Likewise Libra. The standard of care is the same actually. It's just more available there and a common right to all(unlike here unfortunately). Medicare sucks and the Health Insurane industry is a prejiduce money making machine. Something must be changed to improve what we have currently. Anyways, my previous post got deleted because someone didnt like my point of view.
I think there is room for improvement here. CBAI needs to instill confidence in shareholders. New Vegas facility is great but its important to generate revenue and stop dilution. Thanks for not getting into an arguement. lol.

Posted by: Libra59 Date: Sunday, November 08, 2009 6:34:10 PM
In reply to: A deleted message Post # of 10456

I do appreciate your point of view. It is my understanding that 15 out of 20 people in the European model don't get the high standard of health care that currently exists in America.

Let's work on bringing those 5 people in America up to that level that I work so hard for.

Don't force my level down to the one that currently exists for them. Examine Medicare and it's atrocity of governmental waste.

Fine example of what is to come...

Ok, agreee to disagree. I think we had issues because of extreme dilution and not just individual investors selling their shares just to rebuy them later and continue the cycle. I dont think EESO will be what it was described to be by Jared and Mark. Regardless there could be some money here to be made. Good luck with your positions.

Posted by: maui dave Date: Thursday, October 15, 2009 7:37:33 PM
In reply to: Fieveltke who wrote msg# 178831 Post # of 178845

because someone was dumping into the hype, then run price down to buy shares back,of course, especially if there may be an upcoming deal. I am trying to be square,regardless of my position. I am accumulating small buys,and have not sold any. I feel after the last press release, which is now watched closely by the SEC, that this company is ,at least, real,and therefor,at these prices,it is a deal. Sorry for run-on sentence.If they were going to screw us, they won't dare now.

Likewise nobody cares what you think about it and the fact that you still believe that Jared is legit. You have a right to your opinion though. Out of all the things Jared promised and said were happening with the company, nothing has been shown to be true. Sorry you dont like what people are writing but this is what the board is for.

Posted by: Viper49 Date: Thursday, October 15, 2009 4:59:04 PM
In reply to: Fieveltke who wrote msg# 178832 Post # of 178844

Oh my gosh how many times can we talk about the same thing. Just put the record on repeat and walk away. No body knows anymore than the other at this point. Give yourself a break no body cares how you feel about what you know. What will be will be. Move on!!

This was going on way before the S. America trip. It was going out during the supposed buyout ordeal and during the S Korea "contracts". The McDonalds PR was to try and get people to believe that EESO was dealing with them as a business partner. Fortunately most didnt go for it.... except for a few that were talking billions. lol. EESO hasnt shown to follow through on anything other than creating one bogus PR after the next. I understand you might be hopefull and looking for a strong bounce or miracle expansion of this company, theres nothing wrong with that.... but theres no proof of anything Jared said or promised. Zero. Lots of people believed him and lost thousands. Im not one of them and got out in time. But what Jared did wasn't a mistake or misfortune, it was done with intent.

Posted by: maui dave Date: Thursday, October 15, 2009 3:56:49 PM
In reply to: Fieveltke who wrote msg# 178821 Post # of 178831

Thats right. You don't know anything.
2. This all started after s. america trip.
3.Maybe they needed this money for a quick expansion,and not a ripoff.
4. a/s were increased right after s. america trip
5. sure,I could be wrong,or right. 6. McDonalds news seemed purposely misleading.
6.We shall soon see,money is already lost,and waited long enough to keep on for an answer.
7. Yes, I could have made 100k putting my money somewhere else.
8. If it is a real business at all, it should go up anyways.


SURE,i COULDBE WRONG,but don't trell me I am wrong. did you know he just dumped 300 mil. shares 2 days in a row, and that happens to be the same amount of shares they gave WOW?

This is just my hopeful opinion,and yes, I am still buying,although not much to buy with. WhaT THE HELL, GO FOR BROKE.

