Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
The kind where I want to takea 50% loss on this...
See you guys on Monday. Have a nice weekend.
Kinda late. But still good job. You get a cookie too.
Herb1 beat you to it.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boARDS/read_msg.aspx?message_id=35392141
I think so. It's not that big of a deal though. The website is great. I've been looking through it and it might become my go-to site.
Very nice. Kind of ugly, but all the pertinent stuff is there.
You get a cookie.
Good call. Thanks for the research.
I'm not sure. They both have H.R. in front of it which I'm going to guess means "House of Representatives".
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-872
Ok. Bill 877 is a resubmission of bill 2807 which didn't go anywhere in 2007.
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-877
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h110-2807
This is the text from Bill 2807.
6/21/2007--Introduced.
Patients First Act of 2007 - Amends the Public Health Service Act to require the Secretary of Health and Human Services to conduct and support basic and applied research to develop techniques for the isolation, derivation, production, testing, and human clinical use of stem cells that may result in improved understanding of, or treatments for, diseases and other adverse health conditions, including pluripotent stem cells that have the flexibility of embryonic stem cells (whether or not such pluripotent stem cells have an embryonic source), provided that such techniques will not involve: (1) the creation of a human embryo for research purposes; (2) the destruction or discarding of, or risk of injury to, a living human embryo; or (3) the use of any stem cell the derivation or provision of which would be inconsistent with this Act.
Requires the Secretary to issue guidelines implementing this Act to ensure that any research (including any clinical trial) supported under this Act: (1) is clearly consistent with the standards established in this Act, if conducted using human cells; (2) is prioritized in terms of potential for near-term clinical benefit in human patients; and (3) may take into account techniques outlined by the President's Council on Bioethics and any other appropriate techniques and research.
Requires the Secretary to: (1) report on peer reviewed stem cell research proposals that were not funded; and (2) study and submit recommendations to Congress on any structural changes to the C.W. Bill Young Cell Transplantation Program that would help to expand access to new and future stem cell therapeutic products.
I'm going to guess that H.R. 872 is to allow the public to conduct research and to clarify the NIH's involvement in further research. And H.R. 877 is to allow a broader scope of research by the government?
It looks new. It was introducted on Feb 4th.
I'm not really sure what the difference is between that one and this one.
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-872
They're both going to the House Energy and Commerce Committee though.
The more bills the merrier though. IMO
Another day come and gone.
P.S.
I'm not trying to be negative or anything. I'm just doing some DD and this is the kind of stuff I dig up.
If you look at the previous bill in 2007, it took a full 6 months before it was passed by the House and then shot down by George W.
I'm hoping that we won't have to wait until the bill goes into effect. Obama needs to hurry up and sign the executive order.
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s110-5
I'm not sure if this is has changed, but from what I understand, it looks like President Obama is going to let Congress change it instead of using an executive order.
The article is dated 1/22/2009 though...
http://www.stemcellresearchnews.com/absolutenm/anmviewer.asp?a=1554&z=9
They have them as negative .03
From Scottrade.
It is -.03
It's misleading on the site though. They have it like this. The dashes are negative signs.
Per Share Data
EPS excluding extraordinary items (TTM) -
0.03
EPS Normalized (MRFY) -
0.04
Rev per share (TTM) 0.01
BV per share (MRQ) -
0.03
Tangible BV per share (MRQ) -
0.05
Cash per share (MRQ) 0.00
Cash flow per share (TTM) -
0.03
Indicated Annual Dividend (US) 0.00
http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/02/02/gop.stimulus.worries/index.html
STEM CELL RESEARCH ISN'T ON THE LIST! Sunny days ahead.
For those that think that the FOX news segment that was posted is new, it's NOT.
http://www.cordblood.com/cord-blood-banking-news.asp
The story was featured broadcasted on JULY 28th, 2008. The baseball scores on the bottom right were a big indicator.
Not bashing anyone. Just pointing out a fact.
You're not a dummy. I'm wondering the same thing too.
Or does that make us both dummies?
http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1874717,00.html
It's not about "Time to Cover". It's the Cover of "Time Magazine". Next week, their main story is on the benefits and research of stem cells which will probably spark some public interest in the area.