Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Hey Snoot, long time no chat! Here is a site that updates and might save some time for some.It also should come in handy for finding someone who agrees with just about everybodys system! HD
http://mcverryreport.com/
But never on an issue of this import or with this much controversy surrounding it.
You don`t need to go back very far in my opinion to find lots of important issues loaded with controversy. Do you remember WMD`s and there gonna get us. Never found those WMD`s but it brought us 2 unfunded wars that we are still paying for today. The first 700 billion handed to banks or our Country would collaspe still rings in my ears as an important issue with surrounding controversy.I myself sent many emails against the bailout and I read that emails were like 300-1 against...but we still gave away the money. But also with those two points I realize that its very easy to control people with fear. This issue was way down on the fear chart and only made it up to the...it will bankrupt the Country. I look to the north at Canada who has healthcare for all there people and so far that Country has not gone tits up but then they don`t have 2 unfunded wars either. My issue is I still think all Americans should come first before we spend billions to set up a Democracy in a far away Country that the majority of those people might not want or care about anyway.Just my 2 cents Newly...take care
hd
Tipping Point ???...seems a bit strong. Maybe just call it what it is now...16 of 23. That was easy
While some have described reconciliation -- a process that requires only a majority vote in the Senate to pass legislation that reduces the deficit -- as an obscure, rarely used procedure, the truth is that it has been used 22 times since 1980, with 16 of those times occurring when Republicans controlled the Senate.
hd
dasein...here is a little bigger AIG Bonus number being talked about...fwiw
AIG, U.S. Focus on Bonuses For 2010
$200 Million Slated For Controversial Derivatives Unit
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/11/AR2009071100548.html
By Brady Dennis
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, July 11, 2009; 1:23 AM
American International Group's recent discussions with President Obama's compensation czar have centered on whether the company should pay about $250 million in promised bonuses that come due during the next nine months.
AIG has asked the government to rule on several categories of bonuses, said a person familiar with the discussions. These include millions of dollars in payments owed to top corporate executives in coming days, and the troubled insurer has been seeking senior Treasury official Kenneth R. Feinberg's consent in an effort to provide the company with political cover.
But of greater concern to both sides is what to do about the vastly larger sum that comes due in March 2010, when AIG is scheduled to pay more than $200 million in bonuses aimed at retaining executives at AIG Financial Products, the unit whose complex derivative contracts nearly wrecked the insurance giant last fall.
A public furor erupted earlier this year when AIG paid about $165 million in retention bonuses to Financial Products employees. The contracts that guaranteed those awards also promised similar payments in March 2010, and AIG has been examining the issue in hopes of preventing another debacle, company officials have said.
AIG officials have sought a determination from Feinberg, whom Obama appointed last month to oversee the compensation of top executives at the seven firms that have received the largest federal bailouts. The bonuses do not officially fall under his purview, however, because they were promised last year. Feinberg is charged with shaping only current and future compensation.
ad_icon
But company officials have put him in the hot seat nevertheless. If Feinberg blesses the coming bonuses, the move could ignite public anger once again. If he advises against the payments and AIG reneges on its pledge to employees, they could abandon the company. Company executives have warned that a wholesale loss of expertise could endanger taxpayers' investment in AIG, made under a rescue package now valued at $180 billion.
No aspect of the financial crisis has infuriated average Americans and lawmakers more than the AIG bonus issues. The company's predicament began nearly a year and a half ago. In early 2008, before the government's rescue of the giant insurer, employees at AIG Financial Products were promised more than $400 million in retention pay, with lump sums coming in March 2009 and March 2010.
Even after the company's multiple bailouts, lawyers for the government and AIG agreed this year that many of those payments, however unsavory to the public, were legally binding. But with the issue angering millions of Americans, Obama vowed to "pursue every single legal avenue to block" the bonuses. Lawmakers backed a bill that would have taxed the payments to Financial Products employees at 90 percent. Then the uproar died down as quickly as it had begun. But behind the scenes, various pay issues remained unresolved at AIG. In the wake of the March controversy, officials at the Treasury and the Federal Reserve agreed with AIG that it was vital to keep employees at Financial Products, lest the firm's remaining deals go bad and bring down the company, according to company and government sources.
AIG Chairman Edward M. Liddy, in testimony to Congress earlier this year, warned that the deals at Financial Products could still "cause irreparable damage."
Federal officials began talks with AIG executives about revising the compensation packages for Financial Products employees. One possibility was a pay-as-you-go plan, rather than the lump sums that the previous contracts had required on a certain date.
Gerry Pasciucco, who arrived last fall to help dismantle AIG Financial Products, said in April that any new compensation plan had to instill confidence in Financial Products employees or they would leave. But he also recognized that the payments had to be restructured or a new firestorm would erupt when bonuses next came due.
While the pending 2010 retention bonuses at Financial Products have overshadowed all other topics in AIG's discussions with Feinberg, company officials have also requested his guidance on a host of other issues, including incentive and retention bonuses owed to the top 40 or so corporate executives.
In November, the company's top seven executives, including Liddy, agreed to forgo their bonuses through this year. Some executives also agreed to postpone retention awards they were owed by the company.