Maui you give Jared and Co. too much credit. Why would they want people to think they're small potatoes after blasting about the $139 million in revenue for 2009 (and specifically saying that was a low estimate) and pumping the internationally house-hold name company they were dealing with? This company is all about posting PRs that mislead people but this is done in order to raise the price and get people to keep buying their shares while Jareds pockets get fuller.

Posted by: maui dave Date: Thursday, October 15, 2009 3:40:57 PM
In reply to: Fieveltke who wrote msg# 178804 Post # of 178830

I think they posted that McDonalds news purposely to give people monitoring the stock the idea the company is small potatoes. The news was much too insignificant to post for any reason but to mislead.

very clever wording Maui. You sound angry.... You're right. I know nothing but you have the inside scoop. Jared just lied to investors because everything he did was to better the company and not himself. He HAD to keep all contracts and "developments" in total secrecy only to protect the massive growth of EESO. He did this to protect us from the competition and all those evil people trying to screw him/us over. Yes the Belmonts, the SEC, angry fired employees who were out to get him, etc. Jared is an innocent, honest, god-loving man to just cant get a break. Jared, his secretary, Mark Murphy, and some cheesy IR guy were about to bring in over a $100 million in revenue this year and expand to all continents and become a multi billion dollar company. But youre right, I don't know anything at all. I'll just keep believing his PR's (with no proof) because he wants to make me lots of money.


Posted by: maui dave Date: Thursday, October 15, 2009 2:27:37 PM
In reply to: Fieveltke who wrote msg# 178804 Post # of 178820

you don't know anything yet,but you ASSume everything.

Maui, at what point was this company ever moving forward though? Was it when Jared was putting out fake PRs and projecting millions in revenue? Was it when he was dropping random company names to pump the stock? Maybe you consider selling a couple of bottles to a local McDonalds restaurant as moving the company forward, but I don't know. What I do know is that Jared scammed investors and mislead them in order to profit himself and a few others.

Posted by: maui dave Date: Thursday, October 15, 2009 6:57:26 AM
In reply to: maui dave who wrote msg# 178800 Post # of 178803

Or a merger,or whatever. How can you sue a guy for moving a company forward? We just may see things hit the fan soon, IMO

Yeah actually I do know. DD for this company shows it was a bunch of BS PRs. Who cares if its $20-30 million for the year or $139 million? Neither of the 2 "estimates" (and I use that term VERY lightly) are legitimate. My point is that just because this company said something doesn't make it true.

Posted by: desertwolf01 Date: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 2:28:08 AM
In reply to: Fieveltke who wrote msg# 178701 Post # of 178781

That 20 to 30 million was for the year , not the 3rd quarter only, get your dd correct !

Why would you guys believe anything that comes from Jared or the company at this point? Why would you think that the $20-30 million number is any more realistic than the $139 million originally given? Where would this money come from, huh? WOW isnt throwing loads of money EESOs way and the south korea thing was a bunch of unverified BS. Where does Jared come up with 20-30 million dollars in revenue?

Posted by: maui dave Date: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 5:03:37 PM
In reply to: lazyfaire who wrote msg# 178651 Post # of 178698

that 20-30 mil. estimate may have been for 3rd. qtr. only!!!

Why wouldn't they is a better question. This isn't a matter of top secret government information. lol. How about for verification? How about for disclosure and transparency? Any legitimate company will tell you who does their audits. Any real company on track to make $136 million(and in Jareds words that was a low estimate)will have an accounting department or at least an accountant. I wasn't asking for anything abnormal...... and thats why most companies will answer these questions. Since EESO wasn't legitimate but shady they couldnt answer any of this.
You can't just say we will have audited financials by end of Q3 and not have anything planned. This was just another ploy to get more money out of shareholders and to keep pushing all request for proof further into the future.

Posted by: buger Date: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 1:34:56 PM
In reply to: Fieveltke who wrote msg# 178645 Post # of 178662

Why would any company answer those questions. You people have to get a grip.

