Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Uh-Oh.......shorts are not going to like to see that picture. That 22-tonne flatbed of SGP+ went to Illinois. Not Iowa or Texas where previous loads have gone.
Yes. I think if you talk to most IFUS investors, they would tell you that IFUS has had two "startups." The one from 2009 had a rough decade and we all know that history which I won't bother to re-hash here. From my perspective as a long-time investor, IFUS re-started about the middle of last year. Having all those legal problems behind them and no longer a constant drag on the company, Marc has made great strides & progress with the company in the past 6 months. So, yes, to me it "feels like a startup" to answer your question. I'm fairly sure you might disagree with that assessment but I'm OK with that. And I'm definitely OK with the number of shares that Marc has issued to the principals at par value.
"70,000,000 shares at .0001 for Walther & Windsor." Ho hum.... All the shareholders of IFUS that I have ever talked to are happy with those numbers. In fact, many CEO startups issue themselves a much larger percentage of the OS than that. If one day Marc is worth $50 - 100,000,000 because of his efforts establishing a game-changer such as IFUS and I've made $3 million, do you think I really give a **** what Marc makes?
Here below is an example of what can be easily found in the investment world of startups. Nothing is remotely out of line with the IFUS stock allocations. I'm assuming you understand what "lowest par value" means.
Common Practice start-ups:
Most sole founders typically issue themselves 4 to 5 million shares of the 10 million shares.
This allows the founder to grant themselves a sizable stock allocation while the stock is at its lowest (par) value.
Startup Equity Allocation:
When a startup is initially formed, it usually authorizes 10,000,000 shares of common stock.
The initial allocation of this equity is typically broken down into three groups:
Founders: Allocate 8,000,000 shares based on each founder’s ownership percentage.
Stock Plan: Reserve 1,000,000 shares for the company’s stock plan.
Unissued Shares: Leave 1,000,000 shares unissued for future use.
I know, I know! It's awful, what shall we do? [hand wringing] "After 14years in business, IFUS has NO repeat customers!"
Oh yeah, maybe I should do some DD like other IFUS investors......maybe I'll start by reading today's report from the company.
"I am pleased to report that the test being conducted at the feedlot in Iowa is
producing the desired results in a short period of time and that the owner has
ordered two more flat beds holding 40,000 lbs each. We are currently arranging
shipping.
I'm not very good at this, maybe you can help me out. If the owner of a large feedlot in Iowa tries one flatbed truck of SGP+ and likes the way his cattle eat it & they do well on the new ration, and thus he orders TWO MORE flatbed trucks of 40,000 lbs., does that not make him a REPEAT customer??? Just wondering what the definition of REPEAT CUSTOMER is in this day and age.....
I'm a fanatic. The long word shortened to "fan." When my team wins, I celebrate. When my team loses, I don't like it but I begrudgingly say "nice game" and "well played" to the opposing team. Sore losers don't say anything and just go away grumbling to themselves......
So far on here, I haven't seen one post (maybe I missed it) congratulating Marc and IFUS on their generosity donating cattle feed to the starving cattle in Texas. A nice testimonial to a decent human being with some empathy for the stricken ranchers.
With that patent pending, this company can go in 60 different directions. I was expecting the next PR to be something about the COVID trials. Instead, it was on herpes zoster (shingles). Shows that this company has a lot of directions it can go and multiple drug possibilities in the pipeline. I had shingles once and it was a painful 7 weeks of very little sleep with the medication I was prescribed not helping much. If this drug actually works and patients get relief in 3-4 days....... they call it a game-changer.
You make a good point about the number of pills. Patients don't like taking a lot of pills or large ones so the dose optimization study is important for general use and adoption. Health care providers shy away from prescribing medications where patients complain about the size of the pills or how many or how often one needs to take them. Once a day and a small, easy to swallow pill is ideal. But a company can control that property to a certain extent by making the pills more or less potent and larger or smaller by adjusting the inert, carrier materials in the pill as the trial outcome dictates. The best we can hope for on this trial is that a small pill taken once a day for a short period of time is effective at eradicating the virus from the body. If that happens, BIXT is sitting on a gold mine!
