Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Count-doesn't trade in Ontario or Alberta, does it?
Thanks for the link, nufced. I emailed you a fifth of padrone and three dozen limes.
Fisher-do you frequently bring knives to gunfights?
Name Court Case No. Filed NOS Closed
1 ALTOMARE, RICHARD nvdce 2:1999cv01789 12/29/1999 422 07/30/2000
2 ALTOMARE, RICHARD njdce 2:1995cv06512 06/04/1997 190 03/31/1998
3 ALTOMARE, RICHARD A. nvdce 2:2007ms00076 11/28/2007
4 ALTOMARE, RICHARD A. txndce 3:2007mc00115 11/28/2007
5 ALTOMARE, RICHARD A. nyedce 9:1998cv00534 01/28/1998 190 11/02/1998
6 ALTOMARE, RICHARD A. txwdce 5:2007mc00965 11/28/2007 11/28/2007
7 ALTOMARE, RICHARD A. pawdce 2:1996cv01180 06/21/1996 190 05/21/1997
8 ALTOMARE, RICHARD A. nysdce 1:2004cv02322 03/24/2004 850
9 ALTOMARE, RICHARD A. nyedce 1:1997cv03001 05/27/1997 190 02/27/1998
10 ALTOMARE, RICHARD A. madce 1:2007mc10313 11/28/2007
11 ALTOMARE, RICHARD A. flsdce 0:2007cv61488 10/17/2007 710
12 ALTOMARE, RICHARD A. flsdce 9:2007mc80815 09/06/2007 890
New PACER documents. Receiver is on Babsie's ass now:
http://star.the.wonder.pup.angelfire.com/index.html
Please, starforce. The share price is varying randomly around its subpenny stuck level. And it has no significant volume.
How much more clear could it be, virginian. Table 3 shows that fails on the otc are negligable.
OTCBB + Other OTC11269, 9680 .16%
actually, redskies, it is a total scam. Have you bothered to read the osc statement?
Read table 3, Virginian. Pinks have been covered by sho since april 14, 2005.
Yes, virginian, they do. That's "other otc", and fails in them, as you will note, are miniscule, both in shares, and in percentage of issues on the SHO list.
"
Derek-you might want to look at actual data. They contradicts your beliefs totally:
http://sec.gov/spotlight/failstodeliver082106.pdf
Now if you have contradictory sources, please post them.
I wonder who they employees feel about that missed payroll now that it's obvious that the company was paying for this for altomare and babsie:
http://www.residensea.com/
Overachiver-The IRS may be interested as well, since I doubt altomare et. ux. declared the payment of those personal expenses as income.
New USXP documents from PACER, including subpoenae of RA travel expenses paid by the company.
http://star.the.wonder.pup.angelfire.com/index.html
Robert-the SEC should have issued a ten day suspension any number of times when Altomare was putting out lies in PR's and dumping.
At this point, however, since no misinformation is going out to the investing public, they lack cause for a suspension.
Their powers are very limited, and the due process hurdles are all stacked in favor of white collar criminals.
kamryn-are you trying to make a point? WHAT IS IT?
Clearly you did have a problem. You deleted the post.
Need-the OS is closer to 40 billion. The stock is barely trading.
Red-the truth is that pv is a sociopath who pulled off a small time penny stock scam and got caught.
Who owns that company, fisher? Who are its principals? What does it have it to do with SLJB, the public company?
It's not an attack to observe what the powers of the appeals court are, and how they are exercised.
Fisher-you did notice that the company is not operating and is in receivership, eh?
Substantive-a hick town supply company that subsequently closed doesn't count. I'm talking about those multi million dollar cement deals. ( you do know how you account for brokerage arrangements, don't you?)
Is sams still open? How much business do you reckon it does?
fisher-please show any substantive PR that was true prior to Black November. Just one.
Fisher-what legal standard of proof requires 100% certainty? Do cite the statutes.
Good find, Virginian, and a victory for the regulators. However, it doesn't apply to penny stocks, which have no options MM's and whose MM's are no longer exempt.
BTW, what on earth makes you think that the appeal is likely to prevail? If it did it would be a remand back to the court, not a "reinstatement" of Altomare.
Virginian-there is a lot of irrationality in the sub-penny market. CMKX for example, routinely traded a billion shares a day up to the effective date of it's revocation.
The Bud Burrell's of the world continue to hype a "naked short" in USXP. Those who believe him may act on his bad advice.
And at this price, the dollar value of those hundreds of millions of shares is neglibible-a few tens of thousands of dollars a day.
Who knows the exact reason, but is by definition not related to the revocation of the GF clause.
Virginian-the GF clause elimination applied only to stocks that were on SHO. If they weren't on SHO, there were no GF'd shares to be covered.
The amendment eliminates one of the exceptions to the Close-out Requirement for fails to deliver established prior to a security becoming a Threshold Security (�grandfather provision�). The amendment requires Participants to close out any previously-grandfathered fails to deliver in a security that is on the Threshold Security List on October 15th. The close-out must occur within 35 consecutive settlement days of October 15th. If a security becomes a Threshold Security after October 15th, all fails to deliver must be closed out within 13 consecutive settlement days.
