Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
For what? Anything in particular I should be looking for?
Which court?
I’m always glad to help, just let me know what you are seeking...
That’s not true. The DTC keeps records of all cancelled securities and their final ownership before cancellation. ...I’ve posted the document from the DTCC describing the process here before.
N I C E ! ! !
Thanks AZ, looks like we are ready...
...did you notice that the other Motion in the District Court we were discussing this morning...is...gone?!?!
Well, I wasn’t quite sure. But thanks to you now I am...thank you sir.
Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity—Seneca
Oh, I see, thank you. I was wondering about that...
Smh...what a piece of work!
No.
She should have filed an Affidavit for her Motion to the District court trying to block Walrath from closing the cases before her appeal is decided.
I haven’t seen it...
AZ, did the sloppy “lawyer” ever file her Affidavit of Service?
I don’t think so Bob. Your Pro-Se “lawyer” never filed her Affidavit of Service for ze Motion. Clock doesn’t start until she does so...
...sloppy sloppy sloppy.
Someone please correct me if I missed it and she has indeed filed the required affidavit...but I haven’t seen it or anyone saying she did.
I think it was both, 1 and 2. Thank you clawmann.
...now there ya have a point!
Too bad we been catching the “rain” from all these skunks for 11 years.
I agree with you in principle bob, but she blew it in execution and I just want this thing to END.
That crap don’t fly in COURT.
...enough to know if one files a Motion in a court of law one must also send a copy to everyone on the service list and file an “AFFIDAVIT of SERVICE” with the court which states under penalty of perjury that everyone has been given a copy of the Motion.
...she’s a rank amateur, self proven.
Have you listened to the audio of her in court?
LMAO, what a joke.
Good intentions get you nowhere in the real world...only performance matters.
No, I wish she would...for her sake alone!
...and then after ze takes your cash, ze goes around the corner gets in ze Mercedes and goes home to ze HOUSE.
I agree, and I sure hope he does just that Ron.
Did she tell you that, Bob?
If so, I wouldn’t put to much faith on that statement.
You are welcome AZ.
She’s a rank amateur, and it shows. Clear as day.
This type of interference from the bleachers just gives the professionals on the field more ammunition to take pot shots at all of us (message board “crazies”).
...it’s really beginning to pizmeoff!
Yes, thanks for the clarification on the affidavit of service, or lack thereof...
...very very sloppy, indeed.
Curious why they chose to point this out to her...
“Dear Judge Andrews,
We And Proskauer Rose LLP are counsel to WMI Liquidating Trust (“Trust”) in the above-reference chapter 11 cases and appeal. On October 31, 2019, Alice Griffin, appellant and movant, filed her Motion for withdrawal (Limited) of Reference [BK D.I. 12677] (“Motion”), and her letter to the Court dated October 31, 2019, which I have enclosed for your convenience. We write simply to inform the Court that the Trust will file a written response to the Motion within 14 days after filing and service thereof in accordance with Local Rule 7.1.2(b) of the Local Rules of Civil Practice and Procedure of this Court.
Respectfully Submitted,
Marcos A. Ramos
”
There ya have it...I can’t get it to upload this morning. I’ll try again later...
He’s saying it’s been 90 days since the appeal was briefed.
It says they will file a response to the motion within 14 days of its filing.
i was trying to put it up on my media fire, but I'm having trouble uploading it.
if i can get it up i'll link it...
Good stuff Mordi, thank you.
https://www.mymoneyblog.com/ben-franklin-compound-interest.html
...it’s the little things that matter.
Here’s to longevity! Cheers!
I agree with you here Bob.
However I think the whole thing was pointless from the beginning. Only way I change my mind on that is if she were to prevail large in the appeal court and crack this whole farce wide open...
...but I doubt that happens.
He might have done these things by now if the appeal decision was complete.
Look, I’m not happy with Rosen either...we all know he works for JPM’s interest here. Guess who else has that client on ze resume?
I’m quite sure that the crooks here would love to wait and see what happens next November. <-do not discount this as a possible reason for continued delay.
Oh! There’s the special pleader!
...I knew you’d be along to defend her. Good job Bob.
Griffin, Alice
I sure hope so Ron.
Good luck with that...you are correct, of course, that is EXACTLY what has been needed since the “scrivener’s error” was announced.
Problem is that JPM and the FDIC seized all the books and records and no one ever put up a fight to get them back. ...shameful.
Good summary, too.
The company is all that matters now, the past is the past, anything that magically appears later would just be a bonus...but we all know magic is just a slight of hand, an unfortunate fact. The magic happened long ago and it wasn’t meant to impress “us”.
In order of asking:...
Same old “thing”.
No.
I think so.
I think so.
...anyway, good ta see ya Jer! Where ya been hidin’?
There is always never. ...just sayin’
The DTC has and always will have the final share count and who owns each and every one of them.
This will be the mechanism used if there are indeed any “remote” assets to distribute. IF.
Good! I always hated that plane.
That said, Boeing’s 747 is the best passenger plane even flown.
“Any outstanding LTIs and escrow markers will be canceled.”
Boy is there going to be a sh!tstorm around here when THAT happens!
He never intended to file squat...unless, of course, the ruling from the appeals court had been issued. Was nothing more than wishful thinking on his part. He won’t file until the appeal is complete, and he knows it.
Snarky comments about “crazies” and wishful daydreaming about the appeal having no impact on the case aside, he has no choice but to wait for the ruling.
Didn’t think so, just checking.
I’m not surprised either.
And you were surprised by this?
I don’t like the delay anymore than you do, but if it is so frivolous...
...why is the district court taking so long to render a decision?