Even though you are bashing the stock, I will give you a pass on this one since you don't seem to be from farm background. Born and raised on a farm I can say in general that steers are fairly particular about what they eat. Goats on the other hand will eat most anything they can get their mouths around. We would purchase calves that were grass-fed from Kentucky at about 500 lbs and feed them out to 1,000-1,100 lbs then sell for beef. And since we had no pastures on our farm in Ohio but lots of corn, we would switch them over to corn silage. The change would give them "the scoots" for awhile (I think Marc would call them Grade 1 patties☺️ ) and then they would gradually adjust to their new diet. It was expensive to feed pure corn. The SGP+ mixture IFUS produces is much less expensive to ranchers and produces good beef. In talking with Marc about his experiences, cattle take to SGP+ mixed with their traditional feed right away and the patties reach optimal Stage 3 patties usually in about 2 weeks. It did take some time last year to get the formulas and mixtures just right. The ratio of SGP+ to the traditional feed is often 60:40 or 80:20 depending upon what the rancher decides. They don't usually feed SGP+ 100% but apparently from what I have heard it can be done.
"Does it cure the common cold?" I have some experience in medicine for 30 years but no expert on this. It seems to me that it boils down to whether the virus in question (in this case, the common cold viruses) have a galectin fold. There are about 300 viruses estimated to cause "the common cold." Many are in the rhinovirus class but there are some colds caused by coronaviruses (not the SARS recent Covid virus). Thus you get mild colds and "bad colds" depending upon the type of virus you caught. Read this section of the PR carefully:
"“We used Nuclear Magnetic Resonance imaging to engineer / optimize a carbohydrate structure ideally suited to neutralize the spike protein of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Before this discovery, neutralizing antibodies were only able to target the tip of the spike proteins of viruses which rapidly mutate, but after this discovery we found out that carbohydrates are able to neutralize viruses by binding to the galectin fold. The galectin fold represents a conserved structure on the spike protein virtually incapable of mutation, therefore it opens up a whole new field of research in Glycovirology. We believe a large number of viruses contain this galectin binding region on their spike proteins offering a widely druggable target that could be easily tested in a lab setting."
So the key is, does the common cold have a galectin fold? But the part I like the most about this new drug is the "galectin fold is virtually incapable of mutation" part. That means no chasing a new virus mutation every time you turn around with a different drug. If this ProLectin-M drug does what they say it does, big Pharma is NOT going to be happy. It will neutralize (no pun intended) a lot of drugs out there (Paxlovid, monoclonal antibody treatments, etc.) and big Pharma will lose a lot money if this drug works. A big IF for sure. But also keep in mind as some on here have alluded to, these drug trials take a LONG time to do and if you have no patience or don't have a long investment horizon, you are in the wrong place. The FDA has a way of stringing these things out with requests for this, that and the other thing during the trials. "Oh, this patient got shingles while they were on the trial? Oh, maybe the drug caused that. No? Prove it, etc." I've seen it happen and further I was part of one of those trials collecting data for the approval process...... My thoughts FWIW
I'm excited for IFUS and the potential it has shown in the past few months. I've lived through the drama of the past dozen years and now Marc has the company back on track. Sales people at cattle conferences working to drum up sales will bring new ranches on board in the coming months. New plastic wrap technology has improved the safety and efficiency of shipping SGP+ long distances at a MUCH cheaper cost. This allows SGP+ to be marketed AT A PROFIT at most all the cattle country in the US. Did you notice the sales people representing IFUS will be attending a conference in Bose, Montana? They wouldn't bother to go there if IFUS couldn't deliver product that distance at a profit.