In March, as the controversy over AIG Financial Products was unfolding, the company agreed to restructure its corporate bonus plans. As part of the agreement, the senior executives were scheduled to receive half their 2008 bonuses -- which totaled $9.6 million -- in the spring, with another quarter disbursed on July 15 and the rest on Sept. 15. The last two payments would depend on whether the company made progress in revamping its business and paying back bailout money to taxpayers. The company yesterday did not provide specifics about what constituted progress, or whether executives were given well-defined goals to accomplish before being eligible for additional pay.
AIG spokeswoman Christina Pretto said the company had sought the government's input in an effort to resolve its lingering pay issues the right way and to make sure all parties were comfortable before moving forward.
"We all have the same objective -- to execute the restructuring successfully, to repay taxpayers, to reduce risk and to wind down [Financial Products]," Pretto said.
AIG...Well even with those 70% odds of going to 0 its not like *everybody* will lose out...
Washington Post:
- American International Group is preparing to pay millions of dollars more in bonuses to several dozen top corporate executives after an earlier round of payments four months ago set off a national furor. The troubled insurance giant has been pressing the federal government to bless the payments in hopes of shielding itself from renewed public outrage. The request puts the administration's new compensation czar on the spot by seeking his opinion about bonuses that were promised long before he took his post. AIG doesn't actually need the permission of Kenneth R. Feinberg, who President Obama appointed last month to oversee the compensation of top executives at seven firms that have received large federal bailouts. But officials at AIG, whose federal rescue package stands at $180 billion, have been reluctant to move forward without political cover from the government. The payments coming due next week include $2.4 million in bonuses for about 40 high-ranking executives at AIG, according to administration documents from earlier this year. No development in the government's bailout of financial firms has angered lawmakers and ordinary Americans more than the disclosure in mid-March that the global insurer was paying more than $165 million in retention bonuses. They were aimed at retaining 400 employees at AIG Financial Products, the troubled unit whose complex derivative contracts nearly wrecked the global insurance giant. Separately this week, a Citigroup analyst warned that AIG might be worthless to shareholders if or when it ever pays back the billions it owes the U.S. government. "Our valuation includes a 70 percent chance that the equity at AIG is zero," Joshua Shanker of Citigroup wrote in a note to investors. He cites the continuing risks posed by the company's exotic derivative contracts, called credit-default swaps, and its sale of assets at low prices.
FWIW...American International Group Inc., the insurer bailed out four times by the U.S., will likely have no value left for private shareholders after repaying the government, Citigroup Inc. said. “Our valuation includes a 70 percent chance that the equity at AIG is zero,” said Joshua Shanker, an analyst at Citigroup, in a note to investors today on the New York-based insurer.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=ahWAzIKxYzmo
Yup Newly2b I`m all about just keeping what I have if possible. Inflation/deflation let-er-rip because I`m not sure I have any control over it either way. I just about only play ETF`s now and the inverse one`s come in handy when the time is right. I have some silver stashed and should probably look into gold coins. Down the road money made trading ETF`s might not matter if gets to the point ya need the proverbial wheelbarrow to buy a loaf of bread though. I saw you mention a one in ten chance for the wheels to come off. Me...I think I`m more afraid of ten out of ten chance to be stuck in the muck for along time (Japan).Interesting times and good luck to us all...hd
Hello Newly2b...Here is an article I read today on the deflation/inflation debate. fwiw
http://www.investorsinsight.com/blogs/john_mauldins_outside_the_box/archive/2009/07/06/make-sure-you-get-this-one-right.aspx
China`s Elderly will Overwhelm the Nation...
For three decades China's one-child policy helped power this nation's economic rise. With fewer mouths to feed, families saved. Poverty fell. Living standards improved.
But a social experiment that worked well in some respects is now threatening the country's hard-won gains. China's working-age population -- the engine behind its prolific growth -- will start shrinking within a few years. Meanwhile, the ranks of elderly are projected to soar. By the middle of this century, fully a third of China's population will be age 60 or older, compared with 26% in the United States. China's projected 438 million senior citizens will outnumber the entire U.S. population. With fewer workers to support an aging society in need of care, China faces the same demographic squeeze confronting Western nations. The difference: China's family-tinkering policy has accelerated a shift that the country is ill-prepared to manage and finance. "The problem is the age wave is coming while China is still relatively poor," said Richard Jackson of the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies. "China may be the first major country to grow old before it grows rich." The challenge is profound.
http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-china-old6-2009jul06,0,6977821.story?track=rss
Artistic Depiction of the Real Estate Bust
http://www.nytimes.com/slideshow/2009/07/05/magazine/20090705-gilded-slideshow_index.html
choad...just saw this one... ERY talked about fwiw
http://slopeofhope.com/2009/07/top-performer-of-the-day.html
Glad *WE* could help..
- Business is back on Wall Street. If the good times continue to roll, lofty pay packages may be set for a comeback as well. Based on analysts' earnings forecasts for 2009, Goldman Sachs Group Inc.(GS) is on track to pay out as much as $20 billion this year, or about $700,000 per employee. That would be nearly double the firm's $363,000 average last year, and slightly higher than the $661,000 for the average Goldman employee in fiscal 2007, according to analyst estimates reviewed by The Wall Street Journal. the comeback in compensation so far this year shows how hard it is for Wall Street to break its old habits. Repaying last year's capital infusions from the government freed Goldman, Morgan Stanley and other big financial firms from curbs on compensation.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124649352055183157.html#mod=testMod
Industrial Equipment Sector Yet to Hit Bottom, Says Industry Expert
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Industrial-Equipment-Sector-twst-1581535254.html?x=0&.v=1
Joe...here is last weeks trading by GS...
