Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
CARLSBAD, CA / ACCESSWIRE / July 10, 2019 / Patriot Scientific
Patriot Scientific Corporation (OTC PINK: PTSC) announced it has received approval from the Supreme Court of the United States extending the deadline for the filing of a writ of certiorari to September 7, 2019, with respect to patent litigation previously before the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The additional time will permit newly added co-counsel sufficient time to familiarize with the voluminous record, related technical matters, relevant statues, and case law and their application to the important constitutional matters raised by the proceedings.
The application for the extension of time to file the petition for the writ of certiorari may be found on Patriot’s website at: Press Release Patent Litigation SCOTUS Application Document.
Patriot Scientific Corporation Provides Business Strategy Update
Company to Expand Evaluation of Blockchain Technology in Life Sciences Product Development
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/patriot-scientific-corporation-provides-business-220000389.html
( please define the meaning ) It's lawyer speak. It's undefinable! By design.
I still got all my shares. Go figure. I wonder if wolfpack is up there watching?
$0.0110
Hey ender...Where did u get ur degree? Boiler room tech? Heeee
ender......ya still talkin 2 ur self???? hhehehehehehe
neverender---- Threat to Cliff? Link please? TIA
If you seen it many times there should be no reason not to supply one. :0)
neverender... u ought 2 consider given up the dufus-ish babbling, me thinks it's getting old? :0)
GL
NEVERENDER.....
Ya shoulda loaded up at 3 pennies, you'd almost have a double by now.
Just trying to be of help to the local peepicker.....Still not too late to get on the patriot express. hehehehehe
GL
Neverender sez...Just trying 2 help U buddie.
That's just what a car salesman told me when I bought my last car. I'm sure both you and him are worried about my well being. :0)
Thankzzzzzzz
Unadulterated crap.
LOL
Never....FWIW: If a patent is infringed while it is enforceable i.e. before it expires, the patent owner can sue the infringer up to 6 years after the patent expires.
Then you know this. I'm sure.
Thanks dandiamond63?, for the disclosure. But my hold query was actually a rhetorical question on my part.
I can now see where you're coming from.
:0)
Who reinstated you? I think you were on the banned list. Not?
Maybe a buy signal or something else? The big MAHOFF is BOD bashing again on the inferior forum, early this morning yet! :0)
GL
Brian.. One day he's hugging Gloria and the next day he wants to choke her...LOL
A love/hate relationship?
Maybe just a scorned lover?
I'll pass on following brian anywhere......I'd go the other way.
GL
I'll make it simple. Where can we go with constant negative cash flow? PTSC is not making a profit and until we do we're where we belong. Not rocket science here.
BTW: Shareholders have nothing to do with it. They can send all the letters they want, to the BOD the SEC and complain to their hearts content it won't help the bottom line.
Shareholder initiatives. How many shareholder letters and schemes have they put forward? Quite a few. They haven't worked before (not even close) and this time would be no different. IMO
I do not trust the initiators any more than I trust DL. Even less. The BOD are in it for what they can get personally. But then isn't that the way most people work in the real world. We as shareholders want the share price to increase to our sell points to make a profit. Not? Self interest? I would say so. Chucky boy is also no different. Shareholder interest is the last thing that's on CM's mind. Get real folks. Think about it for a minute or 2? CM brought TPL and DL into this venture. What does that say about him?
I also suspect that the writers of that letter are manipulators, be careful of that crew. I hope that rational shareholders don't/didn't give personal information to unknown self interest groups. Like the share amounts along with your name and other private info. WOW!
Ask questions and trust no-one.
I agree with TechKim. The only thing I use agoracom for is the pacers by Banos. Even those don't mean a whole lot. Other than that it's pretty much useless. PRs, filings etc. are publicly announced. Other info is not disclosed because of NDAs or considered inside information.