One can tell the short sellers are getting more anxious and desperate for shares (and I would be too if I was short IFUS). I've observed over the past dozen years that the number of bashers on a stock is directly proportional to the desperation of the short sellers. IFUS at a new high with new bashers appearing every week. This just makes me hold tighter to my shares (sell order at $20/shr and GTC) because we are soon heading to new highs. This is an exciting time for all IFUS shareholders who will reap the benefits of waiting while Marc fought to save the company!
"The truth is that either "Agri-Glow Biotech" never existed before the 9th of December, 2023 .... or doesn't even exist now."
You make a good point. AgriGlow maybe didn't exist before December. I personally don't know. But does that make the business venture between the Indian business and IFUS a non-starter? I always ask myself if there could be other reasons than your two stated options above.
I have a very close friend who formed a business LLC to protect their personal assets in case of a malpractice suit. But my friend does not have a website advertising this fact. I simply cannot find his website anywhere on the web. Apparently thousands of these LLC's exist across the U.S. without websites. Several posters on here seem to imply that for an Indian business to "exist" it must, by definition, have a website. So that begs the question as to whether a business can only exist if it has a website. Or, could it be that after seeing how a JV with IFUS could greatly improve their financial bottom line in the cattle-feeding business, these soon-to-be Indian partners decided to form a legal business entity in India to protect their personal assets? I can visualize that happening.
In fact, I see this as a very positive sign of how serious the Indian business is about going forward with the joint venture with IFUS. Otherwise, one has to ask why they would go to the expense and trouble of registering a new business (AgriGlow, website not included) in India if they didn't plan on completing a joint venture with IFUS at some time in the future.
OK, so it appears that my legal knowledge could fit in a thimble, thank you very much for the kind words. I'm wondering if the passages from a Harvard Law article on this subject would fit in the thimble with me..... The sharing of AgriGlow info to shareholders sounds voluntary to me.
"However, even before a definitive agreement is reached, companies may voluntarily disclose information about the other companies involved in the negotiations, for various reasons, such as to inform shareholders, employees, customers, or regulators, to solicit feedback or support, to respond to rumors or leaks, or to comply with contractual obligations. Such disclosures may include the identity of the parties, the terms and conditions of the proposed deal, the rationale and benefits of the merger, the expected timeline and challenges, and the financial and operational performance of the other companies.
The decision to disclose information about the other companies during negotiations should be made carefully, as it may have legal, financial, and strategic implications."
Even in my wildest dreams, I cannot imagine anyone in their right mind (even if they knew the correct answer) would give a non-shareholder trying to drive down the price of a stock that specific information.
I find it really interesting that you continually post about 2 lawn chairs as if it is evidence of no work being accomplished. Or are you conveniently ignoring the evidence of work having been done recently in the Google Maps picture? That is a change from the historical Google Maps pictures you posted. The evidence of work is alongside the path to the entrance to the plant. SGP+ has fallen off the trailers on both sides of the path as the trailers have been loaded. To me that is evidence of work just done and the chairs are for the workers to rest after having loaded a large truck for delivery. IMO, the Google Maps picture shows a much different narrative than the one which you are trying to construct.
"Two empty chairs looking out from the bay with a small pile and a wheel barrel LoL
https://maps.app.goo.gl/DipCYheudLXbHLcF7?g_st=ic
204 La 1011, Napoleonville, LA 70390"
Peach, thanks for taking the time out of your busy day continuing to post the truth about IFUS. In my experience on the internet and iHub-type boards over the past dozen years, the uptick in posts by non-shareholders (read bashers) reflects a type of desperation by short sellers who see a good stock which is inevitably going to rise and they want out. The chart posted awhile back with borrowing costs hitting near 50% annually! will cause their desperation to increase exponentially while IFUS shareholders are sitting back, smiling and enjoying the ride. The high borrowing cost also shows that IFUS shareholders like you, myself and others are, to borrow a term from the crypto community, HODL'ing* IFUS shares and aren't parting with them any time soon.