I agree. The audited financials was just a decoy to keep investors thinking this company was legit. I contacted EESO many times to ask about the details of this "planned" audit to be completed by Q3 but kind of got the run around and short answers. They werent even sure who they were going to use for this audit and my questions about EESO's accounting department (or lack of) were totally ignored. A few posters on this board were angry with me doing this and told me to shut it.....Anyways, just more proof that Jared and affiliates spread lies and knowingly mislead investors.

Posted by: aanubis Date: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 11:33:07 AM
In reply to: razorpockets who wrote msg# 178619 Post # of 178639

Audited financials were never planned. Jared knew that if he did, everyone would see EESO was no where even close to making the 100's of millions he PR'd. Just another teaser to keep longs holding on, and to keep getting new investors like your family and friends. Meantime he could dilute the $hit out of the stock. Just another pinky scam through and through imo.

I see what you were directing me to. I'm not looking for $ amounts for 2007 and 2008 though. Im trying to get more current information on how many new cutomers signed on in those years, how many in Q1/Q2 of 2009, etc. Are those numbers increasing or decreasing? Those things are important for future and current revenue of CBAI. Thanks again for looking and replying.

Posted by: locksflooring Date: Monday, October 12, 2009 11:37:42 AM
In reply to: Fieveltke who wrote msg# 9337 Post # of 9347

On page 16 it states Customer Contracts

Thanks Locks but these are the Balance Sheet/Income Statement numbers. I was unable to find the client/customer numbers anywhere though and thats what I am searching for. I appreciate the effort again.

Posted by: locksflooring Date: Sunday, October 11, 2009 7:46:09 PM
In reply to: Fieveltke who wrote msg# 9272 Post # of 9335

Well this should be it page 16 Skymark Research on CBAI---http://www.skymarkresearch.com/cbai.pdf

Thanks. I'm just throwing it out there because I havent been able to find that info myself.

Posted by: locksflooring Date: Saturday, October 10, 2009 12:50:39 PM
In reply to: Fieveltke who wrote msg# 9267 Post # of 9271

I think Im getting closer to finding it for you

Thanks for the links Locksflooring. Definitely useful info for this board. However I was searching more about CBAI's numbers in particular. Can't find anything on them other than income statements/balance sheet.

Posted by: locksflooring Date: Friday, October 09, 2009 7:21:53 PM
In reply to: Fieveltke who wrote msg# 9245 Post # of 9265

Bingo --click on price table--http://parentsguidecordblood.org/content/usa/banklists/questionnaire.shtml

Thanks. I was just asking because I couldn't find anything on this on the web. I understand what you are saying about storage income and that could be important to a business, but in order to support this model you need to continue and bring in new customers. And in order to acquire any companies CBAI would need to have a greater cash flow as compared to now. You cant go around swooping up companies if youre doing so purely on the backs of shareholders. Im concerned that CBAI doesnt have ample cash to do this right now and thus why I'm looking into specific numbers. It would help with analysis. Thanks for looking though.

Posted by: Dew Date: Friday, October 09, 2009 6:09:26 PM
In reply to: Fieveltke who wrote msg# 9242 Post # of 9243

I'll have to look back and see what I can find on this. But I think going forward storing stem cells for themselves and other companies becomes the main revenue stream along with acquisitions of other companies. And I think you will see something sooner rather than later on this front. GLTA Longs

Thanks for trying to provide the information I was looking for Up-down. However i was searching for something else and have already read the info you posted. I am looking more for figures/number of individual clients that CBAI now services, and at what rate are new ones are being acquired.

Posted by: up-down Date: Friday, October 09, 2009 5:25:13 PM
In reply to: Fieveltke who wrote msg# 9234 Post # of 9238

Cord Blood America was formed in 1999, but did not go into operation until five years later. Through three acquisitions, Cord Blood America built a customer base concentrated in the Northeast, particularly the Philadelphia area, with cord blood processed and stored under contract with a facility in New Jersey.

