Whow did you find that out? To you have a link?

or sell order............ I down´t hope, but..? Who knows?

From Twitter:

y can chime in too. Some even had their Blackberrys, not sure why they took mine

Hearsay or can you give a link?

http://www.timboucher.com/journal/wp-content/uploads/2007/02/wamu-love.jpg

legal and JP?
That does´nt fit!

Whats about the 39 bil debt? Somebody know anything about?

http://www.kccllc.net/documents/0812229/0812229090812000000000006.pdf

Since the automatic stay prevented the Securities Action from proceeding against WaMu,
the Securities Claimants filed a proof of claim form, Claim Number 3515, in the amount of
$39,837,106,891.00 for violations of federal securities laws based on purchases of certain WaMu
Mortgage Pass-Through Trust Certificates between January 26, 2006 and November 1, 2007,
issued by WaMu-created Trusts. For the reasons set forth below, the Securities Claimants’
Claim Number 3515 against WaMu should not be disallowed or expunged.

I agree with you.

@all

Somebody know who are the bondholters, claiming the 4 Bil.?

@all

here you can vote what will happen with wamu. It´s in german but I hope you can unterstand it.

www.born2live.beepworld.de/index.htm

Where can I find something about Walrath?

Full discovery you my see in 2100, not before!
I think you will never see it.

You´r right!

You trust in the judge?
Whats behind JP? Rockefeller?
Whats bhind the FED?
Whats behind zhe FDIC?
Whats behind Obama?
Whats behind the judge?
Whats the difference between right and fair?

The next worldbank is called JPMC, its like the third worldwar of modern art!

Don´t know, just stolen from a German Board

Attourneys Arguments were heard

Court hearing concluded without a ruling

Judge took it all in and asked no questions. Asked about the next scheduled Omnibus hearing (June 22nd) and said she was taking the matter was "under advisement". I think she wanted to know if the texas action was to be moved to DC or not.

She listened to it all without saying much. I'm still reading a personality issue into her vocal pattern. There's not much there, but she didn't seem happy to be addressing the JPM lawyer a second time.

Wamu lawyers spoke first and focused on how inappropriate the JPM case citations were, and on the fact that their issues were very specific. I didn't sense any reluctance to hear what they had to say.

There was some mention of the CASH turnover even though it was not on the agenda for the day. The judge was impatient with this, a little bit, but when it came down to a request to callendar the matter, she was OK with it.

Just a lot of talk. No real ruling on the 2004 issue. But not much to make JPM feel comfortable.

btw: That´s JPM:

http://dn.sapo.pt/bolsa/interior.aspx?content_id=1235563