What do I have to do on or after October 15th?
This amendment does not require NASDAQ to make any changes to its Threshold Security List. However, Participants should ensure that they close out previously-grandfathered fail to deliver positions within the time frames established by the amendment. Participants that do not close out these fail to deliver positions within 35 days will, by rule, be prohibited from accepting any short sale orders or effecting further short sales in these securities until the entire fail to deliver position is closed out.
Jackson memorabilia auction nets loss for Universal Express
South Florida Business Journal - by Brian Bandell
Universal Express' nationally publicized auction of Michael Jackson family memorabilia didn't net the windfall the Boca Raton-based company expected.
It actually lost hundreds of thousands of dollars on the deal, according to a report by receiver Jane Moscowitz, who took over the company after it lost a lawsuit to the SEC.
In December 2006, Universal Express reported that it paid $5.8 million to New Jersey-based Vintage Associates for thousands of Jackson clothes, drawings and personal effects. The collection was seized in a bankruptcy court case of Michael Jackson's parents.
During an interview at the time, Universal Express CEO Richard Altomare said he expected the auction to generate $40 million to $50 million for his publicly traded luggage shipping company.
Days after the May auction in Las Vegas, Altomare said in a press release that the sales generated between $1.5 million and $2 million.
According to Moscowitz, the auction brought it only $580,110, but Universal Express won't see any of that money.
"The morass of litigation and money owed surrounding the acquisition and auction of this collection make it highly unlikely that any funds will be realized from the sale of this collection," she wrote. "The receiver is, instead, seeking to minimize liabilities."
The real purchase price of the collection was $4 million, but Universal Express only gave Vintage Associates $150,000, she reported. The seller now claims that title to the items never passed to Universal Express.
New York-based Guernsey's agreed to a 15 percent commission with a $700,000 minimum payment to run the auction. Universal Express advanced Guernsey's $200,000.
But Michael and Janet Jackson sued Universal Express in Las Vegas and stopped it from selling some of their personal items.
The bids were lower than expected without those items and because no minimum value was assigned, Moscowitz reported. Some items were not purchased or paid for.
The Jackson 5 tapes weren't auctioned. The family believes it owns the intellectual property of the unreleased songs. The receiver asked Altomare to return them.
Guernsey's had $780,110 in its account for the auction, plus the company's advance. Universal Express could get $80,110, but the auction expenses plus legal fees, Moscowitz reported, would more than exhaust that.
Altomare did not return a call to his home.
In April, the SEC won $25.7 million against Universal Express, Altomare and general counsel Chris Gunderson over selling unregistered securities and issuing false press releases. The company then raised $9.5 million more by selling unregistered shares, which prompted a New York federal judge to replace Altomare with a receiver, who found the company did not have enough assets to remain in business without illegally selling stock. Altomare is under federal investigation.
The company's legal troubles were easily viewable through a Google search. Yet, dozens of companies signed promotional deals with Universal Express. Many of those companies are now on Universal Express' $5.9 million unpaid accounts list.
The largest creditor is Team Rensi Motorsports, a Charlotte, N.C.-based NASCAR team. Owner Ed Rensi said an ad agency brought them a $2 million sponsorship with Universal Express for the season, starting in February. The company only paid $100,000. Not wanting to violate the contract, Rensi kept Universal Express' logo on the car through the season, instead of selling it to another sponsor.
"I decided to sue them and, when I did, I realized they had a receiver," he said. "I knew so little about the company and what they did."
Rensi depended on the ad agency to do due diligence. He is no longer working with that agency because of this, he added.
The ownership of the Florida Panthers and the BankAtlantic Center, where Universal Express had signage during the 2006-2007 season, had $544,950 due from the company.
"A lot of times, due diligence doesn't go as deep as it should because of the interest of making a sale," said Derek Hodes, owner of Miami-based Momentum Marketing, which lines up event and venue sponsorships. "Salespeople are on the front line and expected to perform, and there's a lot of pressure to go with that."
Gee, jake, I would think that you would be leaping at the chance to clarify this issue. Odd that you aren't, eh?
The cat seems to have jakes' tongue, marketmann. Odd that doesn't want to share such revealing information, eh?
So post the documents, jake. It will clear things up, eh?
Quit lying, jake. Nevada does not list assets.
Word games, jake. I have no idea what asset free shell sljb owned. I know for a fact that they owned zero of the hick town lumberyard.
Jake-SLJB never owned any part of the canadian hick town lumberyard
LOL-Neuhaus rolls RA. The rats are all leaving in preparation for the indictments.
Woody-it will be interesting to see what Jake makes of your eyewitness account.
If the FDA worked like the SEC then thalidomide would still be on the market.
No, forgod, there weren't. Let me acquaint you with the concept of source speaking "on background".
Tons of new USXP court documents, courtesy of Elbac:
http://star.the.wonder.pup.angelfire.com/index.html
Sources, mike. Try cultivating them.