Although Schissler described the deals as "successful," the company has posted consistent losses that he projected will continue through at least the end of this year. The $3.6 million loss recorded in the first six months of this year, a slight improvement from $3.7 million recorded in the same period in 2008, raised the cumulated loss during the company's existence to $28.6 million.

Revenue during the first half of the year dropped 27 percent to $1.8 million.

Despite the trend and losses expected to continue at least into next year, Schissler said that building a new laboratory in Las Vegas would turn out to be cheaper than continuing the contract with the New Jersey facility, even when factoring in added transportation costs.

Schissler said that he has concentrated in recent months on slashing the company's heavy debt burden, with the first-half reduction pegged at $5 million.

"I feel good about our capital structure at this point," he said.

But it has been achieved by a gusher of stock issued to redeem the debt, with the number of shares outstanding rising more than tenfold to 2.4 billion over the past year.

In addition, the company recently filed a Securities and Exchange Commission statement to register another 705 million shares as payment for a $7.5 million cash infusion pledged in stages by Los Angeles-based Optimus Capital Partners. The first installment helped get the Las Vegas laboratory under way.

The rest of the money will come only when the company meets certain financial conditions. Last year, the company announced a $4 million investment from Tangiers Investors, but has received only $325,000 through the end of the second quarter.

If more money arrives, Schissler said that the Las Vegas laboratory would be expanded in stages.

http://www.lvbusinesspress.com/articles/2009/09/02/news/iq_30815408.txt

How about I already read them and theres no mention of the actual customer figures or increase/decrease, just financial changes in revenue and etc. Thus why I asked. You sound like you already know so can you be so kind as to share?

Posted by: Dew Date: Friday, October 09, 2009 2:11:14 PM
In reply to: Fieveltke who wrote msg# 9194 Post # of 9233

How about reading the last 10Q or the annual report in the last 10K? That tells you all you're asking and more.

Anybody know how many new clients CBAI aquired this past year? .......... New facility in Vegas is good but not if the company is operating just on the shares being sold into the open market daily. We need more information from the company on actual revenue and sales of their services and not just of a new building being open (that is not in operation as of right now). I think people should be realistic and not throw out wild multi billion dollar projections at this time. All in my opinion.

To be fair, people on these boards discuss positives, negatives, and everything in between. Someone might be all-in on this stock while others might be fully bearish. Also, the idea that people "bash" to get in at a lower price is unsustainable. Somebody being concerned about dilution on one board is not going to have any effect on the PPS. And if someone supposedly could lower that price and "get in at a lower price" then wouldn't there be the risk that the stock would continue to drop thus losing that person even more money? .... People are on hear to make their point be heard. If you check most people that have concerned posts it's usually for a good reason and not because they want to buy at a lower price. Just my 2 cents.

Posted by: The_Scraps_Rock Date: Thursday, October 08, 2009 2:57:46 AM
In reply to: samalone who wrote msg# 8822 Post # of 8925

It's not THAT you discuss it. It's the fervor with which you discuss it. You have focused on nothing but the negatives in the past 3 or 4 trading days. It seems as though you're trying to bash the stock to get in at a lower price point with your newly found 10,000 dollars. This is all just in my opinion of course, but if it sounds like a ducks and acts like a duck...

I don't think SNTSTVN was saying the pictures were photoshoped and fake. I think he/she was just saying that there are companies out there who dilute and dont have sufficient revenue to operate properly. There are many such companies that had products, properties, employees but turned out to be more or less scams. Look at EESO for example... products, property, employees,..even local FOX TV interview. Now SEC is on them and it turns out the company was a scam.
I have money in CBAI and I think it's legit. Dilution is ok to a point and if it's for the right reasons and responsibly. But I also second SNTSTVN in stating that revenue and income from operations is extremely important for a company in any business. Yes, the stem cell field is exciting and growing, but we also have to be realistic and fair when eveluating growth opportunities.