Saw this posted...
The NYSE program trading report for last week is out and Goldman Suck’s program trading principal to agency & customer facilitation ratio has reached a staggering 5.6!
http://evilspeculator.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/2009-06-26_pt.png
Yup Joe...I saw the report on there program trading. The river of Goldman Alumni runs wide and deep I`m afraid. You have the guys that use to work at Goldman going into Government and the guys that were in Government who leave and work for Goldman. Having those ties on both ends opens any door needed. Just seeing some responces here already it looks like alot or most see the crap going on. I guess I have moved to the camp that figures...they know we know...and its like there saying ...so what are you gonna do about it. To me...having Goldman and Government so tight it will very hard to even put a chink in the armor they have. Like most I have a list of friends and aquantainces I email to. I send copies of stuff like this and I hardly ever get a responce. I think they feel I am a tinfoil hat nut job or something!!! maybe I am...As for going to GS in NY heck yeah I`ll go. My friend has a son in law school up there right now for another year and we can crash his place!...hd
Goldman(GS) Profits from the Downturn. For Goldman Sachs, a slow recovery and dysfunctional bank bailout programs mean bigger profits. For a sense of how sweet life is at Goldman, imagine you own the sole lumber yard that stayed dry in a town hit by a 100-year flood. Now as customers line up with fistfuls of money from relief programs, you can set prices at will. That's essentially Goldman's situation. Because it saw the subprime crisis coming and bet on the housing bust, it has emerged from the wreckage as arguably the strongest bond dealer in the world. It can mark up the prices on its inventory of bonds with impunity. Now Goldman is in the unusual position of benefiting from a slow recovery. A plodding economy will keep competitors weak and allow Goldman to book big bond-trading profits. For that reason it's better for Goldman if the U.S. rescue programs don't work and rivals remain hampered by bad assets, says analyst Roger A. Freeman of Barclays Capital (BCS). After all, zombie banks aren't much of a threat.
http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/09_27/b4138018144289.htm
Bernanke Watch...
Citigroup Inc. (C) has halted mortgage applications at a unit that accounted for half the company's residential loans last year after a review found that some appraisals and income-verification documents were missing, Bloomberg reported Wednesday. The report cited a Citi letter to clients saying the division ceased taking new loans on Tuesday and will restart in early July. Citi will use the period to change procedures and fix the omissions, Bloomberg reported.
>>>a review found that some appraisals and income-verification documents were missing...<<< That 50% raise there getting will sure show those responsible that Citi will not tolerate mistakes like this and that they don`t want to loose them to another company!!!
Monkey see-Monkey do...
China's overdue credit-card debt increases
By John Letzing, MarketWatch
SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) -- Despite China's reputation as a nation of savers, the central bank said this week that Chinese consumers are increasingly falling behind on their credit-card payments, suggesting a move toward Western-style spending.
China's credit-card debt at least six months overdue rose 133% in the first quarter, though the total overdue debt was still at the relatively modest level of 4.97 billion yuan ($727.7 million), the People's Bank of China was reported as saying in a state-run media report.
Accounts overdue by six months or more accounted for 3% of total outstanding credit-card debt at the end of March, a 60-basis-point rise from a year earlier, the China Daily cited the PBOC as saying in a report dated Tuesday.
The PBOC warned of the potential risks of rising levels of overdue consumer debt, which come as financial institutions expand their credit card businesses, the report said.
As of March 31, Chinese banks had issued more than 150 million credit cards, an average of 0.11 per person and a 42.9% increase compared to the same time last year, according to the report.
However, China's credit-card use still lags well behind that of the U.S., which boasts 4.39 credit cards per person, the report said.
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/chinese-increasingly-overdue-on-credit-cards?siteid=rss&rss=1
Living the Good Life...50% style
After all those losses and bailouts, rank-and-file employees of Citigroup are getting some good news: their salaries are going up. The troubled banking giant, which to many symbolizes the troubles in the nation’s financial industry, intends to raise workers’ base salaries by as much as 50 percent this year to offset smaller annual bonuses, according to people with direct knowledge of the plan. The shift means that most Citigroup employees will make as much money as they did in 2008, although some might earn more and others less. The company also plans to award millions of new stock options to employees in an effort to retain workers and neutralize a precipitous drop in the value of their stock holdings. The Citigroup proposals, discussed internally this week, present a crucial test for the Obama administration, which has vowed to rein in runaway compensation at companies that have received large taxpayer-financed bailouts. Citigroup has gotten not one but two rescues from Washington. This month, the government assumed a 34 percent stake in the company, whose share price has plunged nearly 84 percent in the last year.
http://www.cnbc.com/id/31514432
Reverse Stock Split in ETFs, More Likely To Come (MWN, FAS, FAZ)...
sorry if already posted
Direxion issued a press release noting that it was conducting a one-for-two reverse stock split on for its triple-leverage ETF called the Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bear 3X Shares (NYSE: MWN). We have actually been waiting for the exact same news, albeit on a larger reverse split scale, on the financial triple-leverage ETF’s and ETN’s. We feel this needs to occur on the Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (NYSE: FAS) and in the Direxion Daily Financial Bear 3X Shares (NYSE: FAZ). These other two ETF’s track the Russell 1000 Financial Services Index with triple leverage, but they are much more volatile because of the derivatives and because there are too many variations in the NAV versus the actual share price at certain times of the day. The low share prices also allow even the smallest of fast money traders to get in and out with too little skin in the game.
