4) This judge wants them to settle... or better yet go their separate ways, just like a really bad marriage or a really good divorce.
5) This judge is well, seasoned, doesn't like small emerging shell companies and based upon his experience I'm sure that he has good reason. Because of the judges minset, paul has two strikes against him going into this proceeding: fist being a shell with no tangible assets other than sam's invention, second for ALLEGEDLY changing the share and corporate structure.
6) Now Pauls corporate lawyer Mr. Duncan, who is not the court appointed litigator wrote the judge a letter refuting what sam is accusing paul of doing. The judge read the letter and went ape shit on Duncan for sending him this letter which did not conform to the courts protocol. Now I found the facts in the letter to be quite compelling and factual regarding what has transpired between paul and sam. And i'm confident and praying to GOD that Duncan's facts are true... which i believe they are. So from that aspect paul should prevail.
7) This judge only wants motions which is a legal term for asking the the court for formal permission only to be followed up by briefs which is a legal way of explaining your position. I see the judges point. He wants total control over the proceedings and will tolerate nothing less than total cooperation and responsible behavior from both sides. I applaud this.
8) This judge is fast tracking the court trial for March. All parties must come to court totally prepared for battle, because this judge promises to get to the truth of the matter. There will be no delays or screwing around by either side or that side might find themselves in default.
9) My guess is that we will not have resolution until early spring... that's if the judge performs as he promised. I think he will.
10) I am down 75% so i'm going to ride this one to the basement, because we are heading there. I won't allow myself to sell under these conditions.
11) There is a glimmer of hope. If Paul is not a con man and i hope and believe he's not; if sam's device is real, and i hope and believe its real; if the judge finds for paul and sam can be convinced to collaborate with paul for his own benefit, then all of us will make bank. If not, then all of us are screwed. Sam will be allowed to walk with the blessing of this judge and the bioharp can then once again be offered the the next highest bidder.
12) Read the documents on the web site... i'd love to hear some educated opinions instead of all the postulation that has overrun polluted this board of late. In the end the documents explain what has been going on behind the scenes for a very long while.
Jem 165... you are onto something... i was in a similar situation with my IP and i settled on the eve of trial with the federal judge doing the arm twisting. The final mediation papers took 2 months to draw up.... several versions thereof. This document took over 2 months to to be filed with the court. The same thing is happening here.
Something to Consider: I'll take the odds of getting a 510K approval over getting a patent granted any day.
Here's why: The average wait in the USPTO is running at 2.5 years. The PTO doesn't provide any time lines such as 150 calendar days and all the hand holding that the FDA provides the applicant. Actually, the PTO provides none whatsoever.
Now consider that 50% of all applications get rejected and are thrown out and cannot be resubmitted unless they are refiled with significant changes.
Not so w/ the FDA, with the NSE running at 3%. Additional information can be asked for and resubmitted in unlimited fashion in the 510K process. Not so with a patent application. If the PTO examiner rejects an applicants claims 3 times,the application gets flat out denied and you are out.
Dean will prevail despite all the theories being floated about. This process of dealing with the government is exasperating. I know. Just my take as a backyard inventor who has lots of experience dealing with the waiting game.
Nobody's mentioned it, but the truth of the matter is that the courts activity slows to a crawl during the summer months due to vacations. Ask any practicing courtroom attorney.
REPOST Information based upon experience....
Yes I am an inventor with valuable patents. Yes i've been in Federal court and yes i've been in mediation.
When i was in mediation, the fortune 50 company that i was suing, told the mediator who told me that they were out of money and couldn't give me any money to drop the suit. That year they only grossed over 30 billion dollars, but in his words they were tapped out of funds.
Mediation only works if both sides are rational and want to stop the legal battle.
Settlement between the parties can happen at any time up until the verdict is handed down by the court. In my case they settled on the eve of trial... very common.
Point is, we don't know whats going on until we get an official word from Paul. All of this guessing and postulation will get us nowhere until we get a real word from Paul.
Summation: either we are going to settle before trial or we are going to get a trial date. Like I said, once we get a date, settlement of the dispute can happen at anytime until a verdict is rendered. Hope this helps.