Posted by: The_Scraps_Rock Date: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 2:56:38 PM
In reply to: sntstvn who wrote msg# 8570 Post # of 8618

The logos on the door and on the floor in the lobby are too well done to be photoshopped. I'm not an "expert" photoshopper, but I have a good idea what to look for. Plus, Alibi went out there himself and took those pictures. The pictures weren't "taken by the company". They were taken by a member of this message board.

Also, there was an interview on a Fox affiliate out of Las Vegas with Matt about the building construction.

This isn't a pinkie. This is an OTCBB company that is fully reporting.

Well if you look at the history of Jareds PRs you will see that they are fabrications and lies with no verifiable information. Also lots of big words/phrase like:" optimistic", " excited", " In the process"," to be released", and his favorate "promising". I know what ure saying and am just joking. But Jared has lied before and he'll do it agan.

Its just another example of Jared's "Everything is going great and don't worry" statements. He never admits any wrongdoing. Even know. He has blamed old employees out to get him, other companies, bashers, etc. I think it's safe to say this company doesnt have anywhere to go but down. Thats my opinion of course. There might be a product but i dont believe its truly Jareds or EESO's but just another company's. I also dont think there are more than 2 or 3 employees here.

Posted by: alaskanwarrior Date: Monday, October 05, 2009 4:25:52 PM
In reply to: Fieveltke who wrote msg# 177980 Post # of 177990

Jared's got to face this head on. IN the last PR, "Jared and EESO are working with the SEC"....what does that mean? So..this is a "misunderstanding?" I dont think so!

Youre missing the point ace. Its not about what i lost cause frankkly i sold before this dropped so it was only a few hundred dollars. Im pissed at the fact that drift bashed everyone who was making legitimate points and had real questions. He was quick to call them names and label them bashers who were there to lower the price just so that they could buy more. That they excuse people like to use in the pinks. And its all bogus. These pinks are in triple and double zeroes... peole dont bash just to get a couple of percentage points down people. It doesnt happen. Theres plenty of cheap shares already available always. Thats a myth and those who dont want to see the scam/drown in their dreams of becoming millionares over some religious CEOs lies and fabrications. Im not blaming him for my losses. Im blaming hinm for being a jacka** to people on this board and lying. He always said he did his dd and that "He KNEW the buyoit was real" and that he spoke to people on the in and this and that. Pretty much he didnt know and he lied about it. He got proved wrong and is still blaming me for something. The guys a joke and all he did was pump this for like 5 months.
Sorry you left 500 k on the table.. Hopefully it wasnt a realized loss.



Posted by: AceSpades Date: Monday, October 05, 2009 3:11:09 PM
In reply to: Fieveltke who wrote msg# 177917 Post # of 177958

Everyone trades on their own DD.

Drift told the truth as he saw it...he was one of the few that attended the OH (I was there as well). We all got scammed....

The bashers being right does not mean the evidence existed at that time....in Feb and Mar the bashers were working for their own interests, not ours.

I left over $500K (yes, half a mill) on the tables and learned some lessons I will never forget.

Dont get pissed off and blame others....your trades are your fault.

Right, so youre telling all the people that invested in EESO that its their fault that they believed Jared and all those that listened to your praises of him? I didnt get greedy by the way. I wasnt the one who was telling everyone to buy as the stock continued to drop (you called them "pullbacks" and "great opportunities to load up"). Before you were practically all up on Jared and defended his every word as if it were from God himself. Now all of a sudden youre singing a different tune. Honestly you were one of the bigest pumpers of this stock. Everything I said about EESO that I found out happened to be true. And everythng you swore to know to be true hapend to be all lies. Keep turning it on me as if im at fault for anything here. In my opinion, youre as bad as Jared. All that DD that u screamed at other people to do and u supposedly did turned out to be worth nothing. Just like according to you everyone here who had legitimate I give Onemillion credit because as the moderator he always remained neutral and fair, and never let his excitement tarnish others opinions. You on the other hand were notorious for it.