The retail shareholders are always the last to hear anything. That would be us. :0)
I say let it go....
press release
June 23, 2014, 8:30 a.m. EDT
Patriot Scientific Reaffirms Engagement of Agility IP Law
CARLSBAD, Calif., June 23, 2014 /PRNewswire/ -- Patriot Scientific Corporation PTSC -2.25% today announced that its joint-venture entity Phoenix Digital Solutions (PDS) has reaffirmed representation by Agility IP Law, LLP in pursuit of infringers of the Moore Microprocessor Patent (MMP) Portfolio™.
"I am extremely pleased that we have solidified our relationship with Agility," stated Carlton Johnson, Patriot's representative to PDS. "Agility was instrumental in our patent infringement win against HTC Corporation, and we look forward to continuing that success against other infringers".
Proceedings in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California alleging infringement of Patriot's '749, '890 and '336 patents against Barnes & Noble Inc., Garmin Ltd., Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd., LG Electronics, Nintendo Co. Ltd., Novatel Wireless Inc., Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., and ZTE Corporation had previously been stayed. Patriot now expects to move forward aggressively with these actions.
"We are excited to continue enforcing the MMP Portfolio," stated Jim Otteson, Founding Partner of Agility. "We strongly believe that the MMP Portfolio is fundamental to modern microprocessor design, as demonstrated by our jury trial victory against HTC Corporation. The HTC win laid the groundwork, which we plan to leverage against current and, if necessary, future defendants."
In October, Patriot announced that it had won its patent infringement lawsuit against HTC Corporation in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. HTC was found to infringe multiple claims of Patriot's '336 patent. The '336 patent is one of several patents that are part of a larger portfolio held by Patriot, known as the MMP Portfolio
AGGGGG,sure quiet....wonder why?????
Because they banned a lot and drove others away. Now they're limited to talking to themselves.
Didn't I predict that would happen, just like what happened to their private yahoo board. Good riddance is what I say. :0)
I felt that crew were playing games (manipulating) with the stock years ago and stated such on that board, many times. That's why I believe that I was banned from there and kept on being banned. Furthermore that's why I was originally banned on this forum. One of their crew moved in as a board monitor here and managed to remove me plus other people.
Now all this is very difficult to prove. Penny stocks are shorted and manipulated on a daily basis. I believe that the SEC hasn't got the resources nor the desire to do anything about it to begin with. Plus as we all know most all of wall street is corrupt, along with congress and all politicians from the local to the national and globally. You can also throw all the local ambulance chasers in there along with them. The lowest in my opinion.... :0)
It's just the way it was, is and always will be. All in my opinion/belief.
There you have it.
GL
My belief is that bringing in lawyers to sue will solely benefit the lawyers not the shareholders or the company. I also doubt that any law firm would take the case. There's simply not enough cash. Even so, what it would do if successful would be to bankrupt the company and render our shares worthless.
I don't need revenge. I would like to make some money on my investment. That's it. I don't know about others here. but I will not donate a penny toward that premise you project.
GL
" the stock will be shorted to the sub penny level " I agree.
So why don't people like ron tag that sorta nonsense? I think there's some sort of take over plan. Something in it for them I just don't know what their agenda is. I also think it's to the detriment of shareholders.
Law suits and SEC investigations do nothing for the shareprice. It's a wonder the SP stays where it is?
Disgusting...IMO
BTW: I also think that the BOD (past and present) have failed miserably. They should take a major share of the blame.
Well you shouldn't have. IMO
This message by Geoff was removed on the other forum probably by you know who...
Re: Who can be trusted and who can't
in response to Who can be trusted and who can't by medtech7309
posted on Apr 11, 14 12:53PM Use the IP Check tool [?]
Can you PM me when you retain the law firm to sue PTSC so I can unload my shares. Thanks!
I think medtech and ron are in it together or ron and medtech are the same person?
Who can be trusted and who can't? I certainly don't trust ron and his minions...
GL
I agree with everything you wrote. However could you provide the instances where PTSC BOD didn't perform their obligations? Merely thinking it doesn't make it so. There has to be some evidence I would think. Before the SEC would follow through you'd have to give them something to go on.