Right at the peak of the selling when the “FAS” shares were so low, we thought that Direxion was going to do a reverse split for “FAS” at that time. A spokesperson even said that was under consideration, but the market rallied so much that it kept this from being a large call. Having 300 million shares trade in a $3.00 ETF is rather misleading when you compare share volume and dollar volume.
What is interesting about this particular reverse split is that the stock price is high (north of $30.00) and the share volume is not that great. The Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bear 3X Shares (MWN) has seen only 135,000 shares trade hands today, yet the average volume per day is less than 70,000 shares.
The FAS is under $9.00 now and the FAZ is barely back above $5.00, but the 52-week lows for these were $2,32 for the FAS and $4.18 for the FAZ. The FAS has traded roughly 168,950,000 shares as of 3:00 PM EST and it usually sees north of 250 million shares trade per day. The FAZ has traded 165,333,669 shares as 3:00 PM EST and it usually sees north of 200 million shares trade per day.
In our opinion this was the right move by Direxion. It was just in the wrong ETFs as the FAS and FAZ are much lower priced and hyperactive for share volume because of excessively low share prices.
We’ll be outlining this in full detail tomorrow and ahead of time to our open email distribution list. We have many more ETF’s from other ETF and exchange-traded product families which we think need to pursue reverse splits, and even a few we think need to just go away entirely.
Hopefully, this is the first of many reverse splits from the world of ETFs to trim down at least some of the trader volatility in these trading instruments. This appears to be the first reverse split in an ETF on the NYSE that we have seen. Whether it is the first or not, it is not likely to be the last.
http://247wallst.com/2009/06/22/a-reverse-stock-split-in-etfs-more-likely-to-come-mwn-fas-faz/#more-38614
“Suck on Our Yachts”
- “Suck on Our Yachts”: Goldman Sachs Issues Non-Apology for Destroying the World Economy. Anyone else out there find himself doubled over laughing after reading Goldman, Sachs chief Lloyd Blankfein's "apology" for his bank's behavior leading up to the financial crisis? Just yesterday I was talking to Guy Cecala at Inside Mortgage Finance, the trade publication that tracks statistics in the mortgage lending industry. He said that at the height of the boom, in 2006, Goldman Sachs underwrote $76.5 billion in mortgage-backed securities, or 7% of the entire market. Of that $76.5 billion, $29.3 billion was subprime, which is bad enough -- but another $29.8 billion was what's called "Alt-A" paper. Alt-A mortgages are characterized, mainly, by crappy documentation and lack of equity: no income verification, no asset verification, little-to-no cash down. So while "only" 38% of the mortgage-backed securities Goldman underwrote were subprime, more than three-fourths of their securities were what is called "non-prime," ie either subprime or Alt-A. "There's a lot of crap in there too," says Cecala. Any way you slice it, Goldman was responsible for putting tens of billions of toxic mortgages on the market, resulting in mass foreclosures, mass depletion of retirement funds, and a monstrously over-leveraged financial system that we will now all be bailing out for the next half-century or so. All of this so that Goldman could make a few billion bucks acting as the middleman in all of these deadly transactions. What is particularly obnoxious about this phrase is that Goldman is bragging about the fact that it actually made money while it was pumping the economy full of explosive leverage. While companies like Lehman and Bear were dumb enough to actually eat their own rat meat, Goldman knew what it was doing and was careful to bet against the same stuff it was selling, which makes its behavior many times worse than that of other banks, not better. Beyond that, Goldman's "risk management" also involved buying massive hedges on its mortgage exposure from...drum roll please... AIG. In fact Goldman was AIGFP's single largest customer; while the bank was busy flooding the world financial system with doomed mortgages, it was also busy piling bets on the back of the insurance behemoth -- $20 billion worth, to be exact. And AIG's death spiral was triggered not so much by its bets going sour, but by companies like Goldman that demanded that AIG put up cash to show its ability to pay. These collateral calls were what killed AIG last September, and Goldman was one of those creditors pulling the trigger: what makes this fact even more obnoxious is that ex-Goldmanite Henry Paulson then stepped in and green-lighted an $80 billion taxpayer bailout. Ultimately another ex-Goldmanite named Ed Liddy was put in charge of AIG, and Goldman ended up getting paid 100 cents on the dollar for its AIG debt.So basically Goldman helped kill AIG, necessitating a federal bailout, after which time it got paid off handsomely for bets that it certainly would not have been paid off completely for had AIG simply been liquidated. And again, AIG probably does not have a market to sell its CDS insurance to firms like Goldman, if firms like Goldman had not cooked up this insane scheme to underwrite billions upon billions of toxic debt and sell it off to secondary buyers as safe investments. Moreover AIG would not have even had this business of selling CDS insurance had not a bunch of ex-Goldman guys, in particular Bob Rubin, quietly pushed to deregulate the derivatives market back at the end of the Clinton administration.
http://www.alternet.org/workplace/140806/%22suck_on_our_yachts%22:_goldman_sachs_issues_non-apology_for_destroying_the_world_economy/?page=entire
Smooth Sailing Again...