Posted by: drifterfcrc Date: Monday, October 05, 2009 12:36:36 PM
In reply to: Fieveltke who wrote msg# 177917 Post # of 177947

Blah blah blah. If you traded this stock correctly and didn't get too greedy you should have made money. Your fault.

Not really twisting anything although you'd like to keep saying that. I don't have Premium so cant pull up your old posts ... but for those that can, check your posts on Feb,March and April and youll see that you were saying that the bashers were here to bring down the pps. im just angry with you because you pumped EESO and disregarded other peoples inquiries about the real facts and proof. .. Bellow is your post from JUNE by which point most couldnt argue that this was a scam and people got taken. Post something of yours from say March instead though... especially what you wrote in response to me.Good luck. EESO is scam.

Posted by: drifterfcrc Date: Monday, October 05, 2009 11:26:14 AM
In reply to: Fieveltke who wrote msg# 177860 Post # of 177916

You can twist posts all you want. Where is the post I posted saying that bashers bringing down the PPS. Nonsense!! Here is just ONE of my posts from back in June. You are way OFF BASE about what I SAID and didn't SAY!!!

Posted by: drifterfcrc Date: Monday, June 29, 2009 7:50:55 PM
In reply to: oneinamillion who wrote msg# 159171 Post # of 177914 [Send a link via email]
Problem now is that he SAYS alot of things. Need follow-through on past PRs for sure. He SAID he would not be raising the AS count and then BAM raised it by 150%. I don't trust the man any longer but to each their own.

Whatever drift. Youre the one who beat the dead horse when you were saying that the only reason stock was dropping was because "bashers" wanted a lower price(on an already dirt cheap btw) stock. YOu're the one who said that i was a "rookie punk" and you would "eat me alive". Tough fighting words from someone who was worshiping Jared the con-artist. Just do everyone a favor and stop trying to sound like you were doing the right thing all along and not attacking those on here who were right. You might have made money on this, or not. Frankly it doesnt matter to me. WHat matters is that you continue to discredit those who were correct from early on.

Posted by: drifterfcrc Date: Sunday, October 04, 2009 10:51:30 PM
In reply to: Fieveltke who wrote msg# 177852 Post # of 177859

Just beating a dead horse now....eom

Yeah read his posts...you'll see that he actually said nothing about EESO was a scam and that he KNEW the buyout was real.... not just the products like hes saying now.

Posted by: drifterfcrc Date: Sunday, October 04, 2009 10:50:18 PM
In reply to: EDDIEHAZEL who wrote msg# 177853 Post # of 177857

You had NO FACTS. Just your opinion. Since most pinkies are scams then odds were with you. I SAID the company HAD PRODUCTS that were NOT SCAMS!!!! Read the posts next time.

Products probably work as far as people say. The scam revolves around diluting(even after Jared said no more shares would be issued), fake/insane/ made-up revenue projections, Big Corporation name droppings w/ no conection to EESO, fake overseas contracts, CEO lying on record continuosly, etc. ALso from the recent reports it seems that formulas arent so unique or Jareds. Theyre just someone elses that he passed off as his own. So no, NOT A LEGITIMATE COMPANY.

Posted by: drifterfcrc Date: Sunday, October 04, 2009 8:38:58 PM
In reply to: Fieveltke who wrote msg# 177828 Post # of 177851

It was a legitimate company. A pinky company with actual products. I have several of them in my home. NOT A SCAM but a typical pinky traded company. The SCAM enzyme cleaners are GREAT.

Yet most of your posts said that EESO wasn't a scam and was a legitimate company. "That .01 percent of pinks that isn't a scam". I cant believe that you still continue to attack all those that proved you wrong. THATS too funny.

Posted by: drifterfcrc Date: Sunday, October 04, 2009 7:05:24 PM
In reply to: kkgd who wrote msg# 177823 Post # of 177824

Most pinkies ARE SCAMS or didn't you know that? Too funny.