Observation based upon experience.... Yes I am an inventor with valuable patents. Yes i've been in Federal court and yes i've been in mediation.
When i was in mediation, the fortune 50 company that i was suing, told the mediator who told me that they were out of money and couldn't give me any money to drop the suit. That year they only grossed over 30 billion dollars, but in his words they were tapped out of funds.
Mediation only works if both sides are rational and want to stop the legal battle.
Settlement between the parties can happen at any time up until the verdict is handed down by the court. In my case they settled on the eve of trial... very common.
Point is, we don't know whats going on until we get an official word from Paul. All of this guessing and postulation will get us nowhere until we get a real word from Paul.
Summation: either we are going to settle before trial or we are going to get a trial date. Like I said, once we get a date, settlement of the dispute can happen at anytime until a verdict is rendered. Hope this helps.
HUNTER WISE REJECTION DOESN'T MEAN A THING. that was only one potential source of funding. perhaps they rejected the Harp because they were perceptive enough to see that the partnership was showing Mondo signs of instability. Maybe it didn't have anything to do with the device.
Any way, in the world of invention, hawing a new technology is incredibility difficult. so difficult i can't even explain it.
Papaul... thank you so much for bringing me up to speed! I guess my July 20th response date looks like it has been thrown out the window!
This is a very serious lawsuit and Paul has handled this like a pro. The attorneys work product is excellent and the facts are on Paul's side!
Needless to say, I just spent an hour reading his lawyers response. It was a read and any investor that professes to care should take the time to read it. There is no more guesswork now that these facts have been so concisely presented.
This information has me singing a different tune altogether. Mediation should work and this case should never see the inside of a court room. Sure hope Sam see's it that way, don't know how he can't. Boy, that stupid bastard is toast!
MEDIATION... is an integral part of any civil lawsuit process. Yes, it is something to be optimistic about, yet there are no guarantees whatsoever. Mediation is only as good as the two parties and the mediator.
Although mediation is optional, in a great sense it is mandatory because if one party declines the threat of pissing off the judge becomes very real. So, both sides go to mediation.
As an inventor, I participated in mediation in a civil matter that that was in US Federal court and it was nothing short of a joke. The mediator I had was the dean of a prestigious law school and he was there just to pick up a few hundred dollars per hour to fund his next trip to Bermuda. The mediator told me that the Fortune 50 company that I was suing for breach of contract, patent infringement, misappropriation of trade secrets and fraud was out of money... ha ha. As it turns out,I have the most patents in my field of anyone in the last 40 years, so I guess my suit was valid.
On a positive note, the chancery division of Del seems to handle these matters with alot more care and greater speed. I really don't know how this court works, but I can tell you that it's looking to be a fart better place than Federal court. I for one am thrilled that we got kicked out of Federal court in Cali.
We have to wait and see. Just a reminder; Pauls response is not due until July 20. I'm rooting for Paul and chomping at the bit like the rest of you. GLTA
a jury trial must be demanded in the initial filing of the law suit. if a jury trial is not demanded, then a bench trial will be conducted by the judge minus any "fact finder" or jury. paul did not demand a jury trial. to me that indicates that he feels very confident about the facts to allow one person [the judge] to decide this matter.
ONE MANS TRASH IS ANOTHER MANS TREASURE. You can't go by all the naysayers, because there will always be more of them than risk takers that are willing to back their dream to the hilt.
By Paul pursuing this litigation in such a professional manner and not doing so on the cheap shows me that he has bought into the reality and viability of the Harp.
Needless to say, I've invested in Paul and have hitched my wagon to his dream. I just hope he was/is right. So until he is proven wrong... I'm a believer.
Altruism... never a need for an apology. your efforts are always appreciated. us longs should work together as a team and head toward an appreciated share price. a well informed, educated and civil board makes the journey just that much more enjoyable. whatever you do, don't silence your opinions... they are valued.
altruism... a tip. only a governmental entity can bring the charge of perjury against an individual or a corporation. an individual can NOT bring the charge of perjury against another. The closest charge to perjury Sam could have brought against Paul is Fraud and deceit. I do not recall if Sam charged paul with this.