*For those not into the crypto environment, HODL = Holding On for Dear Life
Whichever figure you choose to place your sell order, $20/shr or $100/shr, at the moment it must make it kind of difficult to borrow any shares to short.....
My goodness, Peach, these guys are nervous!. Basher to shareholder post ratio of the last hundred or so posts heavily weighted on the basher side. I guess paying almost 50% annual interest rate to borrow IFUS shares to short would make anyone nervous. And then have the audacity to post that there are no IFUS shorts when it is there for all to see in black & white. I hear getting caught in those short trades is sort of like a python that is gradually squeezing (pun intended) the life out of it's victim...... Since the basher posts have been SOOOOOOOOO scary, I've decided to sell my shares. I think $20/share would be a reasonable price, don't you?
Uber, you are correct that the "usual" route from the Port of Mumbai to the Port of Orleans is not through Panama. However, you should be made aware that the recent Houthi rebel attacks in the Suez area have caused carriers to search for alternate routes. Shipping through the Suez is down by almost 50% because of the fear of being hit by a missile. Some of those carriers are choosing to go around the Cape, others, especially from Southeast Asia are going the other way around which is much longer and causing the traffic jam in Panama. I was giving the canal example as one of the things which are unexpected in investments over which neither the company nor the investor has little to no control. But you are correct on the usual shipping route. Either way I suspect that it is going to take the company longer than expected to get this bagasse/SGP+ exchanged.
M0N, what are you talking about insider info?? I've talked to Marc at various times over the past dozen years and he is very careful not to give out insider info to investors. He always replies to certain questions "I can't talk about that, sorry." Or "at the appropriate time, the company will put out a PR, just have some patience." Peach is just a positive-thinking type of guy and believes with all his heart that the India venture will go through. I would also like to think the JV with the Indian businessmen is a done deal but we all know that there are things that happen in this world that are unexpected and over which no one has any control. Shipping is all jammed up in the Panama Canal region and is taking longer to get supplies through. Foodstuffs can get damaged or spoil enroute, etc. But those are unlikely events to happen and we all hope they don't. But most all IFUS investors believe very strongly that if SGP+ reaches India intact (no pun intended) that the cattle there will eat it, show positive results and it will then become a "done deal." These Indian businessmen are apparently no slouches since they spent the money to come all the way to Napoleonville to check out SGP+ to assess whether changing cattle feed to SGP+ would be an option for them. If they are rich enough to afford that type of travel and own 500,000 cattle, in my estimation they are smart enough to do fundamental math. They will find the savings and potential profits so great producing SGP+ locally in India that they'll have a new bagasse-transforming plant under construction as soon as possible after seeing the results of the feed trial. Nothing in life is 100% guaranteed or a "done deal" but most of us investors believe this is one of those "low risk/very high reward" investments. I'm patiently awaiting the results of the Indian JV trial run in March/April. IMO
I did a bit of research on startup companies. I will say that even though I have been invested in IFUS since about 2012, I consider it a startup in the past year now that IFUS has put all the legal problems behind. It is basically making a fresh start after many years as a public company.
One answer I wanted for myself was how much stock should the founders of a company own? And what price should the founders be expected to pay since they are doing all the work and taking on all the risk?
There are a lot of different business sources that I came up with but one recurring theme on equity was:
“How much equity should a founder(s) get in a startup?
The short answer to "how much equity should a founder keep" is founders should keep at least 50% equity in a startup for as long as possible, while investors get between 20 and 30%. There should also be a 10 to 20% portion set aside for employee stock options and, in some cases, about 5% left in a reserve pool.”
The second answer I got was on how much the founders of a public company should be expected to pay for that stock:
“The founders of a startup generally purchase shares at the time of incorporating the company at a nominal price per share, such as $0.0001 per share, paid in cash….