You flipped too late in the game and only because it became too evident that this was scam and Jared was diluting non-stop. For the longest time you were a die-hard supporter of this and took it upon yourself to discredit anyone with legitimate questions about ESSO as Bashers. And all your posts about your "facts" and how you were in the know turned out to be bogus. Obviously you din't KNOW and you had no FACTS. EESO was a big lie and Jared will probably go to jail for this.

Posted by: drifterfcrc Date: Sunday, October 04, 2009 5:49:09 PM
In reply to: Fieveltke who wrote msg# 177787 Post # of 177794

So what??? ALOT of posters believed in the products, Jared and the Company. I got MANY PM's and emails wondering why I flipped the script about Jared and the company. I also posted that I thought abcdefg (Douglas) was a phoney. Got attacked by many for going against this supposed honest individual. LMFAO.

Actually they have sold 2 million GC2000's to undisclosed countries in Africa. These countries are known worldwide and it would definitely raise the share price and people would be ASTONISHED if they heard the names. But of course, due to ongoing contract negotiations and new purchase agreements in the works the names of these countries cannot be disclosed. Also EESO is on point to make 3 billion dollars this year ( and that's a low estimate)... but Jared can't afford an in-house accounting department or any staff right now. Everything is great and the company is growing and expanding better that ever before. Just keep buying shares, lol.


Posted by: lazyfaire Date: Sunday, October 04, 2009 5:40:51 PM
In reply to: lang who wrote msg# 177786 Post # of 177789

Lang, the GC2000 has huge potential!! It's been a while since we last heard about it... perhaps it is no longer in the prototype stage. Just because it looked like a microwave at the time doesn't mean it didn't land EESO some huge multi-million dollar contracts. We just haven't heard about them yet because of this whole "SEC investigation" misunderstanding.

Honestly you should be one of the last people to talk. For the longest time you pumped this stock and defended Jared and his lies. You kept saying how much you KNEW (always in bold letters lol)and how you had contacts everywhere. You defended the supposed Korean contracts, you defended the fake buyout, you defended the promised audit, you defended the DOW connection. You called people who were looking for real proof(including myself)bashers and continuously told people to do their own DD while never providing your facts. You always said that you knew a lot more than other people and that these were FACTS.
I guess the bottom line is that you DIDN'T know anything about EESO and your high praise of Jared was not warranted. The guy is a crook and a liar who took a lot of peoples hard earned money. You put down posters who were just trying to ask questions and get to the truth of what was going on. Now that we finally found out that this was a scam it's too late for too many.


Posted by: drifterfcrc Date: Sunday, October 04, 2009 2:56:29 PM
In reply to: MIGUELITO who wrote msg# 177767 Post # of 177784

Before YOU OPEN YOUR MOUTH you mean. I have been in this stock for a LONG TIME. I know alot more about how it trades then you do. That is a FACT.

Just a few notes.....
SIRI's revenue has been way off what was originally projected.the company's in debt.
CIT might file for bankrupcy.(check todays news)
AIG is soooo underwater right now and the only reason it was kept afloat by the govt is because so many businesses are already co-dependant on it...otherwise it would have been gone months ago. Same with the other companies... None of them are thriving like you say. Most are hanging on with the help of the government bailout.
ESSO "minimal tsunami" is a BIG f'n problem. They have no confirmed revenue or contracts. Supposed "secret" formulas worth millions? please. Jared (the liar), his assistant, a bogus PR guy in it to branch off and start his own pinkie scam, and some more scammers behind the scenes. Oh yeah and the little thing with the SEC. No offense but this company has nothing to offer anyone other than more promises of nothing that ever comes true.

Posted by: MIGUELITO Date: Friday, October 02, 2009 8:38:15 PM
In reply to: A deleted message Post # of 177656

dont messo with my eeso .
siri- they said it was finished
cit- said the same
aig - dead citibank finished, ford to the grave, lvs -gaming is over .
guess what ,they re all there thriving and 6 months ago had bigger trouble compared to eeso's problem
eeso will not go out of business they will survive this minimal tsunami

Guys, most buildings nowadays have backup generators and I don't think you should worry about the issue so much. There have been about 10 posts about the subject today, but in my opinion this shouldn't be a problem. Like I've mentioned before, my concern lies with CBAI's main business: collecting and storing client cord tissue samples. How many new clients are being added monthly, quearterly, etc?