Darwin thanx. Your lintel is right on the money. I'd like to point something out. If you noticed law suits and their responses are constructed by using numbered paragraphs. This is done for a specific reason.
Case in point, Sam responded to each and every paragraph of Paul's suit. Some questions he answered, some he denied, others he referred to the law. This is done because each paragraph asserts something and Sam must assert how he intends to defend each point.
Now likewise, Paul must address each and every paragraph of Sam's response and must reassert what was initially stated in his law suit. This takes time and is a big job. Evidential facts must be documented as well as case law, because this is what Paul intends to prove should he have to defend himself in court.
As I've said before Paul's team will in all probability will not respond until 7/20. Twenty days to shareholders seems like an eternity, however to the lawyers writing the briefs, 20 days seems like an afternoon nap.
DELAWARE CHANCERY RULES....according to the rules, a response must be filed in 20 business days. Holidays and weekends are not included. This makes Paul's response due on July 20th midnight because, Sam responded on Tuesday June 22nd.
Lawyers typically do not file responses until the last minute due to their heavy case loads and invariably they wait until the last minute in most cases. If we get to see Paul's response earlier then great, but nonetheless he has until the 20th to file his response to Sam's counter suit.
No.... sorry for the confusion. Once a brief or a motion has been filed, the other side has 20 days max to respond. So the people looking for Pauls response coming today may be disappointed. Paul's lawyers have 20 business days to respond to Sam's counter suit. I don't recall the exact date of Sam's response, but we have a ways to go on the clock. Look up Sam's filing and count 20 business days forward.
DELAWARE CHANCERY RULES....response is due in 20 business days. Holidays and weekends are not included. Lawyers typically do not file responses until the last minute due to their heavy case loads.
CONTRACT LAW... with regard to performance. Once the contract is signed both parties for better or worse are locked in. The parties are expected to work out their differences amicably and under the terms of the contract.
It is important to note that this contract did not contain a Best Efforts clause which would hold Paul to the highest performance standard. Now i'm not saying that Paul is a saint, but Sam was not within his legal rights to pick up his marbles and go home despite their diffrences.
The judge is going to look into how Paul tried to fix whatever he might of done wrong and if Paul put forth a reasonable effort and Sam still decided to leave.... well then Sam will be be found to be in breach of contract. End of story.
I read it. But to do it properly, you really need to take pauls complaint and go paragraph by paragraph with sams counter-suit. I did not do this, non the less here are my feelings.
Sam's response is weak and overreaching and lacking any solid grounds. If you notice, most of their denials state that it is an interpretation of law. That's just legal maneuvering. Accusing paul of unclean hands, laches and all of the rest are bottom of the barrel window dressing boilerplate speak when you don't got a hand to play. Trust me on this, it's bull.
Sam really didn't accuse paul of doing much. Paul broke a nondisclosure by press release and did not get Sams permission to do one.Very minor almost childish. That's hardly as breach NDA.
So like we've been saying; Sam signed it, he took the consideration of 500MM shares, he didn't back out during the 30 weasel clause and he isn't disputing that because he can't. That my friends is the heart of what signing a contract is all about. Besides, paul did not defraud sam as sam says. No way.
Most of what he complains about is what took place after he signed and took the $$.
Sorry, that's the stuff that has to be reconciled just like any good marriage.
Now we must wait for Paul's lawyers to respond in affidavit fashion to sams counter-suit. Interrogatories to follow.
Paul has a way better hand and i'm not selling. This is not going to play out overnight, but i told you that a while ago.
String... there is no disagreement. What you say is true and it works nicely in a vacuum. I do think there is alot more hassle factor to enforce the courts order in the real world. There will be a tremendous amount of legal protocol needed in order to get to where Paul needs to be. I can only hope that I am totally wrong.
Nother subject. We need to get the lastest version of the Harp in our hands, you can't design this thing off of the patents alone. Patents for all intended purposes protect the concept and that's laid out in the CLAIMS. Patents do not read like recipes and Sam's won't tell Paul how to build the Harp. We need to get the Harp so that it can be back engineered. If we get the real Harp in our hands then the finish line could be in sight. We must get the actual Harp! I don't know how easy that's going to be???