The founders of a company put their name, their family life, their time and their money on the line and take the risk. We investors only put our money on the line. I don’t speak for the rest of the investors on here but I am more than comfortable with the number of shares and percentage of the company that Marc, Rhonda and the principles in IFUS own and the amount they paid for them whether it is .0001, .0036 or whatever.
Thanks for sharing the brochure, Eco. A lot of good information in there to "digest." I can imagine there will be plenty of those brochures at the convention IFUS sales people & team will be attending in January.
"I think a dollar is totally possible in the future, but it won’t be because of some bullshit short position in IFUS"
I tend to agree with you on the short positions. Covering can be a temporary push on the price until all are covered. I'd prefer to think that this stock price is going to be continually pushed by new buyers who are now seeing the benefits of SGP+ as it relates to an industry cattle feed disruptor. Some of those buyers are probably ranchers after seeing how their herds are doing after trialing the SGP+.
On our farm long ago we never had a chance to buy into the private companies supplying feed for our cattle. These ranchers get a chance to play both sides of that equation by making money off a public company (IFUS stock) as well as making money off the cattle by lowering their feed costs significantly.
Quote: [i]"But never, will a single # be verified and there will not be any audits, ever."[/i]
There are bunch of us on here who are going to enjoy reminding you of this post down the road a patch...... 😳
A company cannot be a legitimate, international going concern in this day and age without doing independent, audited financials. IFUS will eventually do them as Marc builds the company and there is a stable revenue stream.
Nothing would make me happier if this wasn't a massive short squeeze driving the stock price. Those are temporary gains. When the shorts finally cover, the stock would no longer make gains as fast. But if you are going to go with the hypothesis that there are no shorts, one should then ask who IS actually doing the buying over the past two weeks if it isn't shorts covering? The answer would either be new blood, longs who continue to buy because they know what they own, new ranchers who have proven to themselves the truth about SGP+ that it is an excellent source of cattle feed or possibly business people from India buying in on the ground floor because they have visited the plant. Any way you wish to slice this up in your mind I don't really care but......... it is all good for IFUS.
What I have observed over the years is that the more desperate the shorts become, the more vicious and nasty the posts become. I am also appalled by the racist comments about future business Asian business partners which reaches a new low for the board and high desperation level for those taking it in the shorts.
If the large, multi-national corporations (take your pick: Amazon, Apple, etc.) that have flourished and have interests around the world would take the attitude that "we won't work with this or that country because we can't trust the people of that country", most all would have never grown or survived. Marc and the IFUS team have already said they will do what every business does that works internationally by setting up legal guidelines and guardrails as IFUS expands at home and abroad. The NDA and LOI speaks to the first of these legally binding agreements with our new business partners and you can be assured that there will be more as IFUS expands into India. I personally know that one on the IFUS team has vast international business experience for years in Asia and the Far East. And Marc has already stated that he would send someone from the IFUS team to India to monitor the new business as it grows. I think all shareholders who have done their DD know that we are in good shape to expand globally.
You're probably right about business people in India buying in. I'm also thinking about the smart ranchers who begin feeding SGP+ and see that it makes a great cattle feed. All of a sudden they realize that they can get in on the ground floor of what will be a multi-billion dollar international company one day. A dime a share is going to look cheap in 6 months.....
I'm not exactly sure why you keep contradicting yourself by writing "No one is short this POS." If you study the broader stock market, the really good stocks which are expected to go up in price/shr are NOT shorted because the shorts would continually lose on the trade.
By contrast, if a stock "is a POS" as you say and expected to go down in value, there is a ton of short interest. So for you to write that "there are no IFUS shorts" because "IFUS is a POS stock" is a contradiction in terms.
You can't have it both ways. Either a stock is a POS and there are a lot of traders short the stock or..... "no one is short because it is a good company expected to rise in value."
Do you feel the squeeze you've talked yourself into?