Bank of America Corp. (BAC), which is among the largest banks to receive government bailout funds, has been paying millions in bonuses to attract talent and retain investment bankers who management sees as vital, the New York Post reported Thursday, citing unnamed sources. Two former Merrill Lynch bankers are among those who are said to have received payouts, according to the article. A spokeswoman for B. of A. told the paper the bonuses were necessary as rival firms poach its best executives.
Rallies in commodity prices and mining company shares stem from a “bubble of belief” in China’s economy that is likely to burst, according to Albert Edwards, a strategist at Societe Generale. “I believe we will look back on the Chinese economic miracle as the sickest joke yet played on investors,” Edwards wrote in a report. He cited falling earnings at the country’s industrial companies. “The bullish group-think on China is just as vulnerable to massive disappointment as any other extreme example of bubble-nonsense I have seen over the last two decades,” his report said. “The fall to earth will be equally as shocking.”
US banks could become less competitive—and less profitable—from President Obama's proposed financial overhaul, analysts say. As details of the sweeping plan emerged, there was worry among investors that the sector—which has been recovering in recent months from last year's financial crisis—could take another hit.
http://www.cnbc.com/id/31409745
Cisco Systems' (CSCO) entry into the server market is creating surprisingly sudden headaches for the network gear maker as longtime server partners — now rivals — steer sales to Brocade Communications Systems. According to market tracker Dell'Oro Group, Brocade (BRCD) gained a sizable 14 points of market share from Cisco between January and March in high-end storage area network switches, which connect data storage systems.
Full Story...
http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article.aspx?id=479230
Strong buying by China has helped lift commodity prices around the world this spring, but growing evidence suggests that a sizable portion of this buying has been to build stockpiles in China, and may not be sustainable. At least 90 large freighters full of iron ore are idling off Chinese ports, where they face waits of up to two weeks to unload because port storage operations are overflowing, chief executives of shipping companies said in interviews this week. Yet actual steel production from that iron ore is recovering much more slowly in China, and Chinese steel exports remain weak. Commodities and shipping executives describe Chinese stockpiling in recent months of a range of other commodities as well, including aluminum, copper, nickel, tin, zinc, canola and soybeans. Starting in April, China began stockpiling significant quantities of crude oil. “There has been enormous stockpiling of all commodities” by China, and this cannot continue indefinitely, said Tim Huxley, the chief executive of Wah Kwong Maritime Transport Holdings, a big shipping line based here. Moody’s Investors Service announced on Wednesday that it was putting a negative outlook on the base metals, mining and steel industries in Asia and the Pacific, having previously done so for these sectors elsewhere. One of the best leading indicators of international trade in commodities is the Baltic Exchange Dry Index, which measures the daily cost of chartering a large freighter. While the Standard & Poor’s GSCI has continued to rise in the last week, the freight index has fallen by a fifth in that period. Richard S. Elman, the chief executive of the Noble Group, Asia’s largest diversified commodities trading company, bounced up from the conference table in his office here when asked about freight rates during an interview on Tuesday morning. He walked over to his desk, dominated by three computer screens that partly obscure a perfect view of Hong Kong’s harbor, and quickly punched up on one screen a list of daily charter rates for large bulk carrier freighters. The list showed ship owners charging $58,000 a day now but just $24,000 a day for charters next year or in 2011 — an indication that there will be more ships than cargoes in the years ahead, particularly with shipyards still finishing vessels ordered during the recent boom. Pointing to the rates for the next two years, Mr. Elman said, “That’s the real market” for ships.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/11/business/economy/11commodity.html?_r=1&ref=business&pagewanted=all
- China’s exports fell by a record as the global recession cut demand for goods produced by the world’s third-largest economy. Overseas sales dropped 26.4 percent in May from a year earlier, the customs bureau said in a statement on its Web site today. That compares with the median estimate for a decline of 23 percent in a Bloomberg News survey of 15 economists, and a 22.6 percent contraction in April.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=al8v4wR00eSo
China is planning a vast increase in its use of wind and solar power over the next decade and believes it can match Europe by 2020, producing a fifth of its energy needs from renewable sources, a senior Chinese official said yesterday. Zhang Xiaoqiang, vice-chairman of China's national development and reform commission, told the Guardian that Beijing would easily surpass current 2020 targets for the use of wind and solar power and was now contemplating targets that were more than three times higher. In the current development plan, the goal for wind energy is 30 gigawatts. Zhang said the new goal could be 100GW by 2020. "Similarly, by 2020 the total installed capacity for solar power will be at least three times that of the original target [3GW]," Zhang said in an interview in London. China generates only 120 megawatts of its electricity from solar power, so the goal represents a 75-fold expansion in just over a decade. "We are now formulating a plan for development of renewable energy. We can be sure we will exceed the 15% target. We will at least reach 18%. Personally I think we could reach the target of having renewables provide 20% of total energy consumption."
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/jun/09/china-green-energy-solar-wind
Hedge Funds Investing In Lawsuits
We came across this interesting piece in Dealbook the other day and thought it was very intriguing. Simply put: hedge funds are now investing in lawsuits now. The premise is pretty simple: they invest in one side of the lawsuit and get a share of the winnings (if, of course, they win the case).