Anyway... I'm waiting to read Sam's counter suit... Please post so that i can have a look. thax
THanx Navy... That is excellent lintel. Asking for more time when plenty has already been granted shows an unorganized camp. Could be be any number of reasons for this. Could be sloppy lawyering... if you read Sam's reponse from the initial complaint those lawyers prepared that response during their lunch break.
Believe me, Sam's response is going to telegraph as to how we move forward and at what speed. Here's hoping for the best.
If Sam defaults he automatically looses. However it would be cleaner for us if he lost fair and square. Meaning it would be better if the judge ruled against him and then imposed an order to comply. Anyway, if he defaults the judge is going to to the same thing anyway. Then it will be up to Sam to comply. The trick is to get him to comply. That is why Paul has already retained Korean counsel, because the fight and the chase may continue overseas. Lord I hope it doesn't play out that way.
We'll know soon enough if he defaulted or not. Best of luck to all you gtys and gals.
Sam has until midnight tonight. We didn't hear because the court closes at 5PM EST. It appears that Sam is going to file this after the court closes. No big deal. However i do hope he files something so that we are not just shadow boxing a default.
Like I said this will not appear in the public forum for a couple of days ie PACER. If Navy or Sammy calls XMDC we might get a flavor for what is going on before the actual documents get posted. That's if we are lucky. I do like the the price rise. Go XMDC!
JUNE 22... Sam's written answer to Paul's lawsuit is due on or before 6/22. That means that both the clerck of the court and Paul's lawyers must have it in hand before midnight of 6/22. The brief that is to be filed is referred to as an answer or a counter-suit.
There will not be a hearing the day the papers are to be filed!
June 22,midnight is just a filing deadline. Nothing more.
I am not being a killjoy here, just explaining the process. After Paul's lawyers get a chance to go over it they can respond by filing a set of counter claims, to then be followed by asking pointed questions called interrogatories.
At some point after that the chancery judge will get involved for an actual hearing that will be conducted between the lawyers ONLY! During this hearing both the plaintiff...Paul and the defendant Sam are usually compelled not to speak at the hearing. As a matter of fact this could just be a conference call between the judge and the opposing lawyers.
What we need to do is to get our hands on Sam's response to Pauls lawsuit. This document will be filed on PACER's website for the public to view 24 to 48 hours after it has been filed.
Keep in mind, only Sam's response will tell us what direction this suit will follow. For example, is Sam stubborn, is he stupid, doe he want to fight or does he want to settle, or does he have a case..
Don't be fooled, Tuesday is not a meeting w/ the judge like many believe. Tuesday will come and go before anyone posts Sam's response, because he's got till midnight if he wants. Look for Sam's responcd to be posted best case scenario by the end of the week. Hope this helps.
STUBY.... one of the very first things asked in a contract dispute is..."did you have a lawyer?"
If the answer is yes, well you are pretty much locked in to the terms.
The second question is..."did anyone put a gun to your head and make you sign it?"
If the answer is no, well then you are really locked in to the terms o f the contract.
The point is, Sam had a lawyer so there goes one major excuse. Now since his attorney drew the contract, there is virtually no way out for him.
Here are the facts :his lawyer drew the contract and Sam didn't try and get out during the 30 day option period.
Remember how Paul just tried to have the venue changed and got slammed, because it was in the contract? Well, Sam is about to get hammered by the very same document. Oh well.
CLARIFICATION REGARDING JUNE 22... Sam's written answer to Paul's lawsuit is due on or before 6/22. That means that both the clerck of the court and Paul's lawyers must have it in hand before midnight of 6/22. The brief that is to be filed is referred to as an answer or a counter-suit.
I am not being a killjoy here, just explaining the process. After Paul's lawyers get a chance to go over it they can respond by filing a set of counter claims, to then be followed by asking pointed questions called interrogatories.
I don't know when the chancery judge gets involved for an actual hearing that will be conducted between the lawyers. During this hearing both the plaintiff...Paul and the defendant Sam are usually compelled not to speak. They will not be talking, that's the whole purpose of having lawyers.
