Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I think your forgetting something. ACRA is friendly with IFUS. I’ve seen no objection from ACRA about this.
Unbelievable. MW owes SA nothing. Not sure why you refuse to acknowledge truth and facts. SA has no legal standing and by virtue of SA selling both cases that were amalgamated into one, ACRA now owns the judgements. Soooo, SA has been paid. I’ll be checking the federal case wire every day. A blind man can see what’s coming. Not good for SA
I’ve looked at every post. Your assumption is 100% wrong
Not true at all and really goes to show how much he’s known
Oh? Please explain. Imo it’s the anchors like SA that play victim and are sue happy idiots trying to wreck a legitimate business. SA track record with almost 50 cases he’s been sued, his character is seriously flawed.
The drama has about another week. I think we’ll see criminal charges on SA. But that’s my opinion
I agree with you. Very well explained
I see it in reverse, but I guess we’ll see next week
The answers are posted.
That’ll be crushed
There’s an old saying. SA went in loaded for bear and came out gutted. That’s exactly what’s happening
Blah blah blah, then we see next week.
Your dreaming. Even my law professors say SA is roasted before he walks in. The facts presented themselves. 1. No legal standing. 2. Doesn’t own either judgement.
It’s really that simple
Either way, your assessment is wrong. Do you have ANY idea the level of DD done with IFUS? Nothing you can say will change that. Why? Posts like this.
Was just looking at this to answer his question. The chain really is obvious.
That’s short lived. I see serious consequences for SA. He’s in a no win situation
Show me me one hint IFUS will dissolve
And just how is that? You can’t dilute with less than 2 billion shares. In pinkyland, some have 20 billion. That’s dilution
Really? 2013? What year is it?
Well that’s generic. Tell us what that is. The two cases are still joined and ACRA owns them.
Actually it’s over for SA. No way around it. He has zero legal position and would be a stupid move to go into court. In addition, for some unknown reason it is reopened, ACRA would certainly join in and 2. MW could readdress the fraud
Better look again, it appears ACRA dropped the case. And if SA is suing MW in federal court to reopen the federal case…it’s fraud bcs he no longer has legal positions in either state of federal court
Tell us what fits he owe SA? Looking at the facts, he owes SA NOTHING! Fact#1 cases were joined so there’s no separate case. Fact#2 SA sold the judgement et all to ACRA and has legal position on the matter.
So tell us what does MW owe SA?
Prove it. Show us proof
Ok, pr’d. Semantics.
Another thought. It’s all mute who won last week, month, year…. Next case is up.
He owes nothing. The judgement was bought. So tell us how he owes anything
No, but I have my suspicions why he was added. It’s all positive
I’m looking into it
I know they will hear new evidence. I know they will follow the law. I know that when SA committed fraud in a federal court, he’s going to be confronted if not arrested for it.
4th request for facts
For the 3rd time tell us why?
SA is finished with IFUS. Let’s examine the facts:
1. Simple reading shows the cases were amalgamated into one case and settled via mediation.
2. SA sold the judgement (which includes the federal case) to ACRA. So he has no more legal standing and no rights to reopen the case.
3. Reading the ACRA case against ES, it apparent SA crossed the line and Schaefer slapped him for it. The obvious affect is a message to SA that if he goes after any part of either suit, which he -doesn’t own and -has no legal standing in, it will be met with legal action
Ancient history. If the case goes to court on the date published, SA previous “wins” will be corrected and the Bailiff will be told to do his duty. SA really dug his own pit in this one. And iHub babble won’t save him.
Again, straighten us all out. What I read is not fantasy. With what SA is trying to do, he may have spun his own web. “Step into my parlor the spider says to the fly.”
Again, straighten us out with facts.
SA had better care. Schaefer’s already given him a taste of “what if,” if he tries to approach MW, RW and IFUS in any legal manner.
Looking at the documents posted, it’s quite apparent how he will react to protect his investment.
It appears Schaefer can and will take this to another level if necessary. I think in this context, SA will get an education
Hmmm let’s test that:
1. MW sunk everything he had into IFUS. What’s else can be mistaken for his willingness, loyalty and passion to stand by the shareholders. Speaking for myself, I’ve seen it and appreciate it.
2. I’m in touch with shareholders daily and none are upset as you say. Name one who’s (upset) from a lack of MW not standing by them.
Explain it? Tell us why…can’t wait to read this. I posted verifiable facts. I’ve shown mine, show yours. And rhetoric
I doubt IFUS would post it if it wasn’t true. Any idiot would know it would be confronted immediately if it wasn’t true.
What court? Name it! Show me one document where the “court” thinks otherwise. The documents posted in here tell a completely different story. Tbh, if SA arrogantly moves forward, and doesn’t cancel it before, I’d be shocked. It would really go to show how stupid and arrogant he really is.
Fact is, if Schaefer sends a letter of satisfaction to the court, bri g the true owner of the judgement, case is closed and SA is arrested for fraud
Good work