Dealbook specifically cites Juridica Capital Management who made 17 investments out of the 122 different cases they looked at, usually investing $7.5 million each case (they have $200 million AUM). Juridica shares have stair-stepped up 24% since their IPO on the London Stock Exchange in 2007. Additionally, Juris Capital in Chicago executes a similar strategy while Credit Suisse also has a unit dedicated to this type of strategy. Juris invests between $500,000 and $3 million per case and their portfolio is seeing 20% returns a year. Apparently, things are going well for funds executing this strategy.
If you think about it, it makes sense. These investors essentially 'bankroll' a litigation team, thus giving them access to all kinds of different tools. The defendant/prosecutor obviously enjoys knowing that their team has deep pockets and the lawyers themselves will find comfort in the fact that they will have no problem getting paid. (Aside: Do you think this would de-incentivize them from working harder since they know they'll get paid regardless?)
Either way, we kind of equate this to a rich investor coming in and purchasing a sports team in an effort to 'turn them around' and ensure they are competitive by providing whatever resources possible (namely: cash). For baseball fans, think the New York Yankees at their recent peak when they were buying everyone in sight. For soccer/futbol fans, think Roman Abramovich at Chelsea FC in the English Premier League. They both spent large amounts of cash and found reasonable amounts of success. The question here is: can this strategy stand the test of time? If these hedge funds can generate solid returns on an annualized basis, things could get intriguing here.
So, what's the key to this type of investment? Avoiding juries. Those in the field equate jury decisions to coin-flips and spins of the roulette wheel. And, in hedge fund land, that's a bit too much uncertainty. (Well, for most hedge funds at least... there are some crazy ones still out there). Overall, an intriguing concept that seems to be gaining more popularity. We're always on the lookout for interesting opportunities like these, so let us know if you find anymore. In the past, we've highlighted some other unique plays that hedge funds have executed, including investing in art, investing in guitars, and investing in wine. We'll have to see what comes next!
The Baltic Dry Index, a measure of shipping costs for commodities, slid the most in almost eight months on speculation demand for iron-ore carriers will weaken. Current rents for capsize ships will plunge 55% on average during the third quarter as panamax vessel rates slide 40%, according to forward freight agreements, bets on future rates. The index fell 284 points, or 6.9%, to 3,809 points, according to the Baltic Exchange today.
The federal comprehensive energy bill could change the whole game for the solar industry. If the bill passes Congress and becomes law, it would require U.S. utility companies to supply around 15% of their electricity from renewable sources like solar and wind power by 2020.
Full Article...
http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article.aspx?id=478675
IRS tax revenue falls along with taxpayers' income
Federal tax revenue plunged $138 billion, or 34%, in April vs. a year ago — the biggest April drop since 1981, a study released Tuesday by the American Institute for Economic Research says.
When the economy slumps, so does tax revenue, and this recession has been no different, says Kerry Lynch, senior fellow at the AIER and author of the study. "It illustrates how severe the recession has been."
For example, 6 million people lost jobs in the 12 months ended in April — and that means far fewer dollars from income taxes. Income tax revenue dropped 44% from a year ago.
"These are staggering numbers," Lynch says.
Big revenue losses mean that the U.S. budget deficit may be larger than predicted this year and in future years.
FIND MORE STORIES IN: Baby Boomer | Moody's
"It's one of the drivers of the ongoing expansion of the federal budget deficit," says John Lonski, chief economist for Moody's Investors Service. The Congressional Budget Office projects a $1.7 trillion budget deficit for fiscal year 2009.
The other deficit driver is government spending, which, the AIER's report says, is the main culprit for the federal budget deficit.
The White House thinks that tax revenue will increase in 2011, thanks in part to the stimulus package, says the report from AIER, an independent economic research institute. But it warns, "Even if that does happen, the administration also projects that government spending will be so much higher each year that large deficits will continue, and the national debt held by the public will double over the next 10 years."
The government may have a hard time trimming spending to reduce the deficit when the recession ends. The 77 million Baby Boomers— those born in 1946 through 1964 — will start tapping their federal retirement benefits soon, which means increased government outlays for Social Security and Medicare.
"It will be doubly difficult for federal government to reduce expenditures and narrow the deficit as rapidly as they did following previous recessions," Lonski says. At the end of the last major recession, in 1981, Boomers were in their 30s. Their incomes were expanding, as was their appetite for goods and services.
The Boomers now are in their 50s and 60s and unlikely to keep increasing incomes for long, which means that revenue from income taxes could flatten in the next few years. Also, Lonski says, they are more likely to save for retirement than spend — and consumer spending is a big driver of the economy.
"The American consumer led us out of previous recessions with some semblance of gusto," Lonski says. "They're too old to do it now."
Economic Releases
8:30 am EST
- Durable Goods Orders for April are estimated to rise .5% versus a -.8% decline in March.
- Durables Ex Transports for April are estimated to fall -.3% versus a -.7% decline in March.
- Initial Jobless Claims for last week are estimated to fall to 628K versus 631K the prior week.
- Continuing Claims are estimated to rise to 6745K versus 6662K prior.
10:00 am EST
- New Home Sales for April are estimated to rise to 360K versus 356K in March.