Anyway... what we need to do is to get our hands on Sam's response to Pauls lawsuit. This document will be filed on PACER's website for the public to view.
Only Sam's response will tell us what direction that this suit is going to take. For example, is Sam stubborn, stupid does he have a case etc.
So don't be fooled, Tuesday is not a meeting w/ the judge like some of you believe, and Tuesday will most likely come and go before anyone posts Sam's response, because he's got till midnight if he wants. Hope this helps.
For what it's worth paul and sam are not trying to pull off a prearranged scam. The last thing that you would do is to have the courts involved if your intention is to pull off a scam. That would be like calling the IRS on yourself and asking them to audit you.
Remember court trials are based on asking hard questions and then obtaining factual answers. If you lie and get caught under oath it is perjury, an offense punishable by jail time.
In my opinion paul has a real legal complaint backed by a real contract. The facts clearly seem to be on his side, sam has gone about this all wrong and hopefully it will all be settled soon in pauls favor. As to the real facts, only the court process will bring those to light. We'll all have to wait and see where we go from there, pretty much anything we all say at this point is just conjecture. Over and Out
STUBBY... i want to point out to immutable facts.
First, it will be found by the judge that paul and sam have a valid and an enforceable contract. End of Story
Second, no matter what sam has decided to entertain after he signed this contract is going to be of no affect. This contract ties him to XMDC and if a third party wants in, they must now buy out pauls interest to go into business w/ sam. If paul wins the case and he wants the contract to be enforced, the court will be more than happy to do it. In my oipinion that's how it is going to go down.
Now if GE or Toshiba wants this device and they offer paul a few bucks a share, after the lawsuit win, paul would be free to sell out his interest and that would include us shareholders. We all win including sam, since he would still be holding his shares of XMDC.
I seriously doubt that the court has any right to strip sam of his shares. However, he may be liable for damages here and if he has no money, then he will be forced to repay paul with some of his stock. Who knows, but it's going to get real interesting soon.
THANX NAVY for keeping us posted like you do. I for one really appreciate your calling the office and feeding the board the straight info like you do.
I'm glad that sam's got a lawyer and that is best for the process and it assures us a better outcome in the end.
You already know my position, Sam signed a contract and did not attempt to withdraw from it during the mandated 30 day time period. Bingo!
THERE WILL NOT BE A COURT APPOINTED LAWYER IN THIS CASE. This is not an instance where the court asks you if you have a lawyer. Sam already had one in Cali and he presumably had one in Del. It is now his burden to defend against Paul's lawsuit. It is his responsibility to respond and once the process begins the court has little sympathy. That's exactly why you never want to be sued. Being sued demands a proper response and no matter amount of running is going to make it go away. Just like an IRS problem.
Sam has two defense options: file pro se with the court so that he can represent himself or he can file a petition with the court claiming that he is an indigent[poor] and needs a lawyer to defend him pro bono [for free]. I don't think the pubic defender thing applies here at all,it has to do when someone who has been charged in a criminal matter and can't provide his own counsel.
MAY I CLEAR SOMETHING UP? I'm no fan of lawyers but the majority of them are not stupid or dishonest.
Let me explain:
All lawyers must pass the bar in the state[s] in which they wish to practice in. If the lawyer is not licensed to practice in a particular state, he can still do so by aligning himself with a firm or a lawyer who is. This is done everyday and ones just needs to file w/ the court to be admitted for the case. This is called Pro Hoc Vice.
Sam if he wants too can pick any lawyer registered to practice in the US. So, the excuse that Sam is picking non-registered Delaware lawyers does not hold water. There has got to be something more.
Here's my guess. Most lawyers worth their salt will evaluate a case based upon several factors, such as how they are getting paid, [which by the way is the most important factor], is the case winnable, will it piss off the judge for being frivolous etc. etc,
For argument sake, let's assume that Sam is not awash in cash... he owes other parties at least 250K. If he doesn't have the necessary funds to pay the lawyers he is pretty much screwed. Very few attorneys, unless they are nuts or publicity seekers will take on such a client. Don't be misled, contingency representation only happens if you have a sure winner, and they are only in insurance cases where there is eventually a money settlement. Contingency representation doesn't just happen.