PTSC was started by lawyers and accountants and throughout their history have had lawyers to run the company, they had lawyers on the BOD, they had provided all the necessary SEC filings over the years and I can't think of any instances where they ran afoul of SEC rules and regulations. I'm merely asking if you can point anything out to me. Like maybe a few instances?
Now some would say I'm a BOD apologist. Quite the contrary. I think they made many mistakes and certainly could of done much better. IMHO Read my general post I wrote yesterday.
Saying I think something is wrong is usually not enough to bring action. Thanks for your response.
GL
Sophie, If we contacted the SEC just what would be the charges? What do you and others claim that PTSC did that was illegal. There's a lot of talk about it on the other board but I'm unclear what they done that was illegal or against SEC rules and regulations?
Perhaps DL and TPL pulled some fast ones but that wouldn't be in the purview of the SEC since they're a private entity and don't trade in any markets. I think the proper way to go about that would be to file charges in the jurisdiction where they conduct business.
Perhaps you could help clarify it for me so I'd know what to say if and when I would contact the SEC.
Thanks in advance for any assistance.
Tom
"agora is NOW what they tried to pull with .....
their YAHOO board years ago, they have taken over completely."...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
I say let them have it. I read some of that stuff for amusement purposes and there's still a few decent people over there that I like to follow. I know their names the rest I mostly ignore. Most of those people are just in need for a soapbox anyhow. This forum is every bit as good as agoracom if not better? If all us folks move here they'll probably try to take this board over? :0)
You seen what happened to their private yahoo forum, if most leave PTSC agoracom also will become defunct. I watched that yahoo board for awhile. They were lucky to get 2 posts a week/month before the end of it.
GL everybody.......
Absolutely disgraceful! A lot of blame to go around. It seems like a gaggle of business men got together around a decade ago and devised a plan to milk the MMP portfolio for all it's worth. In very much a self-serving way at that. I have to agree with some that the BOD was complicit or at the very least enablers as long as a steady paycheck was forthcoming. Until someone can paint a different picture that makes more sense to me I have to go by what appears to me to be the case. I also agree that DL was the real fly in the ointment. As I said before the Board Directors now and from the past have all the proper credentials to see what TPL along with DL were trying to pull off. The co-mingling etc. I also blame CM for pulling DL and cohorts into the equation to begin with.
I also blame myself for not seeing it as it was. The highest I ever paid for PTSC was $0.04 and most was purchased for $0.03. The dividends lowered my cost basis even more. Non the less I still own enough shares to buy a nice car and I wouldn't like to lose that. I guess I'll be hanging around to see how it all plays out.
I did like that recent PR. I think we still may come out ahead. If it was going to go under it probably would have already happened?
Good Luck. And thanks to Kim and Linda.
I'm also happy to be back. Though I never understood why I was banned in the 1st place? Just because someone doesn't like a person is not reason enough to have him/her banned.
Anyhow, thanks to whomever got me out of jail! :0)
GL
OT.....Agoracom reminds me of when I was a kid playing KING of the hill. You have people stumbling over each other trying to show that they're the smartest (it's gotten bloody). I was going to supply agoracom the pacers in lieu of wolf not posting there anymore. On second thought I have to agree with wolf. You can agree with him or not, he sure was dependable. I was always appreciative of his work. Thanks wolf.
I follow a few I think are worthwhile people that post over there I think I'll just be viewing their posts for the most part.
Thanks wolf :0)
Does anyone really think that a shareholder lawsuit will help the share price? WOW! I think their thinking process is definitely malfunctioning.
I'm in this stock to make money, just that simple.. Am I enamored with the BOD, noway! HOWEVER! I think outside influences have much more to do with the company's lack of success than does the BOD. We are going after the corporate world, not just corporate America. A lot of companies with very deep pockets and all or most consolidating against PTSC/TPL.
To battle them a small group of shareholders from a message board decide to pool their resources and contribute $1 per thousand shares they own to seek legal recourse because they're disenchanted with the BOD. Why? Because they think they can get a person to run for the BOD and that's supposed to make a difference? Read above....
What's wrong with this picture? :0)
GL