11:00 am EST
- Bloomberg consensus estimates call for a weekly crude oil inventory drawdown of -150,000 barrels versus a -2,105,000 barrel decline the prior week. Gasoline supplies are expected to fall by -1,300,000 barrels versus a -4,337,000 barrel decrease the prior week. Distillate inventories are estimated to rise by +1,000,000 barrels versus a +672,000 barrel gain the prior week. Finally, Refinery Utilization is estimated to rise by +.4% versus a -1.89% decline the prior week.
Upcoming Splits
- None of note
Other Potential Market Movers
- The Fed’s Fisher speaking, weekly EIA natural gas inventory report, Barclay’s Capital Wireline/Wireless Conference, Cowen Tech/Media/Telecom Conference, Deutsche Bank Energy/Utilities Conference, (HD) shareholders meeting, (IPG) shareholders meeting, Morgan Stanley Cloud Computing Symposium, (AMZN) shareholders meeting, (JNPR) shareholders meeting, (TGT) shareholders meeting and the (NVLS) mid-quarter update could also impact trading today.
Roubini says bottom of U.S. recession not here yet
SEOUL, May 27 - Economist Nouriel Roubini on Wednesday said the end of the global recession is likely to occur at the end of the year rather than the middle, and that U.S. growth will remain below potential afterwards.
"We are not yet at the bottom of the U.S. and the global recession," said Roubini. "The contraction is still occurring and the recession is going to be over more toward the end of the year rather than in the middle of the year."
"There is still too much optimism that a recovery is just around the corner," said Roubini, a professor at New York University's Stern School of Business and chairman of RGE Monitor, an independent economic research firm.
Roubini, who is widely credited for predicting the current economic turmoil, was speaking at the Seoul Digital Forum.
"A more sober analysis suggests we're closer to the bottom; there is light at the end of the tunnel, but it's going to take a while longer, and the recovery is going to be weaker than otherwise expected."
Once the recession ends, "U.S. economic growth is going to be below potential for at least two years," he said, amid multiple imbalances in the housing sector and the financial system, and the rise of public debt.
Roubini said the outlook for Asia was more positive than for Europe, Japan and the United States, thanks to stronger fundamentals.
"The latest economic indicators from Korea ... suggest there is the beginning of an economic recovery, and growth might be already positive in the second quarter."
The downside risk, Roubini said, was if advanced countries did not recover fast enough and if China's rate of growth started to slow again.
Roubini predicted China would post a 6 percent growth rate this year, a "hard landing" considering it grew by 10 percent for a decade.
A robust recovery in Korean, China and other countries in the region would depend upon relying less on external demand and export-led growth and relying more on domestic growth, he said.
From Yahoo Finance:
Roubini recommends Chinese model for North Korea: Economist Roubini says North Korea should follow economic models of China, Vietnam
SEOUL, South Korea (AP) -- Impoverished North Korea can liberalize its economy while maintaining its political system if it follows the path taken by China and Vietnam, prominent economist Nouriel Roubini said Wednesday.
"I think the lesson is that progressive economic opening and liberalization even in a formerly centrally controlled economy can lead to beneficial changes," Roubini told reporters on the sidelines of a technology forum.
Roubini, a professor at New York University, is one of the few experts to have predicted the global financial crisis.
China and Vietnam have aggressively opened their economies to foreign investment in recent decades, resulting in rapid growth and rising living standards even as their ruling communist regimes have remained in place.
North Korea's economy, meanwhile, has lagged far behind. The collapse of the Soviet Union in the early 1990s deprived it of a key source of aid and trade. Subsequent economic mismanagement, severe flooding, a famine and a standoff with the international community over its nuclear development have also contributed to its decline.
Roubini said that the Chinese model shows how a formerly centrally planned economy can liberalize without major political changes and economic openness does not "have to be a threat." If a government provides jobs and income growth "your regime can stay stable in power for a long time" and "economic liberalization can be beneficial for a country," he said.
Roubini called the success of China, Vietnam and other countries in the region a testimony to that view.
"But I'm not sure (North Korea) would listen to such a message or not," he said, describing as "perverse" the relationship between its economy and "more aggressive external behavior."
North Korea in recent months has assumed an increasingly strident tone in its external relations. The country said Monday it carried out its second underground nuclear test in less than years, a move that had drawn widespread international condemnation.
On the global economy, Roubini said that the U.S. is likely to emerge from recession toward the end of this year, rather than the middle as some expect, and will probably only manage growth of about one percent for a year or two, below its potential of three percent.
"I think there is too much optimism that the recovery is just around the corner," he said in a keynote speech at the opening of the annual Seoul Digital Forum. "A more sober analysis of the data suggests we're closer to the bottom, there is light at the end of the tunnel, but it's gonna take a while longer and the recovery's gonna be weaker than otherwise."
Regarding prospects for China's economy, Roubini said he expects it to slow to growth of 6 percent this year, which he added is "effectively a hard landing" for an economy that needs to expand closer to 10 percent to support job creation for the country's rural poor migrating to cities.
Playing Mortgage Chicken, 10 Year Is Currently In The Woodshed
http://zerohedge.blogspot.com/2009/05/playing-mortgage-chicken.html
China Business News:
- China’s electricity output in mid-May fell .57% from the same period a year earlier, citing China State Grid Corp.