As a consequence, i hope our Sam is broke and what we are seeing is that "no ticket... no shirt." We can all hope. GLTA
String... your line of reasoning makes seance, however; and it's a big however... if the bioharp is legit and works like we all hope it does, nobody in the world has clear cut rights to it except paul and XMDC.
No legit company can work with sam due to paul's legitimate claim to the device. should paul win in court and i am very confident that he will, the Bioharp will be out of reach to anyone but paul.
Plain and simple this device has a very big first lien holder and nobody can go around it. That lien holder is paul.
In the case that sam has prior liens on the device and did not tell paul then that is fraud. Should any or all of those liens come to light, paul will have to make arrangements w/ those lien holders to make them whole so that they too can drop any ownership claims to the device.
In my opinion, there is much to be done legally before we send the "DOG" out. JMHO
STUPID RUMORS... that Toshiba or anyone else is holding Dean's machine are totally for the gullible. That would be tantamount to having the fox watch over the hen house.
If dean did allow any company to hold his machine it would be reverse engineered in a heartbeat. Patents mean little and so do non-disclosure agreements.
As for everyone talking about the nondisclosure agreements... you can wipe your behind with them, you need to go to court to defend them if violated and it is not what some of you believe that they are. Same goes for patents, they need to be defended in Federal Court and it can cost multiple millions and can take 4-5 years just to be heard.
As for the 510k process it is very similar to the patent process... which at this stage is totally out of deans control. no amount of wishing is going to make it move faster. Average patent takes 2.5 years to get issued and there is a 50% rejection rate.
Dean is no fool and he knows all of what i've just written. He is playing in the big leagues and i for one am thankful that at least he knows it or he wouldn't have gotten this far. For success, total secrecy it KEY! This is not a scam, he can't placate impatient and untrusting investors, if he did he would end up loosing the prize.
Patience... we are almost there. for what it's worth, I'm a fellow inventor with many patents w/ mega experience that has already played in the same league. Defended MY IP in Federal court too.
IMGG OR Bust you are a very sane and stable voice on this board... keep up the good work, i'll see you in the winners circle.
Darwin thanx for the info. as for disposition of this matter in a few weeks it certainly is possible. as you know, it depends on the parties, the judge, and how the chancery court actually handles the matters before them. if it is a few weeks, nothing could make me happier about owning this stock.
Mypennies.... how soon there is a trial depends on two factors...
the trial courts docket backlog and the particular judges hearing the case. His particular case load can easily be in the multiple hundreds of cases.
This info could be obtained by contacting the court after both parties have spoken to the judge after the pretrial conference. But i don't recommend us doing that just yet.
After the conference, Nadine will be able to provide this info and then we'll have a tentative date and i do mean tentative date. These court trials and scheduling have a mind of their own. Here's hoping for a very expedient resolution for all of us longs.
everybody who cares........... should at least scan the AG agreement between paul and sam and should further scan the complaint and sams answer to trhat complaint.
If you had at least read sams answer it doe not accuse paul of any misdeed. It only points out to the court that the venue was improper. And we've already beat the crap out of that issue.
Altrusim was kind enough post these materials so look them up under his posts to me, if you care to enlighten yourself as to the facts.
Anyway, i read the docs to my satisfaction. Here is the key point: paul gave sam hundreds of millions of shares at the time of the signing with more shares to quickly to follow through his TA. At that signing paul gave sam the overwhelming majority of shares that were owed to him. At this same time sam comes to the table completely empty handed of Bioharp and related IP. Sam brought nothing, yet he signed the contract and accepted the couple of hundred million shares. Never complained or tried to get out of the contract during the 30 day right of rescission period. Sam locked himself in and by the way so did paul for that matter.
In my estimation, Paul is wearing the "white hat" here and that's how the judge is going to see it.
Way... to go Altruism... i'm with you all the way... here's hoping
GLTA
Thanx again Navy... words pale when you talk about those emotions.