Exactly right Eco! You and I were here a long time ago, when was it about 2012? And a bunch of said "we were holding for a dime." And I believe someone on here said that the share price would easily reach 0.0001 before it reached a dime. Now I've had to greatly readjust my thinking about that dime and even holding for $1. I'm thinking with India and later on possibly Brazil in the future, it could go way past $1. IMO
Hey Peach, good post and good reminder regarding borrowing shares and short selling. I believe when you wrote: "As a reminder I have all my IFUS shares at GTC goon til cancelled if you have done that do it....." that you wanted to say, if you have NOT done that, do it. I'm pretty sure all on here understood what you wished to write. It is a good word for us all. I don't want brokerages lending out my shares cheaply to short sellers. They stay with me until $2/shr as well....
Good article which supports exactly what I wrote here. The article uses the term "alternative feed source" which I think describes IFUS' use of bagasse much better.
Quote: $IFUS #india #cattle #drought #feed #Hay #Dairy
Hey did you see this!! Our mission is to feed the world with a renewable feed source.
But…..it is not a “renewable feed source” is it? I mean, not really, in the strictest sense of that term. Corn would then be a renewable feed source because you plant it then harvest it. Hay, oats, barley, sugar cane, rice; all of them are RENEWABLE feed sources because you can re-plant them every year.
But bagasse is BETTER than these “renewable feed sources” because….. farmers need to pay LOTS of money to plant and re-plant their crops each year. My Dad and Brother were good farming folk and they called these costs INPUTS. Like Fuel, expensive fertilizer, machinery (a new tractor can run up to $400,000 these days, a new combine to harvest $500,000+) and then high seed costs (see corn @ $200/bushel).
In comparison, IFUS does NOT need to plant bagasse each year. No inputs. There are huge piles of it that heretofore the sugar cane refineries just burned because they didn’t know what else to do with this waste. And burning it just added to more CO2 and pollution being released into the atmosphere.
So Marc takes it off their hands for....... NOTHING. What a business model! IFUS pays nothing for the bagasse except the shipping. That contributes to the PROFIT MARGIN for those of you keeping score at home.
So I disagree that it is a renewable feed source in the strictest sense of the term. But there are maybe millions? of tons in the world for FREE that are just waiting to be turned into SGP+2.0. That bodes very well for the future of a company like Impact Fusion International....
Before anyone asks once again for a “university study”, I would like to question whether spending a lot of money on a university study is really necessary. Allow me to take a page from the human food supplements industry which is more restrictive than the animal side of the business. It is a huge industry. “The U.S. dietary supplements market size was valued at USD 50.91 billion in 2022 and is expected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 5.7% from 2023 to 2030.” (Grand View Research) So a lot of money is spent on human food supplements which are in large part unregulated. One should also understand that the FDA does NOT approve dietary supplements for safety and effectiveness or their labeling before they are sold to the public. The FDA does not require university-based safety studies. Dietary supplement companies are the one’s responsible for ensuring that their products are safe and accurately labeled. And this is for human (not animal) consumption!
By contrast, the animal market in supplements is more lax in their regulations. So Impact Fusion would be the entity taking responsibility for the overall safety of their products. If one rancher has been feeding his cattle SGP+ for a year without sickness or animal death and is satisfied that the animals are gaining weight, that is proof enough for the rancher that the product is safe and effective for animal consumption. Throw in the kicker that the rancher is making much more in profits than from previous years when he fed them hay and well……does one need to say more?
The take-home message is that without university studies, the human food supplement industry rakes in over $50 billion per year from the U.S. population. I see no reason why IFUS cannot tap into the billions on the animal side of the supplement industry without a university study. IFUS ensures the product is safe and it works and that is all that is needed as far as the government is concerned.