Posted by: momley Date: Friday, October 02, 2009 5:34:07 PM
In reply to: morley480 who wrote msg# 8117 Post # of 8121

Yea, the power supply would be a necessity. Not only for hospitals and medical agencies, but there are other areas of need. But it's an excellent question. Do we know the answer yet?

Anyone know the number of client tissues that CBAI currently stores on their behalf? Thanks in advance.

Although no debt sounds like a great thing, most business people will tell you that you want a little debt when running a company. The thinking behind that theory is that the business and it's management will work just harder when knowing that there is money owed elsewhere. It's like psychological motivator. I'm talking about some debt .... NOT large debt ratios.
The initial steps taken by CBAI to reduce debt are a good sign though. I'd like to see more growth and numbers of individual collection of blood cord tissues from new clients.

Posted by: seanman Date: Friday, October 02, 2009 11:45:01 AM
In reply to: Dew who wrote msg# 8067 Post # of 8069

No debt (after me flip-flopping)
is a good thing,just interest alone,
makes it hard to run a business.

So I am glad I now am off to work,
with no computer access.

Go..CBAI..!!!

Yeah and ESSO will also make $139 million this year.... NOT! Are you serious in saying all that in your post? ESSO consists of Jared and printing of shares. The buyout, contracts in far away countries, buybacks, dividends, and future audited statements are all false dreams. This company hasnt produced an oounce of legitimate proof to back any of their claims. Jared is a POS and a liar.

Posted by: lazyfaire Date: Thursday, October 01, 2009 6:03:37 PM
In reply to: Phil(Hot Rod Chevy) who wrote msg# 177416 Post # of 177418

iHub.

But EESO is NO scam.

I truly expect that EESO is preparing audited financial statements, we will see large new U.S. and international contracts, perhaps a reduced outstanding share count, a dividend, and definitely a buyout and uplisting.

Who needs luck when all of that is forthcoming? lol :)

Are you for real?????? ...........
Of course they're going to say that. Just like they said that there was a buy-out and if we knew the name of the company we would be "ASTOUNDED!". And just like they said they were estimating $139 million in revenue this year (conservative estimate too, lol). And just like they were going to have an audit done in Q3 (It's already the end of Q3 btw). Then you have supposed activities in South America and Korea and etc.
And what earnings are you speaking of? This company has no audited or updated income statements. There is probably no revenue anymore and everyone and their mom seems to be suing the company and Jared...... And how exactly do you come to this conclusion: " This means stock is worth 100 times, after earnings come out,IMO." ?

Posted by: maui dave Date: Monday, September 28, 2009 3:42:44 PM
In reply to: ErJ who wrote msg# 176300 Post # of 176339

EESO Great response.VIABLE,working company. This means stock is worth 100 times, after earnings come out,IMO.

Why do you proceed to hype a company that is in the process of having legal action taken against it for fraudulent activities and practice? The reason EESO is down 90% the last few months is not because of any "bashers". It's because Jared lied and made up stories to pump up the share price from the beginning. People here are complaining not to bring down the price so that they could get shares cheaper BUT because they're angry they've been scammed. Stop pumping and urging people to buy just so you can unload your shares onto them. This company is going in the gutter and has red flags all over it, yet you're still trying to hype it. Jared is a POS and a lot of people lost thousands because of his greed and lies. You must be related to him.

Posted by: msmc Date: Monday, September 28, 2009 1:30:34 PM
In reply to: None Post # of 176240

Great work team.. keep telling other boards..
we are moving up.. now, don't you now, know these fools are just trying to scare you out of your profits.. don't let them.. something big is up.. if not this would have died this AM.. the more you sold the more they kept buying... keep working...