National Business Daily:
- China’s 29 biggest steelmakers had a loss of $278 million in April, citing the China Iron & Steel Association. Steel prices are at the lowest since 1994.
OT/ Chinese Investors to Take Minority Stake in Cleveland Cavaliers
ORLANDO, Fla. -- The Cleveland Cavaliers have agreed to allow an investment group from China to become a minority owner of the basketball franchise and its arena.
The group, which includes JianHua Huang, a Chinese businessman who has brokered sponsorship deals with the New York Yankees and other sports franchises in the U.S., could acquire as much as 15% of Cavaliers Operating Co., the entity that owns the team and operates Quicken Loans Arena in Cleveland.
Reuters
Cleveland Cavaliers' LeBron James, center, could see his brand enhanced overseas by playing for a team with Chinese business partners.
The deal, completed in recent days, is subject to approval by the National Basketball Association's board of governors.
If approved, the deal would provide marketing opportunities for the Cavaliers and superstar LeBron James, who is eligible to become a free agent next summer.
The 24-year-old player, who is already among the league's most popular players in Asia, has stated he wants to become the first billionaire athlete.
His brand overseas could be enhanced by playing for a team with Chinese business partners.
Team president Len Komoroski said Sunday the group approached Cavaliers principal owner Dan Gilbert about the partnership and called the business venture "an exciting new opportunity."
Mr. Gilbert's role in overseeing the organization and 20,000-seat arena won't be affected by the new partners.
Observers have speculated that Mr. James will leave Cleveland next year to play in a larger market. But Mr. James and his corporate sponsors, including Nike Inc., have broader goals and may be able to attain them by tapping China's colossal consumer marketplace without him leaving Cleveland.
Mr. James hasn't given any indication he wants to leave the Cavaliers, who drafted the Ohio native in 2003.
He won a gold medal with the U.S. team last summer at the Beijing Games and has made four trips to China, including one with the Cavaliers during the preseason two years ago.
"It's a big market," Mr. James said before Game 3 of the Eastern Conference Final series in Orlando, which the Cavaliers lost to the Orlando Magic, 99-89, on Sunday night.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124321965984550861.html
Chrysler Dealer Says He Was Axed for Not Buying Cars
May 26 (Bloomberg) -- Chrysler LLC pressured dealers to buy cars in the months before filing for bankruptcy and a Florida dealer claims it is losing the franchise because it refused, according to court documents.
Jim Boast Dodge Inc. of Bradenton, Florida, asked a New York judge in a May 23 filing to block Chrysler’s attempt to terminate its franchise agreement with the dealership, saying the automaker is breaking Florida law and doesn’t have a reasonable business case for the decision.
Between January and March, Chrysler urged U.S. dealers to buy extra cars to convince the U.S. government of the company’s viability and avoid bankruptcy, Boast said in the filing. On May 14, Chrysler asked the judge to cancel 789 car dealership agreements, including Jim Boast’s, who said the dealership bought four vehicles instead of the 60 it was expected to order.
Chrysler executives threatened dealers who didn’t buy enough cars in a Feb. 13 conference call, saying they would “never forget that those dealers did not help the company when it desperately needed help,” Boast said in the filing.
“It will be worth finding out,” the dealer said in court papers, “how many other dealers who failed to adhere to the debtor’s threats have now found themselves on the chopping block.”
Chrysler won’t comment on specific allegations made by dealers because the issues will be dealt with by the judge, spokesman Fred Spar said in a telephone interview.
Reducing Network
The company rejected contracts with about 25 percent of its dealers, who accounted for about 14 percent of sales, Spar said.
“It’s unfortunate,” he said. Chrysler must reduce its dealers network to win approval of a plan to sell its assets to a new company it will form with Italian automaker Fiat, “or else we would have to liquidate all 3,200 dealerships,” he said.
The automaker filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy April 30 after a group of 20 secured lenders rejected an offer by the U.S. government that would have paid them $2.25 billion for $6.9 billion of debt, or 33 cents on the dollar. Chrysler’s 22 U.S. factories with about 26,800 hourly workers were idled May 1.
Chrysler, in its April 30 filings, listed assets of $39.3 billion and liabilities of $55.2 billion, making it the fifth- largest bankruptcy in U.S. history, according to data compiled by Bloomberg News.
Family Business
The Boast family has been a Dodge dealer for almost 70 years, James Keedy, president of Jim Boast Dodge, said in a court filing.
“In light of the fact Bob Boast Dodge has been performing at very good sales levels, I do not believe the termination of Bob Boast Dodge is performance based,” Keedy said. The contract was terminated because the dealer would “not succumb to the recent threats and extortionist behavior” of Chrysler executives, he said in the filing. The dealer is also known as Bob Boast Dodge.
A group of 300 Chrysler dealers has also sought to delay the sale of the automaker’s assets, saying they need more time to fight the cancellation of their franchise agreements.
A hearing is scheduled June 3 in New York.
The case is In re Chrysler LLC, 09-50002, U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan)
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=adncy6970Hm8
Bull or Bear...This seems to make a case for some downtime ahead???
http://www.amateur-investor.net/Weekend_Market_Analysis_May_23_09.htm
OT/...Thanks for that White Deer Video Joe...