When I was young on the farm in the Midwest, we fed cattle silage (corn stalks chopped in the field & put in a silo to ferment) and that is pretty much all we fed the cattle until they were sold at a weight of 1,000 - 1,100 lbs. I don't farm any longer but talking to farmers in the area I hear that very few in the Midwest feed silage anymore. Along came the Ethanol plants where they remove the starch from the corn stalks and turn the starch into ethanol for your car's gas tank. The remains of the crushed stalk can be called "distiller's grain" and apparently from what I hear, most feedlots are feeding their herds distiller's grain because it is cheaper and works better. It apparently took a few years until farmers caught on and realized they didn't need to put all that work into making silage in silos and are now tearing the silos down as the switch has been made to distiller's grain as a feed.
So I ask myself, how different is distiller's grain from bagasse? Corn stalks and sugar cane look almost the same from a distance. In the first, they remove starches (sugar chains chemically) and the leftovers are fed to cattle. In the second, they remove the sugar and why couldn't the leftovers be fed to cattle in the same way as distiller's grain? I'd be interested in hearing anyone's thoughts on this.
Thanks DDABET for posting that perspective and your help in launching the company many years ago. Yes, there was a day way back when spirits were high as the Supreme operation was starting out. I'm still upset about how a few of the former directors derailed that dream. They turned it into the nightmare that it has become. There are now quite a few hurdles that Marc will need to overcome to re-ignite that dream. For one, I am happy and content that he has chosen to go silent on what his progress has been over the past year. I know that it appears to many that nothing is going on but I do like your analogy of the winning lottery ticket and keeping quiet about it until certain things fall into place. I am with you as one of the longs who hold on to that glimmer of hope for the future.
Re: ....
Do not buy IFUS UNTIL they start to achieve the following items.
in resolving the New Jersey court case
in filing Nevada papers in AUGUST
in adding proof that secret sauce works with scientific data
in using that data to sign up multiple cattle feed lots
in adding new partners to develop Mastic Blast drink
in adding new employees, distributors, and customers
in cleaning up otc reports and doing financials
in applying for a new patent
in adding new board members and additional manufacturing plants
in having new feed lots and customers buy STOCK in IFUS
in having transparent PR's, articles, and facebook updates after many of the above are completed.
I believe that is the most reasonable post I have seen in awhile. The poster is not promoting or encouraging anyone to buy IFUS stock at the moment. They are just saying these are the things (the checklist if you will) which IFUS will need to accomplish before anything positive is going to happen going forward.
It will be interesting going forward to see how many of those bullet items can be checked off the list. Make no mistake about it, IFUS is high risk, high reward. One needs to weigh the risk before putting money into any stock. Those who expected a quick reward with IFUS have obviously been disappointed here. It is of no value to anyone to recount again why we are at this juncture, it has been stated numerous times prior. My hope is that by the end of the year, some of these items will be checked off the list and we will see progress going forward as Marc builds the company.
Good luck to all.
I talk to Marc on a semi-regular basis. He doesn't ask me for money. By your post, I assume that your experience has been different with him?
Sky9, that is correct info. It would be common courtesy to give Marc a call when you are going to visit so someone can show you around the plant and see how the operation works. The problem with popping in announced is that Marc is on the road a lot selling bagasse and you could miss him. We all look forward to the day when IFUS is bringing in substantial revenues and can begin hiring salespersons to help Marc in this venture. Until that time he will remain on the road a lot visiting ranches and distributors and you won't find him around the plant as much. (I suspect that is where these rumors about the plant being abandoned started) You can't sell an unusual product like this just sitting in Napoleonville waiting for ranchers to call.....
Marc just updated the brochures on FB if there are any cattle feeders in the crowd wishing to purchase Supreme Gold Plus or update understanding of products.
Thanks Slojab. That worked or at least the order is in process.
Can anyone give me a link to your supplier of Intact Digest? The supplier that I ordered from is back-ordered and I am almost out. I know there are other suppliers and links given on here from time to time but I can't seem to find them at the moment. Thanks.